scholarly journals Informed consent, privacy and confidentiality practised by doctors of a tertiary care hospital in a developing country

Author(s):  
Waris Qidwai ◽  
Rumina Tabassum ◽  
Fahad Hanif Khan ◽  
Salman Javed ◽  
Syed Mustafa Ali ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Zoheb Rafique Rafique ◽  
Urooj Bhatti

Objective: The aim of this paper was to assess the practice of medical ethics by the physicians at a public sector hospital in Jamshoro Sindh. Material and methods: This survey was conducted at four medical units of tertiary care hospital at jamshoro in the month of august 2014. Participants were randomly selected from patients aged over 18 years. A structured questionnaire was designed and the participants were asked about their demographic profile and their physician’s practice regarding informed consent, maintaining confidentiality, privacy and other treatment formalities. Written consent was taken from all the participants before interview.Results: A total of 100 patients were randomly selected for this study. The majority of patients reported that informed consent was taken from them. The patients also responded that privacy and confidentiality is maintained during their treatment. However, many patients agreed that they were not properly informed about the laboratory findings, role of proposed drugs and also side effects of drugs. Conclusion: There is marked improvement in the practice of medical ethics by physicians of this tertiary care hospital. However, awareness workshops should be conducted to update and improve the knowledge of medical ethics among physicians. This will surely help them translate the knowledge into practice. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bioethics.v5i3.21531 Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 2014 Vol.5 (3): 1-5.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (ICON-2022) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Ghazanfar Saleem ◽  
Saima Ali ◽  
Nida Ghouri ◽  
Quratulain Maroof ◽  
Muhammad Imran Jamal ◽  
...  

Background and Objective: Maintaining privacy and ensuring confidentiality with patients is paramount to developing an effective patient-provider relationship. This is often challenging in over-crowded Emergency Departments (EDs). This survey was designed to explore patients’ perceptions on maintenance of privacy and confidentiality and their subsequent interactions with providers in a busy tertiary care hospital in Karachi. Methods: Trained nursing staff conducted structured interviews with 571 patients who presented to The Indus Hospital (TIH) ED from January to December 2020. All patients were 14 years of age or older, could speak and understand Urdu, and provide informed consent. Patients were asked about their perceptions of privacy and confidentiality in the ED and whether this affected their interactions with providers. Results: Respondents were primarily men (64%) under the age of 45 (62%) presenting for the first time (49%). The majority of patients felt that privacy and confidentiality were maintained, however 10% of patients reported that they had rejected examination due to privacy concerns and 15% of patients reported that they had changed or omitted information provided to a provider due to confidentiality concerns. There was correlation between privacy and confidentiality concerns and patient-provider interactions (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Despite the often over-crowded and busy environment of the ED, patients generally felt that privacy and confidentiality were maintained. Given the correlation between perception and behavior and the importance of an effective patient-provider relationship, particularly in the acute setting when morbidity and mortality is high, initiatives that focus on maintaining privacy and confidentiality should be pursued. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.ICON-2022.5785 How to cite this:Saleem SG, Ali S, Ghouri N, Maroof Q, Jamal MI, Aziz T, et al. Patient perception regarding privacy and confidentiality: A study from the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(2):351-355.  doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.ICON-2022.5785 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 133 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Cherian ◽  
P Mahadevan ◽  
S Chandramathi ◽  
J Govindan ◽  
IL Mathew

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e025299
Author(s):  
Udagedara Mudiyanselage Jayami Esha Samaranayake ◽  
Yasith Mathangasinghe ◽  
Anura Sarath Kumara Banagala

ObjectiveTo identify the different perceptions on informed surgical consent in a group of Sri Lankan patients.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted in a single surgical unit at a tertiary care hospital from January to May 2018. The protocol conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients undergoing elective major surgeries were recruited using initial purposive and later theoretical sampling. In-depth interviews were conducted in their native language based on the grounded theory. Initial codes were generated after analysing the transcripts. Constant comparative method was employed during intermediate and advanced coding. Data collection and analyses were conducted simultaneously, until the saturation of the themes. Finally, advanced coding was used for theoretical integrations.ResultsThirty patients (male:female=12:18) were assessed. The mean age was 41±9 years. Sinhalese predominated (50.0%, n=15). Majority underwent thyroidectomy (36.7%, n=11). The generated theory categorises the process of obtaining informed consent in four phases: initial interaction phase, reasoning phase, convincing phase and decision-making phase. Giving consent for surgery was a dependent role between patient, family members and the surgeon, as opposed to an individual decision by the patient. Some patients abstained from asking questions from doctors since doctors were ‘busy’, ‘short-tempered’ or ‘stressed out’. Some found nurses to be more approachable than doctors. Patients admitted that having a bystander while obtaining consent would relieve their stress. They needed doctors to emphasise more on postoperative lifestyle changes and preprocedure counselling at the clinic level. To educate patients about their procedure, some suggested leaflets or booklets to be distributed at the clinic before ward admission. The majority disliked watching educational videos because they were ‘scared’ to look at surgical dissections and blood.ConclusionThe informed consent process should include key elements that are non-culture specific along with elements or practices that consider the cultural norms of the society.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama H. Ababneh ◽  
Eman A. AboTaleb ◽  
Mohammad A. Abu Ameerh ◽  
Yacoub A. Yousef

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferha Saeed ◽  
Roha Khalid ◽  
Abdullah Khan ◽  
Shazia Masheer ◽  
Javed H Rizvi

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose A. Castro-Rodriguez ◽  
Ana M. Ramirez ◽  
Paola Toche ◽  
Dolores Pavon ◽  
Maria A. Perez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document