Possible Involvement of a Cell Cycle Control System Dependent on Nuclear Activities in Establishment of the Cell Division Interval in Early Xenopus Embryos

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 913-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Gotoh ◽  
Aya Yoshizumi ◽  
Atsunori Shinagawa
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Control System ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Xenopus Embryos ◽  
A Cell

scholarly journals Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint.

Genetics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
T A Weinert ◽  
L H Hartwell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
A Cell ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
Rad Mutants

Abstract In eucaryotes a cell cycle control called a checkpoint ensures that mitosis occurs only after chromosomes are completely replicated and any damage is repaired. The function of this checkpoint in budding yeast requires the RAD9 gene. Here we examine the role of the RAD9 gene in the arrest of the 12 cell division cycle (cdc) mutants, temperature-sensitive lethal mutants that arrest in specific phases of the cell cycle at a restrictive temperature. We found that in four cdc mutants the cdc rad9 cells failed to arrest after a shift to the restrictive temperature, rather they continued cell division and died rapidly, whereas the cdc RAD cells arrested and remained viable. The cell cycle and genetic phenotypes of the 12 cdc RAD mutants indicate the function of the RAD9 checkpoint is phase-specific and signal-specific. First, the four cdc RAD mutants that required RAD9 each arrested in the late S/G2 phase after a shift to the restrictive temperature when DNA replication was complete or nearly complete, and second, each leaves DNA lesions when the CDC gene product is limiting for cell division. Three of the four CDC genes are known to encode DNA replication enzymes. We found that the RAD17 gene is also essential for the function of the RAD9 checkpoint because it is required for phase-specific arrest of the same four cdc mutants. We also show that both X- or UV-irradiated cells require the RAD9 and RAD17 genes for delay in the G2 phase. Together, these results indicate that the RAD9 checkpoint is apparently activated only by DNA lesions and arrests cell division only in the late S/G2 phase.

Cyclin A, cell cycle control and oncogenesis

1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Pagano ◽  
Giulio Draetta
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
A Cell

scholarly journals Effects of cell-cycle-dependent expression on random fluctuations in protein levels

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 160578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Soltani ◽  
Abhyudai Singh
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Stochastic Component ◽  
Stochastic Expression ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Intrinsic Stochasticity ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Random Fluctuations ◽  
Cell To Cell Variability

Expression of many genes varies as a cell transitions through different cell-cycle stages. How coupling between stochastic expression and cell cycle impacts cell-to-cell variability (noise) in the level of protein is not well understood. We analyse a model where a stable protein is synthesized in random bursts, and the frequency with which bursts occur varies within the cell cycle. Formulae quantifying the extent of fluctuations in the protein copy number are derived and decomposed into components arising from the cell cycle and stochastic processes. The latter stochastic component represents contributions from bursty expression and errors incurred during partitioning of molecules between daughter cells. These formulae reveal an interesting trade-off: cell-cycle dependencies that amplify the noise contribution from bursty expression also attenuate the contribution from partitioning errors. We investigate the existence of optimum strategies for coupling expression to the cell cycle that minimize the stochastic component. Intriguingly, results show that a zero production rate throughout the cell cycle, with expression only occurring just before cell division, minimizes noise from bursty expression for a fixed mean protein level. By contrast, the optimal strategy in the case of partitioning errors is to make the protein just after cell division. We provide examples of regulatory proteins that are expressed only towards the end of the cell cycle, and argue that such strategies enhance robustness of cell-cycle decisions to the intrinsic stochasticity of gene expression.

scholarly journals Intracellular free calcium oscillates during cell division of Xenopus embryos.

1991 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Grandin ◽  
M Charbonneau
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Volume ◽  
Intracellular Ph ◽  
Calcium Ions ◽  
Volume Ratio ◽  
Mean Amplitude ◽  
Free Calcium ◽  
Periodic Oscillations ◽  
Xenopus Embryos

In Xenopus embryos, previous results failed to detect changes in the activity of free calcium ions (Ca2+i) during cell division using Ca2(+)-selective microelectrodes, while experiments with aequorin yielded uncertain results complicated by the variation during cell division of the aequorin concentration to cell volume ratio. We now report, using Ca2(+)-selective microelectrodes, that cell division in Xenopus embryos is accompanied by periodic oscillations of the Ca2+i level, which occur with a periodicity of 30 min, equal to that of the cell cycle. These Ca2+i oscillations were detected in 24 out of 35 experiments, and had a mean amplitude of 70 nM, around a basal Ca2+i level of 0.40 microM. Ca2+i oscillations did not take place in the absence of cell division, either in artificially activated eggs or in cleavage-blocked embryos. Therefore, Ca2+i oscillations do not represent, unlike intracellular pH oscillations (Grandin, N., and M. Charbonneau. J. Cell Biol. 111:523-532. 1990), a component of the basic cell cycle ("cytoplasmic clock" or "master oscillator"), but appear to be more likely related to some events of mitosis.

Expression of the cell cycle control gene, cdc25, is constitutive in the segmental founder cells but is cell-cycle-regulated in the micromeres of leech embryos

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 3035-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.T. Bissen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Control Gene ◽  
Cdc25 Phosphatase ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Zygotic Transcription ◽  
Founder Cells ◽  
Drosophila Embryos

The identifiable cells of leech embryos exhibit characteristic differences in the timing of cell division. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying these cell-specific differences in cell cycle timing, the leech cdc25 gene was isolated because Cdc25 phosphatase regulates the asynchronous cell divisions of postblastoderm Drosophila embryos. Examination of the distribution of cdc25 RNA and the zygotic expression of cdc25 in identified cells of leech embryos revealed lineage-dependent mechanisms of regulation. The early blastomeres, macromeres and teloblasts have steady levels of maternal cdc25 RNA throughout their cell cycles. The levels of cdc25 RNA remain constant throughout the cell cycles of the segmental founder cells, but the majority of these transcripts are zygotically produced. Cdc25 RNA levels fluctuate during the cell cycles of the micromeres. The levels peak during early G2, due to a burst of zygotic transcription, and then decline as the cell cycles progress. These data suggest that cells of different lineages employ different strategies of cell cycle control.

scholarly journals The proteasome controls ESCRT-III–mediated cell division in an archaeon

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 369 (6504) ◽  
pp. eaaz2532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Tarrason Risa ◽  
Fredrik Hurtig ◽  
Sian Bray ◽  
Anne E. Hafner ◽  
Lena Harker-Kirschneck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Division Ring ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Sulfolobus Acidocaldarius ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Membrane Remodeling

Sulfolobus acidocaldarius is the closest experimentally tractable archaeal relative of eukaryotes and, despite lacking obvious cyclin-dependent kinase and cyclin homologs, has an ordered eukaryote-like cell cycle with distinct phases of DNA replication and division. Here, in exploring the mechanism of cell division in S. acidocaldarius, we identify a role for the archaeal proteasome in regulating the transition from the end of one cell cycle to the beginning of the next. Further, we identify the archaeal ESCRT-III homolog, CdvB, as a key target of the proteasome and show that its degradation triggers division by allowing constriction of the CdvB1:CdvB2 ESCRT-III division ring. These findings offer a minimal mechanism for ESCRT-III–mediated membrane remodeling and point to a conserved role for the proteasome in eukaryotic and archaeal cell cycle control.

scholarly journals SET8 prevents excessive DNA methylation by methylation-mediated degradation of UHRF1 and DNMT1

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huifang Zhang ◽  
Qinqin Gao ◽  
Shuo Tan ◽  
Jia You ◽  
Cong Lyu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Global Dna Methylation ◽  
Protein Methylation ◽  
Accessory Factor ◽  
Protein Methyltransferase ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Do So

Abstract Faithful inheritance of DNA methylation across cell division requires DNMT1 and its accessory factor UHRF1. However, how this axis is regulated to ensure DNA methylation homeostasis remains poorly understood. Here we show that SET8, a cell-cycle-regulated protein methyltransferase, controls protein stability of both UHRF1 and DNMT1 through methylation-mediated, ubiquitin-dependent degradation and consequently prevents excessive DNA methylation. SET8 methylates UHRF1 at lysine 385 and this modification leads to ubiquitination and degradation of UHRF1. In contrast, LSD1 stabilizes both UHRF1 and DNMT1 by demethylation. Importantly, SET8 and LSD1 oppositely regulate global DNA methylation and do so most likely through regulating the level of UHRF1 than DNMT1. Finally, we show that UHRF1 downregulation in G2/M by SET8 has a role in suppressing DNMT1-mediated methylation on post-replicated DNA. Altogether, our study reveals a novel role of SET8 in promoting DNA methylation homeostasis and identifies UHRF1 as the hub for tuning DNA methylation through dynamic protein methylation.

scholarly journals Myosin II is an Active Stress Sensor at the Core of a Cell Division Control System

2010 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 161a-162a
Author(s):  
Yee Seir Kee ◽  
Richard Firtel ◽  
Pablo Iglesias ◽  
Douglas Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Myosin Ii ◽  
Active Stress ◽  
Stress Sensor ◽  
The Core ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Division Control

scholarly journals Epithelial integrity and cell division: Concerted cell cycle control

Cell Cycle ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-400
Author(s):  
Katerina Ragkousi ◽  
Matthew C. Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Epithelial Integrity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document