scholarly journals Penerapan Good Corporate Governance dalam Pengungkapan Islamic Social Reporting pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-281
Author(s):  
Angrum Pratiwi ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Rizky Amaliyah

The implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) should be implemented properly, in order to create a healthy banking according to sharia principles. An important part of the governance structure of the Bank is the board of commissioners, directors, and the sharia supervisory board. This study analyzes the effect of GCG disclosure consisting of the board of commissioners, board of directors and sharia supervisory board on Islamic social reporting in Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia. This type of research is associative quantitative. The research sample consisted of seven (7) Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia, with an observation period of 2014-2019. The data source comes from the annual report and GCG report of each Islamic commercial bank. Disclosure of ISR is carried out by means of a dichotomy, namely "1" if the report is disclosed and "0" if not disclosed. Data analysis using multiple linear regression. Hypothesis testing using the t test, F test, and R Square. The results showed that the variable size of the board of commissioners had no effect on the ISR disclosure. Meanwhile, the variable size of the board of directors and sharia supervisory board affects the ISR disclosure. The quality and competence of the board of directors and the sharia supervisory board determine Islamic banks in implementing good corporate governance.Penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) sudah semestinya diterapkan dengan baik, agar terwujudnya perbankan yang sehat sesuai prinsip syariah. Bagian penting dalam struktur tata kelola Bank adalah komisaris, direksi, serta dewan pengawas syariah. Penelitian ini menganalisa pengaruh pengungkapan GCG yang terdiri dari dewan komisaris, dewan direksi dan dewan pengawas syariah terhadap Islamic social reporting pada bank umum syariah di Indonesia. Jenis penelitian adalah kuantitatif asosiatif. Sampel penelitian berjumlah tujuh (7) bank umum syariah di Indonesia, dengan periode pengamatan 2014-2019. Sumber data berasal dari annual report dan laporan GCG masing-masing bank umum syariah. Pengungkapan ISR dilakukan dengan cara dikotomi, yaitu “1” apabila laporan tersebut diungkapkan dan “0” apabila tidak diungkapkan. Analisis data menggunakan regresi linier berganda. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan uji t, uji  F, dan R Square. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa variabel ukuran dewan komisaris tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan ISR. Sedangkan, variabel ukuran dewan direksi dan dewan pengawas syariah berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan ISR. Kualitas dan kompetensi dewan direksi serta dewan pengawas syariah menentukan bank syariah dalam menerapkan tata kelola perusahaan yang baik.

Wahana ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-259
Author(s):  
Rifqi Muhammad ◽  
Hapsari Yuni Oktaviyanti

This study aims to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance as measured by the number of sharia supervisory boards, sharia supervisory board meetings, number of board of directors, board of directors meetings, number of board of commissioners, board of commissioners meeting on the performance of sharia maqashid. The sample used in this study is Full-fledge sharia banks in Indonesia based on sharia banking statistics published by the Financial Services Authority as of July 2019. The study was conducted based on an analysis of 72 annual reports and GCG reports obtained from 12 Sharia Commercial Banks in 2013 - 2018. The results of this study indicate that the variables of the board of directors' meeting significantly influence the performance of the Maqashid syariah. While the variable number of sharia supervisory boards, sharia supervisory board meetings, number of board of directors, number of board of commissioners and board of commissioners meeting on maqashid syariah performance.


Author(s):  
Yugi Maheswari ES ◽  
Iwan Fakhruddin ◽  
Azmi Fitriati ◽  
Bima Cinintya Pratama

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) yang diproksikan oleh dewan direksi, dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan dewan pengawas syariah terhadap risiko pembayaran yang diukur dengan rasio Non Performing Financing (NPF) pada Bank Umum Syariah. Populasi penelitian adalah Bank Umum Syariah Yang Terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa laporan tahunan Bank Umum Syariah periode 2015-2019. Sampel yang dikumpulkan adalah 14 bank syariah sebayak 70 data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dewan direksi berpengaruh negative erhadap NPF. Dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan dewan pengawas syariah tidak berpengaruh terhadap NPF.  The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) which is proxied by the board of directors, the board of independent commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and the sharia supervisory board against payment risk as measured by the Non Performing Financing (NPF) ratio at the Bank Sharia General. The study population was a Sharia Commercial Bank Registered at Financial services Authority. The data used was secondary data in the form of reports annual Sharia Commercial Bank for the period 2015-2019. The samples collected were 14 Islamic banks as much as 70 data. The results showed that the board of directors has a negative effect on NPF. Independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and sharia supervisory board have no effect on NPF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 566-589
Author(s):  
Haniatus Sa’diyah

This study aims to determine the effect of corporate governance as proxied by the Board of Commissioners, the Board of Independent Commissioners, the Board of Directors and the Sharia Supervisory Board on Financial Performance, through a connecting variable, namely Non Performing Financing (NPF). The sample of this research is using purposive sampling method. The population is 13 Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia. The samples obtained were 8 Islamic Commercial Banks. The data is obtained from the quarterly reports of each bank, namely the first quarter of 2017 to the second quarter of 2020. Data analysis and hypothesis testing methods use path analysis using panel data. The results of this study indicate that corporate governance as proxied by the Board of Commissioners, the Independent Commissioner, the Board of Directors and the Sharia Supervisory Board has no effect on financial performance and non-performing financing. This means that higher corporate governance does not affect financial performance or non-performing financing. In this study it was also found that non-performing financing has an effect on financial performance. If non-performing financing decreases, financial performance will increase. In addition, non-performing financing in this study cannot be an intervening variable for corporate governance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 2546-2563
Author(s):  
Dr. Phan Thi Thanh Thuy

Good corporate governance is always associated with an effective internal control system, which is expected to quickly forecast and detect the infringements of laws and the company's charters committed by the main corporate governance bodies like the board of directors, the general director, and provide timely advice on remedial solutions. Following this theory, since the adoption of the first Vietnamese company law in 1990, the supervisory board, a special body of Vietnamese corporate governance structure, has formed and become a traditionally internal control body in joint-stock companies (JSCs). However, supervisory boards seem not to promote their effectiveness as expected. Many major violations conducted by the board of directors and the CEO took place in large companies, where the supervisory boards did not detect or were complicit in these violations. Most recently, the trend of replacing supervisory boards with independent directors and audit committees has occurred in many public companies in Vietnam. This paradox raises questions about the ineffectiveness of supervisory boards and the reasons causing the situation. To find the answers, the article will focus on analyzing the role of the supervisory board in Vietnamese JSCs compared with international practices. Thereby, to find out the reasons for the limitations of supervisory boards in both legal provision and practice. To conclude the research, the article will make some suggestions for reforming the supervisory board so that this internal control body could bring its effectiveness.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Jielend Ariandhini

This study aims to determine the effect of Corporate Governance (CG) as measured by the composition of the board of commissioners, the composition of the board of directors, the composition of the audit committee and the composition of the syariah supervisory board on the profitability of sharia commercial banks as measured by Return On Assets (ROA). The Method of this research is quantitatif by using secondary data with documentation technique. The population used in this study is all sharia commercial banks, based on the financial statements of each bank. The observation period in this research is from 2011 to 2016. The sampling technique is done by purposive sampling method. There are 5 banks, namely Bank Muamalat, Bank Sharia Mandiri, Bank Negara Indonesia Sharia, Bank Rakyat Indonesia Sharia, Bank Central Asia Sharia. Data analysis technique used in this research is panel regression. The results showed that independent variables of board of commissioner and syariah supervisory board have no significant effect on financial performance measured by Return on Asset (ROA). The independent variable of the board of directors has a positive and significant impact on the financial performance measured using Return on Assets (ROA), and the audit committee independent variable has a negative and significant effect on the financial performance measured using Return on Assets (ROA).


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosyid Nur Anggara Putra

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh mekanisme Good Corporate Governance dengan variabel ukuran dewan komisaris, proporsi komisaris independen, ukuran dewan direksi, ukuran komite audit, ukuran dewan pengawas syariah, dan kompetensi dewan pengawas syariah terhadap manajemen laba pada bank syariah di Indonesia periode 2014-2018. Sampel ditentukan dengan teknik purposive sampling sehingga diperoleh 12 bank syariah sebagai sampel penelitian. Data dianalisis menggunakan regresi data panel dengan fixed effect model dengan software eviews 10. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa ukuran dewan komisaris dan ukuran dewan pengawas syariah berpengaruh positif terhadap perilaku manajemen laba. ukuran komite audit berpengaruh negatif terhadap manajemen laba, sedangkan proporsi komisaris independen, ukuran dewan direksi, dan kompetensi dewan pengawas syariah tidak berpengaruh terhadap perilaku manajemen laba pada bank syariah di Indonesia.This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance mechanism with variable size of the board of commissioners, the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the board of directors, the size of the audit committee, the size of the sharia supervisory board, and the competence of the sharia supervisory board on earnings management in Islamic banks in the 2014-2018 period. The sample is determined by purposive sampling technique so that 12 Islamic banks are obtained as a research sample. Data were analyzed using panel data regression with fixed-effect models with software e-views 10. The results of the analysis showed that the size of the board of commissioners and the size of the sharia supervisory board had a positive effect on earnings management behavior. Audit committee size has a negative effect on earnings management, while the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the board of directors, and the competence of sharia supervisory boards do not affect earnings management behavior in Islamic banks in Indonesia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
Indriyani Indriyani ◽  
Rinda Asytuti

This study aims to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance on Islamic banking financial performance as measured by Return On Assets. The Good Corporate Governance used in this study is the board of commissioners, the board size, audit committee size, sharia supervisory board size, and Islamic social reporting. The population in this study is all Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia. The sample used was 9 Islamic commercial banks from 2015-2018. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression test. The results showed that the size of the board of commissioners and ISR partially had a significant negative effect on ROA. While the size of the board of directors, the size of the audit committee and the size of the sharia supervisory board have no significant effect on ROA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darwanto ◽  
Anis Chariri

This study aims to investigate the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on the financial performance of sharia banking. GCG is measured by the Board of Commissioners Performance, the Board of Commissioners Composition, the Number of Audit Committees, the Board of Directors, and the Sharia Supervisory Board Performance, whereas financial performance is proxied by Return on Assets, financing risk (Non-Performing Financing), and capital (Capital Adequacy Ratio). Sharia commercial banks registered by Bank Indonesia made the sample of this study. Annual reports and GCG reports of sharia commercial banks from 2014 to 2017 are used as a data source. The study uses a panel data regression approach to analyze the data; some interesting results have been obtained. The Sharia board positively affected financial performance of Islamic banks in terms of return on assets and capital adequacy ratio, and negatively as to non-performing financing. Similarly, the board of directors had a significant impact on the financial performance of Islamic banks in the same direction as the sharia supervisory board in terms of the three components. Meanwhile, the board of commissioners had a significant and positive impact only on the return on assets of Islamic banks in Indonesia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
Amrina Rosada

This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance on Financial Performance at Islamic Banks. The independent variable in this study is Good Corporate Governance as measured by the board of directors, the independent board of commissioners, the islamic supervisory board and the audit committee. The population in this study were 11 Islamic commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This research data was obtained from the annual report for 2015-2019. The results showed that the audit committee has an effect on financial performance as measured by return on assets, while the board of directors, independent commissioners, and islamic supervisory board has no effect on financial performance as measured by return on assets. Together the board of directors, independent commissioners, islamic supervisory board and audit committee have an effect on return on asset.


Author(s):  
Jun aidi ◽  
Nurd iono ◽  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Icuk Rangga Bawano

This study examines the effect of good corporate governance and sustainability report on company performance. Good corporate governance is dependent on the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the audit committee, institutional ownership, management ownership. Sustainability report is facilitated by economic, environmental and social aspect as well as disclosure index. While Company performance is generated by Return on Assets (ROA). This research was conducted on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2014-2018. The purposive sampling technique was used. Hypothesis testing was done by linear regression analysis. The results of testing the first variable showed that institutional ownership affects ROA and has a negative relationship direction. While the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent directors, the size of the audit committee, and management ownership have no effect on ROA. However, the result of the second variable showed that the disclosure of economic aspects affects ROA and has a positive relationship direction. While disclosure of environmental and social aspects does not affect ROA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document