scholarly journals PIDANA HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF ETIKA DEONTOLOGI

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohmatul Izad
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Ethical Values ◽  
Ethical Aspects ◽  
Deontological Ethics ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Interpretative Approach

AbstractDiscourse about capital punishment is a discourse that often causes polemics. Problems that underlie the problem of capital punishment do not only occur in the realm of law, but also the realm of thought outside. The problem that often becomes polemic is whether the death penalty for serious criminals will have a deterrent effect for anyone not to commit the same crime, is a life not the most substantial right of life for humans, and capital punishment is often considered contrary to human rights. This study specifically examines capital punishment in Indonesia in terms of deontological ethics theory, which looks at the issue of capital punishment from the perspective of ethical values that start with acts of kindness based on duties and obligations. This study analyzes the polemic of capital punishment, both pros, and cons, as well as tracing the roots of morality in the practice of capital punishment, so this research can make a new contribution through the perspective of ethical deontology in viewing ethical aspects in the practice of capital punishment. On this basis, this research uses a descriptive-interpretative approach. Researchers critically dissect how the root of the formation of the death penalty in Indonesia, by carefully reviewing it from the perspective of ethical deontology.Keywords: Death Penalty, Deontology Ethics, Human Rights. AbstrakWacana tentang pidana hukuman mati merupakan wacana yang banyak menimbulkan polemik. Problem yang mendasari persoalan pidana hukuman mati tidak hanya terjadi pada ranah hukum, tetapi juga dalam ranah pemikiran secara luar. Masalah yang sering menjadi polemik adalah apakah hukuman mati bagi para pelaku pidana berat akan menimbulkan efek jera bagi siapapun untuk tidak melakukan tindak kejahatan yang sama, bukankah nyawa adalah hak hidup paling substansial bagi manusia, dan hukuman mati seringkali dianggap bertentangan dengan hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini secara khusus mengkaji tentang pidana hukuman mati di Indonesia ditinjau dari sudut teori etika deontologi, yakni melihat persoalan pidana mati dari perspektif nilai-nilai etis yang bertitik tolak pada tindakan kebaikan berdasarkan tugas dan kewajiban. Penelitian ini menganalisis tentang polemik hukuman mati, baik yang pro dan kontra, maupun menelusuri akar-akar moralitas dalam praktik pidana hukuman mati, kiranya penelitian ini dapat memberikan kontribusi baru melalui cara pandang etika deontologi dalam melihat sisi-sisi etis dalam praktik pidana hukuman mati. Atas dasar tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deksriptif-interpretatif. Peneliti membedah secara kritis bagaimana akar terbentuknya hukuman mati di Indonesia, dengan secara cermat melakukan peninjauan dalam perspektif etika deontologi.

scholarly journals A Gap Between Right to Live Protection and Death Penalty in Indonesia (Judges Decision on Cases Threatened Death Penalty)

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 02005
Author(s):  
Febrian ◽  
Nurhidayatuloh ◽  
Helena Primadianti ◽  
Ahmaturrahman ◽  
Fatimatuz Zuhro
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Courts ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Life And Death ◽  
The Government

In Indonesia, right to life and death penalty has been perceived separately both by legislative and judiciary institutions. It can be seen from the government stand to ratify covenant regarding to right to life, but impose death penalty. This article is trying to elaborate judges’ decisions to cases threatened to death at district courts in South Sumatra and Yogyakarta Province. The research will contribute to provide an understanding of judges to the Article 6(2) ICCPR in both provinces. The main methods for this research comprise literature review and review of selected verdicts from district courts in both provinces. The data will be supported by several interviews to several judges serving in the district courts. As a result, none of the verdicts provide a consideration on human rights law set forth in the Article 6(2) for the cases threatened to death. In contrast, some judges believe that capital punishment has a deterrent effect for others. Fortunately, in some district courts, the judges are for sure that death penalty is the very last choice for very sadistic culprit when there is no mitigating circumstance in sentencing.

scholarly journals DEATH PENALTY AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE, THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, AND INDONESIAN LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksidelfa Yanto . .
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to give a deterrent effect for others who want to commit similar offense. Nevertheless as a matter of fact, there are still many similar offense occurred though capital punishment has been implemented.<br /><br />Keywords : Capital punishment, rights to live and human rights.

scholarly journals DEATH PENALTY EXECUTION AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, AND INDONESIAN LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksidelfa Yanto
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to give a deterrent effect for others who want to commit similar offense.    Nevertheless as a matter of fact, there are still many similar offense occurred though capital punishment has been implemented.    </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords : Capital punishment, rights to live and human rights</em></strong><strong><em>.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>

scholarly journals KEBERADAAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
The Right

Capital punishment is the heaviest crime and difficult to apply in a country of law considering the death penalty is one of the acts of human rights violations, but to make someone discourage of committing a crime there needs to be rules or penalties that can provide a deterrent effect and provide security for the community from all form of crime. The purpose of writing is directed to find out the regulation of the Death Penalty in the Criminal Law Code which is stipulated in several articles in the Criminal Code and the existence of capital punishment in the legal system in Indonesia in terms of human rights perspective, which of course would be contrary to human rights, especially the right to life, however capital punishment is also needed as an effort to prevent the occurrence of crimes, especially those classified as serious

scholarly journals Death Penalty for Corruptors: Between the Human Rights and Challenges of Progress in Indonesian Law

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Toba Sastrawan Manik ◽  
Sunarso Sunarso
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Significant Problem ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
Public Corruption

The study concerned here examined students' perceptions of death penalty existence for corruptors. Corruption is a significant problem that captures the attention of the wider public. Corruption has a vast, systematic, and complex impact so that it could be classified as an extraordinary crime. Despite that classification, it turns out that the public considers corruptors’ punishment in Indonesia still too light and has not met the public’s expectations regarding justice. The people still feel the disparity in a penalty for corruption. The public believes capital punishment to a punishment option that could cause a deterrent effect. The majority of the public wants corruptors to be sentenced to death, but there is opposition to the death penalty on the grounds of upholding human rights. This study was conducted by students of the Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (PPKn) or Department of Pancasila and Citizenship, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan. It is found in the study that students agree on the death penalty for corruptors, that they do not see human rights as an excuse for rejecting the death penalty. Moreover, the death penalty is to be viewed as a breakthrough in combating corruption in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Eksistensi Pidana Mati dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Mochamad Sukedi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Severe Type

The existence of human rights is a concept that in principle is inherent in the existence and life of humans, human rights actually have a long history in which history can be traced from daily intercourse between humans. The international world knows the form of capital punishment is a type of crime that is very controversial and heaviest imposed on the perpetrators of crime so that it always raises a variety of pros and cons opinions in it. Based on this, the purpose of this paper is to find out and understand the basic legal arrangements for the death penalty in Indonesia and the application of capital punishment in the perspective of human rights. This research uses normative legal research. The death penalty is a very old type of crime that may even be as old as the existence of humanity itself. Capital punishment is the most severe type of criminal offenses of all types of basic crimes, so that capital punishment sanctions constitute a threat imposed on the perpetrators of serious crimes that have been decided by the court. In the international worldview, capital punishment is one of the most controversial forms of crime of all types of criminal sanctions in the criminal justice system in force in the world. Regarding law enforcement applied in Indonesia itself, it still applies the provisions of criminal sanctions in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and there is also listed in the Law outside the Criminal Code. Keberadaan hak asasi manusia merupakan suatu konsep yang pada prinsipnya melekat pada keberadaan dan hidup manusia, hak asasi manusia sesungguhnya memiliki sejarah panjang yang mana sejarah tersebut dapat ditelusuri dari pergaulan sehari-hari antarmanusia. Dunia Internasional mengenal bentuk pidana mati adalah merupakan jenis pidana yang sangat kontroversial dan terberat dijatuhkan kepada pelaku kejahatan, sehingga selalu menimbulkan berbagai opini pro-kontra di dalamnya. Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka tujuan dalam penulisan ini yaitu untuk mengetahui dan memahami tentang pengaturan dasar hukum pidana mati di Indonesia serta penerapan pidana mati dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Sanksi pidana mati merupakan salah satu jenis pidana yang sangat tua bahkan mungkin sama tuanya dengan keberadaan umat manusia itu sendiri. Sanksi pidana mati yaitu jenis pidana yang paling berat dari segala jenis pidana pokok, sehingga sanksi pidana mati merupakan ancaman yang dikenakan kepada pelaku kejahatan berat yang telah diputus oleh pengadilan. Dalam pandangan dunia internasional, pidana mati adalah salah satu jenis bentuk pidana paling kontroversial dari semua jenis sanksi pidana dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang berlaku di dunia. Mengenai penegakan hukum yang diterapkan di Indonesia sendiri masih menerapkan ketentuan sanksi pidana dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan ada pula yang dicantumkan di dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan di luar KUHP.

KEBIJAKAN MODERASI PIDANA MATI

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Mei Susanto ◽  
Ajie Ramdan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Life Imprisonment ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Moderation Model ◽  
The Right

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007 selain menjadi dasar konstitusionalitas pidana mati, juga memberikan jalan tengah (moderasi) terhadap perdebatan antara kelompok yang ingin mempertahankan (retensionis) dan yang ingin menghapus (abolisionis) pidana mati. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam putusan a quo dikaitkan dengan teori pemidanaan dan hak asasi manusia dan bagaimana kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam RKUHP tahun 2015 dikaitkan dengan putusan a quo. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian doktrinal, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur, dan hasil-hasil penelitian yang relevan dengan objek penelitian. Penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, putusan a quo yang memuat kebijakan moderasi pidana mati telah sesuai dengan teori pemidanaan khususnya teori integratif dan teori hak asasi manusia di Indonesia di mana hak hidup tetap dibatasi oleh kewajiban asasi yang diatur dengan undang-undang. Kedua, model kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam RKUHP tahun 2015 beberapa di antaranya telah mengakomodasi amanat putusan a quo, seperti penentuan pidana mati di luar pidana pokok, penundaan pidana mati, kemungkinan pengubahan pidana mati menjadi pidana seumur hidup atau penjara paling lama 20 tahun. Selain itu masih menimbulkan persoalan berkaitan dengan lembaga yang memberikan pengubahan pidana mati, persoalan grasi, lamanya penundaan pelaksanaan pidana mati, dan jenis pidana apa saja yang dapat diancamkan pidana mati.Kata kunci: kebijakan, KUHP, moderasi, pidana mati. ABSTRACTConstitutional Court’s Decision Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007, in addition to being the basis of the constitutionality of capital punishment, also provides a moderate way of arguing between retentionist groups and those wishing to abolish the death penalty (abolitionist). The problem in this research is how the moderation policy of capital punishment in aquo decision is associated with the theory of punishment and human rights and how the moderation policy of capital punishment in the draft Criminal Code of 2015 (RKUHP) is related with the a quo decision. This study is doctrinal, using primary and secondary legal materials, in the form of legislation, literature and research results that are relevant to the object of analysis. This study concludes, firstly, the aquo decision containing the moderation policy of capital punishment has been in accordance with the theory of punishment, specificallyy the integrative theory and the theory of human rights in Indonesia, in which the right to life remains limited by the fundamental obligations set forth in the law. Secondly, some of the modes of moderation model of capital punishment in RKUHP of 2015 have accommodated the mandate of aquo decision, such as the determination of capital punishment outside the main punishment, postponement of capital punishment, the possibility of converting capital punishment to life imprisonment or imprisonment of 20 years. In addition, it still raises issues regarding the institutions that provide for conversion of capital punishment, pardon matters, length of delay in the execution of capital punishment, and any types of crime punishable by capital punishment. Keywords: policy, criminal code, moderation, capital punishment.

scholarly journals Masalah Pidana Mati

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
nur rois
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Contentious Issue ◽  
Abolitionist Movement

Issue of capital punishment is a contentious issue since the death penalty was man created, the controversy of the human rights and the state's right to use capital punishment. Lately the abolitionist movement are violently opposed to the death penalty policy - Masalah pidana mati merupakan masalah yang menjadi perdebatan manusia sejak pidana mati itu diciptakan, kontroversi dari sisi hak asasi manusia dan hak negara untuk mencabut nyawa warga negara. Akhir-akhir ini gerakan kaum abolisionis semakin keras menentang kebijakan pidana mati tersebut

scholarly journals Death Penalty in Pakistan in nexus with International Human Rights Laws and Sharia’h

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-86
Author(s):  
Muhammad Waqas Javed ◽  
◽  
Naila Kareem ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
International Human ◽  
Civil And Political Rights ◽  
International Fair

In the instant study, we focus to point out Islamic perspective in relation to international human rights laws pertaining to death penalty in the context of Pakistan. We have discussed the perspective certain jurists who claim qisas is an alternative prayer, and it can be abolished. However, the study maintains that Islamic injunctions support, and recommend for capital punishment for certain offences, while diyatis an alternative penalty. Further, we have deliberated death penalty in the light of human rights conventions with special focus on Article 6 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966. The debate also surrounds abolitionists or retentionists views with special reference to Pakistan. It concludes that immediate abolishment of death penalty may not be possible in Pakistan. Nevertheless, as a first step, it needs to re-interpret the phrase “most serious crimes” envisaged under Article 6 of ICCPR in its true letter and spirit, or to exercise de facto abolishment of it until its crippled criminal justice system ensures international fair trial standards. As internal peace and security situation improves in Pakistan, so it may enforce de-jure halt.

scholarly journals MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE INDONESIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-198
Author(s):  
Tajul Arifin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Drugs And Crime ◽  
Low Rate

AbstractThis research mainly uses statistical data published by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDDC) in April 2014 to support the hypothesis of this research that “Human Rights Activists in Indonesia as in other countries have failed in comprehending the wisdom (hikmah) of the application of Capital Punishment”. This study found that: (1) the hypothesis of this research was strongly supported by the data; (2) the application of Syari`ah Criminal Law in Saudi Arabia has been an unchallenged proof for the wisdom (hikmah) behind the application of Capital Punishment by keeping the level of murder crime to a low rate which sharply contrast to many countries which apply positive laws which are based on a social contract between the ruler and the ruled, such as in The United States and Mexico; and (3) In upholding the true justice in Islamic Criminal Law, punishment can only be awarded to the criminals in a society where the Islamic ideal of social justice has been achieved. AbstrakPenelitian ini menggunakan data statistik yang diterbitkan oleh United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDDC) pada bulan April 2014 untuk mendukung hipotesis dari penelitian ini bahwa "Aktivis HAM di Indonesia seperti di negara-negara lain telah gagal dalam memahami hikmah dari penerapan hukuman mati". Studi ini menemukan bahwa: (1) hipotesis penelitian ini sangat didukung oleh data; (2) penerapan Hukum Pidana Syari`ah di Arab Saudi telah menjadi bukti tak terbantahkan untuk menunjukkan hikmah di balik penerapan hukuman mati dengan menjaga tingkat kejahatan pembunuhan pada tingkat yang sangat rendah yang sangat berlawanan dengan yang terjadi di banyak negara yang menerapkan hukum positif yang didasarkan pada kontrak sosial antara penguasa dan rakyat, seperti di Amerika Serikat dan Meksiko; dan (3) dalam menegakkan keadilan sejati dalam Hukum Pidana Islam, hukuman hanya dapat diberikan kepada penjahat dalam masyarakat di mana keadilan sosial yang ideal menurut Islam telah dicapai.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document