Novel Approach to Enhance Field Development Plan Process and Reservoir Management to Maximize the Recovery Factor of Gas Condensate Reservoirs Through Integrated Asset Modeling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oswaldo Espinola Gonzalez ◽  
Laura Paola Vazquez Macedo ◽  
Julio Cesar Villanueva Alonso ◽  
Julieta Alvarez Martinez

Abstract The proper exploitation for a gas condensate reservoir requires an integrated collaboration and management strategy capable to provide detailed insight about future behavior of the reservoir. When a development plan is generated for a field, the reservoir management is not performed integrally, this is, different domains: geology, reservoir, drilling, production, economics, etc., work separately, and therefore, an adequate understanding of the main challenges, leading to issues such as an over dimensioning of surface facilities, excessive costs, among others. Through this paper, a methodology to improve the conventional field development plan is described, which contains 4 main pillars: Collaborative approach, Integrated analysis, engineering optimization and monitoring & surveillance. The methodology involves the description of a hybrid workflow based on the integration of multiple domains, technologies and recommendations to consider all the phenomena and compositional changes over time in the whole production system, aiming to define the optimum reservoir management strategy, facilities and operational philosophy as part of the Field Development Plan (FDP). Conventionally, the used of simplistic models most of times do not allow seeing phenomena in the adequate resolution (near wellbore and porous media effects, multiphase flow in pipelines, etc.), that occur with high interdependency in the Integrated Production System. With this methodology, the goal pursued is to support oil and gas companies to increase the recovery factor of gas condensate fields through the enhancement in the development and exploitation process and therefore, reducing associated costs and seizing available time and resources.

2018 ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Vasilev ◽  
D. A. Misyurev ◽  
A. V. Filatov

The authors created a geodynamical polygon on the Komsomolsk oil and gas condensate field to ensure the industrial safety of oil and gas production facilities. The aim of its creation is mul-tiple repeated observations of recent deformation processes. Analysis and interpretation of the results of geodynamical monitoring which includes class II leveling, satellite observations, radar interferometry, exploitation parameters of field development provided an opportunity to identify that the conditions for the formation of recent deformations of the earth’s surface is an anthropogenic factor. The authors identified the relationship between the formation of subsidence trough of the earth’s surface in the eastern part of the field with the dynamics of accumulated gas sampling and the fall of reservoir pressures along the main reservoir PK1 (Cenomanian stage).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamir Lokhandwala ◽  
Vaibhav Joshi ◽  
Ankit Dutt

Abstract Hydraulic fracturing is a widespread well stimulation treatment in the oil and gas industry. It is particularly prevalent in shale gas fields, where virtually all production can be attributed to the practice of fracturing. It is also used in the context of tight oil and gas reservoirs, for example in deep-water scenarios where the cost of drilling and completion is very high; well productivity, which is dictated by hydraulic fractures, is vital. The correct modeling in reservoir simulation can be critical in such settings because hydraulic fracturing can dramatically change the flow dynamics of a reservoir. What presents a challenge in flow simulation due to hydraulic fractures is that they introduce effects that operate on a different length and time scale than the usual dynamics of a reservoir. Capturing these effects and utilizing them to advantage can be critical for any operator in context of a field development plan for any unconventional or tight field. This paper focuses on a study that was undertaken to compare different methods of simulating hydraulic fractures to formulate a field development plan for a tight gas field. To maintaing the confidentiality of data and to showcase only the technical aspect of the workflow, we will refer to the asset as Field A in subsequent sections of this paper. Field A is a low permeability (0.01md-0.1md), tight (8% to 12% porosity) gas-condensate (API ~51deg and CGR~65 stb/mmscf) reservoir at ~3000m depth. Being structurally complex, it has a large number of erosional features and pinch-outs. The study involved comparing analytical fracture modeling, explicit modeling using local grid refinements, tartan gridding, pseudo-well connection approach and full-field unconventional fracture modeling. The result of the study was to use, for the first time for Field A, a system of generating pseudo well connections to simulate hydraulic fractures. The approach was found to be efficient both terms of replicating field data for a 10 year period while drastically reducing simulation runtime for the subsequent 10 year-period too. It helped the subsurface team to test multiple scenarios in a limited time-frame leading to improved project management.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Alexei Huerta Quinones ◽  
Alex Fernando Lanchimba ◽  
Peter Colonomos

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadijah Ibrahim ◽  
Petrus Nzerem ◽  
Ayuba Salihu ◽  
Ikechukwu Okafor ◽  
Oluwaseun Alonge ◽  
...  

Abstract The development plan of the new oil field discovered in a remote offshore environment, Niger Delta, Nigeria was evaluated. As the oil in place is uncertain, a probabilistic approach was used to estimate the STOOIP using the low, mid, and high cases. The STOOIP for these cases were 95 MMSTB, 145 MMSTB and 300 MMSTB which are the potential amount of oil in the reservoir. Rock and fluid properties were determined using PVT sample and then matched to the Standing correlations with an RMS of 4.93%. The performance of the different well models were analyzed, and sensitivities were run to provide detailed information to reduce the uncertainties of the parameters. Furthermore, production forecast was done for the field for the different STOOIP using the predicted number of producer and injector wells. The timing of the wells was accurately allocated to provide information for the drillers to work on the wells. From the production forecast, the different STOOIP cases had a water cut ranging from 68-73% at the end of the 15-year field life. The recoverable oil estimate was accounted for 33.25 MMSTB for 95 MMSTB (low), 55.1 MMSTB for 145 MMSTB (mid) and 135 MMSTB for 300 MMSTB (high) at 35%, 38% and 45% recovery factor. Based on the proposed development plan, the base model is recommended for further implementation as the recovery factor is 38% with an estimate of 55.1 MMSTB. The platform will have 6 producers and 2 injectors. The quantity of oil produced is estimated at 15000 stbo/day which will require a separator that has the capacity of hold a liquid rate of about 20000 stb/day. The developmental wells are subsequently increased to achieve a water cut of 90-95% with more recoverable oil within the 15-year field life. This developmental plan is also cost effective as drilling more wells means more capital expenditure.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
Hamidreza Karamimirazizi ◽  
Reza Ettehadi Osgouei ◽  
Rosmer Brito ◽  
Ali Karimi Vajargah

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-363
Author(s):  
L. A. Rapatskaya

The study aims to analyze the relationship between the redetermination of the complexity of the geological structure of the Verkhnechonsky oil and gas condensate field and the schedule adjustment of the field development plans. The paper uses the data on the exploration and production wells obtained from the pilot operation of JSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz, the geophysical work results, and the research materials publicly available in the press. The geological structure of the Verhnechonskoye oil and gas condensate field is unique in its complexity. This is due to the following factors: a combination of tectonic disturbances accompanied by the intrusion of traps; high mineralization of the reservoir water; sharp variability of the filtration and reservoir properties of the producing horizons by area and section due to the unevenness of the lithological composition of the reservoirs, their salinization and complete pinch-out. The development system of any field should take into account the peculiarities of the field’s tectonic and lithological-facies structure, and meet specific technical and economic requirements for drilling and operating wells. The complexity of the field structure requires a thorough selection of a development system that inevitably changes as the features of the field structure are studied, e.g. vertical drilling suggested at the initial stage of the filed development was shortly after replaced with inclined-horizontal drilling with the calculation of two options. Within the pilot operation project of the Verkhnechonsky field, JSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz has developed two variants of uniform grids of directional and horizontal wells with pattern flooding for the most explored deposits of the Verkhnechonsky horizon of blocks I and II. Because of the intensive processes of the reservoirs’ secondary salinization, the flooding method required a study of the reservoir water composition. However, the proposed drilling plan using a downhole engine and gamma-ray logging could not ensure the wellbores ducting through the most productive sections of the horizon, therefore, the flow rates of some directional and horizontal wells were not high enough. To increase the drilling efficiency, the specialists of the Drilling Department (JSC Verhnechonskneftegaz), together with the Department of Geology and Field Development (Schlumberger Ltd.), proposed a new methodology that increases the drilling efficiency by using a rotary-controlled system, logging-while-drilling, and geosteering. Thus, the development system of the Verkhnechonsky oils and gas condensate field was changing in the process of specifying the field’s geological structure, anisotropy reservoir properties, and the thickness of the producing horizons in size and cut, their salinization and pinch-out, and the composition of the reservoir waters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document