Adsorption Inhibitor Role in a Constant Salinity Surfactant-Polymer CSSP Flooding Design for an Offshore Field Application

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Azhan Abdul Manap ◽  
Nazliah Nazma Zulkifli

Abstract A base chemical flooding formulation using alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) has been developed for application in offshore environments. The formulation uses combination of conventional alkali (sodium carbonate) with amphoteric surfactant. The field is currently under waterflooding using sea water as injection water. However, since alkali is incompatible with divalent ions in sea water, an alternative formulation using seawater with no additional water treatment is also being developed and considered for application. The alternative formulation uses combination of alkyl propoxy sulfate (APS) and alkyl ethoxy sulfate (AES). Coreflood recovery performance of both formulations is similar. Without alkali, high surfactant adsorption becomes major concern for the alternative formulation. Thus, an adsorption inhibitor (AI) agent – polyacrylic acid type, is being considered as an additive to address this concern. While AI showed potential in reducing surfactant adsorption and improving oil recovery efficiency, it can also increase overall cost for the surfactant in sea water chemical formulation. Hence, the merit to apply AI was not clearly observed.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Wartenberg ◽  
Margaux Kerdraon ◽  
Mathieu Salaun ◽  
Lena Brunet-Errard ◽  
Christophe Fejean ◽  
...  

Abstract This paper is dedicated to the selection of the most effective way of mitigating surfactant adsorption in chemical EOR flooding. Mitigation strategies based on either water treatment or adsorption inhibitors were benchmarked for a sea water injection brine, on both performances and economics aspects. Performances in surfactant adsorption reduction were evaluated by applying salinity and/or hardness gradient strategies through dedicated water softening techniques, such as reverse osmosis or nanofiltration. Adsorption inhibitor addition, which does not require any water treatment, was also assessed and optimized for comparison. For each scenario, a suitable surfactant formulation was designed and evaluated through phase diagrams, static adsorption and diphasic coreflood experiments. Then the real benefit of surfactant adsorption reduction on the overall EOR process economics (including the costs of chemicals and water treatment) was assessed depending on the selected strategy. Sea water was considered as the injection brine for this study as it is widely used in chemical EOR process and often suffers high surfactant adsorption level. It was found that residual oil saturation after chemical flooding (SORc) dropped from 29% to 7% by applying a hardness gradient through nanofiltration process while 4% was reached with reverse osmosis. Regarding costs and footprint however, nanofiltration was found to be more advantageous. Adsorption inhibitors addition met similar performances to nanofiltration-based process (SORc=7%) and could be a valuable option depending on injected volume (pilot or small deployment) or field location (off-shore) as they do not require water treatment plant investment. Overall, this study provides useful practical insights on both performances and economics for selecting the most adapted strategy depending on the considered field case.


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (05) ◽  
pp. 713-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Flaaten ◽  
Quoc P. Nguyen ◽  
Gary A. Pope ◽  
Jieyuan Zhang

Summary We present a systematic study of laboratory tests of alternative chemical formulations for a chemical flood design and application. Aqueous and microemulsion phase behavior tests have previously been shown to be a rapid, inexpensive, and highly effective means to select the best chemicals and minimize the need for relatively expensive coreflood tests. Microemulsion phase behavior testing was therefore conducted using various combinations of surfactants, cosolvents, and alkalis with a particular crude oil and in reservoir conditions of interest. Branched alcohol propoxy sulfates and internal olefin sulfonates showed high performance in these tests, even when mixed with both conventional and novel alkali agents. Systematic screening methods helped tailor and fine tune chemical mixtures to perform well under the given design constraints. The best chemical formulations were validated in coreflood experiments, and compared in terms of both oil recovery and surfactant retention in cores. Each of the four best formulations tested in corefloods gave nearly 100% oil recovery and very low surfactant adsorption. The two formulations with conventional and novel alkali agents gave almost zero surfactant retention. In standard practice, soft water must be used with alkali, but we show how alkali-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding can be used in this case even with very hard saline brine. Introduction Many mature reservoirs under waterflood have low economic production rates despite having as much as 50 to 75% of the original oil still in place. These reservoirs are viable candidates for chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) that uses both surfactant to reduce oil/water interfacial tension (IFT) and polymer to improve sweep efficiency. However, designing these aqueous chemical mixtures is complex and must be tailored to the reservoir rock and fluid (i.e., crude oil and formation brine) properties of the application. The early success of a systematic laboratory approach to low-cost, high performance chemical flooding depends on the efficiency of designing a formula for coreflood injection in accordance with sound evaluation criteria. A general, a three-stage procedure has been developed previously to screen hundreds of potential chemicals (i.e., surfactant, cosurfactant, cosolvent, alkali, polymer, and electrolytes), and arrive at a mixture having good recovery of residual oil in cores (Jackson 2006; Levitt 2006; Levitt et al. 2006). Additionally, furthering laboratory and field-testing in this area contributes to an expanding research database to help broaden reservoir types that can become candidates for routine chemical EOR application. This paper describes a systematic laboratory approach to low cost, high performance chemical flooding, and explores novel approaches to ASP flooding in reservoirs containing very hard saline brines. The design strategy first uses microemulsion phase behavior experiments to quickly select and optimize concentrations of injected chemicals. Assessment of formula optimization strategies are carried out through varying surfactant-to-cosurfactant ratio, reducing cosolvent concentration, reducing total surfactant concentration, selecting a suitable alkali, and using formation brine in the injection mixture. Formulations performing well in phase behavior are validated in coreflood experiments that adhere to necessary design criteria such as pressure and salinity gradients, surfactant adsorption, and capillary effects. We illustrate the application of our design approach in prepared Berea sandstone cores previously waterflooded with very hard saline brine, and show how ASP flooding can use some of the same brine in the chemical formulation. Conventional ASP flooding requires soft water that may not always be available, and softening hard brines can be very costly or infeasible in many cases depending on the location and other factors. These new results demonstrate high tolerance to both salinity and hardness of the high performance surfactants, and how novel alkalis--in particular sodium metaborate--can provide similar benefits in such harsh environments as sodium carbonate has shown in environments without divalent cations. This experimental success begins to vastly increase the range of conditions for economical EOR using chemicals.


Nanomaterials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Franco ◽  
Lady J. Giraldo ◽  
Carlos H. Candela ◽  
Karla M. Bernal ◽  
Fabio Villamil ◽  
...  

The primary objective of this study is to develop a novel experimental nanofluid based on surfactant–nanoparticle–brine tuning, subsequently evaluate its performance in the laboratory under reservoir conditions, then upscale the design for a field trial of the nanotechnology-enhanced surfactant injection process. Two different mixtures of commercial anionic surfactants (SA and SB) were characterized by their critical micelle concentration (CMC), density, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra. Two types of commercial nanoparticles (CNA and CNB) were utilized, and they were characterized by SBET, FTIR spectra, hydrodynamic mean sizes (dp50), isoelectric points (pHIEP), and functional groups. The evaluation of both surfactant–nanoparticle systems demonstrated that the best performance was obtained with a total dissolved solid (TDS) of 0.75% with the SA surfactant and the CNA nanoparticles. A nanofluid formulation with 100 mg·L−1 of CNA provided suitable interfacial tension (IFT) values between 0.18 and 0.15 mN·m−1 for a surfactant dosage range of 750–1000 mg·L−1. Results obtained from adsorption tests indicated that the surfactant adsorption on the rock would be reduced by at least 40% under static and dynamic conditions due to nanoparticle addition. Moreover, during core flooding tests, it was observed that the recovery factor was increased by 22% for the nanofluid usage in contrast with a 17% increase with only the use of the surfactant. These results are related to the estimated capillary number of 3 × 10−5, 3 × 10−4, and 5 × 10−4 for the brine, the surfactant, and the nanofluid, respectively, as well as to the reduction in the surfactant adsorption on the rock which enhances the efficiency of the process. The field trial application was performed with the same nanofluid formulation in the two different injection patterns of a Colombian oil field and represented the first application worldwide of nanoparticles/nanofluids in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. The cumulative incremental oil production was nearly 30,035 Bbls for both injection patterns by May 19, 2020. The decline rate was estimated through an exponential model to be −0.104 month−1 before the intervention, to −0.016 month−1 after the nanofluid injection. The pilot was designed based on a production increment of 3.5%, which was successfully surpassed with this field test with an increment of 27.3%. This application is the first, worldwide, to demonstrate surfactant flooding assisted by nanotechnology in a chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) process in a low interfacial tension region.


1977 ◽  
Vol 17 (05) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.J. Trogus ◽  
T. Sophany ◽  
R.S. Schechter ◽  
W.H. Wade

Abstract The adsorption of commercial polyoxyethylene nonyl phenols and alkyl benzene sulfonates was studied by measuring the surfactant breakthrough from Berea cores. A rate model that reduces to a Langmuir-type isotherm at equilibrium represented these dynamic results and predicted successfully the equilibrium isotherms determined by static experiments.The ratios of both adsorption and desorption were determined and were observed to increase with the number of ethylene oxide groups. Adsorption of the nonionic surfactant appeared to be by hydrogen bonding and the amount adsorbed per unit of area was the same on a number of metal oxide substrates.Negligible adsorption was observed for sulfonates with an alkyl chain length of 9 or less. Introduction Surfactant adsorption is one of the important features governing the economic viability of chemical flooding processes. However, the adsorption on mineral oxide surfaces is only one of several possible mechanisms leading to surfactant losses.Other mechanisms include precipitation of surfactant in the presence of divalent ions, diffusion of surfactant into dead-end pores, and surfactant partitioning into the oil phase. It is necessary partitioning into the oil phase. It is necessary to minimize the losses by all mechanisms. The work reported here addresses the problem of surfactant adsorption; other mechanisms are not considered.There are a number of approaches that have the potential for minimizing adsorption. The most potential for minimizing adsorption. The most desirable surfactant is one that does not adsorb at all; however, such surfactants may not be effective oil-recovery agents. Sacrificial agents that adsorb in place of the surfactant can be used in a preflush or as a competitive additive to the surfactant slug, but effective agents have not yet been identified.Two aspects of the adsorption process are of interest the rate and the amount adsorbed. Both are examined here. The measurements include the dynamic adsorption of both anionic and nonionic surfactants in Berea cores that are initially filled with brine. The breakthrough curves are represented successfully using a model that accounts for the surface coverage. The rate expression reduces to a Langmuir-type isotherm. The shape of this curve has been verified by conducting static experiments.The study included both nonionic and anionic surfactants. These were not pure surfactants but, in general, they are well characterized. The anionic surfactants were studied because their behavior should-be representative of more complex mixtures such as the petroleum sulfonates that have been regarded as prime candidates for oil-recovery agents. These sulfonates are sensitive to divalent ions and many chemical slugs include quantities of nonionic surfactants to alleviate this difficulty to some extent. Therefore, this study included a systematic study of a particular class of nonionic surfactants. This study is the first to report rates of adsorption and desorption. From this information, the nature of the adsorption can be better understood. THEORY Michaels and Morelos have established that the adsorption of polyanions on kaolin occurs by hydrogen bonding. The specific sites at which this adsorption takes place were not defined. For the adsorption of surfactants, this mechanism can be represented as follows: ....................... (1) SPEJ p. 337


1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (06) ◽  
pp. 606-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Thomas ◽  
Paul D. Fleming ◽  
William K. Winter

Abstract A mathematical model describing one-dimensional (1D), isothermal flow of a ternary, two-phase surfactant system in isotropic porous media is presented along with numerical solutions of special cases. These solutions exhibit oil recovery profiles similar to those observed in laboratory tests of oil displacement by surfactant systems in cores. The model includes the effects of surfactant transfer between aqueous and hydrocarbon phases and both reversible and irreversible surfactant adsorption by the porous medium. The effects of capillary pressure and diffusion are ignored, however. The model is based on relative permeability concepts and employs a family of relative permeability curves that incorporate the effects of surfactant concentration on interfacial tension (IFT), the viscosity of the phases, and the volumetric flow rate. A numerical procedure was developed that results in two finite difference equations that are accurate to second order in the timestep size and first order in the spacestep size and allows explicit calculation of phase saturations and surfactant concentrations as a function of space and time variables. Numerical dispersion (truncation error) present in the two equations tends to mimic the neglected present in the two equations tends to mimic the neglected effects of capillary pressure and diffusion. The effective diffusion constants associated with this effect are proportional to the spacestep size. proportional to the spacestep size. Introduction In a previous paper we presented a system of differential equations that can be used to model oil recovery by chemical flooding. The general system allows for an arbitrary number of components as well as an arbitrary number of phases in an isothermal system. For a binary, two-phase system, the equations reduced to those of the Buckley-Leverett theory under the usual assumptions of incompressibility and each phase containing only a single component, as well as in the more general case where both phases have significant concentrations of both components, but the phases are incompressible and the concentration in one phase is a very weak function of the pressure of the other phase at a given temperature. pressure of the other phase at a given temperature. For a ternary, two-phase system a set of three differential equations was obtained. These equations are applicable to chemical flooding with surfactant, polymer, etc. In this paper, we present a numerical solution to these equations paper, we present a numerical solution to these equations for I D flow in the absence of gravity. Our purpose is to develop a model that includes the physical phenomena influencing oil displacement by surfactant systems and bridges the gap between laboratory displacement tests and reservoir simulation. It also should be of value in defining experiments to elucidate the mechanisms involved in oil displacement by surfactant systems and ultimately reduce the number of experiments necessary to optimize a given surfactant system.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Chun Zhou ◽  
Meng Lu ◽  
Fuchen Liu ◽  
Wenhong Li ◽  
Jianshen Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Based on the results of the foam flooding for our low permeability reservoirs, we have explored the possibility of using low interfacial tension (IFT) surfactants to improve oil recovery. The objective of this work is to develop a robust low-tension surfactant formula through lab experiments to investigate several key factors for surfactant-based chemical flooding. Microemulsion phase behavior and aqueous solubility experiments at reservoir temperature were performed to develop the surfactant formula. After reviewing surfactant processes in literature and evaluating over 200 formulas using commercially available surfactants, we found that we may have long ignored the challenges of achieving aqueous stability and optimal microemulsion phase behavior for surfactant formulations in low salinity environments. A surfactant formula with a low IFT does not always result in a good microemulsion phase behavior. Therefore, a novel synergistic blend with two surfactants in the formulation was developed with a cost-effective nonionic surfactant. The formula exhibits an increased aqueous solubility, a lower optimum salinity, and an ultra-low IFT in the range of 10-4 mN/m. There were challenges of using a spinning drop tensiometer to measure the IFT of the black crude oil and the injection water at reservoir conditions. We managed the process and studied the IFTs of formulas with good Winsor type III phase behavior results. Several microemulsion phase behavior test methods were investigated, and a practical and rapid test method is proposed to be used in the field under operational conditions. Reservoir core flooding experiments including SP (surfactant-polymer) and LTG (low-tension-gas) were conducted to evaluate the oil recovery. SP flooding with a selected polymer for mobility control and a co-solvent recovered 76% of the waterflood residual oil. Furthermore, 98% residual crude oil recovery was achieved by LTG flooding through using an additional foaming agent and nitrogen. These results demonstrate a favorable mobilization and displacement of the residual oil for low permeability reservoirs. In summary, microemulsion phase behavior and aqueous solubility tests were used to develop coreflood formulations for low salinity, low temperature conditions. The formulation achieved significant oil recovery for both SP flooding and LTG flooding. Key factors for the low-tension surfactant-based chemical flooding are good microemulsion phase behavior, a reasonably aqueous stability, and a decent low IFT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document