Special Therapeutic Justice Program for the Crime Treatment of Risk Taking Government Employee with PTSD: Focusing on the Veterans Treatment Courts in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-101
Author(s):  
KyeongSeon Kim ◽  
Ki Woong Cho
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
The United States ◽  
Government Employee ◽  
Therapeutic Justice ◽  
Treatment Courts ◽  
Justice Program ◽  
Veterans Treatment Courts

When is it Ethical to Inform Administrators about Student Risk-Taking Behaviors? Perceptions of School Counselors

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 2156759X1201500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Moyer ◽  
Jeremy R. Sullivan ◽  
David Growcock
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
School Counselors ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
School Administrators ◽  
The United States ◽  
Student Risk ◽  
Risk Taking Behaviors ◽  
Perceptions Of School

School counselors from across the United States responded to a survey asking when they should break confidentiality and report student risk-taking behaviors to school administrators. Generally, counselors believed it to be more ethical to break confidentiality when the behaviors were directly observed (as opposed to reported by students) and when the behaviors occurred on school grounds during school hours. Results also suggest counselors were more willing to break confidentiality when their school had a written policy guiding their actions. All behaviors showed some variance among respondents, suggesting a lack of agreement regarding when it is appropriate to break confidentiality and report risk-taking behaviors to administrators. This article discusses implications and suggestions for school counselors.

scholarly journals Low interest rates and executive risk-taking incentives: Evidence from the United States

2020 ◽  
pp. 234094442092771
Author(s):  
Paula Castro ◽  
Maria T Tascon ◽  
Francisco J Castaño ◽  
Borja Amor-Tapia
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Interest Rates ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
The United States ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Monetary Policies ◽  
Stock Return Volatility ◽  
Low Interest Rates ◽  
Institutional Shareholders

This article contributes to the literature by indicating how certain monetary policies impact the compensation incentives of US managers to adopt riskier business policies. Specifically, based on the agency problems between shareholders and managers and between shareholders and creditors, a research framework is developed to identify the influence of low interest rates on managers’ risk-taking incentives proxied by the sensitivity of executive compensation to stock return volatility (Vega). We examine 1,293 firms in the United States between 2000 and 2016, and the results indicate that low interest rates increase the managers’ short-term risk-taking incentives and that those incentives contribute to the risk effectively taken by the firm. Our results are robust to the use of alternative monetary proxies and to the presence of passive versus active institutional shareholders. JEL CLASSIFICATION E41; E43; E51; M12; M52

Student Risk-Taking Behaviors: When Do School Counselors Break Confidentiality?

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 2156759X0801100
Author(s):  
Michael Moyer ◽  
Jeremy Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
School Counselors ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
The United States ◽  
High School Counselors ◽  
Adolescent Risk ◽  
Student Risk ◽  
Perceived Dangerousness ◽  
Risk Taking Behaviors

A total of 204 middle and high school counselors from across the United States responded to a survey in which they were asked to determine whether they view specific adolescent risk-taking behaviors of varying intensity, frequency, and duration as warranting parental notification. Results suggest that counselors’ perceptions that it is ethical to break confidentiality and report the risk-taking behaviors increased when the behaviors were more intense, more frequent, and of longer duration. Further, although there was less ambiguity regarding the perceived dangerousness of some behaviors (e.g., suicidal ideation), all behaviors showed some variance or disagreement among respondents with regard to their willingness to break confidentiality. Implications and suggestions for school counselors are considered.

A Simplified Measure of Investor Risk Aversion

2020 ◽  
pp. 026010792092451
Author(s):  
John Grable ◽  
Eun Jin Kwak ◽  
Martha Fulk ◽  
Aditi Routh
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Revealed Preference ◽  
The United States ◽  
Relative Risk Aversion ◽  
Measures Of Risk ◽  
Constant Relative Risk Aversion

This article introduces a simplified measure of investor risk aversion. The singleitem question combines elements from revealed preference and propensity measurement techniques in a way that matches traditional constant relative risk-aversion estimation procedures. Based on survey data from 500 investors living in the United States, scores from the proposed measure were found to correlate with other measures of risk aversion, as well as with indicators of risk-taking. A validity test showed that answers to the proposed measure were statistically associated with equity and cash ownership holdings in respondent portfolios. The simplicity and intuitive nature of the proposed measure and the alignment of question response categories to estimates of constant relative risk aversion make this a potentially valuable addition to the toolkit of researchers, financial educators, investors and those who provide advice to investors. JEL: C83, D10, D11, D14, D19, D81

Implementation of sustainable public procurement practices and policies: A sorting framework

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Prier ◽  
Edward Schwerin ◽  
Clifford P. McCue
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Organizational Size ◽  
Current State ◽  
Systematic Pattern ◽  
The U.S

In general, there are many disincentives standing in the way of promoting change in public procurement practices by government agencies. Because engaging in sustainable purchasing requires some level of entrepreneurialism and risk-taking, a sorting framework is adopted to gauge whether some organizations are systematically more likely to pursue sustainable public purchasing (SPP) efforts than others. One-way analysis of variance and other methods are applied to a survey of public procurement practitioners across over 300 governments in the U.S. Results strongly suggest that agencies of various scope and reach tend to abstain from aggressively pursuing SPP efforts. However, when they do employ SPP, these efforts tend to be quite variable across and within levels of government and organizational size. In an effort to bridge theory with empirical data, a strong case can be made that the current state of SPP in the United States is the result of random and very cautious experimentation with little systematic pattern to SPP adoption.

Leader Development Across Cultures

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan David Walker
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Leader Development ◽  
The United States ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Open Debate ◽  
The Individual

Imagine you are in a training room and the distinguished professor standing in the front, flown in especially from the United States, tells you unequivocally that schools can only improve when leaders distribute power more equitably among teachers, encourage open debate, and reward individual risk-taking. Now imagine you are leading a school in a place where teachers expect the principal to make the decisions, where it is unacceptable to openly disagree with others, especially the ‘boss’, and where the success of the organization easily trumps that of the individual.

Victims and Prosecutors

2021 ◽  
pp. 372-398
Author(s):  
Amanda Konradi ◽  
Tirza Jo Ochrach-Konradi
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Plea Bargaining ◽  
Case Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Prosecutorial Discretion ◽  
Trial Courts ◽  
Victim Satisfaction ◽  
Victim Impact Statements ◽  
Therapeutic Justice

This chapter explores crime victims’ experiences in U.S. trial courts in relation to the passage, application, and adjudication of state and federal victims’ rights legislation (VRL). It reviews victims’ current rights established through legislation and case law: to privacy, information, and notification; to be present; and to be heard in pre-trial hearings, in trials, in plea bargaining, and in victim impact statements. It reviews qualitative research documenting how and why prosecutorial discretion is often exercised to limit victims’ participation in trials and pleas, highlighting incentives for emotion management. It also reviews proposals, which are counter to this standard, designed to achieve greater victim participation and to produce higher quality testimony, including extensive pre-court preparation and courtroom intermediaries. It assesses the efficacy of practices to protect victims from secondary victimization in court, including shielding (close circuit video and screens) and support dogs. It explores use of private attorneys to (1) ensure that prosecutors and judges comply with VRL and (2) pursue victim-directed, private prosecution of sexual assault in the United States and elsewhere. It concludes that the promise of VRL—to provide therapeutic justice outcomes, achieve victim satisfaction, and enact procedural justice—is yet to be realized in the United States; however, an evidence-based approach toward prosecutorial practice would be advantageous for victims.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document