Recruitment of low-income pregnant women into a dietary and dental care intervention: lessons from a feasibility trial
Abstract Background There are difficulties in carrying out research in low-income urban communities, but the methodological challenges and suggestions on how to deal with them are often undocumented. The aim of this study is to describe the challenges of recruiting and enrolling low-income pregnant women with periodontitis to a clinical trial on vitamin D/calcium milk fortification and periodontal therapy (PT) and describe the patient-, study protocol- and setting-related factors related to women’s ineligibility and refusal to participate in the study Methods Qualitative and quantitative data on recruitment to a 2x2 factorial feasibility clinical trial were used. 18 women attending the health centre in a low-income area in Duque de Caxias (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) took part in focal group discussions and data were thematically analysed. Quantitative data were analysed using appropriate descriptive statistics, including absolute and relative frequencies. Results Of all referrals (767), 548 (78.5%) did not meet the initial eligibility criteria. The main reason for exclusion (58%) was advanced gestational age (>20 weeks) at first prenatal appointment. The study recruited 70 women in 56 weeks and did not reach the benchmark of 120 women in 36 weeks (58.3% of the original target). Recruitment was severely hindered by health centre closures due to general strikes. Non-participation of those eligible after periodontal examination was approximately 24% (22 out 92) and predominantly associated with patient-related barriers (e.g. transportation barriers, family obligations, unresponsive to phone calls, and disconnected telephones). The recruitment yields were 9.1% (70/767) of all women contacted at first prenatal visit and 76.1% (70/92) of those screened eligible and enrolled in the trial. Women did not report concerns regarding random allocation and considered fortified milk as a healthy and safe food for pregnant women. Some women reported that financial constraints (e.g. transportation cost) could hinder participation in the study. Conclusion Engagement between the research team and health centre staff (e.g. nurses) facilitated referral and recruitment, yet some pregnant women failed to participate in the study largely due to significant patient-related socio-demographic barriers and setting-related factors. Our data illustrates the complexity of overcoming recruitment and enrolment challenges for clinical trials in resource-limited settings.