scholarly journals Sickness absence and disability pension among women with breast cancer: a population-based cohort study with a predictive model

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Kvillemo ◽  
Lingjing Chen ◽  
Matteo Bottai ◽  
Paolo Frumento ◽  
Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Social Insurance ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Population Based ◽  
First Year ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Diagnosis Date

Abstract Women’s return to work after diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) are becoming more prevalent. However, register-based national investigation on sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP) in BC women is lacking. The aim of the study was to explore SA and DP before and after a first BC diagnosis and the possibility to predict new cancer-related SA by using disease-related and sociodemographic factors. Methods: A longitudinal register study of the 3536 women in Sweden aged 19-64 with a first BC diagnosis in 2010 was conducted by linkage of multiple national registers. Particularly, information on SA and DP was obtained from the National Social Insurance Agency’s database. Descriptive statistics on SA and DP two years before and three years after the BC diagnosis were performed. The risk of having a new SA spell due to BC or BC-related diagnoses was modeled using logistic regression. Results: The proportion of women with SA increased during the year following the BC diagnosis date and declined over the next two years to proportions before diagnosis. At the time of BC diagnosis, half of the women began a new SA spell >14 days with cancer, cancer-related, or mental diagnosis. Disease-related and sociodemographic factors including occupational sector, living area, age, cancer stage, educational level, and number of previous SA days showed statistical significance (p<0.05) in predicting a new SA around BC diagnosis. By using these factors, it was possible to correctly predict 67% of the new SA spell. Conclusions: SA among women with BC was elevated mainly in the first year after diagnosis. New SA following BC diagnosis can accurately be predicted.

scholarly journals Sickness absence and disability pension among women with breast cancer: a population-based cohort study from Sweden

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia K. Kvillemo ◽  
Lingjing Chen ◽  
Matteo Bottai ◽  
Paolo Frumento ◽  
Gino Almondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Social Insurance ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Population Based ◽  
First Year ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Diagnosis Date

Abstract Background Women’s return to work after diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) is becoming more prevalent. However, register-based national investigation on sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP) in BC women is lacking. The aim of the study was to explore SA and DP before and after a first BC diagnosis and the possibility to predict new cancer-related SA by using disease-related and sociodemographic factors. Methods A longitudinal register study of the 3536 women in Sweden aged 19–64 with a first BC diagnosis in 2010 was conducted by linkage of five nationwide registers. Particularly, detailed information on SA and DP was obtained from the National Social Insurance Agency. Descriptive statistics on SA and DP 2 years before through 3 years after the BC diagnosis were performed. The risk of having a new SA spell due to BC or BC-related diagnoses was modeled using logistic regression. Results The proportion of women with SA increased during the year following the BC diagnosis date and declined over the next 2 years to proportions before diagnosis. At the time of BC diagnosis, half of the women began a new SA spell > 14 days with cancer, cancer-related, or mental diagnosis. Disease-related and sociodemographic factors including occupational sector, living area, age, cancer stage, educational level, and number of previous SA days showed statistical significance (p < 0.05) in predicting a new SA around BC diagnosis. By using these factors, it was possible to correctly predict 67% of the new SA spell. Conclusions SA among women with BC was elevated mainly in the first year after diagnosis. New SA following BC diagnosis can accurately be predicted.

scholarly journals Sickness absence and disability pension among women with breast cancer: a population-based cohort study with a predictive model

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Kvillemo ◽  
Lingjing Chen ◽  
Matteo Bottai ◽  
Paolo Frumento ◽  
Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Social Insurance ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Population Based ◽  
First Year ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Diagnosis Date

Abstract Background: Women’s return to work after diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) are becoming more prevalent. However, register-based national investigation on sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP) in BC women is lacking. Methods: The aim of the study was to explore SA and DP before and after a first BC diagnosis and the possibility to predict new cancer-related SA by using disease-related and sociodemographic factors. A longitudinal register study of the 3536 women in Sweden aged 19-64 with a first BC diagnosis in 2010 was conducted by linkage of multiple national registers. Particularly, information on SA and DP was obtained from the National Social Insurance Agency’s database. Descriptive statistics on SA and DP before and after the BC diagnosis were performed. The risk of being on sickness with a new SA spell due to BC or BC-related diagnoses was modeled using logistic regression. Results: The proportion of women with SA increased during the year following the BC diagnosis date and declined over the next two years to proportions before diagnosis. At the time of BC diagnosis, half of the women began a new SA spell >14 days with cancer, cancer-related, or mental diagnosis. Disease-related and sociodemographic factors including occupational sector, living area, age, cancer stage, educational level, and number of previous SA days showed statistical significance (p<0.05) in predicting a new SA around BC diagnosis. By using these factors, it was possible to correctly predict 67% of the new SA spell. Conclusion: SA among women with BC was elevated mainly in the first year after diagnosis. New SA following BC diagnosis can accurately be predicted

Sickness Absence and Disability Pension After Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A 5-Year Nationwide Cohort Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (18) ◽  
pp. 2044-2052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Kvillemo ◽  
Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz ◽  
Richard Bränström ◽  
Kerstin Nilsson ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Social Insurance ◽  
Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Occupational Health Services ◽  
First Year

Purpose To explore future diagnosis-specific sickness absence and disability pension among women with breast cancer compared with women without breast cancer. Also, to examine associations with disease-related and sociodemographic factors among those with breast cancer. Methods Longitudinal register data on 3,547 women living in Sweden (age 20 to 65 years) who were first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2005, and a matched comparison cohort (n = 14,188), were analyzed for the annual prevalence of diagnosis-specific sickness absence and disability pension over 5 years. Logistic regressions were used to explore associations of disease-related and sociodemographic factors with future sickness absence and disability pension among women with breast cancer. Results Immediately after being diagnosed with breast cancer, the proportion of women with sickness absence was high but decreased continuously from the 1st through 5th year after diagnosis (71%, 40%, 30%, 22%, and 19%, respectively). In comparison, the range for women without breast cancer was 17% to 11%, respectively. The higher prevalence of sickness absence after breast cancer was mainly a result of breast cancer diagnosis, not a mental diagnosis, or other somatic diagnoses. Advanced cancer at diagnosis, > 90 days sickness absence before diagnosis, low education, and being born outside Sweden were associated with higher odds ratios for sickness absence and disability pension (odds ratio range, 1.40 to 6.45). Conclusion The level of sickness absence increased substantially in women with breast cancer during the first year after diagnosis and approached the level of breast cancer–free women in the following years; however, even in the first year, most women were not on sickness absence for a substantial time, and even in high-risk groups, many were not on sickness absence or disability pension in the following years. Information about relatively low future sickness absence and disability pension levels can be used by patients when planning their work, by health care professionals, and by social insurance officers. Employers and Occupational Health Services need this information to adequately handle workplace adjustments.

scholarly journals Associations of sickness absence and disability pension due to mental and somatic diagnoses when aged 60–64 with paid work after the standard retirement age; a prospective population-based cohort study in Sweden

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksiina Martikainen ◽  
Alice Svensson Alavi ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson ◽  
Kristin Farrants
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Retirement Age ◽  
Paid Work ◽  
Diagnosis Group ◽  
Lower Likelihood

Abstract Background The proportion of people working beyond age 65 is increasing. We aimed to explore whether sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP) due to mental, somatic, or both diagnoses when aged 60–64 were associated with being in paid work when aged 66–71. Methods This prospective population-based cohort study included all 98,551 individuals who in 2010 turned 65 years, lived in Sweden, and were in paid work at some point when aged 60–64. Data from three nationwide registers were used with 2010 as baseline, with SA or/and DP as the exposure variables (2005–2009) and paid work as the outcome variable (2011–2016). Logistic regression was conducted to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between exposures and outcome, controlling for sociodemographic factors. The analyses were also stratified by sex. Results Nearly half were in paid work during follow-up. Those with SA due to mental diagnoses had lower likelihood of being in paid work among both sexes (women OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69–0.84; men 0.74; 0.65–0.84), while this association was smaller for SA due to somatic diagnoses (women 0.87; 0.84–0.91; men 0.92; 0.89–0.96). SA due to both mental and somatic diagnoses was associated with a lower likelihood of paid work for men (0.77; 0.65–0.91), but not women (0.98; 0.88–1.09). Regardless of diagnosis group and sex, DP had the strongest association with not being in paid work (women mental DP 0.39; 0.34–0.45; women somatic DP 0.38; 0.35–0.41; women mental and somatic DP 0.28; 0.15–0.56; men mental DP 0.36; 0.29–0.43; men somatic DP 0.35; 0.32–0.38; men mental and somatic DP 0.22; 0.10–0.51). Combined SA and/or DP demonstrated ORs in-between the diagnosis groups of SA and DP alone (e.g., mental SA and/or DP women and men combined 0.61; 0.57–0.65). Conclusions SA and DP were negatively associated with being in paid work after the standard retirement age of 65. The association was especially strong for DP, irrespective of diagnosis group. Moreover, compared to somatic diagnoses, SA due to mental diagnoses had a stronger association with not being in paid work. More knowledge is needed on how mental SA impedes extending working life.

scholarly journals Sickness absence and disability pension in relation to first childbirth: three cohorts in Sweden

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bjorkenstam ◽  
C Orellana ◽  
K Laszlo ◽  
P Svedberg ◽  
M Voss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Multiple Births ◽  
First Birth ◽  
Period Effects ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background Childbirth is suggested to be associated with elevated levels of sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP). However, knowledge about patterns of SA/DP before and after childbirth as compared to patterns among women who remain nulliparous is limited. We aimed to compare SA/DP across several periods among women with different childbirth status. Methods We analysed three population-based cohorts of all women aged 18-39 years who had not previously given birth and who lived in Sweden on 31 December 1994, 1999, or 2004, respectively. We compared crude and standardized annual mean SA and DP net days during three years preceding to three years after the date of first childbirth, among women having (1) their first and only birth during the subsequent three years, (2) their first birth and at least another delivery, and (3) no childbirths before, nor during the study period. Results Despite an increase in SA in the year preceding the first childbirth, women who gave birth, and especially women with multiple births, tended to have lower levels of SA/DP days throughout the years than women without childbirths. SA/DP days varied across age groups; young women (aged 18-24 years) without childbirths had fewer SA days, but more DP days than their same-aged counterparts who gave birth, regardless of year. These results did not differ across the three cohorts, suggesting that the results were not affected by period effects. Conclusions Women with more than one childbirth had fewer days of SA and DP, as compared to women with one childbirth and to women having no births. Thus, childbirth does not seem to be associated with higher levels of SA and DP. Some of these results can be due to a health selection into giving birth, especially having more births. Key messages Except for the year before delivery, i.e., when pregnant, women giving birth had fewer SA and DP days than women with no births. Thus, childbirth does not seem to be associated with higher SA and DP. Women who had more than one childbirth had less SA/DP days than those with one childbirth.

Cluster headache

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. e404-e413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Steinberg ◽  
Pontus Josefsson ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson ◽  
Christina Sjöstrand
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Headache ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Main Diagnosis ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Aged People ◽  
Headache Patients

ObjectiveTo estimate the prevalence of cluster headache in working-aged people, compare sickness absence rates and disability pension in cluster headache patients to rates in a matched comparison group, and explore associations of sociodemographic factors with such rates.MethodsThrough population-based registers, we identified 3,240 people aged 16–64, living in Sweden in 2010, who at least once during 2001–2010 received inpatient or specialized outpatient health care with cluster headache (ICD-10 code G44.0) as main diagnosis. A comparison group (n = 16,200), matched for age, sex, type of living area, and educational level, from the total population aged 16–64 (n = 5,945,895) was used. Outcomes were sickness absence (>14 days) and disability pension during 2010. Crude and adjusted prevalence rates and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were computed.ResultsThe prevalence of cluster headache in working-aged people was 0.054%. In 2010, 17.30% of the cluster headache group and 9.16% of the comparison group had been on sickness absence. In the cluster headache group, female patients had higher sickness absence rates (25.31%) and full-time disability pension (13.17%) than male patients (13.38% and 8.79%). Cluster headache patients older than 35 had higher rates than those of the same age in the comparison group. Further, cluster headache patients born outside Sweden were more likely to have full-time disability pension than patients born in Sweden.ConclusionsMuch higher rates of the patients had sickness absence or disability pension than in the comparison group. Further shown differences related to sex, age, and other sociodemographic factors need to be addressed.

scholarly journals Sick leave and disability pension before and after breast cancer diagnosis: a Swedish cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
L C Chen ◽  
K A Alexanderson
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Work Capacity ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background Most working-aged women are, after diagnosed with breast cancer (BC), on some sickness absence and/or disability pension (SADP). We aimed to explore possible trajectories of their previous and subsequent SADP days and risk factors for consistently high levels of future SADP. Methods In a longitudinal cohort study of all 3536 women in Sweden aged 19-64 with a first BC diagnosis in 2010, we calculated their annual SADP net days from two years before to three years after BC diagnosis date. A group-based trajectory model was applied to depict SADP patterns. Logistic regressions were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for having &gt;90 or &gt; 180 SADP days/year in the three postdiagnostic years. Results Three trajectories of SADP days/month over the five years were identified: “high” (30% of all)”, “increase only around diagnosis” (61%), and ’constant very high’ (9%). Across the study period, the risk factors associated with constantly high levels of SADP days (&gt;90 or &gt; 180 days/year) were similar. Particularly, factors significantly associated with having annual SADP &gt;90 days during all the three postdiagnostic years were: stage II cancer (OR = 4.59; 95% CI 2.98-7.07), stage III+IV (OR = 26.57; 13.52-52.22), prediagnosis SA 1-30 days (OR = 2.73; 1.30-5.70), prediagnosis SA &gt; 90 days (OR = 24.52; 12.25-49.08), and prediagnosis DP (OR = 659.97; 292.52-&gt;999.99). Conclusions When diagnosed with BC, SADP increased significantly postdiagnosis, however, decreased with time and the absolute majority had no SADP the third year after BC diagnosis. Advanced cancer stage and previous high SADP were the highest risk factors for later SADP. Key messages Most breast cancer survivors’ work capacity (sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP) is only affected shortly post-diagnosis. Prior SADP and high cancer stage were strongest risk factors. Register-based information on breast cancer patients and their sickness absence and disability pension before and after diagnosis are useful to identify different types of return-to-work patterns.

scholarly journals Sickness absence and disability pension before and after first childbirth and in nulliparous women: longitudinal analyses of three cohorts in Sweden

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e031593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Björkenstam ◽  
Cecilia Orellana ◽  
Krisztina D László ◽  
Pia Svedberg ◽  
Margaretha Voss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sickness Absence ◽  
Disability Pension ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Longitudinal Analyses ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean

ObjectiveChildbirth is suggested to be associated with elevated levels of sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP). However, detailed knowledge about SA/DP patterns around childbirth is lacking. We aimed to compare SA/DP across different time periods among women according to their childbirth status.DesignRegister-based longitudinal cohort study.SettingSweden.ParticipantsThree population-based cohorts of nulliparous women aged 18–39 years, living in Sweden 31 December 1994, 1999 or 2004 (nearly 500 000/cohort).Primary and secondary outcome measuresSum of SA >14 and DP net days/year.MethodsWe compared crude and standardised mean SA and DP days/year during the 3 years preceding and the 3 years after first childbirth date (Y−3to Y+3), among women having (1) their first and only birth during the subsequent 3 years (B1), (2) their first birth and at least another delivery (B1+), and (3) no childbirths during follow-up (B0).ResultsDespite an increase in SA in the year preceding the first childbirth, women in the B1 group, and especially in B1+, tended to have fewer SA/DP days throughout the years than women in the B0 group. For cohort 2005, the mean SA/DP days/year (95% CIs) in the B0, B1 and B1+ groups were for Y−3: 25.3 (24.9–25.7), 14.5 (13.6–15.5) and 8.5 (7.9–9.2); Y−2: 27.5 (27.1–27.9), 16.6 (15.5–17.6) and 9.6 (8.9–10.4); Y−1: 29.2 (28.8–29.6), 31.4 (30.2–32.6) and 22.0 (21.2–22.9); Y+1: 30.2 (29.8–30.7), 11.2 (10.4–12.1) and 5.5 (5.0–6.1); Y+2: 31.7 (31.3–32.1), 15.3 (14.2–16.3) and 10.9 (10.3–11.6); Y+3: 32.3 (31.9–32.7), 18.1 (17.0–19.3) and 12.4 (11.7–13.0), respectively. These patterns were the same in all three cohorts.ConclusionsWomen with more than one childbirth had fewer SA/DP days/year compared with women with one childbirth or with no births. Women who did not give birth had markedly more DP days than those giving birth, suggesting a health selection into childbirth.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document