Lung sonography is useful for the initial detection of left-sided double lumen tracheal tube position in both novice and expert; a randomized prospective crossover study
Abstract Background Detecting the position of the double lumen tube (DLT), lung sonography, can be an effective technique and may provide more detailed information than chest auscultation. However, the diagnostic efficacy of lung sonography for determining DLT position can differ between novice and expert.Methods We enrolled and allocated ninety patients into two groups; one group using chest auscultation and the other using lung sonography for the determination of DLT position. In both groups, two repeat-assessments were provided by two independent examiners; first by a novice, and second by an expert. The primary outcome was the overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive or negative predictive values between novice and expert in confirming the position of the left-sided DLT. In both groups, final position was confirmed by a fiberoptic bronchoscopy.Results Both using auscultation and sonography, novices and experts showed similar diagnostic efficacy. However, in patients using sonography, both novice and expert showed better outcomes than in patients using chest auscultation. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, lung sonography seemed to showe a better predictability in incorrect DLT position than chest auscultation, especially by experts.Conclusion Lung sonography showed a better diagnostic efficacy for detecting DLT position than chest auscultation. Furthermore, using lung sonography, novice investigator may perform similar assessment for identifying incorrect DLT position to expert.