scholarly journals Nurse practitioners in Swiss family practices as potentially autonomous providers of home visits: an exploratory study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gysin ◽  
Iren Bischofberger ◽  
Rahel Meier ◽  
Anneke van Vught ◽  
Christoph Merlo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Swiss primary care is challenged by impending shortages of general practitioners (GPs) in rural areas and decreasing number of GP home visits. In Anglo-Saxon and many other countries, nurse practitioners (NPs) have been implemented and provide high quality, patient-centred home visits autonomously. In Switzerland, the NP role is new and there are currently only a handful of ongoing pilot projects in family practices. Hence, studies are lacking and data collection is challenging as NPs are not yet registered providers who could be identified in billing or health insurance data. Our aims were to gain insights in the frequency of home visits by NPs in Swiss family practices, and to determine their autonomy based on the required level of GP supervision during consultations.Methods We used consultation data from two pilot practices in rural Switzerland. In “Practice A”, the NP was in postgraduate education and data was gathered electronically between August 2017 and 2018. In “Practice B”, the NP had completed her education, and had two years of work experience as a NP when data was collected manually between April and June 2018. We used a coding system based on five levels of GP supervision to identify NP consultations and home visits, and to determine the NPs’ autonomy in each consultation.Results We analysed data from 1375 consultations. The share of home visits in all NP consultations was 17% in Practice A and 51% in Practice B. Both NPs had a higher share of autonomously conducted consultations during home visits than in the office. In Practice A, the proportion of consultations in which the NP was autonomous increased from 0% in the first month of her employment to 19% after 13 months of GP supervision. In Practice B, the NP was autonomous in about three-quarters of her consultations.Conclusions After completing postgraduate education with clinical supervision by GPs, and few years of practical experience in their role, NPs can reach a relatively high degree of autonomy and might pose a potential solution to the decreasing numbers of GP home visits in Swiss primary care.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gysin ◽  
Iren Bischofberger ◽  
Rahel Meier ◽  
Anneke van Vught ◽  
Christoph Merlo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Switzerland is challenged by impending shortages of general practitioners (GPs) in rural areas and decreasing number of GP home visits. In Anglo-Saxon and many other countries, nurse practitioners (NPs) have been implemented and provide high quality, patient-centred home visits autonomously. In Switzerland, the NP role is new and there are currently only a handful of ongoing pilot projects in family practices. Hence, studies are lacking and data collection is challenging as NPs are not yet registered providers who could be identified in billing or health insurance data. Our aims were to gain insights in the frequency of home visits by NPs in Swiss family practices, and to determine their autonomy during visits and consultations based on the required level of GP supervision. Methods We used consultation data from two pilot practices in rural Switzerland. In “Practice A”, the NP was in postgraduate education and data was gathered electronically between August 2017 and 2018. In “Practice B”, the NP had completed her education, and had two years of work experience as a NP when data was collected manually between April and June 2018. We used a coding system based on five levels of GP supervision to identify NP consultations and home visits, and to determine the NPs’ autonomy in each consultation. Results We analysed data from 1375 consultations. The share of home visits in all NP consultations was 17% in Practice A and 51% in Practice B. Both NPs had a higher share of autonomously conducted consultations during home visits than in the office. In Practice A, the proportion of consultations in which the NP was autonomous increased from 0% in the first month of her employment to 19% after 13 months of GP supervision. In Practice B, the NP was autonomous in about three-quarters of her consultations. Conclusions First cases provide some evidence that after completing postgraduate education with clinical supervision by GPs, and few years of practical experience in their role, NPs could reach a relatively high degree of autonomy and might pose a potential solution to the decreasing numbers of GP home visits in Swiss primary care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gysin ◽  
Iren Bischofberger ◽  
Rahel Meier ◽  
Anneke van Vught ◽  
Christoph Merlo ◽  
...  

In Swiss primary care, general practitioner (GP) home visits have decreased due to impending GP shortages particularly in rural areas. Nurse practitioners (NP) are newly introduced in family practices and could potentially offer home visits to the increasing number of multimorbid elderly. We analysed consultation data from two pilot projects (Practice A and Practice B) with the goal to measure the frequency and patient characteristics of NP consultations both in the practice and on home visits, and to determine the NPs’ autonomy based on the required GP supervision. In Practice A, 17% of all NP consultations were home visits, in Practice B 51%. In both practices, the NPs saw older patients and reported higher autonomy on home visits compared to consultations in the practice. In Practice A, the NP encountered a higher share of multimorbid patients on home visits than in the practice, and the NP’s proportion of autonomously conducted consultations increased from 0% in the first month to 19% after 13 months of GP supervision. In Practice B, the NP was autonomous in about three-quarters of consultations after 2 years on the job. These first cases provide some evidence that NPs could reach a relatively high degree of autonomy and might pose a potential solution for the decreasing numbers of GP home visits to multimorbid elderly in Swiss primary care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. 788-792
Author(s):  
Alison Wells ◽  
Edward Tolhurst

Background: The extension of roles within the primary care team is one approach recommended to address the shortage of GPs in the UK. A key aspect of care that advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) can undertake is acute home visits. Aim: To evaluate the perspectives of ANPs performing acute in-hours home visits in primary care. Methods: Qualitative data were gathered in eight semi-structured interviews across a primary care locality, then analysed via a process of thematic analysis. Findings: Three key themes were identified: providing holistic care; engaging with the home setting; and negotiating role ambiguity. Conclusion: Practices wishing to involve ANPs in acute home visits should ensure clear definition and good understanding of the ANP role. Effective interprofessional relationships should be fostered with appropriate mentorship and clinical supervision to support ANPs in optimising their contribution to acute home visits.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 696-709
Author(s):  
Calum F Leask ◽  
Heather Tennant

Background Considering new models of delivery may help reduce increasing pressures on primary care. One potentially viable solution is utilising Advanced Practitioners to deliver unscheduled afternoon visits otherwise undertaken by a General Practitioner (GP). Aims Evaluate the feasibility of utilising an Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) to deliver unscheduled home visits on behalf of GPs in a primary care setting. Methods Following a telephone request from patients, ANPs conducted unscheduled home visits on behalf of GPs over a six-month period. Service-level data collected included patient-facing time and outcome of visits. Practice staff and ANPs participated in mind-mapping sessions to explore perceptions of the service. Results There were 239 accepted referrals (total visiting time 106.55 hours). The most common outcomes for visits were ‘medication and worsening statement given’ (107 cases) and ‘self-care advice’ (47 cases). GPs were very satisfied with the service (average score 90%), reporting reductions in stress and capacity improvements. Given the low referral rejection rate, ANPs discussed the potential to increase the number of practices able to access this model, in addition to the possibility of utilising other practitioners (such as paramedics or physiotherapists) to deliver the same service. Conclusions It appears delivering unscheduled care provision using an ANP is feasible and acceptable to GPs.


This chapter begins by outlining the different roles that nurses can occupy in primary and community care. It provides information on learning to work in primary and community care, the focus and responsibilities of general practice nursing (including advanced nurse practitioners), school nursing, health visiting, and district nursing. It covers clinical supervision and appraisal, continuing professional development, and facilitating nursing in practice. Research ethics and research governance in primary care and community nursing is discussed, alongside teamwork and leadership development, and innovation and project planning. Finally, it considers information for changing and informing practice.


1977 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton I. Roemer

The worldwide growth of specialization in medicine has led to a perceived shortage of primary care. A major response in the United States has been the training of physician extenders (both physician assistants and nurse practitioners). Other industrialized countries have rejected this approach, in favor of strengthening general medical practice through continuing education, provision of ancillary personnel, use of health centers, and by other methods. Developing countries use doctor-substitutes as a reasonable adjustment to their lack of economic resources. All countries use ancillary personnel for selected procedures, such as midwifery, which involve only limited judgment and decision making. The American strategy on use of doctor-substitutes for primary care, however, follows from unwillingness to train greater numbers of primary care physicians and to require them to serve in places of need. This results in an inequitable concentration of doctor-substitutes on service to the poor in both urban and rural areas.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107755872094591
Author(s):  
Hannah T. Neprash ◽  
Laura Barrie Smith ◽  
Bethany Sheridan ◽  
Ira Moscovice ◽  
Shailendra Prasad ◽  
...  

The growing ranks of nurse practitioners (NPs) in rural areas of the United States have the potential to help alleviate existing primary care shortages. This study uses a nationwide source of claims- and EHR-data from 2017 to construct measures of NP clinical autonomy and complexity of care. Comparisons between rural and urban primary care practices reveal greater clinical autonomy for rural NPs, who were more likely to have an independent patient panel, to practice with less physician supervision, and to prescribe Schedule II controlled substances. In contrast, rural and urban NPs provided care of similar complexity. These findings provide the first claims- and EHR-based evidence for the commonly held perception that NPs practice more autonomously in rural areas than in urban areas.


JAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 321 (1) ◽  
pp. 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xue ◽  
Joyce A. Smith ◽  
Joanne Spetz

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Harry Holt

<b>Purpose</b>: This paper reviews and integrates the literature on the stigma associated with opioid use disorder (OUD) and how this acts as a barrier for patients seeking Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT). Implications for patients in rural areas who face stigma for opioid use disorder are reviewed. <b>Methods: </b>We examine the extant literature since 2007, reviewing studies focused on the stigma against patients suffering from OUD and MAT. <b>Findings</b>: The review identifies five categories of sources of stigma that research has addressed: Stigma against the patient; stigma by nurses; stigma by primary care physicians; stigma from counselors; stigma by pharmacy and dispensary staff; stigma against MAT by drug courts, stigma by family members, coworkers, and employers. <b>Conclusions</b>: Stigma exists as prejudice, negative stereotypes and associations, and labels. Despite widespread evidence supporting Methadone Maintenance Therapy (MMT) and Buprenorphine Maintenance Therapy (BMT) effectiveness, stigma abounds within the medical community and society at large. Discriminatory practices, poor relationships with dispensing staff, pharmacists, counselors, and doctors, and a feeling of being separate or “alien” from others are cited as barriers to involvement and participation in MAT. This has created disparities in health care outcomes as well as the access and availability of MAT services. Rural patients experience these sources of stigma and face a heightened barrier to access for MAT services. However, the primary care setting along with delivery of care through primary care physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners offers a means to increase care in rural areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document