scholarly journals A pilot study: lenticule quality of hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in rabbits

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhao ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Tian Han ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Xingtao Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate lenticule surface characteristics of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia correction in. Methods: The left and right eyes of 8 rabbits were divided into two groups. The right eyes were assigned to a hyperopia group, and the left eyes to a myopia group. The rabbits received SMILE procedures with +3.00 D and –3.00 D correction for the hyperopia and myopia groups, respectively. Extracted lenticules were examined via scanning electron microscopy. Lenticules from odd-numbered rabbits were accessed with the anterior surface, and lenticules from even-numbered rabbits were observed with the posterior surface. A previously established scoring system was used to evaluate lenticule surface characteristics. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the scores between the two groups. Results: All procedures were performed successfully, and the lenticules were extracted smoothly. One myopia lenticule that was facing downward was handled failed in preparation for imaging, thus 15 lenticules were ultimately graded. Twelve lenticules exhibited smooth surfaces, and regularly arranged tissue bridges were observed in almost all regions. Three lenticules exhibited a partially rough surface and irregularities affecting more than 10% of the lenticules (2 in the hyperopia group and 1 in the myopia group). There was no significant difference between the scores of the surfaces of the lenticules in the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The surface quality of lenticules after SMILE for hyperopia correction may be comparable to that of myopia lenticules. Future studies should concentrate on the clinical effect of human hyperopia lenticules.

scholarly journals A pilot study: lenticule quality of hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in rabbits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhao ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Tian Han ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Xingtao Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Surgical Manipulation ◽  
Scanning Electron

Abstract Background: To evaluate lenticule surface characteristics of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia correction in rabbits. Methods: The left and right eyes of 8 rabbits were divided into two groups. The right eyes were assigned to a hyperopia group, and the left eyes to a myopia group. The rabbits received SMILE procedures with +3.00 D and –3.00 D correction for the hyperopia and myopia groups, respectively. Extracted lenticules were examined via scanning electron microscopy. Lenticules from odd-numbered rabbits were accessed with the anterior surface, and lenticules from even-numbered rabbits were observed with the posterior surface. A previously established scoring system was used to evaluate lenticule surface characteristics. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the scores between the two groups. Results: All procedures were performed successfully, and the lenticules were extracted smoothly. One myopia lenticule that was facing downward was handled failed in preparation for imaging, thus 15 lenticules were ultimately graded. Twelve lenticules exhibited smooth surfaces, and regularly arranged tissue bridges were observed in almost all regions. Three lenticules exhibited a partially rough surface and irregularities affecting more than 10% of the lenticules (2 in the hyperopia group and 1 in the myopia group). Rough lenticules occurred in twice as many Lenticules in the hyperopia group compared to the myopia group. Conclusions: Scan quality of lenticules after SMILE for hyperopia correction is comparable to that of myopia lenticules. The shape of hyperopic lenticule may increase the difficulty of surgical manipulation and result in surface roughness.

scholarly journals A pilot study: lenticule quality of hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in rabbits

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhao ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Tian Han ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Xingtao Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Surgical Manipulation ◽  
Scanning Electron

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate lenticule surface characteristics of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia correction in rabbits. Methods: The left and right eyes of 8 rabbits were divided into two groups. The right eyes were assigned to a hyperopia group, and the left eyes to a myopia group. The rabbits received SMILE procedures with +3.00 D and –3.00 D correction for the hyperopia and myopia groups, respectively. Extracted lenticules were examined via scanning electron microscopy. Lenticules from odd-numbered rabbits were accessed with the anterior surface, and lenticules from even-numbered rabbits were observed with the posterior surface. A previously established scoring system was used to evaluate lenticule surface characteristics. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the scores between the two groups. Results: All procedures were performed successfully, and the lenticules were extracted smoothly. One myopia lenticule that was facing downward was handled failed in preparation for imaging, thus 15 lenticules were ultimately graded. Twelve lenticules exhibited smooth surfaces, and regularly arranged tissue bridges were observed in almost all regions. Three lenticules exhibited a partially rough surface and irregularities affecting more than 10% of the lenticules (2 in the hyperopia group and 1 in the myopia group). Rough lenticules occurred in twice as many Lenticules in the hyperopia group compared to the myopia group. Conclusions: Scan quality of lenticules after SMILE for hyperopia correction is comparable to that of myopia lenticules. The shape of hyperopic lenticule may increase the difficulty of surgical manipulation and result in surface roughness.

scholarly journals A pilot study: lenticule quality of hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in rabbits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhao ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Tian Han ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Xingtao Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Surgical Manipulation ◽  
Scanning Electron

Abstract Background: To evaluate lenticule surface characteristics of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia correction in rabbits.Methods: The left and right eyes of 8 rabbits were divided into two groups. The right eyes were assigned to a hyperopia group, and the left eyes to a myopia group. The rabbits received SMILE procedures with +3.00 D and –3.00 D correction for the hyperopia and myopia groups, respectively. Extracted lenticules were examined via scanning electron microscopy. Lenticules from odd-numbered rabbits were accessed with the anterior surface, and lenticules from even-numbered rabbits were observed with the posterior surface. A previously established scoring system was used to evaluate lenticule surface characteristics. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the scores between the two groups.Results: All procedures were performed successfully, and the lenticules were extracted smoothly. One myopia lenticule that was facing downward was handled failed in preparation for imaging, thus 15 lenticules were ultimately graded. Twelve lenticules exhibited smooth surfaces, and regularly arranged tissue bridges were observed in almost all regions. Three lenticules exhibited a partially rough surface and irregularities affecting more than 10% of the lenticules (2 in the hyperopia group and 1 in the myopia group). Rough lenticules occurred in twice as many Lenticules in the hyperopia group compared to the myopia group.Conclusions: Scan quality of lenticules after SMILE for hyperopia correction is comparable to that of myopia lenticules. The shape of hyperopic lenticule may increase the difficulty of surgical manipulation and result in surface roughness.

scholarly journals SMILE and Wavefront-Guided LASIK Out-Compete Other Refractive Surgeries in Ameliorating the Induction of High-Order Aberrations in Anterior Corneal Surface

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-jie Ye ◽  
Cai-yuan Liu ◽  
Rong-feng Liao ◽  
Zheng-yu Gu ◽  
Bing-ying Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spherical Aberration ◽  
Laser In Situ Keratomileusis ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Corneal Surface ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
High Order Aberrations

Purpose. To compare the change of anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration (WF-LASIK), femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Methods. In a prospective study, 82 eyes underwent LASIK, 119 eyes underwent WF-LASIK, 88 eyes underwent FS-LASIK, and 170 eyes underwent SMILE surgery. HOAs were measured with Pentacam device preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. The aberrations were described as Zernike polynomials, and analysis focused on total HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), horizontal coma, and vertical coma over 6 mm diameter central corneal zone.Results. Six months postoperatively, all procedures result in increase of anterior corneal total HOAs and SA. There were no significant differences in the induced HOAs between LASIK and FS-LASIK, while SMILE induced fewer total HOAs and SA compared with LASIK and FS-LASIK. Similarly, WF-LASIK also induced less total HOAs than LASIK and FS-LASIK, but only fewer SA than FS-LASIK (P<0.05). No significant difference could be detected in the induced total HOAs and SA between SMILE and WF-LASIK, whereas SMILE induced more horizontal coma and vertical coma compared with WF-LASIK (P<0.05).Conclusion. FS-LASIK and LASIK induced comparable anterior corneal HOAs. Compared to LASIK and FS-LASIK, both SMILE and WF-LASIK showed advantages in inducing less total HOAs. In addition, SMILE also possesses better ability to reduce the induction of SA in comparison with LASIK and FS-LASIK. However, SMILE induced more horizontal coma and vertical coma compared with WF-LASIK, indicating that the centration of SMILE procedure is probably less precise than WF-LASIK.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for high myopia: a Meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanyan Fu ◽  
Yewei Yin ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Aiqun Xiang ◽  
Ying Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Spherical Aberration ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lenticule Extraction

Abstract Background To compare postoperative clinical outcomes of high myopia after being treated by Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).Methods Comprehensive studies were conducted on the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases.Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were extracted by 2 independent authors, and the RevMan 5.3 version software were used in analyzing.Result Ten studies involving 637 patients (1093 eyes;575 eyes in the SMILE group and 518 eyes in the FS-LASIK group) were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled result revealed no significant differences in the following outcomes: the logMAR values of postoperative UDVA(WMD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02,0.00, I²=0%, P = 0.10 at postoperative 1mo; WMD =-0.01, 95% CI: -0.00 to 0.01, I²=0%,P = 0.35 at postoperative 3mo; WMD = -0.01, 95% CI:-0.02 to 0.01, I²=17%,P = 0.26 at long term), the logMAR values of postoperative CDVA(WMD = -0.02, 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.00, I²=0%, P = 0.11),and the postoperative mean refractive SE (WMD =0.02, 95% CI:0.04 to 0.08, I²=29%, P=0.60) . In the long-term observation, postoperative tHOA (WMD =-0.10, 95% CI:-0.13 to -0.07, I²=15%, P<0.00001)and postoperative spherical aberration (WMD =-0.13, 95% CI:--0.17 to -0.09, I²=38%, P<0.00001) were found to be less in the SMILE group compared with the FS-LASIK group, but no significant difference was found in postoperative coma (WMD =-0.02, 95% CI:-0.04 to 0.00, I²=98%, P=0.40).We also found greater PCE change post FS-LASIK than SMILE at long term follow-ups(WMD =-0.69, 95% CI:-1.36 to -0.01, I²=0%, P<0.05, however, there was no significant difference between the two groups at 3- or 6- months.(WMD =-0.19, 95% CI:-0.41 to 0.03, I²=31%, P=0.09;WMD =-0.20, 95% CI:-0.50 to 0.10, I²=17%, P=0.20)Conclusion For patients with high myopia, both SMILE and FS-LASIK are safe and efficacious. However, SMILE induced less tHOA and spherical aberration compared with FS-LASIK. Besides, FS-LASIK showed a greater increase in PCE than SMILE only at long term follow-ups. It remains to be seen whether the patients can get a better visual quality after SMILE and more comparative studies focused on high myopia is necessary.

Influence of age on small incision lenticule extraction outcomes

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-316865
Author(s):  
Laura Primavera ◽  
Mario Canto-Cerdan ◽  
Jorge L Alio ◽  
Jorge L Alio del Barrio
Keyword(s):  
Corneal Stroma ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Over 40 Years

PurposeTo evaluate the influence of patient’s age at the time of surgery on small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) refractive outcomes.MethodsThis is a retrospective, consecutive, comparative study. We compared the refractive outcomes after myopic SMILE from two groups of patients divided by age (patients ≤35 and ≥40 years old). All eyes were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were differences on efficacy, safety, predictability and astigmatic changes by vector analysis with ASSORT software between both study groups.Results102 matched eyes of 53 patients were included. Preoperatively, we evidenced no differences in the mean SE or astigmatism between groups. However, 6 months postoperatively we observed a significantly worse mean astigmatism (p=0.019), while not regarding SE, in the older population, with a trend towards undercorrection of the refractive cylinder in the ≥40 group. We also observed a statistically significant difference in the efficacy (0.86–1 month and 0.97–6 months in ≥40group vs 0.97–1 month and 1.07–6 months in the ≤35 group; p=0.003) and safety indexes (0.93–1 month and 1.04–6 months in ≥40 group vs 1.0–1 month and 1.11–6 months in the ≤35 group; p=0.008) at 6 months among groups.ConclusionsPost-SMILE refractive outcomes in those patients over 40 years of age, although acceptable, are not as good as those obtained in younger patients, showing a significantly lower efficacy and safety indexes, and poorer astigmatic outcomes, with a tendency towards undercorrection. We hypothetise that the increased corneal stroma stiffness in the aged group modifies the post-SMILE corneal stroma remodelling capacity, thus affecting the SMILE refractive and visual response.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Articular Eminence Inclination in Normo-Divergent Subjects with Different Skeletal Classes through CBCT

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 5992
Author(s):  
Francesco Moscagiuri ◽  
Francesco Caroccia ◽  
Chiara Lopes ◽  
Beatrice Di Carlo ◽  
Erica Di Maria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Articular Eminence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right

(1) We aimed to compare articular eminence inclination (AEI) in normo-divergent subjects (SN^GoGn = 32° ± 5°), with different anteroposterior sagittal skeletal classes through a cone beam computed generated tomography (CBCT). (2) In this cross-sectional study, CBCT records were retrospectively analysed. From the original sample of 52 CBCT records, 33 records of normo-divergent adult subjects were selected (11 Class I, 13 Class II and 9 Class III). On mid-sagittal section of the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) on both sides, AEI was calculated by graphic method. (3) The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to evaluate any difference between AEI on both left and right sides in the three groups. No statistically significant difference was observed on either the right side (p = 0.174) or the left side (p = 0.624). (4) Articular eminence inclination seems to be not related with skeletal class. Given the lack of significance in the observed differences between AEI and skeletal classes, we believe that future studies should focus on assessing possible relationships between AEI and different vertical skeletal patterns.

scholarly journals Comparison of early visual quality in patients with moderate myopia using different optical zones in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Wu ◽  
Zhenping Huang
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Night Vision ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Optical Zone ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background The early visual qualities of patients with moderate myopia were evaluated after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using different optical zones. Methods In this retrospective case study, 27 cases (51 eyes) were selected, including 10 cases in Group A (19 eyes), 6.6–6.8 mm in the optical zone, 10 cases in Group B (19 eyes), 6.4–6.5 mm in the optical zone, and 7 cases in Group C (13 eyes),6.1–6.3 mm in the optical zone. The following items were examined preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively: uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical, cylinder, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal mean curvature (CMC), total ocular aberrations (TA), total low order aberrations (tLOAs), defocus, astigmatism and total high order aberrations (tHOAs), spherical, coma, trefoil, modulation transfer function (MTF), MTFcutoff, SR, objective scatter index (OSI), point scatter function at 50 and 10% (PSF50%, PSF10%), and contrast visual acuity of 100, 20, and 9% (VA100%, VA20%, and VA9%). We compared the three groups by Kruskal-Wallis test. Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for each group before and 1 month after surgeries. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There was no significant difference in UCVA, BCVA, CCT, cylinder, and CMC in three groups preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively (P> 0.05). Comparison of the aberrations of the three groups showed statistically significant difference only in TA, tLOA, defocus, astigmatism and SA preoperatively, and trefoil 1 month postoperatively(P< 0.05). The postoperative TA, tLOAs, defocus, astigmatism and trefoil of the three groups were lower than those before surgeries (P< 0.05). The postoperative tHOAs of Group B and C was lower than those before surgeries (P< 0.05). The MTF results showed that before surgeries, there were significant differences in three groups (P< 0.05) in spatial frequencies 5~15 cycles per degree (cpd), and no differences in 20~30 cpd(P> 0.05), while no difference were observed in all spatial frequencies postoperatively (P> 0.05). Comparing the preoperative and postoperative MTF values for each group, the results showed that there was a significant difference in Group C at 5~20 cpd after surgeries(P< 0.05). There was no significant difference in MTFcutoff, SR, OSI, PSF50%, PSF10%, VA100%, VA20%, and VA9% in the three groups preoperatively (P> 0.05). One month after surgeries, higher VA9% values were measured for Group C compared to Group A and B (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in each group before and after surgeries (P> 0.05). Conclusion SMILE could improve the visual qualities of patients with moderate myopia. Reducing the surgical optical zone will only affect night vision slightly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document