Recommend-Response and Complications Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Parathyroidectomy for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Dialysis Patients
Abstract Introduction : To compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound(US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and parathyroidectomy (PTX) in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Methods In this retrospective study, we divided patients into PTX (n=53) and RFA (n=47) groups. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieved the target range of iPTH concentrations(124-558pg/mL) and the long-term prognosis. The secondary outcomes were the differences in the changes of iPTH, calcium, and phosphorus over time and the incidence of adverse events. Results There was rarely difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Primary outcomes: The iPTH concentrations of 25.8% of patients in the PTX group and 51.3% of the RFA group were within the recommended range at the endpoint (P=0.031). Survival analysis revealed that the difference in all-cause mortality and cumulative response rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P=0.902, P=0.141, respectively). Secondary outcomes: The iPTH concentrations in PTX group and RFA group dropped sharply after treatment and were 82.30±163.21pg/mL and 279.96±306.57pg/mL (P<0.001). There was no difference in the trend of iPTH, calcium, and phosphorus levels between the two groups over time(P>0.05). In addition, the incidence of infection and the hospital stay in the RFA group were significantly less. And preoperative bone-specific alkaline phosphatase concentration was a risk factor for postoperative hypocalcemia. Conclusion US-guided RFA was minimally invasive and no less than PTX in terms of cumulative response rate and complications in the treatment of severe SHPT in maintenance dialysis patients and may be used as an alternative technique to PTX, which need further studies to confirm.