scholarly journals Comparison Between Selective Caudal Fixed Screw Construct and All Variable Screw Construct in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Jun Yang ◽  
Sehan Park ◽  
Seongyun Park
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Locking Mechanism ◽  
Adjacent Disc ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Caudal Level

Abstract Objectives: This retrospective comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of selective caudal fixed screw constructs with all variable screw constructs in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: Thirty-five patients who underwent surgery using selective caudal fixed screw construct (SF group) were compared with 44 patients who underwent surgery using all variable constructs (AV group). The fusion rate, subsidence, adjacent level ossification development (ALOD), adjacent segmental disease (ASD), and plate-adjacent disc space distance were assessed.Results: The one-year fusion rates assessed by computed tomography bone bridging and interspinous motion as well as the significant subsidence rate did not differ significantly between the AV and SF groups. The ALOD and ASD rates and plate-adjacent disc space distances did not significantly differ between the two groups at both the cranial and caudal adjacent levels. The number of operated levels was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis in the logistic regression analysis.Conclusion: The stability provided by the locking mechanism of the fixed screw did not lead to an increased fusion rate at the caudal level. Therefore, the screw type should be selected based on individual patient’s anatomy and surgeon’s experience without concern for increased complications caused by screw type.

scholarly journals Comparison between selective caudal fixed screw construct and all variable screw construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Jun Yang ◽  
Sehan Park ◽  
Seongyun Park
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Locking Mechanism ◽  
Adjacent Disc ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Caudal Level

AbstractThis retrospective comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of selective caudal fixed screw constructs with all variable screw constructs in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Thirty-five patients who underwent surgery using selective caudal fixed screw construct (SF group) were compared with 44 patients who underwent surgery using all variable constructs (AV group). The fusion rate, subsidence, adjacent level ossification development (ALOD), adjacent segmental disease (ASD), and plate-adjacent disc space distance were assessed. The one-year fusion rates assessed by computed tomography bone bridging and interspinous motion as well as the significant subsidence rate did not differ significantly between the AV and SF groups. The ALOD and ASD rates and plate-adjacent disc space distances did not significantly differ between the two groups at both the cranial and caudal adjacent levels. The number of operated levels was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis in the logistic regression analysis. The stability provided by the locking mechanism of the fixed screw did not lead to an increased fusion rate at the caudal level. Therefore, the screw type should be selected based on individual patient’s anatomy and surgeon’s experience without concern for increased complications caused by screw type.

A unique device, the disc space–fitted distraction device, for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: early clinical and radiological evaluation

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Tani ◽  
Hiroyasu Nagashima ◽  
Akira Isoshima ◽  
Masahiko Akiyama ◽  
Hiroki Ohashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Spinal Curvature ◽  
Radiological Evaluation ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Distraction Device ◽  
Adjacent Disc ◽  
Curvature Index

Object To perform interbody distraction and to obtain spinal curvature correction during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the authors recently adopted a new stand-alone device, a disc space–fitted distraction device (DFDD). In this preliminary report the authors introduce this unique device and discuss some advantages in terms of short-term clinical and radiological evaluations. Methods The most unique aspect of the DFDD is the function of gentle distraction at anterior disc space with maximum lordotic correction of up to 8° while rotating a screw at the front of the device. Additional advantages are related to its configuration such as disc space–matched shape in all dimensions, tapering contour for easy insertion into the disc space, multiple spikes to avoid dislodgment, wider contact area to the vertebral endplate for diminishing sinking process, and sufficient space for accommodation of bone-conductive materials. Twenty-four patients who have been observed more than 12 months after ACDF were involved in this evaluation. Results The objective clinical outcome, measured by the Neurological Cervical Spine Scale, was significantly improved. In radiological evaluation, statistically significant improvement compared with preoperative values was noted on the curvature index, C2–7 curvature, and disc angle (p < 0.01) throughout the entire postoperative period, up to 12 months. A high fusion rate and remodeling process around the implants were also observed. Conclusions The DFDD may have some advantages over other devices—its distraction action, diminished sinking, and early solid bone union resulted in maintaining sufficient correction of the spinal curvature. This corrected spinal curvature may play an important role in preventing progressive adjacent-disc degeneration subsequent to ACDF in the long term.

Does smoking have an impact on fusion rate in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and rigid plate fixation?

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 527-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles Luszczyk ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Jeffrey S. Fischgrund ◽  
Steven C. Ludwig ◽  
Rick C. Sasso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Solid Fusion ◽  
Cervical Plate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Plate

Object Although smoking has been shown to negatively affect fusion rates in patients undergoing multilevel fusions of the cervical and lumbar spine, the effect of smoking on fusion rates in patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft and plate fixation has yet to be thoroughly investigated. The objective of the present study was to address the effect of smoking on fusion rates in patients undergoing a 1-level ACDF with allograft and a locked anterior cervical plate. Methods This study is composed of patients from the control groups of 5 separate studies evaluating the use of an anterior cervical disc replacement to treat cervical radiculopathy. For each of the 5 studies the control group consisted of patients who underwent a 1-level ACDF with allograft and a locked cervical plate. The authors of the present study reviewed data obtained in a total of 573 patients; 156 patients were smokers and 417 were nonsmokers. A minimum follow-up period of 24 months was required for inclusion in this study. Fusion status was assessed by independent observers using lateral, neutral, and flexion/extension radiographs. Results An overall fusion rate of 91.4% was achieved in all 573 patients. A solid fusion was shown in 382 patients (91.6%) who were nonsmokers. Among patients who were smokers, 142 (91.0%) had radiographic evidence of a solid fusion. A 2-tailed Fisher exact test revealed a p value of 0.867, indicating no difference in the union rates between smokers and nonsmokers. Conclusions The authors found no statistically significant difference in fusion status between smokers and nonsmokers who underwent a single-level ACDF with allograft and a locked anterior cervical plate. Although the authors do not promote tobacco use, it appears that the use of allograft with a locked cervical plate in single-level ACDF among smokers produces similar fusion rates as it does in their nonsmoking counterparts.

scholarly journals Partial uncinatectomy combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of one-level cervical radiculopathy: analysis of clinical efficacy and sagittal alignment

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haimiti Abudouaini ◽  
Tingkui Wu ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Beiyu Wang ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Uncinate Process ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Uncovertebral Joint

Abstract Background Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that uncovertebral joint contributes to segment mobility and stability to a certain extent. Simultaneously, osteophytes arising from the uncinate process are a common cause of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). For such patients, partial uncinatectomy (UT) may be required. However, the clinical efficacy and sagittal alignment of partial UT during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) have not been fully elucidated. Methods A total of 87 patients who had undergone single level ACDF using a zero-profile device from July 2014 to December 2018 were included. Based on whether the foraminal part of the uncovertebral joint was resected or preserved, the patients were divided into the ACDF with UT group (n = 37) and the ACDF without UT group (n = 50). Perioperative data, radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The mean follow-up was 16.86 ± 5.63 and 18.36 ± 7.51 months in the ACDF with UT group and ACDF without UT group, respectively (p > 0.05). The average preoperative VAS arm score was 5.89 ± 1.00 in the ACDF with UT group and 5.18 ± 1.21 in the ACDF without UT group (p = 0.038). However, the average VAS arm score was 4.22 ± 0.64, 4.06 ± 1.13 and 1.68 ± 0.71, 1.60 ± 0.70 at 1 week post operation and at final follow up, respectively, (p > 0.05). We also found that the C2-7 SVA and St-SVA at the last follow-up and their change (last follow-up value − preoperative value) in the ACDF with UT group were significantly higher than ACDF without UT group (p < 0.05). No marked differences in the other cervical sagittal parameters, fusion rate or complications, including dysphagia, ASD, and subsidence, were observed. Conclusions Our result indicates that ACDF using a zero-p implant with or without partial UT both provide satisfactory clinical efficacy and acceptable safety. However, additional partial UT may has a negative effect on cervical sagittal alignment.

Albert Dereymaeker and Joseph Cyriel Mulier’s description of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in 1955

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald H. M. A. Bartels ◽  
Jan Goffin
Keyword(s):  
French Literature ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Subsequent Paper ◽  
Intervertebral Disc Space ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Iliac Crest Graft ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Time Period

Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) is a very well-known and often-performed procedure in the practice of spine surgeons. The earliest descriptions of the technique have always been attributed to Cloward, Smith, and Robinson. However, in the French literature, this procedure was also described by others during the exact same time period (in the 1950s).At a meeting in Paris in 1955, Belgians Albert Dereymaeker and Joseph Cyriel Mulier, a neurosurgeon and an orthopedic surgeon, respectively, described the technique that involved an anterior cervical discectomy and the placement of an iliac crest graft in the intervertebral disc space. In 1956, a summary of their oral presentation was published, and a subsequent paper—an illustrated description of the technique and the details of a larger case series with a 3.5-year follow-up period—followed in 1958.The list of authors who first described ACDF should be completed by adding Dereymaeker’s and Mulier’s names. They made an important contribution to the practice of spinal surgery that was not generally known because they published in French.

scholarly journals Risk factor analysis of axial symptoms after single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective study of 113 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 6100-6108
Author(s):  
Lin-Feng Wang ◽  
Zhen Dong ◽  
De-Chao Miao ◽  
Yong Shen ◽  
Feng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Axial Symptoms

Objective This retrospective study was performed to investigate the risk factors for axial symptoms (AS) after single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods One hundred thirteen patients with cervical spondylosis who had undergone single-segment ACDF from January 2012 to December 2015 were divided into those with and without AS (n = 34 and n = 79, respectively). Clinical data and radiological evaluation results were recorded. Results The occurrence rate of AS was 30.1% (34/113), and the average visual analog scale score was 4.5 points. Bony fusion was achieved in all cases during follow-up. There were no differences in age, sex, disease duration, diagnostic categories, operative segment, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, or adjacent segment degeneration. However, cervical range of motion (CROM), cervical curvature, and disc space enlargement significantly differed between the groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that CROM, cervical curvature, and disc space enlargement were independently associated with AS. Conclusions AS after single-segment ACDF is not rare. Disc space enlargement is a risk factor for AS, while higher CROM and lordotic cervical curvature are protective factors. Excessive or insufficient disc space enlargement could increase the incidence of AS. Maintaining CROM within the normal range and restoring cervical lordosis might help to prevent AS.

scholarly journals Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone cages in the management of single and double level cervical spondylotic myelopathy-our experiences of 80 cases

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-34
Author(s):  
Md Anowarul Islam ◽  
Mohd Alamgir Hossain ◽  
Ahmed Asif Iqbal ◽  
Md Qumruzzaman Parvez ◽  
Md Ahsanuzzaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Medical University

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) is challenging with respect to both patient selection and choice of surgical procedure.Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with an artificial cage made of polyetheretherketoneMaterials & Methods: From January 2012 to January 2017, 80 consecutive patients referred to the Department of spine surgery, Bangabandhu Shekh Mujib Medical University were recruited for the study. Postoperative Clinical outcome assessed with Nurick scale for myelopathy, Odom's criteria for functional outcome and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for both neck and arm pain. Radiological fusion was assessed by X-ray. Operative complications were reported.Results: 36 patients were operated for one level discectomy and fusion with PEEK cages and 44 patients for two levels. There were 48 (60%) males and 32 (40%) females. The age of the patients ranged from 30-72 years, a mean ± SD 45 ± 8.34. At the 2 years clinical follow-up, there were significant post operative improvements of Nurick scale, and VAS comparative to preoperative record. According to Odom's criteria, 72/80 patients (90%) were graded excellent-good.Conclusion: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage is an effective treatment of cervical myelopathy having higher fusion rate and lack of donor site morbidity.KYAMC Journal Vol. 9, No.-1, April 2018, Page 32-34

scholarly journals Fivefold higher rate of pseudarthrosis with polyetheretherketone interbody device than with structural allograft used for 1-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie L. Krause ◽  
James T. Obayashi ◽  
Kelly J. Bridges ◽  
Ahmed M. Raslan ◽  
Khoi D. Than
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Bone Growth ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Structural Allograft ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVECommon interbody graft options for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) include structural allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). PEEK has gained popularity due to its radiolucency and its elastic modulus, which is similar to that of bone. The authors sought to compare the rates of pseudarthrosis, a lack of solid bone growth across the disc space, and the need for revision surgery with the use of grafts made of allogenic bone versus PEEK.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed 127 cases in which patients had undergone a 1-level ACDF followed by at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up. Data on age, sex, body mass index, tobacco use, pseudarthrosis, and the reoperation rate for pseudarthrosis were collected. These data were analyzed by performing a Pearson’s chi-square test.RESULTSOf 127 patients, 56 had received PEEK implants and 71 had received allografts. Forty-six of the PEEK implants (82%) were stand-alone devices. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups with respect to patient age, sex, or body mass index. Twenty-nine (52%) of 56 patients with PEEK implants demonstrated radiographic evidence of pseudarthrosis, compared to 7 (10%) of 71 patients with structural allografts (p < 0.001, OR 9.82; 95% CI 3.836–25.139). Seven patients with PEEK implants required reoperation for pseudarthrosis, compared to 1 patient with an allograft (p = 0.01, OR 10.00; 95% CI 1.192–83.884). There was no significant difference in tobacco use between the PEEK and allograft groups (p = 0.586).CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study demonstrate that the use of PEEK devices in 1-level ACDF is associated with a significantly higher rate of radiographically demonstrated pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery compared with the use of allografts. Surgeons should be aware of this when deciding on interbody graft options, and reimbursement policies should reflect these discrepancies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document