scholarly journals Achieving objective response in treatment of non-resectable neuroendocrine tumors does not predict longer time to progression compared to achieving stable disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Espen Thiis-Evensen ◽  
Amalie Christine Poole ◽  
Hong-Thien Thi Nguyen ◽  
Jon Sponheim
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Tumor Load

Abstract Background: There are several treatment modalities for unresectable neuroendocrine tumors. Traditionally, the aim of these treatments has been to reduce the tumor load; referred to as objective response (OR). Less emphasis has been put on inducing the tumors to stop growing without a reduction in total tumor load; termed as stable disease (SD). We wanted to investigate whether achieving OR compared to obtaining SD predicted a longer time to progression (TTP) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (WHO Grade 1 and 2) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy. Methods : Patients treated with either peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177 Lutetium-DOTA-octreotate, the chemotherapy combination streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil or everolimus were retrospectively assessed to evaluate the effect of the treatments on disease progression. We analyzed the TTP for patients for each treatment modality and compared the TTP between those who achieved OR and those who achieved SD. Results: Altogether 56 patients treated with PRRT, 32 treated with streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil and 52 treated with everolimus were included in the analyses. The median TTP for those treated with PRRT and achieving OR was 31 months, the TTP for those achieving SD was 43 months (p=0,2). For patients treated with streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil the results were: OR: 18 months, SD: 23 months (p=0,9) and for those treated with everolimus; OR: 9 months, SD: 20 months (p=0,5), respectively. We found no differences between patients achieving OR compared to SD regarding age, sex, stage, primary tumor location, Ki-67% or ongoing treatment with somatostatinanalogues. Conclusions: We found no treatment benefit with regard to TTP for our patients that experienced OR compared to those who achieved SD, but a trend toward longer TTP among patients with SD.

scholarly journals Achieving objective response in treatment of non-resectable neuroendocrine tumors does not predict longer time to progression compared to achieving stable disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Espen Thiis-Evensen ◽  
Amalie Christine Poole ◽  
Hong-Thien Thi Nguyen ◽  
Jon Sponheim
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Tumor Load

Abstract Background: There are several treatment modalities for unresectable neuroendocrine tumors. Traditionally, the aim of these treatments has been to reduce the tumor load; referred to as objective response (OR). Less emphasis has been put on inducing the tumors to stop growing without a reduction in total tumor load; termed as stable disease (SD). We wanted to investigate whether achieving OR compared to obtaining SD predicted a longer time to progression (TTP) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (WHO Grade 1 and 2) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy. Methods : Patients treated with either peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177 Lutetium-DOTA-octreotate, the chemotherapy combination streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil or everolimus were retrospectively assessed to evaluate the effect of the treatments on disease progression. We analyzed the TTP for patients for each treatment modality and compared the TTP between those who achieved OR and those who achieved SD. Results: Altogether 56 patients treated with PRRT, 32 treated with streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil and 52 treated with everolimus were included in the analyses. The median TTP for those treated with PRRT and achieving OR was 31 months, the TTP for those achieving SD was 43 months (p=0,2). For patients treated with streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil the results were: OR: 18 months, SD: 23 months (p=0,9) and for those treated with everolimus; OR: 9 months, SD: 20 months (p=0,5), respectively. We found no differences between patients achieving OR compared to SD regarding age, sex, stage, primary tumor location, Ki-67% or ongoing treatment with somatostatinanalogues. Conclusions: We found no treatment benefit with regard to TTP for our patients that experienced OR compared to those who achieved SD, but a trend toward longer TTP among patients with SD.

scholarly journals Indications of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Gastroenteropancreatic and Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Updated Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1267
Author(s):  
Baptiste Camus ◽  
Anne-Ségolène Cottereau ◽  
Lola-Jade Palmieri ◽  
Solène Dermine ◽  
Florence Tenenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Double Dose ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Phase Iii Study

Radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumors is a form of systemic radiotherapy that allows the administration of targeted radionuclides into tumor cells that express a large quantity of somatostatin receptors. The two most commonly used radio-peptides for radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors are 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE. Radio-peptides have been used for several years in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, the randomized Phase III study NETTER-1 compared177Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose (double-dose) octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors, and demonstrated its efficacy in this setting. Strong signals in favor of efficiency seem to exist for other tumors, in particular for pancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. This focus on radionuclide therapy in gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors addresses the treatment modalities, the validated and potential indications, and the safety of the therapy.

scholarly journals GEP–NETs UPDATE: Radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors

2015 ◽  
Vol 172 (1) ◽  
pp. R1-R8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter A van der Zwan ◽  
Lisa Bodei ◽  
Jan Mueller-Brand ◽  
Wouter W de Herder ◽  
Larry K Kvols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) patients. Most studies report objective response rates in 15–35% of patients. Also, outcome in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival compares very favorably with that for somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, or new, ‘targeted’ therapies. They also compare favorably to PFS data for liver-directed therapies. Two decades after the introduction of PRRT, there is a growing need for randomized controlled trials comparing PRRT to ‘standard’ treatment, that is treatment with agents that have proven benefit when tested in randomized trials. Combining PRRT with liver-directed therapies or with targeted therapies could improve treatment results. The question to be answered, however, is whether a combination of therapies performed within a limited time-span from one another results in a better PFS than a strategy in which other therapies are reserved until after (renewed) tumor progression. Randomized clinical trials comparing PRRT with other treatment modalities should be undertaken to determine the best treatment options and treatment sequelae for patients with GEPNETs.

Single institution experience with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 623-623
Author(s):  
Heying Duan ◽  
Gaia Ninatti ◽  
Bradley Girod ◽  
Valentina Ferri ◽  
Pamela L. Kunz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Low Toxicity

623 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare but increasing in incidence. The only curative treatment is surgery, which in many cases is not an option due to metastatic disease at diagnosis. The NETTER-1 study showed high efficacy and low toxicity of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for midgut NETs. Here, we present our initial experience with PRRT in the treatment of patients with NET. Methods: Fifty-two patients (27 males and 25 females; 37 - 81 yo, mean ± SD: 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with documented progressive NET (25 pancreas, 17 small intestine, 1 coecum, 4 unknown primary, 3 paragangliomas, and 2 pheochromocytomas) were referred to undergo PRRT at our institution from July 2018 to September 2019. Laboratory tests were obtained at baseline, 1 week before each cycle and every 3 months following treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and toxicity were assessed. An interim overall survival (OS) analysis was performed. Results, when possible, were compared with the NETTER-1 trial. Lines of therapy were documented. Results: 22/52 (42%) patients completed all 4 cycles of PRRT. 18/52 (34%) patients are currently being treated. 12/52 (23%) patients had to discontinue treatment. Hematotoxicity was the only side effect which can be related to PRRT. The 6-month and 9-month PFS rate was 82.4% and 66.8% respectively vs. 89% and 84% in the NETTER-1 trial. The ORR was 36% vs. 18% in the NETTER-1 trial. In the interim OS analysis, 6 deaths occurred. In contrast to the NETTER-1 study, PRRT in our patient cohort was performed later in the course of treatment (median lines of therapy before PRRT = 4 ±1.3 (range 1-6)). Conclusions: Our preliminary data show overall good results of PRRT in patients with NETs. However, compared to the NETTER-1 trial, PFS is shorter which is most likely due to the extensive pretreatment, but ORR was higher. [Table: see text]

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahad Alsadik ◽  
Siraj Yusuf ◽  
Adil AL-Nahhas
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

Background: The incidence of pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs) has increased considerably in the last few decades. The characteristic features of this tumour and the development of new investigative and therapeutic methods had a great impact on its management. Objective: The aim of this review is to investigate the outcome of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Methods: A comprehensive literature search strategy was used based on two databases (SCOPUS, and PubMed). We considered all studies published in English, evaluating the use of PRRT (177Luteciuim- DOTA-conjugated peptides and 90Yetrium- DOTA- conjugated peptides) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours as a standalone entity or as a subgroup within the wider category of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP NETs). Results: PRRT was found to be an effective treatment modality as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in the treatment of non-operable and metastatic pNETs where other options are limited. Complete response was reported to be between 2-6% while partial response was achieved in up to 60% of cases. Survival analysis was also impressive. Progression Free Survival (PFS) reached a mean of 34 months and Overall Survival (OS) of 53 months. PRRT also proved to improve patients’ Quality of Life (QoL). Acute and sub-acute side effects like nephrotoxicity and haematotoxicity are usually mild and reversible. Conclusion: PRRT is well tolerated and effective treatment option for non-operable and/or metastatic pNETs. Side effects are usually mild and reversible. Larger randomized controlled trails need to be done to compare PRRT with other treatment modalities and to provide more detailed guidelines regarding patient selections, the choice of PRRT, follow up and response assessment to maximum potential benefit.

scholarly journals Predictive and Prognostic Impact of Blood-Based Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Commencing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Fiona Ohlendorf ◽  
Rudolf Werner ◽  
Christoph Henkenberens ◽  
Tobias Ross ◽  
Hans Christiansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Response ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Inflammatory Biomarkers ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Peptide Receptor

Tumor microenvironment inflammation contributes to the proliferation and survival of malignant cells, angiogenesis, metastasis, subversion of adaptive immunity, and reduced treatment response. We aimed to evaluate the early predictive and prognostic significance of markers of systemic inflammation in patients receiving somatostatin-receptor targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This retrospective observational cohort study included 33 patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with PRRT. Pretreatment blood-based inflammatory biomarkers, e.g., Creactive protein levels (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), were documented and inflammation indexes, e.g., neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet × CRP multiplier (PCM), were calculated. Tumor burden was determined using [68Ga]GaDOTATATE PET/CT before enrollment and every 2 cycles thereafter until progression. Therapy response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, including its volumetric modification. Inflammatory biomarkers and inflammatory indexes demonstrated marked heterogeneity among patients, and were significantly higher in non-responders (e.g., CRP (P < 0.001), ANC (P = 0.002), and PCM (P < 0.001)). Change in whole-body tumor burden after two cycles of PRRT was significantly associated with CRP (P = 0.0157) and NLR (P = 0.0040) in multivariate regression analysis. A cut-off of 2.5 mg/L for CRP (AUC = 0.84, P = 0.001) revealed a significant outcome difference between patients with adversely high vs. low CRP (median PFS 508 days vs. not yet reached (HR = 4.52; 95% CI, 1.27 to 16.18; P = 0.02)). Tumor-driven systemic inflammatory networks may be associated with treatment response, change in tumor burden, and prognosis in patients with GEPNETs receiving PRRT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document