scholarly journals Efficacy of lower dose Pirfenidone for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in real practice: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeontaek Hwang ◽  
Jung-Kyu Lee ◽  
Sun Mi Choi ◽  
Yeon Joo Lee ◽  
Young-Jae Cho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pirfenidone slows the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone by dose and disease severity in real-world patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Methods This multi-centre retrospective cohort study investigated 338 patients treated with pirfenidone between July 2012 and March 2018. Demographics, pulmonary function, mortality, and pirfenidone-related adverse events were recorded. Efficacy was analysed according to pirfenidone dose and disease severity using linear mixed-effects models to assess the annual decline rate of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity (DL CO ) of the lungs for carbon monoxide.Results The mean %FVC predicted and %DL COpredicted were 72.6±13.1% and 61.4±17.9%, respectively. Pirfenidone treatment lasted 16.1±9.0 months. In the standard-dose (1800 mg/day) group, the mean %FVC predicted was -6.56% (95% CI -9.26, -3.87) per year pre-pirfenidone treatment, but -4.43% (95% CI -5.87, -3.00) per year post-treatment. In the lower-dose group, the mean %FVC predicted was -4.96% (95% CI -6.82, -3.09) per year pre-pirfenidone treatment, but -1.79% (95% CI -2.75, -0.83) per year post-treatment. The FVC decline rate was significantly reduced regardless of GAP stage. However, the DL CO decline rate was significantly reduced in the GAP stage II–III group, but not stage I group. Adverse events and mortality were similar across dose groups, but were more frequent in the GAP stage II–III group than in the stage I group.Conclusions The effect of pirfenidone on reducing disease progression persisted even with a consistent lower dose of pirfenidone.Trial registration Retrospectively registered

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzo Suzuki ◽  
Kazutaka Mori ◽  
Yuya Aono ◽  
Masato Kono ◽  
Hirotsugu Hasegawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Currently, there are two antifibrotics used to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): pirfenidone and nintedanib. Antifibrotics slow disease progression by reducing the annual decline of forced vital capacity (FVC), which possibly improves outcomes in IPF patients. During treatment, patients occasionally switch antifibrotic treatments. However, prognostic implication of changing antifibrotics has not yet been evaluated. Methods This multi-center retrospective cohort study examined 262 consecutive IPF patients who received antifibrotic therapy. Antifibrotic agents were switched in 37 patients (14.1%). The prognoses were compared between the patient cohort that switched antifibrotics (Switch-IPF) and those without (Non-Switch-IPF) using propensity-score matched analyses. Results The median period between the initiation of antifibrotic therapy and the drug switch was 25.8 (12.7–35.3) months. The most common reasons for the switch were disease progression (n = 17) followed by gastrointestinal disorders (n = 12). Of the 37 patients that switched antifibrotics, only eight patients disrupted switched antifibrotics by their adverse reactions. The overall prognosis of the Switch-IPF cohort was significantly better than the Non-Switch-IPF cohort (median periods: 67.2 vs. 27.1 months, p < 0.0001). In propensity-score matched analyses that were adjusted to age, sex, FVC (%), history of acute exacerbation, and usage of long-term oxygen therapy, the Switch-IPF cohort had significantly longer survival times than the Non-Switch-IPF group (median 67.2 vs. 41.3 months, p = 0.0219). The second-line antifibrotic therapy showed similar survival probabilities than those in first-line antifibrotic therapy in multistate model analyses. Conclusion Switching antifibrotics is feasible and may improve prognosis in patients with IPF. A further prospective study will be required to confirm clinical implication of switching the antifibrotics.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiaan Tuyls ◽  
Stijn E. Verleden ◽  
Wim A. Wuyts ◽  
Jonas Yserbyt ◽  
Robin Vos ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Raimundo ◽  
Eunice Chang ◽  
Michael S. Broder ◽  
Kimberly Alexander ◽  
James Zazzali ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 655.1-655
Author(s):  
J. Rakholiya ◽  
M. Koster ◽  
H. Langenfeld ◽  
C. S. Crowson ◽  
A. Abril ◽  
...  

Background:Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory condition of medium- and large-sized arteries. Prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for treatment of patients with GCA (1). However, there is a limited data on the use of TCZ in routine clinical practice.Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCZ in a retrospective cohort study of patients with GCA treated with TCZ.Methods:Patients with GCA treated with TCZ at 4 clinical centers of a single tertiary care institution (2000-2020) were identified. The diagnosis of GCA was confirmed by at least one of the following modalities: 1. Arterial biopsy 2. Large vessel imaging 3. Clinical diagnosis of GCA meeting ACR classification criteria and established by a rheumatologist. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory studies, treatment course and adverse events were abstracted from the medical record; only patients with at least 6 months of follow-up after TCZ initiation were included. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate time to TCZ discontinuation and time to first relapse after TCZ discontinuation. Poisson regression models were used to compare relapse rates before and after TCZ initiation.Results:The study cohort included 119 patients [61% female; mean (SD) age at GCA diagnosis 70.3 (8.2) years]. The majority of patients (89%) had a biopsy-proven and/or imaging-based diagnosis of GCA, while 13 (11%) had a clinical diagnosis of GCA. In addition to glucocorticoids, 40 (34%) patients received other immunosuppressive agents prior to TCZ. The method of initial TCZ administration was subcutaneous (162mg/ml) weekly in 48 (41%), subcutaneous every other week in 20 (17%), monthly 4mg/kg infusions in 34 (29%), monthly 8mg/kg infusions in 14 (12%) and non-standard dosing in 3 remaining patients. The median (IQR) duration from GCA diagnosis to TCZ initiation was 4.8 (1.2-22.0) months and the median (IQR) duration of TCZ treatment was 18 (11-28) months. The mean (SD) dose of prednisone at TCZ initiation was 31 (19) mg/day and was reduced to a mean (SD) dose of 3.9 (6.7) mg/day at TCZ discontinuation/last follow-up visit. The relapse rate per year decreased 43% from 0.77 to 0.44 after the initiation of TCZ (RR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.44-0.75; p<0.001). The mean (SD) ESR and CRP decreased from 22 (20) mm/hour to 6 (9.2) mm/hour and from 19.1 (25) mg/L to 5.4 (16.6) mg/L, respectively from TCZ initiation to TCZ discontinuation/last follow-up visit. At 2 years of follow-up, 67% of patients had discontinued glucocorticoids. At last follow up, 46 patients had discontinued TCZ, only 14 of which were due to adverse events. The median time to TCZ discontinuation was 2.9 years. Only 17% (95%CI: 10-24%) had discontinued by 1 year after TCZ initiation and 38% (95% CI: 26-47%) had discontinued by 2 years. The most common adverse events were infections and cytopenias. While on TCZ, 1 patient developed new onset vision loss related to GCA and 1 patient, without history of diverticulitis, had bowel perforation. Among those discontinuing TCZ, 61% had relapsed at least once by 1 year after TCZ discontinuation.Conclusion:In this large single institution cohort of patients with GCA, TCZ use resulted in a significantly reduced relapse rate and reduction in glucocorticoid dosage. Overall, patients tolerated long-term use with only 12% discontinuing due to adverse events. However, over half of patients stopping TCZ had a subsequent flare; highlighting ongoing use may be required beyond two years in several patients with GCA to maintain remission.References:[1]Stone JH, et al. Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849. PMID: 28745999.[2]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis. Observational, open-label multicenter study of 134 patients in clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Aug;49(1):126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 5. PMID: 30655091.Disclosure of Interests:Jigisha Rakholiya: None declared, Matthew Koster: None declared, Hannah Langenfeld: None declared, Cynthia S. Crowson: None declared, Andy Abril: None declared, Pankaj Bansal: None declared, Lester Mertz: None declared, Alicia Rodriguez-Pla: None declared, Rahul Sehgal: None declared, Benjamin Wang: None declared, Kenneth J Warrington Grant/research support from: Research support: Kiniksa, Eli Lilly


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavo Marijic ◽  
Larissa Schwarzkopf ◽  
Lars Schwettmann ◽  
Thomas Ruhnke ◽  
Franziska Trudzinski ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aimed to compare pirfenidone and nintedanib-treated patients regarding all-cause mortality, all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalizations, and overall as well as respiratory-related health care costs borne by the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). Methods A retrospective cohort study with SHI data was performed, including IPF patients treated either with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to adjust for observed covariates. Weighted Cox models were estimated to analyze mortality and hospitalization. Weighted cost differences with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied for cost analysis. Results We compared 840 patients treated with pirfenidone and 713 patients treated with nintedanib. Both groups were similar regarding two-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.76; 1.07), one-year all cause (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95; 1.25) and respiratory-related hospitalization (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.72; 1.08). No significant differences were observed regarding total (€− 807, 95% CI: €− 2977; €1220) and respiratory-related (€− 1282, 95% CI: €− 3423; €534) costs. Conclusion Our analyses suggest that the patient-related outcomes mortality, hospitalization, and costs do not differ between the two currently available antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib. Hence, the decision on treatment with pirfenidone versus treatment with nintedanib ought to be made case-by-case taking clinical characteristics, comorbidities, comedications, individual risk of side effects, and patients’ preferences into account.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stijn E Verleden ◽  
Naoya Tanabe ◽  
John E McDonough ◽  
Dragoş M Vasilescu ◽  
Feng Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document