scholarly journals Changes in Prenatal Depression and Anxiety Levels in Low Risk Pregnancy Among Iranian Women: A Prospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraf Kazemi ◽  
Aazam Dadkhah
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Health ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Low Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Anxiety Levels ◽  
A Prospective Study

Abstract Background There is limited information on the changes in uncomplicated pregnancies. Therefore, in the present study, the changes of depression and anxiety changes in uncomplicated pregnancies during the prenatal period was evaluated.Method This longitudinal study was performed on 256 pregnant women at the beginning of the first trimester of pregnancy. Inclusion criteria included the absence of pre-pregnancy depression and anxiety and poor pregnancy history. Exclusion criteria were the incidence of pregnancy complications. The level of their depression and anxiety at the time of entering the study were completed by self-report using the DASS questionnaire at 9–10, 11–12, 24–25, and 33–35 weeks of pregnancy.Results The results of the study indicated the effect of time on the level of perinatal depression and anxiety (p < 0.001). These findings showed that the level of depression increased significantly from 9 to 24 weeks of pregnancy and decreased in the 32–34 weeks, but did not reach the level of depression at 9 weeks of pregnancy. Also, the anxiety level increased significantly from the onset of pregnancy to the 24 weeks gestation but did not change during the second and third trimesters. The findings of the study showed that depression and anxiety levels in each of the pregnancy termites were related to its level in the previous trimesters.Conclusion The results of the study showed that the level of depression and anxiety of women in uncomplicated pregnancies also increases. Therefore, psychological health screenings in the second trimester of pregnancy should be performed in these women.

scholarly journals Adequacy and Sources of Protein Intake among Pregnant Women in the United States, NHANES 2003–2012

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 795
Author(s):  
Mary M. Murphy ◽  
Kelly A. Higgins ◽  
Xiaoyu Bi ◽  
Leila M. Barraj
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
The United States ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Health And Nutrition ◽  
Animal Source ◽  
Usual Intake ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Using Data

Limited information is available on protein intake and adequacy of protein intake among pregnant women. Using data from a sample of 528 pregnant women in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2003–2012, usual intake of protein (g/day and g/kg body weight (bw)/day) and prevalence of intake below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) by trimester of pregnancy were calculated using the National Cancer Institute method. Percent contributions to protein intake by source (i.e., plant and animal, including type of animal source) were also calculated. Mean usual intake of protein was 88 ± 4.3, 82 ± 3.1, and 82 ± 2.9 g/day among women in trimester 1, 2, and 3 of pregnancy, respectively, or 1.30 ± 0.10, 1.35 ± 0.06, and 1.35 ± 0.05 g/kg bw/day, respectively. An estimated 4.5% of women in the first trimester of pregnancy consumed less protein than the EAR of 0.66 g/kg bw/day; among women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, 12.1% and 12.8% of women, respectively, consumed less protein than the EAR of 0.88 g/kg bw/day. Animal sources of protein accounted for approximately 66% of total protein. Findings from this study show that one in eight women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy have inadequate intake of protein. Pregnant women should be encouraged to consume sufficient levels of protein from a variety of sources.

284: Starting aspirin (ASA) in the first trimester (T1) promotes placental invasion in low-risk pregnancy

2014 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. S149-S150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozhan Turan ◽  
Dana Block-Abraham ◽  
Lauren Doyle ◽  
Jerome Kopelman ◽  
Robert Atlas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
First Trimester ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Low Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Placental Invasion

First trimester erythropoietin (EPO) serum concentration as a potential marker for abnormal placentation disorders. Reference values for erythropoietin (EPO) concentration at 11–13+6 weeks of gestation

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemysław Kosiński ◽  
Dorota A. Bomba-Opoń ◽  
Mirosław Wielgoś
Keyword(s):  
Serum Concentration ◽  
Intrauterine Growth Restriction ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Abnormal Placentation ◽  
Intrauterine Growth ◽  
Potential Marker ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
And Control

AbstractTo investigate the possible effect of abnormal placentation disorders such as preeclampsia (PE), pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) on erythropoietin (EPO) serum concentration in women in the first trimester of pregnancy.A prospective study was performed in a group of pregnant women between 11 and 13A group of 198 analyzed patients was divided into three groups depending on pregnancy outcome: abnormal placentation group (n=30), macrosomia (n=13) and control group (n=155). EPO concentrations between the three groups of patients revealed that they differ significantly (F=15.172, P<0.001). EPO concentration is significantly higher in abnormal placentation patients compared to the control group (P<0.001) and macrosomia group (P=0.004). The most significant increase in EPO concentration was detected within patients with PIH. Also the uterine artery pulsatility index was positively correlated with EPO concentration (P<0.01).First-trimester maternal EPO concentration might be considered as a possible marker of abnormal placentation disorders and should be given more attention in future prospective studies.

The Accuracy of Single Progesterone, Single β-hCG, and Their Combination Measurement in Predicting Early Miscarriage: A Prospective Study in Outpatient Setting

KnE Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Sia
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Good Predictor ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Β Hcg ◽  
A Prospective Study

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Most of miscarriage events occurred during the first trimester of pregnancy. Recent studies found the beneficial effects of maternal serum markers to predict pregnancy outcomes. However, study in Indonesian setting was still limited, especially in outpatient setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum progesterone and β-hCG measurement  as a beneficial predictor of miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Materials &amp; Methods:</strong> This was a prospective study recruiting outpatients pregnant women in Aceh who seek first medical attention for their pregnancy during January 2013 to January 2015. Serum progesterone and β-hCG level were measured beside routine obstetric procedure. The discrimination attained between miscarriage and non-miscarriage groups of pregnant women at the end of first trimester was evaluated using logistic regression and receiver operating curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 70 pregnant recruited in this study, nineteen of them (27.1%) experienced miscarriage. Serum progesterone level of women in miscarriage group was lower than non-miscarriage group (17.85 (IQR 13.26-21.15) ng/dl vs 33.67 (IQR 21.83-44.14), p&lt;0.001). Serum β-hCG level was also lower in miscarriage group (10 681 (IQR 5 787.5-26 577.5) mIU/ml vs 48 109 (IQR 17 137-93 915) mIU/ml, p=0.001). Single progesterone measurement gave a good predictor ability for miscarriage with 82.2% accuracy, 86.3% sensitivity and 73.7% specificity if 19.5 ng/dl was used as a cut-off point.</p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maternal serum progesterone level could be a good predictor for miscarriage during the first trimester of pregnancy. Single β-hCG serum in combination with progesterone serum measurement only had little added value for predicting miscarriage.

scholarly journals Stress and Anxiety Levels in Pregnant and Post-Partum Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (24) ◽  
pp. 9450
Author(s):  
Anna Stepowicz ◽  
Barbara Wencka ◽  
Jan Bieńkiewicz ◽  
Wojciech Horzelski ◽  
Mariusz Grzesiak
Keyword(s):  
Post Partum ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
State Trait Anxiety Inventory ◽  
Stress Scale ◽  
Informal Relationship ◽  
The Social ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Anxiety Levels ◽  
Mental Treatment

The aim of this study was to analyze stress and anxiety levels experienced by pregnant and post-partum women during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to indicate the social and medical factors that could contribute to stress and anxiety. A total of 210 patients were enrolled in the study. Two well-established test-tools were applied: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). The study revealed that the levels of stress and anxiety experienced by the surveyed patients were moderate to high. We demonstrated that women with mental treatment history, those in the first trimester of pregnancy and the ones that are single or in an informal relationship tend to experience higher levels of psychological distress and anxiety. Such factors as age, education, parity, eventful obstetric history, comorbidities, and the number of hospital stays proved to be statistically insignificant in the analysis. Our findings could be used to identify patients at greater risk of experiencing adverse mental effects and to provide them with adequate psychological support. Further multi-center studies are warranted in order to draw final conclusions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document