Old Does Not Necessarily Mean Worse: Standard Stupp Regimen for Elderly Patients (≥ 70 years) with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract Introduction Glioblastoma (GBM) is frequent in elderly patients, but their frailty provokes debate regarding optimal treatment in general, and the standard Stupp regimen in particular, although this is the mainstay for younger (<65 years) patients. Methods All patients with newly diagnosed GBM and age ≥ 70 who were referred to our institution for Stupp treatment were reviewed from 2004 to 2018. MGMT status was not available for treatment decision. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were relapse-free survival (RFS), early (≤ 1 month after RCT) adverse neurological events (symptoms of intracranial hypertension and/or use of corticosteroids and/or hospitalization) and temozolomide hematologic toxicity assessed by CTCAE v5. Results 128 patients were included. The median age was 74.1 (IQR: 72-77). 15% of patients were ≥80 years. 62.5% and 37.5% of patients fulfilled the criteria for RPA class I-II and III-IV, respectively. 81% of patients received the entire RCT and 28% completed the maintenance temozolomide. With median follow-up of 11.7 months (IQR: 6.5-17.5), median OS was 11.7 months (CI95%: 10-13 months). Median RFS was 9.5 months (CI95%: 9-10.5 months). 60% of patients had early adverse neurological events, of whom 44% had progression and 8% experienced grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events. RPA class III-IV and occurrence of neurological events were associated with lower OS rates, whereas post-operative neurological disabilities were not. Age ≥80 was not associated with worsened outcomes. Conclusions Stupp radiochemotherapy was feasible and effective for “real-life” elderly patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, even in the case of post-operative neurological disabilities.

Download Full-text

Standard 6-week chemoradiation for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-01537-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Loïg Vaugier ◽

Loïc Ah-Thiane ◽

Maud Aumont ◽

Emmanuel Jouglar ◽

Mario Campone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Real Life ◽

Treatment Decision ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Neurological Progression ◽

Neurological Disabilities

AbstractGlioblastoma (GBM) is frequent in elderly patients, but their frailty provokes debate regarding optimal treatment in general, and the standard 6-week chemoradiation (CRT) in particular, although this is the mainstay for younger patients. All patients with newly diagnosed GBM and age ≥ 70 who were referred to our institution for 6-week CRT were reviewed from 2004 to 2018. MGMT status was not available for treatment decision at that time. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), early adverse neurological events without neurological progression ≤ 1 month after CRT and temozolomide hematologic toxicity assessed by CTCAE v5. 128 patients were included. The median age was 74.1 (IQR: 72–77). 15% of patients were ≥ 80 years. 62.5% and 37.5% of patients fulfilled the criteria for RPA class I–II and III–IV, respectively. 81% of patients received the entire CRT and 28% completed the maintenance temozolomide. With median follow-up of 11.7 months (IQR: 6.5–17.5), median OS was 11.7 months (CI 95%: 10–13 months). Median PFS was 9.5 months (CI 95%: 9–10.5 months). 8% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 hematologic events. 52.5% of patients without neurological progression had early adverse neurological events. Post-operative neurological disabilities and age ≥ 80 were not associated with worsened outcomes. 6-week chemoradiation was feasible for “real-life” elderly patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, even in the case of post-operative neurological disabilities. Old does not necessarily mean worse.

Download Full-text

Old Does Not Necessarily Mean Worse: Standard 6-Week Chemoradiation For Elderly Patients (≥ 70 Years) With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

10.21203/rs.3.rs-493204/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Loig Vaugier ◽

Loïc Ah-Thiane ◽

Maud Aumont ◽

Emmanuel Jouglar ◽

Mario Campone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Real Life ◽

Treatment Decision ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Neurological Progression ◽

Neurological Disabilities

Abstract IntroductionGlioblastoma (GBM) is frequent in elderly patients, but their frailty provokes debate regarding optimal treatment in general, and the standard 6-week chemoradiation in particular, although this is the mainstay for younger patients. MethodsAll patients with newly diagnosed GBM and age ≥ 70 who were referred to our institution for chemoradiation (RCT) were reviewed from 2004 to 2018. MGMT status was not available for treatment decision at that time. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), early adverse neurological events without neurological progression ≤ 1 month after RCT and temozolomide hematologic toxicity assessed by CTCAE v5. Results128 patients were included. The median age was 74.1 (IQR: 72-77). 15% of patients were ≥80 years. 62.5% and 37.5% of patients fulfilled the criteria for RPA class I-II and III-IV, respectively. 81% of patients received the entire RCT and 28% completed the maintenance temozolomide. With median follow-up of 11.7 months (IQR: 6.5-17.5), median OS was 11.7 months (CI95%: 10-13 months). Median PFS was 9.5 months (CI95%: 9-10.5 months). 8% of patients experienced grade ≥3 hematologic events. 52.5% of patients without neurological progression had early adverse neurological events. Post-operative neurological disabilities and age ≥80 were not associated with worsened outcomes. Conclusions6-week chemoradiation was feasible for “real-life” elderly patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, even in the case of post-operative neurological disabilities.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Melphalan and Prednisone Plus Thalidomide in Patients Older Than 75 Years With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2008.21.0948 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (22) ◽

pp. 3664-3670 ◽

Cited By ~ 284

Author(s):

Cyrille Hulin ◽

Thierry Facon ◽

Philippe Rodon ◽

Brigitte Pegourie ◽

Lotfi Benboubker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Standards Of Care ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Grade 3 ◽

To Receive

Purpose Until recently, melphalan and prednisone were the standards of care in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The addition of thalidomide to this combination demonstrated a survival benefit for patients age 65 to 75 years. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial investigated the efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and December 2006, 232 previously untreated patients with myeloma, age 75 years or older, were enrolled and 229 were randomly assigned to treatment. All patients received melphalan (0.2 mg/kg/d) plus prednisone (2 mg/kg/d) for 12 courses (day 1 to 4) every 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/d of oral thalidomide (n = 113) or placebo (n = 116), continuously for 72 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Results After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide compared with those who received melphalan and prednisone plus placebo (median, 44.0 v 29.1 months; P = .028). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group (median, 24.1 v 18.5 months; P = .001). Two adverse events were significantly increased in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group: grade 2 to 4 peripheral neuropathy (20% v 5% in the melphalan and prednisone plus placebo group; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (23% v 9%; P = .003). Conclusion This trial confirms the superiority of the combination melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide over melphalan and prednisone alone for prolonging survival in very elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicity was acceptable.

Download Full-text

Comparison Of Sequential Vs Alternating Administration Of Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP) and Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (Rd) In Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: GEM2010MAS65 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.403.403 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 403-403 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Joaquín Martínez-López ◽

Miguel T. Hernandez ◽

Rafael Martinez ◽

Laura Rosiñol ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Sequential Scheme ◽

To Receive

Abstract Background VMP and Rd are two of the most efficient and widely accepted regimens in the treatment of elderly newly diagnosed MM patients. In order to further improve the outcome of elderly patients, one possibility would be to use regimens including all these drugs simultaneously, but this may result into high toxicity. Alternatively, the use of these regimens (VMP and Rd) in a sequential or alternating scheme could improve the treatment of elderly patients. We hypothesized the alternating scheme would minimize the emergence of resistant clones, and would reduce the cumulative toxicity. In order to test this hypothesis we decided to compare VMP and RD in a sequential vs an alternating scheme. Patients and methods 241 patients were randomized to receive a sequential scheme consisting on 9 cycles of VMP followed by 9 cycles of Rd or the same regimens in an alternating approach (one cycle of VMP alternating with one Rd (half of the patients started by VMP and half by Rd) up to 18 cycles). VMP included the iv administration of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 twice weekly for 1 six-weeks cycle, followed by once weekly for 8 four-weeks cycles in combination with oral melphalan 9 mg/m2 and prednisone 60 mg/m2 once daily on days 1–4 of each cycle. Rd treatment consisted on lenalidomide 25 mg daily on days 1-21 plus dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. Results 121 patients were allocated to receive the sequential scheme and 120 the alternating regimen. Both arms were well balanced according to the baseline characteristics. 52% patients in the sequential arm and 55% in the alternating and had high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p or 1q gains). After 9 cycles of treatment, in the sequential arm, 35 out of 66 (54%) achieved at least VGPR vs 51 out of 65 patients (78%) in the alternating arm (p=0.002), including sCR/CR rate of 28% vs 38% in the sequential and alternating arms, respectively (p=NS). Seven patients in each arm achieved immunophenotypic CR. Moreover, while four patients progressed in the sequential arm under treatment with VMP, no patients in the alternating scheme developed disease progression during the first 9 cycles, After a median follow up of 12 months, there was a trend for shorter TTP in the sequential as compared with the alternating scheme (18 m-TTP of 83% vs 89% (p=NS)). In terms of OS, 83% of patients in the sequential arm were alive at 18 m versus 93% in the alternating (p=NS). Patients who achieved sCR/CR had a significantly longer 18 m-TTP as compared with patients who didn’t achieve it in both sequential (100% vs 71%; p=0.006) and alternating arms (100% vs 79%; p=0.006) and this translated into a significant benefit in OS. No differences were observed in overall response rates and CR rates in standard and high risk patients. The 18 m-TTP was similar in standard and high risk groups in both sequential (86% vs 81%) and alternating arms (84% vs 94%), noting that 94% of patients receiving the alternating scheme were progression-free at 18 months. Regarding hematologic toxicity, the frequency of G3-4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the sequential than in the alternating arm (16% and 23%) and the same trend was observed for G3-4 thrombocytopenia (16% vs 20%). Concerning non-hematologic toxicity, 5% and 4% of the patients in the sequential and alternating arms developed G3-4 infections, respectively; the rate of G3-4 skin rash was 4% in the sequential and 3% in the alternating arm; 4% of patients in the sequential arm developed G3-4 peripheral neuropathy and 3% in the sequential arm. The rate of grade 3-4 thrombotic events was 2% in both arms. Nevertheless, the detailed evaluation of the toxicity will be done at the completion of the trial when all patients will have received the same amount of drugs in either a sequential or an alternating scheme (at the present time, 42 patients in the sequential arm were not yet at risk for the development of lenalidomide-related side effects). Conclusions The administration of melphalan, bortezomib, lenalidomide and steroids in elderly MM patients in a sequential or alternating scheme is feasible. Although longer follow-up is necessary, the alternating scheme may be superior in terms of response rate and outcome, as result of the early exposure of the plasma cell to different agents. Toxicity profile is acceptable. Aparently both schemes of therapy seems to overcome the poor prognosis of high risk cytogenetic. Disclosures: Mateos: Janssen, Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is not approved for newly diagnosed MM patients. Ocio:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. San Miguel:Janssen, Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (IRd) Consolidation Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Large Multi-Center Phase II Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-109920 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 123-123 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ravi Vij ◽

Nitya Nathwani ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

Mark A. Fiala ◽

Abhinav Deol ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Consolidation Therapy ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Oral Regimen ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown to improve progression-free and overall survival in multiple myeloma (MM) and has largely become the standard of care. Consolidation therapy, a brief duration of more-intensive chemotherapy administered prior to maintenance, has been shown to further deepen responses and may improve long-term outcomes. Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) is an all oral regimen that has been shown to be active in newly diagnosed MM as well as relapsed disease. In this study, we are analyzing the safety and efficacy of IRd as consolidation therapy after ASCT (NCT02253316). Methods: Eligible patients, age 18-70 with newly diagnosed MM undergoing ASCT during first-line treatment, are being consented prior to ASCT. Approximately 4 months following ASCT, patients receive 4 cycles of consolidation therapy with IRd [ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, lenalidomide 15 mg on days 1 through 21, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8 and 15]. The primary end point is minimal residual disease (MRD) status. MRD is being assessed by ClonoSEQ where possible and by multi-color flow where not. Toxicity, IMWG response rate, PFS, and OS are secondary end points. One month after the last consolidation cycle, patients are randomized (1:1) to maintenance therapy with single-agent ixazomib (4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15) or lenalidomide (15 mg daily). In total, 240 patients will be enrolled on the trial. This presentation coincides with planned interim analysis 2 which included data from the consolidation phase only. Results: As of July 2018, 172 patients with NDMM have been enrolled from 10 centers within the US. The median age was 57 (range 28-70) and 67% were male. 76% were white, 10% African-American/Black, and 13% were another race. 39% were ISS Stage I, 30% were Stage II, and 20% were Stage III. All patients received proteasome inhibitors and/or IMIDs as front-line induction and melphalan as conditioning for ASCT. IRd consolidation started at a median of 110 days post-ASCT (range 80-138). IRd has been well tolerated. Only 4% (6/154) of patients have been unable to complete the 4 cycles of consolidation to date due to toxicity. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity has been uncommon; 4% neutropenia, 3% thrombocytopenia, and 2% anemia. There has been no grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Non-hematologic grade 3-4 toxicities have included: infection (8%), nausea/vomiting/diarrhea (3%), and transaminitis (1%). No grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy has been reported. One case of grade 5 pneumonia was reported but was not considered related to study treatment. Following ASCT, the MRD-negative rate was 26% and this improved to 37% following consolidation. In the subset of patients with Clonoseq results available, the MRD negative rate improved from 19% to 27%. Clinical response rate improved similarly; prior to consolidation the VGPR or better rate was 76% including 39% CR/sCR. Following consolidation, the VGPR or better rate was 85% including 56% CR/sCR. 137 patients went on to receive maintenance with either ixazomib (n = 71) or lenalidomide (n = 66). At time of submission, the median follow-up from start of IRd is 14 months and 28 patients have relapsed/progressed and 6 have expired. An interim analysis is planned for 2019, representing the first comparison of ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance. Conclusion: IRd consolidation following ASCT appears to be safe and effective. The all oral regimen is convenient for patients which greatly simplifies follow-up in the peri-transplant period. Study enrollment is scheduled to complete in Q1 of 2019. Disclosures Vij: Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy. Deol:Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Kaufman:Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; BMS: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Hofmeister:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Gregory:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Berdeja:Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Chari:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; The Binding Site: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Ixazomib-Based Frontline Therapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in Real-Life Practice Showed Comparable Efficacy and Safety Profile with Those Reported in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Multi-Center Study in China

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128614 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3181-3181

Author(s):

Jing Li ◽

Li Bao ◽

Zhong-jun Xia ◽

Sili Wang ◽

Xin Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Real Life ◽

Routine Practice ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Frontline Therapy ◽

Grade 3

Jing Li, Li Bao and Zhong-jun Xia contributed equally to this study. Background: Ixazomib (ixa) is the first oral proteasome inhibitor that approved for the use in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in > 60 countries. In a recently reported long-term result of a phase 1/2 study (NCT01217957), the all-oral triplet regimen of ixazomib plus Rd (IRd) demonstrated favorable efficacy with acceptable toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Meanwhile, a large phase 3 trial (TOURMALINE-MM2, NCT01850524) evaluating IRd in stem-cell transplantation (SCT) ineligible NDMM patients is ongoing. However, outcomes and toxicity profiles of novel-agent-based MM therapies in real world practice often differ from data reported in clinical trials and data of the efficacy of ixa-based treatment in NDMM in routine practice is currently missing. Aims and Methods: To assess the efficacy and safety profile of ixa-based frontline therapy in NDMM patients in routine practice, we performed a large national, multi-center, observational study enrolling ixa-treated (at least one cycle completed) NDMM patients from 14 China centers. Clinical records on demographics, disease characteristics, treatment regimen and duration, response rate, adverse events (AEs), and treatment discontinuations and survival were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 60 NDMM patients treated with ixa-based regimens were included. Ixa-based regimens included IRd in 23 (38.3%) patients, the ixa and dexamethaxone (Id) in 17 (28.3%) patients and Id plus chemotherapeutics/other agents (Adriamycin in 12 patients, cyclophosphamide in 5 patients, and thalidomide in 3 patients) in 20 (33.3%). None of the patients included received SCT during follow-up. Median age was 69 years (range 35 - 85) with 33 (55.0%) ≥65 years. At initial diagnosis, ISS stage I/II/III disease were presented in 21.7%/28.3%/50.0% patients at initial diagnosis; high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (including del 17p, t(4;14), and/or t(14;16) detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization) were detected in 9 patients (19.6%, among 46 patients with FISH results). Twenty-six (43.4%) patients had a ECOG PS ≥2 and 5 patients (8.3%) had extramedullary disease. Eighteen patients were not eligible for ixa phase 1/2 study (NCT01217957) according to its inclusion and exclusion criteria, and even more patients (36, 60%) were not eligible for TOURMALINE-MM2 study. (Table1). The best confirmed ORR (partial response or better) for all 60 patients was 93.3% (56/60), including 63.3% of patients with ≥VGPR and 20.0% with a CR. The median time to response was 41 days. Similar response was observed among different subgroups: the ORR in Ixa phase1/2 study-eligible/ineligible group, MM2 trial- eligible/ineligible group and patients with standard/high-risk cytogenetics was 95.2%, 88.9%, 91.7%, 94.4%, 91.9% and 100.0%, respectively. And no significant difference in response between different ixa-based regimens was observed. After a median follow-up of 137.5 days after the first dose of ixazomib treatment (range, 28 - 372), median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS) were not reached. (Table2) Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher were uncommon, reported in 14 (23.3%) patients, including thrombocytopenia (4 patients, 6.7%), diarrhea (5 patients, 8.3%), pneumonia (3 patients, 5.0%) and hypokalemia (1, 1.7%). No drug-related grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy was recorded. Median cycles of ixa received were 4 cycles (range 1-11); 50 (83.3%) were still on treatment at data cut-off; 6 (10.0%) patients discontinued ixa due to intolerable AEs and 4 (6.7%) stop treatment for other reasons (mostly economic concerns). Discussion and conclusion: Here we reported the first real world, multi-center data on the efficacy and safety profile of ixa-based frontline therapy in patients with NDMM. Our results show that the ixa-based frontline therapy in real-life clinical practice is highly effective and fast in response, with an efficacy data (ORR 93.3%, ≥VGPR rate 63.3%) even better than that reported in NCT01217957 trial (ORR 88.0%, ≥VGPR rate 58.8%). Given the fact that no patients received SCT during follow-up in our cohort, our results maybe more comparable to the ongoing MM2 trial assessing SCT-ineligible NDMM. Ixa-based frontline therapy is well tolerated in NDMM patients treated in routine clinical practice. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor that approved for the use in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here in this abstract, I will present data on real-life practice of the use of ixazomib in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Download Full-text

Five-year survival data in newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy along with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e13009 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e13009-e13009

Author(s):

T. Wadasadawala ◽

R. Jalali ◽

A. Munshi ◽

T. Gupta ◽

N. Kalyani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Survival Data ◽

Recursive Partitioning ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Karnofsky Performance Score ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Performance Score ◽

Adjuvant Temozolomide ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽

Grade 3

e13009 Background: We report 5-year survival data in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy along with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Methods: Between March 2001 to April 2008, 81 patients with newly diagnosed histopathologically proven glioblastoma underwent surgery followed by external radiotherapy to a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Concurrent oral TMZ (75 mg/m2) was given daily with RT followed by adjuvant TMZ for 5 days every 28 days for six cycles (150 mg/m2 for the first cycle and 200 mg/m2 for rest of the cycles). Patients were monitored clinicoradiologically as per standard practice. Results: Patients aged between 11–73 years with a median age of 49 years (60 males, 21 females). Forty per cent of patients underwent a gross total resection of tumour, 44% had partial resection, and 16% an open or stereotactic biopsy only. 79% of the patients had a post-operative Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of >80. All six adjuvant cycles were completed in 68%. The 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival was 34%, 24%, 11%, and 11%, respectively (95% CI 14.03–21.96). The median overall and progression-free survival was 18 (2–92 months) and 16 months (2–72 months), respectively. On multivariate analysis, completion of all six cycles of adjuvant TMZ was associated with significantly better survival (p = 0.000). Neurological performance score (NPS) of 2–3 (p = 0.06) and Recursive Partitioning Analysis class V (p = 0.093) showed a trend towards poorer outcome. Treatment was generally well tolerated with only 2.5% of patients developing grade 3 anemia, leucopoenia, and neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 5% patients. Conclusions: Concurrent radiotherapy and TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ results in encouraging survival even at a long follow-up. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Ixazomib or Lenalidomide Maintenance Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Consolidation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Large Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130644 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 602-602 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Ravi Vij ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

Nitya Nathwani ◽

Mark A. Fiala ◽

Feng Gao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Background: Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in multiple myeloma (MM), and has largely become the standard of care. However, toxicity leads to early discontinuation in nearly one-third of patients and additional options are needed (McCarthy, et al, JCO, 2017). Ixazomib is another maintenance option that has been shown to improve PFS; however, studies comparing lenalidomide and ixazomib are lacking. In this randomized phase 2 study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of using lenalidomide and ixazomib as part of consolidation and maintenance therapies after ASCT (NCT02253316). Methods: Eligible patients, age 18-70 with newly diagnosed MM undergoing ASCT during first-line treatment, were consented prior to ASCT. Approximately 4 months following ASCT, patients received 4 cycles of consolidation therapy with IRd [ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, lenalidomide 15 mg on days 1 through 21, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8 and 15]. Primary data on IRd consolidation were presented at ASH 2018 (Abstract 109920). One month after the last consolidation cycle, patients were randomized (1:1) to maintenance therapy with single-agent ixazomib (4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or lenalidomide (10 mg daily months 1-3 followed by 15 mg for months 4+). The arms were stratified based on MRD-status post-consolidation. In total, 237 patients were enrolled from 10 US centers. This abstract coincides with planned interim analysis 3 which is the first comparison of ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance. While the study was not powered to compare PFS between the two arms, the sample will provide a reasonable power to estimate non-inferiority. There is a planned stopping rule for non-inferiority set at a hazard ratio of >1.3 in favor of lenalidomide. Secondary end-points include MRD-negativity following 12 cycles and toxicity. Results: At time of abstract submission, 215 patients had completed IRd consolidation and 191 had begun maintenance. 90 were randomized to ixazomib and 94 to lenalidomide. 7 patients were not randomized due to toxicity during consolidation; data from these patients are not included in the analyses. The characteristics of the two arms are summarized in Table 1. Hematologic toxicity has been infrequent with ixazomib with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurring in 11% and 23% of patients. In comparison, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 45% and 35% of patients on lenalidomide. The most common non-hematologic toxicities in both arms have been GI-related and infections, both expected events. 16% of patients on ixazomib have experienced Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity compared to 34% on lenalidomide. No grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy has been reported in either arm. 11% of patients on ixazomib have discontinued due to toxicity and another 9% have required a dose reduction to 3mg. Lenalidomide toxicity has led to discontinuation in 15% of patients and another 12% were dose reduced to 5mg. Only 45% of patients receiving 4+ cycles of lenalidomide were able to titrate to the 15mg dose. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months from randomization (19.7 months post-ASCT), 30% of patients on ixazomib have discontinued treatment due to disease progression. After a median follow-up of 12.3 months from randomization (20.2 months post-ASCT), 18% patients on lenalidomide have discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Conclusion: Ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance have been well tolerated to date. A comparison of PFS is currently being conducted as part of interim analysis 3 and final results will be presented, representing the first report directly comparing lenalidomide and ixazomib maintenance. Table 1: Disclosures Vij: Genentech: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Martin:Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Roche and Juno: Consultancy. Fiala:Incyte: Research Funding. Deol:Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Hofmeister:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Nektar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gregory:Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Chari:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosko:Vyxeos: Other: Travel support.

Download Full-text

Chidamide Plus R-CHOP21 in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113942 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2968-2968 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Muchen Zhang ◽

Ying Fang ◽

Pengpeng Xu ◽

Shu Cheng ◽

Li Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

B Cell ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Large B Cell

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and is heterogeneous in clinical, immunophenotypic and genetic features. More than 50% of patients with DLBCL are older than 60 years at diagnosis. Among them, up to 40% of patients relapse or develop refractory disease upon R-CHOP treatment. Dose-dense R-CHOP14 failed to show superior efficacy or survival compared with standard R-CHOP21 in elderly patients and intensive chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation was difficult due to toxicity. Therefore, development of new first-line therapy remains great interests to improve disease outcome in elderly patients with DLBCL. Perturbation of the epigenome plays a crucial role in lymphoma progression. Several histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) have been investigated in relapsed or refractory DLBCL as mono- or combination treatment, showing promising activities to suppress lymphoma growth and overcome resistance to immune-chemotherapies. This prospective phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chidamide in combination with R-CHOP21 in elderly patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL (NCT02753647). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, aged 61 to 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, IPI>1 were enrolled. The dose and administration schedule were as follows: rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0, cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 on day 1, doxorubicin 50mg/m2 on day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, prednisone 60 mg/m2 from day 1 to day 5, chidamide 20mg/d on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, every 21 days for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate assessed by PET-CT, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and main adverse events (AEs). Results: From March 2016 to April 2018, 49 patients were enrolled; 41 patients completed all treatment and 8 patients were still in the treatment cycles. Median age was 67 years (range, 61-75) and 28 patients (57.1%) were male. Thirty-eight patients (77.6%) presented advanced Ann Arbor stage, and 41 patients (83.7%) showed elevated serum LDH level. Thirty-one patients (63.3%) had multiple extra-nodal sites, mainly involving bone, gastrointestinal, liver, and bone marrow. Forty-one patients (83.7%) had IPI scores ≥3 at diagnosis. By immunohistochemistry, 12 (24.5%) patients were categorized as germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype based on Hans algorithm, and 12 (25.5%) patients were defined as BCL-2 and MYC double expression. Among 41 patients available for evaluation, the CR rate was 85.4% (35/41), and the ORR was 90.3% (37/41). After a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 3-30), the 1-year PFS was 92.1% and 1-year OS was 94.7%. There were 2 deaths due to disease progression, of which 1 had triple-hit lymphoma. Regarding toxicity, grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 167 cycles (60.5%), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 27 cycles (9.8%), and grade 3 anemia in 11 cycles (4.0%). However, febrile neutropenia was reported in significantly fewer cycles (6.1%) and was a maximum of grade 3. Grade 3 liver dysfunction was observed in 7 cycles (2.5%). No grade 4 non-hematological events were reported. Of note, 2 patients positive for EBER-ISH at diagnosis remained in EBV-DNA negative during treatment and follow-up. Conclusion: Chidamide with R-CHOP21 is effective and safe in elderly patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Bendamustine Improves Clinical Outcome in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) According to Different Clinical and Biological Prognostic Factors

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5668.5668 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5668-5668

Author(s):

Giovanni Del Poeta ◽

Maria Ilaria Del Principe ◽

Dario Ragusa ◽

Pietro Bulian ◽

Francesco Buccisano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Real Life ◽

Median Number ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

First Line ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Bendamustine has been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of CLL, either alone compared with chlorambucil (Knauf et al, JCO 2009 and BJH 2012) or in combination with monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab both in second or more lines (Fischer et al, JCO 2011) and in first line treatment (Fischer et al, JCO 2012). However, the relationship between its activity with clinical and biological prognosticators has been addressed only in few studies. For this purpose, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of bendamustine, in a real-life contest, on 56 patients, median age 66 years (41-80), median number of previous regimens 1 (0-3, 32% previously untreated). Bendamustine was given for a median number of 6 cycles (70-90 mg/m2), in 82% of cases with rituximab at conventional doses. Overall (ORR) and complete response (CRR) rates were 73% and 44.6%, respectively. Obviously, CRR was higher (83.3%) for 18 patients treated in first line. A significant correlation was found between lower ORR and lymphocyte doubling time <12 months (OR 4.30; P=0.019), thus suggesting that a high proliferation rate may confer a reduced response to bendamustine. As already previously reported, there was a relationship between ORR and number of prior treatments in univariate analysis (OR 0.23; P=0.0055). Interestingly, there was also a significant correlation between lower ORR and the higher expression (>30%) of alpha-4 integrin CD49d (OR 13.0; P=0.018), an important marker of bad prognosis in CLL (Bulian et al, JCO 2014). On the other hand, no significant correlations were found between ORR and CD38, ZAP-70 or IGHV mutational status. Similarly, no significant correlations were noted between ORR and FISH cytogenetics, excluding del(17)p, or NOTCH1 mutations, thus confirming the independence of response to bendamustine from some well-known important biologic prognostic factors. In fact, multivariate analysis confirmed a significant relationship only between ORR and TP53/del(17)p (OR 0.020; P=0.0015) and concomitant rituximab (OR 0.019; P=0.0074). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS were 57% and 86%, respectively. Side effects included grade 3-4 neutropenia, infections, thrombocytopenia and anemia which occurred in 21%, 12%, 12% and 5% of patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity, including infusion-related reactions, heart or kidney or liver failure were found almost exclusively in elderly patients treated with bendamustine after two or more lines of therapy (12.5%). In multivariate analisys of OS, calculated from the end of treatment with bendamustine, only response to bendamustine (P=0.008) was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor, while both the number of previous therapies and the concomitant use of rituximab demonstrated no statistical significance. These our results confirm both the activity and safety of bendamustine, particularly in combination with rituximab, also in the setting of elderly patients, often affected by two or three comorbidities. Noteworthy, this effectiveness appears to be present also in patients with unfavorable clinical and biological features, excluding del(17)p or TP53 mutations, in which the employment either of modern oral BCR inhibitors or of BH3 mimetics anti-Bcl-2 will be definitely active, also in combination with the same bendamustine. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text