Potential of Organic and Inorganic Amendments for Stabilizing Nickel in Acidic Soil, and Improving the Nutritional Quality of Spinach

Author(s):  
Umeed Ali ◽  
Muhammad Shaaban ◽  
Saqib Bashir ◽  
Muhammad Afzal Chhajro ◽  
Li Qian ◽  
...  

Abstract Contamination of soils by nickel (Ni) has become a serious environmental problem throughout the world, and this substance wields dangerous effects on the ecosystem and food chain. A pot experiment was conducted to examine the effect of rice straw (RS), rice straw biochar (BI) and calcite (CC) at 1% and 2% application rates in a Ni contaminated soil. The objective was to potentially stabilize Ni and reduce its bioavailability to spinach (Spinacia Oleracea L.). Spinach plants were grown in a Ni contaminated Ultisol (commonly known as a red clay soil). Physiological results indicated that a BI 2% application rate significantly increased the photosynthetic rate by 4-18.6 µmol m2 S− 1 and transpiration rate by 1.7–8.9 mmol m2 S− 1. Similarly, growth parameters for root and shoots dry biomass increased 1.7- and 6.3-fold, respectively, while essential nutrients were enhanced in the spinach plant compared to those in the untreated soil (CK). Moreover, adding amendments significantly decreased CaCl2 extractable Ni by 62.5% 94.1%, and 87.2%, while the toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP) fell by 26.7%, 47.8%, and 41.7% when using RS, BI and CC, respectively, at 2% compared to CK. The Ni concentrations in the spinach roots declined by 51.6%, 73.3% and 68.9%, and in the shoots reduced by 54.1%, 76.7% and 70.8% for RS, BI and CC, at a 2% application rate, respectively. Bio-concentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) dropped significantly by as much as 72.7% and 20%, for BI 2% application rate. Results of the present study clearly indicated that biochar potential soil amendments for Ni stabilization, thereby reducing its bioavailability in the Ni contaminated soil. This process enhanced the safety of food to be consumed and mitigated security risks.

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 101388
Author(s):  
Shichao Liu ◽  
Zhonglei Xie ◽  
Yintao Zhu ◽  
Yanmiao Zhu ◽  
Yan Jiang ◽  
...  

Chemosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 244 ◽  
pp. 125418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umeed Ali ◽  
Muhammad Shaaban ◽  
Saqib Bashir ◽  
Ruili Gao ◽  
Qingling Fu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrin M. Dodds ◽  
Christopher L. Main ◽  
L. Thomas Barber ◽  
Charles Burmester ◽  
Guy D. Collins ◽  
...  

Field studies were conducted in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Tennessee during 2010 and 2011 to determine the effect of glufosinate application rate on LibertyLink and WideStrike cotton. Glufosinate was applied in a single application (three-leaf cotton) or sequential application (three-leaf followed by eight-leaf cotton) at 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, and 2.4 kg ai ha−1. Glufosinate application rate did not affect visual injury or growth parameters measured in LibertyLink cotton. No differences in LibertyLink cotton yield were observed because of glufosinate application rate; however, LibertyLink cotton treated with glufosinate yielded slightly more cotton than the nontreated check. Visual estimates of injury to WideStrike cotton increased with each increase in glufosinate application rate. However, the injury was transient, and by 28 d after the eight-leaf application, no differences in injury were observed. WideStrike cotton growth was adversely affected during the growing season following glufosinate application at rates of 1.2 kg ha−1 and greater; however, cotton height and total nodes were unaffected by glufosinate application rate at the end of the season. WideStrike cotton maturity was delayed, and yields were reduced following glufosinate application at rates of 1.2 kg ha−1 and above. Fiber quality of LibertyLink and WideStrike cotton was unaffected by glufosinate application rate. These data indicate that glufosinate may be applied to WideStrike cotton at rates of 0.6 kg ha−1 without inhibiting cotton growth, development, or yield. Given the lack of injury or yield reduction following glufosinate application to LibertyLink cotton, these cultivars possess robust resistance to glufosinate. Growers are urged to be cautious when increasing glufosinate application rates to increase control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in WideStrike cotton. However, glufosinate application rates may be increased to maximum labeled rates when making applications to LibertyLink cotton without fear of reducing cotton growth, development, or yield.


2020 ◽  
Vol 259 ◽  
pp. 109674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umeed Ali ◽  
Muhammad Shaaban ◽  
Saqib Bashir ◽  
Qingling Fu ◽  
Jun Zhu ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (No. 8) ◽  
pp. 372-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Trakal ◽  
M. Komárek ◽  
J. Száková ◽  
V. Zemanová ◽  
P. Tlustoš

The aim of this study was to evaluate metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) sorption behavior after biochar application into a metal-contaminated soil. Additionally, two different types of biochar originated from the same organic material (contaminated and uncontaminated) at different application rates (1% and 2% w/w) were evaluated as a novelty of the experiment. Batch sorption/desorption experiments were established to compare the sorption behavior of metals originating from single- and multi-element solutions. Zinc as one of the main contaminants in the studied soil was easily desorbed in the presence of Cu, Pb and to a lesser extent by Cd. This desorption was reduced after biochar application. The obtained results proved the different sorption behavior of metals in the single-metal solution compared to the multi-metal ones due to competition effect. Moreover, during multi-element sorption, Zn was significantly desorbed. The applied biochar enhanced Cu and Pb sorption and no changes were observed when contaminated and uncontaminated biochar was used. Furthermore, the application rate (1% and 2% w/w) had no effect as well. In summary, it is needed to point out that the applied rates of biochars were insufficient for metal immobilization in such contaminated soils.


2021 ◽  
Vol 771 ◽  
pp. 144764
Author(s):  
Isha Medha ◽  
Subhash Chandra ◽  
Kumar Raja Vanapalli ◽  
Biswajit Samal ◽  
Jayanta Bhattacharya ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document