Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with or without consolidation chemotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Author(s):  
Mingyue Xiang ◽  
Dali Han ◽  
Bo Liu ◽  
Guifang Zhang ◽  
Heyi Gong

Abstract Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy(I-CCRT), induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy(I-CCRT-C), and concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy(CCRT-C) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESSC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil or docetaxel from February 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate survival. Efficacy was assessed using RECIST, version 1.0. Prognosis factors were identified with Cox regression analysis. Results Patients were treated with CCRT-C(n=59), I-CCRT(n=20), and I-CCRT-C(n=48), SCRT(n=119). The median follow-up duration was 73.9 months for the entire cohort. The ORR of the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C, SCRT groups was 89.8%, 70.0%, and 77.1%, respectively ( P = 0.078). The median PFS in the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 32.5, 16.1, and 27.1 months, respectively ( P = 0.464). The median OS of the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 45.9, 35.5, and 54.0 months, respectively ( P = 0.788). Cox regression analysis indicated that I-CCRT and I-CCRT had comparable PFS and OS with CCRT-C( P > 0.05). Neutropenia grade ≥ 3 in CCRT-C, I-CCRT, I-CCRT-C, and SCRT groups was 47.5%, 15%, and 33.3% of patients, respectively( P =0.027). Conclusions I-CCRT and I-CCRT-C using cisplatin plus fluorouracil or docetaxel regimen had comparable outcomes with CCRT-C for locally advanced ESCC. I-CCRT and I-CCRT-C seem to have less severe neutropenia than CCRT-C, and potential to be a standard treatment option for locally advanced ESCC.

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haishan Wu ◽  
Yilin Yu ◽  
Qunhao Zheng ◽  
Tianxiu Liu ◽  
Yahua Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective There is still no definitely therapeutic evidence of a beneficial effect of chemotherapy with radiotherapy for older patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We aim to determine the influence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients aged 65 years or older with locally advanced ESCC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 581 ESCC patients who underwent CRT and RT alone. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the impact of clinical factors on long‐term overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Finally, we compared the toxicity rates of these patients. Results The median OS and PFS of the overall population were 23.2 months (2.0–162.6 months) and 18.6 months (1.1–159.6 months). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that chemotherapy (p < 0.05), tumor thickness (p < 0.01), and N stage (p < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors associated with both OS and PFS. In the chemotherapy subgroup, patients who received 2–8 cycles of chemotherapy had better OS than those who received 1 cycle (p = 0.015). The results also revealed that the CRT group has better OS and PFS than RT alone group for patients aged 65–74 years (both p < 0.01). However, for patients aged 75 years or older, there was no statistically significant difference between CRT and RT alone (both p > 0.05). Besides, higher staged ESCC has the inferior OS and PFS than lower staged ESCC for patients received RT alone and aged 65–74 years (both p < 0.05). Finally, there were significantly more severe hematologic toxicities in the CRT group than in those treated with RT alone in this study (p < 0.001). Conclusions The present study suggested that CRT for locally advanced ESCC in patients aged 65 years or older had a significant benefit over RT alone in terms of OS and PFS. However, for patients aged 75 years or older, there was no statistically significant difference between CRT and RT alone. CRT should be performed with special attention in patients aged 75 years or older.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Lv ◽  
Songtao Han ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Yuqin Deng ◽  
Feng Yangchun

Abstract Objective To investigate the value of complete blood count in predicting the survival rate of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods A total of 3587 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were initially admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2010 to December 2017 were collected by retrospective study. The relevant clinical data were collected by the medical record system, and the patients were followed up by the hospital medical record follow-up system. The follow-up outcome was death. The survival time of all patients was obtained. The survival curve was established using the cut-off value of each index obtained by ROC curve. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis model and nomogram were established to predict the survival prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The role of each index in the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was studied Results The cut-off values of NLR, NMR, LMR, RDW and PDW in blood routine were 3.52, 10.22, 2.25, 13.85% and 12.05%, respectively. Survival curve analysis showed that patients aged < 60 years and NLR < 3.52 had survival. All indicators were divided into high and low groups according to ROC curve. Univariate Cox regression analysis model showed that RDW (≥ 13.85) and NLR (≥ 3.52) groups were risk factors for the prognosis of ESCC, with HR values of 1.099 (1.015–1.191; p = 0.020) and 1.340 (1.231–1.458; p < 0.001) compared with RDW (< 13.85) and NLR (< 3.52), respectively; multivariate Cox regression analysis model showed that NLR was significantly associated with the prognosis of ESCC, with HR of 1.342 (1.232–1.461; p < 0.001) for NLR (≥ 3.52) NLR (< 3.52). Conclusion NLR results in blood count can be used to predict the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15526-e15526
Author(s):  
C. Lin ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
J. C. Cheng ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
Y. Tsai ◽  
...  

e15526 Background: To assess the feasibility of preoperative induction chemotherapy in addition to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by esophagectomy if possible for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with a special emphasis on M1a or nodal M1b disease. Methods: Patients who had histologic proof of T3N1M0, M1a, or nodal M1b ESCC first received up to 3 courses of induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 or docetaxel 40 mg/m2 IV 1-hr D 1, 8; cisplatin 35 mg/m2 IV 2-hr D 1, 8; 5-fluorouracil 2000 and leucovorin 300 mg/m2 IV 24-hr D 1, 8; repeated every 28 days). This was followed by CCRT (paclitaxel 35 mg/m2 1-hr D 1, 4 /wk, cisplatin 15 mg/m2 1-hr D 2, 5/wk, and radiotherapy 2 Gy D 1–5 /wk) (Lin CC et al. Ann Oncol 18:93–8,2007). When the accumulated radiation dose reached 40 Gy, the feasibility of esophagectomy was evaluated in all patients. In patients for whom esophagectomy was not feasible, CCRT was continued to a dose of 60 Gy. Results: Fifty-six patients (M:F = 51:5, median age 58, range 41–78) with locally advanced (T3N1M0:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 30:7:19) ESCC (upper:mid:lower = 15:25:16) were enrolled from June 22, 2006 to December 17, 2008. By December 31, 2008, 10 patients are still under protocol treatment. Eighteen (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 14:3:1) (40%) and 20 of 46 patients underwent surgery and continued CCRT up to 60 Gy, respectively. Nine (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 7:2:0) (20%) and 5 patients had pathologic complete response and microscopic residual disease, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range 0.5–30.8), 17 (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 9:2:6) patients had relapse. Four and 13 patients had local recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 20.3 months. The median overall survival had not reached yet with 1- and 2-year overall survival being 76 and 57%, respectively. There was no difference in progression- free or overall survival among patients with T3N1M0, M1a, or nodal M1b disease. Conclusions: Three-step strategy of preoperative taxane-based induction chemotherapy then CCRT followed by esosphagectomy if possible appears quite active in locally advanced ESCC patients with 46% having M1a or nodal M1b disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4074-4074
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Makoto Tahara ◽  
Satoshi Mochizuki ◽  
Sadamoto Zenda ◽  
Takashi Kojima ◽  
...  

4074 Background: Standard of care for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, its survival remains limited. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU (DCF) demonstrated promising activity with pathological complete response (CR) of 22% for resectable stage II/III ESCC (Hara H et.al, ASCO 2012). This study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC. Methods: Eligibility criteria included clinically T4 and/or M1 lymph node (LYM) ESCC, PS 0-1, and 20-70 years old. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on days 64 and 92, and fluorouracil 700 mg/m2on days 64 to 67 and 92 to 95 concurrently with radiotherapy (60Gy in 30 fractions, 5 days/week). Results: From August 2009 to November 2011, 33 patients were enrolled.There were 16 pts with T4M0 disease, 13 with nonT4M1 LYM, and 4 with T4M1 LYM.Most grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (66%), leukopenia (39%), anorexia (18%), dysphasia (12%), nausea (9%), febrile neutropenia (6%), and hyponatremia (6%) during induction chemotherapy. Most grade 3 or 4 toxicities were leukopenia (27%), neutropenia (20%), dysphasia (17%), anorexia (13%), esophagitis (13%), nausea (10%), and febrile neutropenia (3%) during CRT. No treatment related death was observed. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 88% (29/33). The overall response rate after completion of induction chemotherapy was 61%. Eleven pts (38%) achieved CR after completion of protocol treatment. With a median follow-up period of 14 months, 1y-PFS and 1y-OS are 38.5 and 78.6 %, respectively. Of a total of 33 patients, eighteen patients (55%) received secondary treatment. Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT in unresectable locally advanced ESCC was well tolerated. Although these data are preliminay, this approach warrants further evaluation. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003370.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.


Author(s):  
Nattinee Charoen ◽  
Kitti Jantharapattana ◽  
Paramee Thongsuksai

Objective: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) are key players in host immune evasion and oncogenic activation, respectively. Evidence of the prognostic role in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is conflicting. This study examined the associations of PD-L1 and mTOR expression with 5-year overall survival in OSCC patients. Material and Methods: The expressions of PD-L1 and mTOR proteins were immunohistochemically evaluated on tissue microarrays of 191 patients with OSCC who were treated by surgery at Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand from 2008 to 2011. Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results: PD-L1 expression was observed in 14.1% of cases while mTOR expression was present in 74.3% of cases. Females were more likely to have tumors with PD-L1 (p-value=0.007) and mTOR expressions (p-value=0.003) than males. In addition, lower clinical stage and well differentiated tumor are more likely to have mTOR expression (p-value= 0.038 and p-value<0.001, respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that age, tumor stage, nodal stage, combined surgical treatment with radiation or chemoradiation therapy, surgical margin status, PD-L1 expression and mTOR expression are independent prognostic factors. High PD-L1 expression (hazard ratio (HR) 3.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.26–7.79) and high mTOR expression (HR 1.69, 95% CI, 1.00–2.84) are strong predictors of poor outcome. Conclusion: A proportion of OSCC expressed PD-L1 and mTOR proteins. Expression of PD-L1 and mTOR proteins are strong prognostic factors of OSCC.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 79-79
Author(s):  
C. Lin ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
J. C. Cheng ◽  
C. Yen ◽  
H. Shiah ◽  
...  

79 Background: We investigated the efficacy and safety of adding cetuximab into twice-weekly paclitaxel/cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), followed by surgery, for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Patients with operable ESCC (T3N0-1M0 or T1-3N1M0 or M1a) were treated with paclitaxel (35 mg/m2 1 h on days 1 and 4/week), cisplatin (15 mg/m2 1 h on days 2 and 5/week), cetuximab (400 mg/m2 2 h on day -5, then 250 mg/m2 2 h on day 3/week) and radiotherapy (2 Gy on days 1-5/week). When the accumulated radiation dose reached 40 Gy, the feasibility of esophagectomy was evaluated for all patients. In patients for whom esophagectomy was not feasible, CCRT was continued to a radiation dose of 60-66 Gy. Results: Sixty-two patients with ESCC were enrolled, and the majority had T3N1M0 or M1a tumors by endoscopic ultrasonographic staging (94%). All patients received CCRT to 40 Gy. Forty-three patients underwent surgery, and 17 patients continued definitive CCRT to 60-66 Gy. Of the scheduled doses of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab, 80%, 79%, and 99% were given, respectively. The intent-to-treat pathological complete response rate was 24% (15/62) (95% confidence interval: 13-35%). At the median follow-up of 13.3 months, the one-year progression-free and overall survivals were 76% and 63%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were leukopenia (51%), neutropenia (15%), esophagitis (19%), and infection (12%). Grade 1, 2, and 3 skin rash occurred in 59%, 36%, and 2% of patients, respectively. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 hypomagnesemia occurred in 14%, 5%, 0%, and 5% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Adding cetuximab to twice-weekly paclitaxel/cisplatin-based CCRT prior to esophagectomy is an active and tolerable treatment for locally advanced ESCC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document