scholarly journals Patient-reported Outcome Measures After Hospitalization During the COVID-19 Pandemic, a Survey Among COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matan Elkan ◽  
Ayana Dvir ◽  
Ronit Zaidenstein ◽  
Maly Keller ◽  
Dana Kagansky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality

Abstract Background: Many people recovering from COVID-19 suffer from long-term sequelae. The objective of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in COVID-19 patients a few months after discharge. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional case-control study on COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia patients admitted to Shamir Medical Center, Israel (03-07/2020). In the months following discharge, patients were invited to participate in a survey and fill the RAND-36 questionnaire. Patient's characteristics and comorbidities were extracted from electronic charts. Results: Among 66 COVID-19 participants, the median age was 58.5 (IQR 49.8-68.3), 56.1% were female, and more than a third were obese (36.4%). The median length of stay was 7 days (IQR 4-10). Patient-reported outcome measures were reported at a median follow-up of 9-months (IQR 6-9). Pain, general health, vitality, and health change had the lowest scores (67.5, 60, 57.5, and 25 respectively). Matching to patients hospitalized with pneumonia due to other pathogens was performed on 42 of the COVID-19 patients. Non-COVID-19 patients were more frequently current or past smokers (50% vs 11.9%, p<0.01) and suffered more often from chronic lung disease (38.1% vs 9.5%, p=0.01). The score for health change was significantly lower in the COVID-19 group (25 vs 50, p<0.01). Conclusions: Post COVID-19 patients continue to suffer from an assortment of symptoms and perceive a deterioration in their health many months after hospitalization. This emphasizes the importance of prolonged medical follow-up in this population, and the need for additional research to better understand this novel's disease long-term effects.

Prospective Evaluation of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State to Identify Clinically Successful Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1159-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
José F. Vega ◽  
Cale A. Jacobs ◽  
Gregory J. Strnad ◽  
Lutul Farrow ◽  
Morgan H. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: The length of most patient-reported outcome measures creates significant response burden, which hampers follow-up rates. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is a single-item, patient-reported outcome measure that asks patients to consider all aspects of life to determine whether the state of their joint is satisfactory; this measure may be viable for tracking outcomes on a large scale. Hypothesis: The PASS question would identify clinically successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at 1-year follow-up with high sensitivity and moderate specificity. We defined “clinically successful” ACLR as changes in preoperative to postoperative scores on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale and the KOOS knee-related quality of life subscale in excess of minimal clinically important difference or final KOOS pain or knee-related quality of life subscale scores in excess of previously defined PASS thresholds. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients enrolled in a prospective longitudinal cohort completed patient-reported outcome measures immediately before primary ACLR. At 1-year follow-up, patients completed the same patient-reported outcome measures and answered the PASS question: “Taking into account all the activity you have during your daily life, your level of pain, and also your activity limitations and participation restrictions, do you consider the current state of your knee satisfactory?” Results: A total of 555 patients enrolled in our cohort; 464 were eligible for this study. Of these, 300 patients (64.7%) completed 1-year follow-up, of whom 83.3% reported satisfaction with their knee after surgery. The PASS question demonstrated high sensitivity to identify clinically successful ACLR (92.6%; 95% CI, 88.4%-95.6%). The specificity of the question was 47.1% (95% CI, 35.1%-59.5%). The overall agreement between the PASS and our KOOS-based criteria for clinically successful intervention was 81.9%, and the kappa value indicated moderate agreement between the two methods (κ = 0.44). Conclusion: The PASS question identifies individuals who have experienced clinically successful ACLR with high sensitivity. The limitation of the PASS is its low specificity, which we calculated to be 47.1%. Answering “no” to the PASS question meant that a patient neither improved after surgery nor achieved an acceptable final state of knee health. The brevity, interpretability, and correlation of the PASS question with significant improvements on various KOOS subscales make it a viable option in tracking ACLR outcomes on a national or global scale.

P06.03 Child, parent, and clinician selection of patient-reported outcome measures to use in pediatric neuro-oncology outpatient follow-up clinics

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii24-ii24
Author(s):  
K S Bull ◽  
S Stubley ◽  
A Freeman ◽  
C Liossi ◽  
A E Darlington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Perceived Relevance

Abstract BACKGROUND Survivors of childhood brain tumours are at risk of poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Appropriate and relevant measures can be used to monitor HRQoL so that timely interventions may be made for issues thus identified. We had previously selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with good psychometric properties that had emerged as well-suited for this use in two systematic reviews. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the views of families regarding the suitability of the selected measures for use in paediatric neuro-oncology follow-up clinics. These views were then used to inform the choice of PROMs for use on the KLIK PROM portal, a website designed to gather HRQoL information from families. MATERIAL AND METHODS As part of the PROMOTE study, we used a multi-centre, multi-informant, cross-sectional, qualitative methods research design. Using ‘think aloud’ audio-recorded interviews, children aged 8–17 years diagnosed within the previous five years with a brain tumour, off treatment and receiving outpatient care, and their parents, were shown a total of nine PROMs and asked to express their views on which they preferred. Detailed notes were made of all audio-recordings by two independent researchers. The final choice of PROMs to be included on the KLIK PROM portal was agreed through discussion of the PROMs selected by families with an expert panel of clinicians, researchers, and parent representatives. RESULTS 16 children and 17 parents participated and of these 2 children and 2 parents did not express a preference. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Core module was the most popular among the children and parents with 7/14 (50%) of children selecting it as either their 1st or 2nd choice citing that they liked the questions and felt them to be most relevant to them, and 8/15 (53%) of parents citing that it was easy, quick and simple, the wording was easy, and they liked the questions about emotional, social, and school functioning. The least popular questionnaires, with no participants selecting them as first choices, were the Kidscreen-10 and the Health Utilities Index. The latter 2 were selected only as 2nd or lower choices by 1 child and 3 parents respectively. CONCLUSION The PROMs that were finally selected for the KLIK PROM portal were the parent- and child-report PedsQL-Core measures of HRQoL due to their good psychometric properties, family and clinician preference and perceived relevance to follow-up care, and for clinical utility on the KLIK PROM portal.

Patient Reported Outcome Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life and Asthenia after Thyroidectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 394-401
Author(s):  
Mary Kate Luddy ◽  
Rachel Vetter ◽  
Jessica Shank ◽  
Whitney Goldner ◽  
Anery Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

scholarly journals The Olympia anatomic polished cemented stem is associated with a high survivorship, excellent hip-specific functional outcome, and high satisfaction levels: follow-up of 239 consecutive patients beyond 15 years

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth S. Turnbull ◽  
Claire Marshall ◽  
Jamie A. Nicholson ◽  
Deborah J. MacDonald ◽  
Nicholas D. Clement ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
High Satisfaction ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cemented Stem ◽  
Oxford Hip Score

Abstract Introduction The Olympia femoral stem is a stainless steel, anatomically shaped, polished and three-dimensionally tapered implant designed for use in cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term survivorship, radiographic outcome, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the Olympia stem. Patients and methods Between May 2003 and December 2005, 239 patients (264 THAs) underwent a THA with an Olympia stem in our institution. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) score, and patient satisfaction at mean 10 years following THA. Patient records and radiographs were then reviewed at a mean of 16.5 years (SD 0.7, 15.3–17.8) following THA to identify occurrence of complications or revision surgery for any cause following surgery. Radiographs were assessed for lucent lines and lysis according to Gruen’s zones Results Mean patient age at surgery was 68.0 years (SD 10.9, 31–93 years). There were 156 women (65%, 176 THAs). Osteoarthritis was the indication for THA in 204 patients (85%). All cause stem survivorship at 10 years was 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.9%–100%) and at 15 years was 97.5% (94.6%–100%). The 15-year stem survival for aseptic loosening was 100%. Analysis of all-cause THA failure demonstrated a survivorship of 98.5% (96.3%–100%) at 10 years and 95.9% (92.4%–99.4%) at 15 years. There were 9 THAs with non-progressive lucent lines in a single Gruen zone and 3 had lines in two zones, and no patient demonstrated signs for lysis. At a mean of 10-year (SD 0.8, 8.7–11.3) follow-up, mean OHS was 39 (SD 10.3, range 7–48) and 94% of patients reported being very satisfied or satisfied with their THA. Conclusions The Olympia stem demonstrated excellent 10-year PROMs and very high rates of stem survivorship at final follow-up beyond 15 years.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Outcomes in Children with Foregut Anomalies

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 587
Author(s):  
Isabel I. Sreeram ◽  
Chantal A. ten Kate ◽  
Joost van Rosmalen ◽  
Johannes M. Schnater ◽  
Saskia J. Gischler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Patient Reported

Increasing numbers of children and adults with chronic disease status highlight the need for a value-based healthcare system. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to value-based healthcare, yet it remains unclear how they relate to clinical outcomes such as health and daily functioning. We aimed to assess the added value of self-reported PROMs for health status (HS) and quality of life (QoL) in the long-term follow-up of children with foregut anomalies. We evaluated data of PROMs for HS and/or QoL among eight-year-olds born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), esophageal atresia (EA), or congenital lung malformations (CLM), collected within the infrastructure of a multidisciplinary, longitudinal follow-up program. Clinical outcomes were categorized into different outcome domains, and their relationships with self-reported HS and QoL were assessed through multivariable linear regression analyses. A total of 220 children completed HS and/or QoL self-reports. In children with CDH and EA, lower cognition was significantly associated with lower self-reported HS. Due to the low number of cases, multivariable linear regression analysis was not possible in children with CLM. HS, QoL, and clinical outcomes represent different aspects of a child’s wellbeing and should be measured simultaneously to facilitate a more holistic approach to clinical decision making.

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis patients: results of the first multicenter cross-sectional ePROMs study in France

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdallah Guerraoui ◽  
Mathilde Prezelin-Reydit ◽  
Anne Kolko ◽  
Marie Lino-Daniel ◽  
Charlotte Dumas de Roque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Dialysis Session ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cardiovascular Comorbidities ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Kidney failure with replacement therapy and hemodialysis are associated with a decrease in quality of life (QOL). Self-reported QOL symptoms are not always prioritized by the medical team, potentially leading to conflicting priorities with patients. Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) allow physicians to better identify these symptoms. The objective was to describe the prevalence of symptoms self-reported by hemodialysis (HD) patients. Methods A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in three HD centers. Patients were included if they were 18 years old or over treated with HD for at least 3 months in a center. Data were collected by the patient via a self-administered ePROMs questionnaire. Data included patient characteristics, post-dialysis fatigue and intensity, recovery time after a session, perceived stress, impaired sleep the day before the dialysis session, current state of health and the change from the past year. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify relations between symptoms. Results In total, we included 173 patients with a mean age of 66.2 years, a mean ± SD hemodialysis duration of 48.9 ± 58.02 months. The prevalence of fatigue was 72%. 66% had a high level of stress (level B or C). Recovery time was more than 6 h after a HD session for 25% of patients and 78% declared they had a better or unchanged health status than the previous year. Sleep disturbance was associated with cardiovascular comorbidities (OR 5.08 [95% CI, 1.56 to 16.59], p = 0.007). Conclusions Fatigue and stress were the main symptoms reported by HD patients. The patient’s care teams should better consider these symptoms.

scholarly journals Digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for remote monitoring of patients on cancer treatment: a cross-sectional questionnaire feasibility study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayuran Ananth Sivanandan ◽  
Catherine Sharma ◽  
Pippa Bullard ◽  
Judith Christian
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Patient Reported

BACKGROUND Oncology has increasing outpatient activity related to increased cancer incidence, better survival rates and more treatments. Innovative technological solutions could help deal with this increasing demand and digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to identify those patients that need a face-to-face (FTF) appointment is one potential approach. OBJECTIVE Our study aimed to assess the feasibility of digital PROM questionnaires to enable remote symptom monitoring for patients on cancer treatment and their ability to determine the requirement for a FTF appointment. METHODS This study was performed at a tertiary oncology centre between December 2018 and February 2019. Target clinics covered both systemic therapy and radiotherapy cohorts. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) helped form the basis for acute toxicity questionnaires which were adapted into patient-friendly language. Treatment-specific digital PROM questionnaires were answered by patients and their clinicians alongside face-to-face appointments. Patients and clinicians did not see each other’s results, which were not used for clinical decisions. Agreement between patients and clinicians was assessed through descriptive statistics. Patient and staff feedback was also obtained. RESULTS 90 patients took part in the study across 10 different treatment pathways. By comparing paired patient and clinician responses, the sensitivity of the patient-completed questionnaires in correctly determining the need for FTF review was 93.6% and no patients with severe toxicity would have been missed with the questionnaires. Digital PROMs revealed 28.9% of participating patients did not need FTF review based on their symptoms. Certain oncological treatment pathways, such as immunotherapy, were found to have a larger proportion of patients with minimal symptoms compared to others, such as conventional chemotherapy. Patient and staff feedback showed high approval with digital PROMs and their potential for use in remote monitoring. CONCLUSIONS Digital PROM questionnaires can feasibly determine the need for FTF review in ‘on treatment’ oncology clinics. Their use with specific treatments could safely reduce the requirement for FTF care and future work should evaluate their application in the remote monitoring of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document