Does Conventional Specimen Radiography After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer Help To Reduce The Rate of Second Surgeries?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Schaefgen ◽  
Annika Funk ◽  
Peter Sinn ◽  
Thomas Bruckner ◽  
Christina Gomez Andreu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Positive Margin ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Positive Margins ◽  
Specimen Radiography

Abstract PurposeThis is the first study to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative specimen radiography on margin level and its potential to reduce second surgeries in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MethodsThis retrospective study included 174 cases receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of primary breast cancer. Conventional specimen radiography (CSR) was performed to assess potential margin infiltration of the target lesion and recommend an intraoperative re-excision of any radiologically positive margin. The histological workup of the specimen served as gold standard for the evaluation of the accuracy of CSR and the potential reduction of second surgeries by CSR-guided re-excisions. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with and without clinical complete response. Results 1044 margins were assessed. Of 47 (4.5%) histopathological positive margins, CSR identified 9 correctly (true positive). 38 infiltrated margins were missed (false negative). This resulted in a sensitivity of 19.2%, a specificity of 89.2%, a PPV of 7.7% and a NPV of 95.9%. The rate of secondary procedures was reduced from 23 to 16 with a number needed to treat (NNT) of CSR guided intraoperative re-excisions of 25. In the subgroup of patients with cCR, the prevalence of positive margins was 10/510 (2.0%), PPV was 1.9% and the NNT was 85. ConclusionPositive margins after NACT are rare and CSR has only a low sensitivity to detect them. Thus, the rate of secondary surgeries cannot be significantly reduced by recommending targeted re-excisions, especially in cases with cCR.

scholarly journals Does conventional specimen radiography after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer help to reduce the rate of second surgeries?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Schaefgen ◽  
Annika Funk ◽  
H.-P. Sinn ◽  
Thomas Bruckner ◽  
Christina Gomez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Positive Margin ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Positive Margins ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Specimen Radiography

Abstract Purpose This is the first study to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative specimen radiography on margin level and its potential to reduce second surgeries in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods This retrospective study included 174 cases receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of primary breast cancer. Conventional specimen radiography (CSR) was performed to assess potential margin infiltration and recommend an intraoperative re-excision of any radiologically positive margin. The histological workup of the specimen served as gold standard for the evaluation of the accuracy of CSR and the potential reduction of second surgeries by CSR-guided re-excisions. Results 1044 margins were assessed. Of 47 (4.5%) histopathological positive margins, CSR identified 9 correctly (true positive). 38 infiltrated margins were missed (false negative). This resulted in a sensitivity of 19.2%, a specificity of 89.2%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 7.7%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.9%. The rate of secondary procedures was reduced from 23 to 16 with a number needed to treat (NNT) of CSR-guided intraoperative re-excisions of 25. In the subgroup of patients with cCR, the prevalence of positive margins was 10/510 (2.0%), PPV was 1.9%, and the NNT was 85. Conclusion Positive margins after NACT are rare and CSR has only a low sensitivity to detect them. Thus, the rate of secondary surgeries cannot be significantly reduced by recommending targeted re-excisions, especially in cases with cCR. In summary, CSR after NACT is inadequate for intraoperative margin assessment but remains useful to document removal of the biopsy site clip.

scholarly journals Re-Excision Rates in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with and without the Use of a Radiopaque Tissue Transfer and X-ray System

Breast Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 302-307
Author(s):  
Suniza Jamaris ◽  
Leyla Akpolat-Basci ◽  
Miltiades Stephanou ◽  
Sarah Wetzig ◽  
Yueksel Cubuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Transfer System ◽  
Tissue Transfer ◽  
Resected Tissue ◽  
Specimen Radiography

Background: Significant re-excision rates in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy may result from difficulties in defining the surgical target particularly in cases with excellent treatment response. Devices allowing an exact topographic localisation of the lesion in the resected tissue could reduce re-excision rates by optimising the intraoperative detection of involved margins. Methods: 80 patients with invasive breast cancer receiving BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this non-randomized case-control study. 40 patients with specimen radiography performed in a standard approach (control group) were compared to 40 patients with use of a radiopaque tissue transfer system (study group). Results: 19/80 (23.75%) patients required re-excision because of involved margins; among those, 14/40 (35%) were in the control group and 5/40 (12.5%) in the study group. The association between the use of the radiopaque tissue transfer system and the lower re-excision rate was statistically significant (p = 0.023). Conclusion: Our analysis provides a rationale for the routine use of a radiopaque tissue transfer system for specimen radiography in BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer in order to reduce re-excision rates.

Locoregional recurrence following pathologic complete response in patients with T1-3 N0 breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast conserving surgery and whole breast radiation: Is a trial of omission of radiation warranted?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12625-e12625
Author(s):  
Elena Parvez ◽  
Thierry Muanza
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Study Objective

e12625 Background: Pathologic complete response(pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) in patients with breast cancer(BC) is associated with decreased recurrence and improved survival. In NSABP B18 and B27, 10-yr locoregional recurrence(LRR) after pCR in patients with Stage I-III BC undergoing breast conserving surgery(BCS) and whole breast RT(WBRT) was 5.2-6.9%. However, LRR may be overestimated as Her2 therapy was not used and only some eligible patients received endocrine therapy. A retrospective study using modern protocols found a 5-yr LRR of up to 2.6%. We hypothesize that LRR in N0 patients is even lower, and de-escalation of therapy should be examined. The study objective is to assess if a prospective trial of omission of WBRT after BCS in patients with N0 BC and pCR after NAC is warranted and to assess feasibility. Methods: Patients with T1-T3 N0 invasive BC diagnosed between Dec 2011-2017 treated with NAC and BCS were identified from a hospital BC registry. Health records were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with pCR, defined as absence of residual invasive or in-situ disease(ypT0N0). Incidents of locoregional and distant recurrence were recorded. Results: Of 89 patients with T1-3 N0 invasive BC treated with NAC and BCS, 29(32.6%) had pCR. Median follow-up was 61.1 months. Median age was 55 yrs and median tumour size was 2.4cm. Receptor status was 16(55.2%) HR-Her2-, 4(13.8%) HR-Her2+, 7(24.1%) HR+Her2+ and 2(6.9%) HR+Her2-. NAC protocols consisted of an anthracycline and/or a taxane in 27(90%) patients, and 6 patients were treated on NAC trials. All patients with Her2+ disease received Her2 targeted therapy. Adjuvant endocrine therapy was taken by 8 of 9 patients with HR+ disease. All patients received WBRT without nodal RT. RT plan was available for 26(86.7%) patients. RT dose ranged from 40-50Gy, and all but 4 received tumour bed boost. There were no local or regional recurrence events at last follow-up. One patient developed brain metastases at 15.7 months. Conclusions: Over 6 years, 29 patients were identified that would be eligible for a prospective trial evaluating omission of WBRT after pCR in N0 patients treated with NAC and BCS. At median 5-yr follow-up, there were no locoregional recurrences in our cohort, demonstrating that the absolute benefit provided by WBRT is likely small. Our results indicate a prospective trial is warranted and will require multi-institution participation to accrue.

Pathologic Complete Response With Six Compared With Three Cycles of Neoadjuvant Epirubicin Plus Docetaxel and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Operable Breast Cancer: Results of ABCSG-14

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 2012-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günther G. Steger ◽  
Arik Galid ◽  
Michael Gnant ◽  
Brigitte Mlineritsch ◽  
Alois Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Purpose Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy for operable breast cancer downstages tumors initially not suitable for breast-conserving surgery. A pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a surrogate for longer overall survival, but this beneficial effect remains to be established. This phase III trial evaluated whether doubling the number of cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the pCR rate. Patients and Methods Patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer (T1-4a-c, N±, M0; stage I to III) were eligible and randomly assigned to either three or six cycles of epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 3 through 10 (ED+G), every 21 days. The primary end point was the pCR rate of the breast tumor. Secondary end points were pathologic nodal status after surgery and the rate of breast-conserving surgery. Results A total of 292 patients were accrued, and 288 patients were assessable for efficacy and safety. Groups were well balanced for known prognostic factors. Six cycles of ED+G, compared with three cycles, resulted in a significantly higher pCR rate (18.6% v 7.7%, respectively; P = .0045), a higher percentage of patients with negative axillary status (56.6% v 42.8%, respectively; P = .02), and a trend towards more breast-conserving surgery (75.9% v 66.9%, respectively; P = .10). Rates of adverse events were similar, and no patients died on treatment. Conclusion Doubling the number of neoadjuvant ED+G cycles from three to six results in higher rates of pCR and negative axillary nodal status with no excess of adverse effects. Thus, six cycles of ED+G should be the standard neoadjuvant treatment for operable breast cancer if this combination is chosen.

scholarly journals Tumor Biology Correlates With Rates of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 260 (4) ◽  
pp. 608-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy C. Boughey ◽  
Linda M. McCall ◽  
Karla V. Ballman ◽  
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf ◽  
Gretchen M. Ahrendt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery

Impact of sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Results from a prospective institutional database.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12619-e12619
Author(s):  
Megan Tesch ◽  
Nathalie LeVasseur ◽  
Christine E. Simmons ◽  
Stephen K. L. Chia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
The Impact

e12619 Background: There has been growing interest in the optimal sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer. However, data comparing efficacy of administering taxanes prior to anthracyclines as opposed to the opposite sequence remains limited and inconsistent. The objective of our study was to assess the impact of sequence order on pathologic and clinical outcomes in a real-world setting. Methods: A prospective institutional database was analyzed to identify all HER2-negative breast cancer patients treated with NACT from 2012 to 2019. Rates of pathologic complete response (pCR), down-staging, and breast-conserving surgery were compared between patients who received anthracyclines followed by taxanes (AC-T) to those who received taxanes followed by anthracyclines (T-AC). Chi-square and independent sample non-parametric tests were used to test for associations between variables and outcomes. Results: Of the 270 patients who met eligibility criteria, 175 (65%) received AC-T and 95 (35%) received T-AC. Median age was 55 (IQR 24-86). Overall, 83% of patients had stage IIB or greater tumors, 40% had grade 3 histology, and 36% had triple-negative disease. Characteristics were balanced between the AC-T and T-AC groups (all p < 0.05). Median duration of treatment with NACT was 102 days (IQR 29-203). Rates of pCR (19% vs 21%, p = 0.750), down-staging (68% vs 61%, p = 0.188), and conversion to breast-conserving surgery (26% vs 20%, p = 0.314) were similar for AC-T vs T-AC, respectively. pCR was higher in triple-negative compared to hormone-positive cases (33% vs 13%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this small population-based cohort, sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in evaluated outcomes from NACT for breast cancer. This supports the current variation in prescribing practice and highlights the need for further studies in this area.

scholarly journals Image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy to assess pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients with exceptional response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl) ◽  
pp. 39-39
Author(s):  
Victoria Teoh ◽  
Fiona MacNeill ◽  
Nicola Roche ◽  
Gerald Gui ◽  
Romney Pope ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Invasive Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Image Guided

39 Background: Image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) is increasingly used after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to assess residual disease in the breast, facilitate risk-adaptive surgery and potentially identify exceptional responders who may not require surgical intervention. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the diagnostic performance of a standardized post-NAC VAB protocol, developed following retrospective analysis of institutional data (1). Methods: Prospective cohort study of patients with HER2 positive and triple negative (TN) invasive ductal carcinoma, treated with NAC, who had partial/complete imaging response and underwent post-NAC VAB to aid surgical planning between 02/2018 and 06/2019. The aim of VAB was to sample the site of residual imaging abnormality (breast residuum <2cm) previously marked by clip insertion. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual disease in the breast (ypT0). Diagnostic accuracy of VAB was calculated using final surgical pathology as the reference standard. Simple descriptive statistics were performed. Results: 26 eligible patients underwent post-NAC VAB. This was representative in 23 cases. The overall pCR rate was 46.2% (42.1% for HER2 positive, 57.1% for TN phenotypes). The post-NAC VAB false negative rate (FNR) was 9.1% (95% CI: 0-26.1) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 90.91% (95% CI: 60.27-98.51) with an overall accuracy of 86.96% (95% CI: 66.41-97.22). Conclusions: This data suggests that post-NAC VAB may reliably predict pCR in patients with HER2 positive and TN invasive ductal carcinoma with good response to NAC. Further technical refinements in VAB technique, standardization in patient selection and prospective trials are warranted to further explore the role of post-NAC VAB in supporting minimal or no surgery trials. References 1. Tasoulis MK, Roche N, Rusby JE, Pope R, Allen S, Downey K, Nerurkar A, Osin P, Wilson R, MacNeill F. Post neoadjuvant chemotherapy vacuum assisted biopsy in breast cancer: Can it determine pathologic complete response before surgery? J Clin Oncol 2018;36 (Supplement): abstr 567.

scholarly journals Molecular Biomarkers Predict Pathological Complete Response of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Review

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5477
Author(s):  
Ana Julia Aguiar de Freitas ◽  
Rhafaela Lima Causin ◽  
Muriele Bertagna Varuzza ◽  
Cassio Murilo Trovo Hidalgo Filho ◽  
Vinicius Duval da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Information

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is often used to treat locally advanced disease for tumor downstaging, thus improving the chances of breast-conserving surgery. From the NAC response, it is possible to obtain prognostic information as patients may reach a pathological complete response (pCR). Those who do might have significant advantages in terms of survival rates. Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease that requires personalized treatment strategies. The development of targeted therapies depends on identifying biomarkers that can be used to assess treatment efficacy as well as the discovery of new and more accurate therapeutic agents. With the development of new “OMICS” technologies, i.e., genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, among others, the discovery of new biomarkers is increasingly being used in the context of clinical practice, bringing us closer to personalized management of BC treatment. The aim of this review is to compile the main biomarkers that predict pCR in BC after NAC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document