scholarly journals High dose vitamin C in sepsis (HDVCIS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Zhao ◽  
Mengjiao Li ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Leshan Liu ◽  
Yihui Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
High Dose Vitamin

Abstract Sepsis is an inflammatory syndrome with life-threatening organ dysfunction resulting from a dysregulated host response to infection. Although the treatment for sepsis has improved a lot in the last 30 years, sepsis related mortality remains high. In the recent 10 years, high dose intravenous injection of vitamin C, the first line antioxidant of human, has received more and more attention in the field of critical care, its beneficial effect has been demonstrated by several small scale clinical trial and animal studies, but the effect of high dose vitamin C on sepsis in a larger trial seems warranted in further study. Here we will conduct a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, adaptive sample size, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial named as HDVCIS. The trial protocol has been approved by Clinical Trail Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine. This trial has been registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800017633) in August 7, 2018. Patients will be recruited from 4 medical centers in China. Its object is to testify the efficacy and safety of high dose vitamin C in the treatment of sepsis.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of berberine for dyslipidemia: study protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhao ◽  
Yuan-Yuan Yang ◽  
Bao-Lin Yang ◽  
Ya-Wei Du ◽  
Da-Wei Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Double Blind

Abstract Background Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a leading cause of death worldwide. The clinical utility of commonly used lipid-lowering drugs such as statins and fibrates is sometimes limited by the occurrence of various adverse reactions. Recently, berberine (BBR) has received increasing attention as a safer and more cost-effective option to manage dyslipidemia. Thus, a high-quality randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BBR in the treatment of dyslipidemia is deemed necessary. Methods/design This is a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 118 patients with dyslipidemia will be enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups at a ratio of 1:1. BBR or placebo will be taken orally for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is the percentage of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction at week 12. Other outcome measures include changes in other lipid profiles, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, blood pressure, body weight, Bristol Stool Chart, traditional Chinese medicine symptom form, adipokine profiles, and metagenomics of intestinal microbiota. Safety assessment includes general physical examination, blood and urine routine test, liver and kidney function test, and adverse events. Discussion This trial may provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of BBR for dyslipidemia. Importantly, the findings of this trial will help to identify patient and disease characteristics that may predict favorable outcomes of treatment with BBR and optimize its indication for clinical use. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900021361. Registered on 17 February 2019.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Evaluation of Artesunate in IgA Nephropathy (TEATING) Study: A study protocol of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Chen ◽  
Zi Wang ◽  
Jicheng Lv ◽  
Lijun Liu ◽  
Hang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Iga Nephropathy ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Kidney Diseases ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Stage Renal Disease

Abstract Background IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerular disease and a common cause of progression to end-stage renal disease in patients with kidney diseases. Proteinuria levels are critical to the prognosis of patients with IgA nephropathy, but many patients are still unable to effectively control proteinuria levels after receiving adequate RAAS blockers. Antimalarial drugs have shown good efficacy in the treatment of kidney disease in previous studies; however, there have been no strict designed randomized controlled trials to confirm the clinical efficacy of artesunate in IgA nephropathy patients. Therefore, we designed this clinical trial to compare the effect of artesunate versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy. Methods This study was a randomized, double-blind, three-group-parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. One hundred and twenty eligible IgA nephropathy patients at risk of progression were randomly divided into artesunate 100mg group, artesunate 50 mg group, and placebo group. Changes in proteinuria and renal function were measured after 6 months of intervention. The levels of Gd-IgA1, Anti-Gd-IgA1 in the patient's blood will also be tested to further understand possible immune mechanisms. Discussion Clinical evidence for artesunate treatment of IgA nephropathy is currently lacking, and we expect that the results of this trial will provide high-quality clinical evidence for artesunate as a treatment option for IgA nephropathy in the future. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000038104, registration date: 10 September 2020. http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=61338&htm=4.

scholarly journals Single High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation as an Approach for Reducing Ultramarathon-Induced Inflammation: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1280
Author(s):  
Jan Mieszkowski ◽  
Andżelika Borkowska ◽  
Błażej Stankiewicz ◽  
Andrzej Kochanowicz ◽  
Bartłomiej Niespodziński ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Inflammatory Marker ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Oncostatin M ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Single High Dose ◽  
High Dose Vitamin

Purpose: A growing number of studies indicate the importance of vitamin D supplementation for sports performance. However, the effects of a single high-dose vitamin D supplementation on ultramarathon-induced inflammation have not been investigated. We here analyzed the effect of a single high-dose vitamin D supplementation on the inflammatory marker levels in ultramarathon runners after an ultramarathon run (maximal run 240 km). Methods: In the study, 35 runners (amateurs) were assigned into two groups: single high-dose vitamin D supplementation group, administered vitamin D (150,000 IU) in vegetable oil 24 h before the start of the run (n = 16); and placebo group (n = 19). Blood was collected for analysis 24 h before, immediately after, and 24 h after the run. Results: Serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly increased after the ultramarathon in both groups. The increase was greater in the vitamin D group than in the control group. Based on post-hoc and other analyses, the increase in interleukin 6 and 10, and resistin levels immediately after the run was significantly higher in runners in the control group than that in those in the supplementation group. Leptin, oncostatin M, and metalloproteinase tissue inhibitor levels were significantly decreased in both groups after the run, regardless of the supplementation. Conclusions: Ultramarathon significantly increases the serum 25(OH)D levels. Attenuation of changes in interleukin levels upon vitamin D supplementation confirmed that vitamin D has anti-inflammatory effect on exercise-induced inflammation.

scholarly journals Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Toxicity of Disoproxil Tenofovir Fumarate and Emtricitabine for Mild to Moderate SARS-CoV-2 Infections

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo A M Lima ◽  
Erico A G Arruda ◽  
Roberto J Pires-Neto ◽  
Melissa S Medeiros ◽  
J Quirino-Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Respiratory Infection ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Double Blind

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of tenofovir (TDF) and TDF combined with emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 infections. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with clinical suspicion of mild to moderate respiratory infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 who were treated at an outpatient clinic. Patients were randomly recruited to take 10 days of TDF (300 mg/day), TDF (300 mg/day) combined with FTC (200 mg/day) or placebo Vitamin C (500 mg/day). The primary parameter was the score of symptoms and predictive signs of COVID-19, assessed on the seventh day of patient follow-up. From a total of 309 patients with clinical suspicion of SARS-CoV-2, 227 met the inclusion criteria and were randomly distributed into the following groups: (a) 75 (one did not initiate treatment) in the TDF group; (b) 74 in the TDF combined with FTC group; and (c) 77 in the Vitamin C group (placebo). Of the 226 patients, 139 (62%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Fever (37.8oC), ageusia or dysgeusia, anosmia or dysosmia, and two or more clinical symptoms or signs were significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was no significant change in clinical score based on clinical symptoms and signs between treatment groups. Patients with mild to moderate infection by SARS-CoV-2 had higher concentrations of G-CSF, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α compared to patients without infection. Patients with mild to moderate respiratory infection, with fever (37.8oC), loss of smell, loss of taste and two or more symptoms, have a better prediction for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 showed higher and more persistent proinflammatory cytokines profile compared to patients not infected with SARS-CoV-2. Pharmacological intervention with TDF or TDF combined with FTC did not change the clinical signs and symptoms score in mild to moderate respiratory infection in patients with SARS-CoV-2 compared to the Vitamin C group (placebo).

scholarly journals High-dose vitamin C infusion for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Xin Rao ◽  
Yiming Li ◽  
Yuan Zhu ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
C 50 ◽  
Intravenous Vitamin ◽  
High Dose Vitamin

Abstract BackgroundNo specific medication has been proven effective for the treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we tested whether high-dose vitamin C infusion was effective for severe COVID-19.MethodsThis randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed at 3 hospitals in Hubei, China. Patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the ICU were randomly assigned in as 1:1 ratio to either the high-dose intravenous vitamin C (HDIVC) or the placebo. HDIVC group received 12 g of vitamin C/50 ml every 12 hours for 7 days at a rate of 12 ml/hour, and the placebo group received bacteriostatic water for injection in the same way. The primary outcome was invasive mechanical ventilation-free days in 28 days(IMVFD28). Secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, organ failure, and inflammation progression.ResultsFifty-four critical COVID-19 patients were ultimately recruited. There was no difference in IMVFD28 between two groups. During the 7-day treatment period, patients in the HDIVC group had a steady rise in the PaO2/FiO2 (day 7: 229 vs. 151 mmHg, 95% CI 33 to 122, P = 0.01). Patients with SOFA scores ≥ 3 in the HDIVC group exhibited a significant reduction in 28-day mortality (P = 0.05) in univariate survival analysis. IL-6 in the VC group was lower than that in the placebo group (19.42 vs. 158.00; 95% CI -301.72 to -29.79; P = 0.04) on day 7.ConclusionThe addition of HDIVC may provide a protective clinical effect without any adverse events in critically ill patients with COVID-19.Clinicaltrial.gov identifer: NCT04264533

scholarly journals Early high-dose vitamin C in post-cardiac arrest syndrome (VITaCCA): study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander Rozemeijer ◽  
Harm-Jan de Grooth ◽  
Paul W. G. Elbers ◽  
Armand R. J. Girbes ◽  
Corstiaan A. den Uil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lung Injury Score ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Search Trial ◽  
Intravenous Vitamin

Abstract Background High-dose intravenous vitamin C directly scavenges and decreases the production of harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during ischemia/reperfusion after a cardiac arrest. The aim of this study is to investigate whether short-term treatment with a supplementary or very high-dose intravenous vitamin C reduces organ failure in post-cardiac arrest patients. Methods This is a double-blind, multi-center, randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted in 7 intensive care units (ICUs) in The Netherlands. A total of 270 patients with cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation will be randomly assigned to three groups of 90 patients (1:1:1 ratio, stratified by site and age). Patients will intravenously receive a placebo, a supplementation dose of 3 g of vitamin C or a pharmacological dose of 10 g of vitamin C per day for 96 h. The primary endpoint is organ failure at 96 h as measured by the Resuscitation-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (R-SOFA) score at 96 h minus the baseline score (delta R-SOFA). Secondary endpoints are a neurological outcome, mortality, length of ICU and hospital stay, myocardial injury, vasopressor support, lung injury score, ventilator-free days, renal function, ICU-acquired weakness, delirium, oxidative stress parameters, and plasma vitamin C concentrations. Discussion Vitamin C supplementation is safe and preclinical studies have shown beneficial effects of high-dose IV vitamin C in cardiac arrest models. This is the first RCT to assess the clinical effect of intravenous vitamin C on organ dysfunction in critically ill patients after cardiac arrest. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03509662. Registered on April 26, 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03509662European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT): 2017-004318-25. Registered on June 8, 2018. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2017-004318-25/NL

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document