Evaluation of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radical Esophagectomy in Clinical T1bN0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoma Haneda ◽  
Eisuke Booka ◽  
Kenjiro Ishii ◽  
Hirotoshi Kikuchi ◽  
Yoshihiro Hiramatsu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The standard treatment for patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is radical esophagectomy. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is regarded as a treatment option, and good clinical outcome of this treatment has been reported. This study compared the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy with radical esophagectomy.Methods: From January 2011 to December 2019, this study enrolled 68 consecutive patients. Patients were classified into two groups whether treated by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy. Survival outcome were compared and subsequent therapies after recurrence were also investigated.Results: Surgery was performed to 39 patients, and 29 patients received definitive chemoradiotherapy. No significant difference was noted in overall survival between two groups. However, the rate of 5-year recurrence free survival was significantly lower in definitive chemoradiotherapy group than that of surgery group (91.1% vs. 62.7%, Hazard ratio 3.976, 95% Confidence interval 1.076-14.696, p = 0.039). Patients who had local recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy received endoscopic submucosal dissection or photodynamic therapy as salvage therapies, and resulted in no disease progression and a good prognosis.Conclusions: Definitive chemoradiotherapy may become a promising alternative therapy comparable with radical esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Early detection of recurrence by frequent follow-up after definitive chemoradiotherapy is important to control disease within local recurrence, and salvage therapy for local lesions could contribute to long-term survival.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenyu Zhai ◽  
Shenshen Fu ◽  
Xiaoqiang Li ◽  
Fangfang Duan ◽  
Hongying Liao ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundSeveral kinds of anastomoses with varying locations that can be performed after the surgical resection of lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic impact of anastomosis locations in these patients who underwent radical esophagectomy.MethodsLower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients which underwent radical esophagectomy and confirmed as microscopically complete resection were retrospectively enrolled. Anastomoses below the aortic arch or below the azygos arch were defined as low anastomosis. Other anastomoses were defined as high anastomosis. Overall survival of these two kinds of anastomoses were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox regression model.ResultsOf the 781 patients enrolled, 196 and 585 were classified as the low anastomosis and high anastomosis groups, respectively. Overall, the survival time in low anastomosis group (median OS, 36.1 versus 65.4; P=0.01) was shorter than high anastomosis group but no statistical difference was observed in multivariate analysis (P=0.195). Again, no significant difference in survival between low anastomosis and high anastomosis group (median OS, 140.9 versus 124.8; P=0.345) were observed in pT1-T2 subgroup. In pT3-T4 subgroups, patients with low anastomosis group had significantly poorer survival that those with high anastomosis (median OS, 27.1 versus 42.9, P=0.003), even after controlling for other confounders (P=0.026). Notably, the impact of anastomosis location on long-term survival in pT3-4 patients was not significantly modified by nodal status. The internal validation of patients undergoing Sweet approach shown that pT3-T4 patients with high anastomosis had survival advantages (adjusted HR=0.711, 95%CI, 0.601 0.990, P=0.041)ConclusionsFor lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with declared T3-4 status, low anastomosis is associated with worse prognosis and should be avoided.



Esophagus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-439
Author(s):  
Yoichi Yamamoto ◽  
Tomohiro Kadota ◽  
Yusuke Yoda ◽  
Keisuke Hori ◽  
Ken Hatogai ◽  
...  


Esophagus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiko Yamamoto ◽  
Ryu Ishihara ◽  
Hiroyasu Iishi ◽  
Noriya Uedo ◽  
Yoji Takeuchi ◽  
...  


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4094-4094
Author(s):  
Weimin Mao ◽  
Xinming Zhou ◽  
Qixun Chen ◽  
Youhua Jiang ◽  
Xun Yang ◽  
...  

4094 Background: Nomograms have been widely and successfully used for numerous cancers to obtain reliable prognostic information for each individual patient.To date, however, no studies have conducted survival estimates using nomograms for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Chinese population.The purpose of this study is to develop a nomogram to predict the long-term survival probabilities in patients diagnosed with ESCC after radical esophagectomy. Methods: This study involves a dataset containing 1923 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for ESCC at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital in Hangzhou, China. Among them, 1,578 patients with no missing data were used to build a prognostic nomogram based on Cox proportional hazard regression model. A multivariate survival analysis using Cox regression model was applied to identify significant variables with P-values <0.05. On the basis of the predictive model with the identified variables, a nomogram was constructed for predicting five-year and ten-year overall survival probabilities. The prediction model was internally validated using bootstrap resampling, assessing its optimism-corrected discrimination and calibration. Results: The median of overall survival times of 1578 ESCC patients was 35.6 months, and the 5-year and 10-year survival rate was 32% and 20%, respectively. The multivariate Cox model identified alcohol, tumor length, surgical approach, number of surgical removed lymph node, ratio of metastatic lymph nodes, region of lymph nodes dissection, depth of invasion, differentiation of tumor, postoperative complications as covariates significantly associated with survival. Across the 100 bootstrap replicates, the median optimism-corrected summary C-index for predicting survival was 0.713 (SE=0.011). Conclusions: A nomogram predicting 5- and 10-year overall survival after radical esophagectomy for ESCC in Chinese population was constructed and validated based on nine significant variables. The nomogram can be applied in daily clinical practice for individualized survival prediction of ESCC patients after potentially curative esophagectomy.





2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Nakatsumi ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Shintaro Nakano ◽  
Kentaro Sawada ◽  
Tetsuhito Muranaka ◽  
...  

115 Background: The standard treatment of resectable esophageal cancer in Japan is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery, while definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered as an alternative treatment. There are no randomized clinical trials comparing NAC and CRT in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of NAC or CRT in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients (pts) with clinical stage IB/II/III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received NAC (n = 26) or CRT (n = 17) in Hokkaido University Hospital from January 2009 to December 2014. To compare NAC with CRT, Fisher’s exact test or Mann-Whitney U test was used in terms of pts’ characteristics, and Log-rank test was used in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Pts’ characteristics were as follows; Gender (male/female): 24/2 in NAC and 16/1 in CRT, median age (range): 65y (55-78) in NAC and 72y (57-80) in CRT, primary lesion (Ut/Mt/Lt): 4/12/10 in NAC and 2/9/6 in CRT, clinical stage IB-II/III: 11/15 in NAC and 9/8 in CRT. Four pts (15.4%) in NAC and seven pts (41.2%) in CRT had multiple primary cancer. All pts in NAC and 15 pts in CRT received 5-FU+cisplatin (CDDP), and two pts in CRT received 5-FU+nedaplatin. RT dose in CRT was 50.4Gy in 11 pts, 59.4Gy in five pts and 60Gy in one patient. Four out of 10 pts in NAC with local recurrence received salvage CRT, and three out of 10 pts in CRT with local recurrence received salvage surgery. Median PFS was 21.6 months in NAC and 8.7 months in CRT (HR 1.282, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.871-1.887, p = 0.203), and median OS was 50.4 months in NAC and 48.6 months in CRT (HR 1.151, 95% CI 0.752-1.761, p = 0.516). 5-year OS rate was 49.7% in NAC and 48.3% in CRT. Conclusions: Definitive CRT showed comparable outcome to NAC followed by surgery in pts with resectable thoracic ESCC. Efficacy of NAC or CRT were not sufficient compared to clinical trials. Improvement in efficacy by development of optimal multimodality therapy was warranted.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document