scholarly journals The Results of Conversion Therapy for Initially Unresectable Gastric Cancer: a Respective Analysis of 191 Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaopeng Zhang ◽  
Song Wu ◽  
Yuan Kong ◽  
Wei Li
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conversion Therapy ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Unresectable Gastric Cancer ◽  
N Stage ◽  
Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Perfusion

Abstract 【Objective】 To analyze the clinical efficacy of systemic chemotherapy combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion in the treatment of locally invasive stage III gastric cancer and stage IV gastric cancer. 【Methods】 The clinical data of 191 patients with gastric cancer who received systemic chemotherapy combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion from June 2010 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. 【Results】 The unresectable factors in 191 patients with gastric cancer included peritoneum metastasis (106), local invasion (67), liver metastasis (25), lung metastasis (3), bone metastasis (4), adnexal metastasis (3) and adrenal metastasis (4). After conversion therapy, 191 patients were divided into finished conversion group and non-finished group. There were significant differences in T stage, M stage and tumor differentiation between the two groups. During the course of chemotherapy, 11 patients had grade 3 or 4 chemotherapy adverse reactions. The median survival was 36 months in the finished conversion group and 14 months in the non-finished group. The median survival of the 69 R0 resected patients was 38 months, which was higher than that of chemotherapy alone (14 months), best supportive care (13 months) and patients who completed chemotherapy without R0 resection (19 months). Univariate Cox survival analysis found that N stage, R0 resection, response to chemotherapy and unresectable factors were prognostic factors. Multivariate Cox survival analysis showed that N-stage, response to chemotherapy and unresectable factors were independent prognostic factors. 【 Conclusion 】 For unresectable gastric cancer patients, surgical treatment after chemotherapy can prolong survival. Radical surgical treatment after conversion therapy and chemotherapy response are important factors related to patient survival. Chemotherapy alone can prolong survival in primary unresectable gastric cancer, but with limited effect.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal and Systemic Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110363
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Hejing Huang ◽  
Dejun Yang ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conversion Surgery ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

Background: The optimal treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) versus neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NSC) for GCPM. Methods: Patients of GCPM received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 between January 2011 and June 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was carried out to reduce the selection bias. Multivariate Cox regression model was applied to screen the prognostic factors. Results: After PSM processing, 71 patients in each group were matched among the 186 GCPM patients included. NIPS yielded a better ascites and cytology response to chemotherapy, higher conversion resection rate and R0 resection rate than NSC. The overall survival (OS) rate in NIPS group was better than that in NSC group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the P stage, ascites response, conversion surgery rate and R0 resection rate were independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis indicated that NIPS showed a survival benefit over NSC only in patients with cT3-4a, P1-2, whose cytology turned negative, and who received conversion surgery; while not in patients with cT4b, P0 or P3, whose cytology did not turn negative, or who did not receive conversion surgery. Conclusions: NIPS is a safe and feasible treatment for GCPM, which showed more benefit than NSC.

scholarly journals Short-Term Survival and Safety of Apatinib Combined With Oxaliplatin and S-1 in the Conversion Therapy of Unresectable Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaisheng Ye ◽  
Yi Zeng ◽  
Shenghong Wei ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Zhitao Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conversion Therapy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Unresectable Gastric Cancer ◽  
Short Term Survival

Abstract BackgroundTo investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in the treatment of unresectable gastric cancer.Patients and methodsPreviously untreated patients with unresectable HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer were selected. All the patients received six cycles of S-1 and oxaliplatin and five cycles of apatinib, which were administered at intervals of three weeks. The surgery was performed after six cycles of drug treatment. The primary endpoints were radical resection (R0) rate and safety. This study was registered with the China Trial Register, number ChiCTR-ONC-17010430(01/12/2016-01/12/2022).ResultsA total of 39 patients were enrolled. Efficacy evaluation was feasible for 37 patients. One patient achieved complete response (CR, 2.7%), 26 patients achieved partial response (PR, 70.3%), three patients had stable disease (SD, 8.1%) and seven patients had progressive disease (PD, 18.9%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 73.0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 81.1%. 22 patients underwent surgery, among which 14 patients underwent radical resection (R0), with a R0 resection rate of 63.6%. The 1-year survival rate of the surgical group (22 patients) was 71.1% and the 2-year survival rate was 41.1%. The median survival time was 21 months. The incidence of adverse reactions (AEs) was 100%. Leucopenia (65.3%) and granulocytopenia (69.2%) were the most common hematological AEs. The most common non-hematological AEs were fatigue (51.3%) and oral mucositis (35.9%).ConclusionApatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed good short-term survival and acceptable safety in the conversion therapy of unresectable gastric cancer.

Phase II study of conversion therapy using S1/paclitaxel chemotherapy plus apatinib in unresectable gastric cancer (Ahead-G325 trial).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangdong Cheng ◽  
Zhiyuan Xu ◽  
Yian Du ◽  
Ping Hu ◽  
Guofa Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conversion Therapy ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Related Complication ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Unresectable Gastric Cancer

53 Background: Occasionally, an initially unresectable gastric cancer (GC) can be converted to a resectable one by chemotherapy. Combination with inhibitors against VEGFR-2 can lead to a clinical improvement. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of S1/paclitaxel chemotherapy plus apatinib, a novel inhibitor of VEGFR-2, in the conversion therapy of unresectable GC. Methods: This was a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase II design. Eligible patients (pts) were aged 20-70 years and had histologically proven unresectable, HER-2 negative, advanced GC with a single non-curable factor confined to either the liver (H1), peritoneum (P1), or para-aortic lymph nodes (16a1/b2). The ECOG performance status was 0-2. No prior radiotherapy, chemotherapy, target therapy or immunotherapy was allowed. Patients received 2 cycles of S1/paclitaxel chemotherapy (S1: 60 mg, oral, bid for 2 weeks followed by a drug-free interval of 1 week; paclitaxel: 150 mg/m2, iv, 3h, on day 1) plus apatinib (500 mg, oral, qd) and 1 cycle of S1/paclitaxel chemotherapy prior to radical surgery. Three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (S1 and apatinib) were given 4-6 weeks after surgery. Primary endpoint was R0 resection rate. Thirty-three pts were enrolled. Results: Among the 28 pts eligible for preoperative efficacy evaluation, 21 achieved partial response (PR), 5 had stable disease (SD), and 2 had progressive disease (PD), resulting in an overall response rate of 75.0% and a disease control rate of 92.9%. Of the 21 pts with PR, 3 refused consents for surgery and 18 achieved R0 resection. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 73.9%. The common hematologic AEs were neutropenia (60.9%), leukopenia (52.2%) and hemoglobin decrease (47.8%), and nonhematologic AEs included hyperbilirubinemia (56.5%), hand-foot syndrome (34.8%), oral mucositis (30.4%), fatigue (30.4%), proteinuria (21.7%) and hypocalcemia (21.7%). There was no severe surgery-related complication. Conclusions: Combination of apatinib with S1/paclitaxel chemotherapy shows clinical benefits in unresectable GC, with acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02529878.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Conversion Surgery Following Apatinib Plus Paclitaxel/S1 for Advanced Gastric Cancer With Unresectable Factors: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Xu ◽  
Can Hu ◽  
Jianfa Yu ◽  
Yian Du ◽  
Ping Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Conversion Surgery ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Unresectable Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

Objective: Conversion therapy (surgical resection after chemotherapy) is a promising option for unresectable gastric cancer (GC) patients. Addition of anti-angiogenesis drug improves response to chemotherapy. Hence, this study explored the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative paclitaxel (PTX)/S1 chemotherapy combined with apatinib for unresectable GC.Methods: Thirty-one eligible patients with a single unresectable factor were enrolled in this multi-center, single-arm trial. Apatinib (500 mg qd) was administered continuously, while PTX (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S1 (80 mg/m2) on day 1–14 were given every 3 weeks. The treatment was given for three cycles preoperatively, but the last cycle did not include apatinib. The primary objective measurements included R0 resection rate, objective response rate (ORR) and morbidity of preoperative treatment.Results: Among the 31 patients, 30 patients were evaluable for tumor response, the ORR to preoperative treatment was 73.3%. Eighteen of 30 patients underwent surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in 17 patients. The patients who underwent the conversion surgery had a superior OS compared with those who did not (3 years OS: 52.9 vs 8.3%, p = 0.001). The surgery was operated after apatinib had stopped for a median duration of 4 weeks. Neither anastomotic leakage nor wound healing complications was observed. No increased bleeding event was observed compared with historical data. During preoperative treatment, grade 3 or 4 toxicities were experienced by 58.1% of the patients.Conclusion: Chemotherapy in combination with apatinib demonstrated higher rates of conversion and R0 resection and a superior survival benefit in initial unresectable GC. It is safe and reasonable to suspend apatinib for 4 weeks before the gastrectomy.

scholarly journals Short-term survival and safety of apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in the conversion therapy of unresectable gastric cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaisheng Ye ◽  
Yi Zeng ◽  
Shenghong Wei ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Zhitao Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conversion Therapy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Unresectable Gastric Cancer ◽  
Short Term Survival

Abstract Background We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in the treatment of unresectable gastric cancer. Patients and methods Previously untreated patients with unresectable HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer were selected. All the patients received six cycles of S-1 and oxaliplatin and five cycles of apatinib, which were administered at intervals of three weeks. The surgery was performed after six cycles of drug treatment. The primary endpoints were radical resection (R0) rate and safety. This study was registered with the China Trial Register, number ChiCTR-ONC-17010430 (01/12/2016–01/12/2022). Results A total of 39 patients were enrolled. Efficacy evaluation was feasible for 37 patients. One patient achieved complete response (CR, 2.7%), 26 patients achieved partial response (PR, 70.3%), three patients had stable disease (SD, 8.1%) and seven patients had progressive disease (PD, 18.9%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 73.0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 81.1%. 22 patients underwent surgery, among which 14 patients underwent radical resection (R0), with a R0 resection rate of 63.6%. The 1-year survival rate of the surgical group (22 patients) was 71.1% and the 2-year survival rate was 41.1%. The median survival time was 21 months. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 100%. Leucopenia (65.3%) and granulocytopenia (69.2%) were the most common hematological AEs. The most common non-hematological AEs were fatigue (51.3%) and oral mucositis (35.9%). Conclusion Apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed good short-term survival and acceptable safety in the conversion therapy of unresectable gastric cancer.

Conversion surgery for unresectable gastric cancer following complete response of distant metastasis by systemic chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 152-152
Author(s):  
Daisuke Kobayashi ◽  
Mitsuro Kanda ◽  
Chie Tanaka ◽  
Naoki Iwata ◽  
Masamichi Hayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conversion Surgery ◽  
Unresectable Gastric Cancer

152 Background: In case of gastric cancer (GC), conversion surgery (CS) can be defined as resection of the primary cancer by gastrectomy which had not been originally planned but was indicated after confirming complete response (CR) in the distant metastasis (DM) by chemotherapy. In the present study, we looked at prognostic significance of CS, which is intended to cure originally unresectable GC. Methods: From 2004 to Feb in 2016, 24 GC patients who were treated by chemotherapy and achieved CR in DM underwent CS among 909 patients with gastrectomy in our department. 10 out of 24 patients who had peritoneal metastases (P) as a single non-curative factor underwent intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IP) in addition to systemic chemotherapy. CR was confirmed by CT and/or laparoscopic examination. Results: 15 patients had P, 13 had distant lymph node metastases (LYM), 2 had liver metastases, and 2 had lung metastases. Chemotherapeutic regimens consisted of systemic chemotherapy plus IP of taxane in 10 patients, S-1/CDDP in 7, capecitabine/CDDP/trastsuzumab in 3, and others in 4. Median duration of chemotherapy before surgery was 7.3 months (2.3-17.5). Total gastrectomy was performed in 18 patients and distal gastrectomy in 6, achieving R0 resection in 21 patients and R1 in 3. 10 patients with P who underwent IP relapsed within 12 months postoperatively except for 2 and had significantly shorter overall survival time than those with other DM except for P (median: 20 vs. 42 months, P = 0.004). Among 14 patients who had DM other than P as target lesions, 9 are disease-free with postoperative median follow up time of 35 months (6.8-82), and 5 patients had recurrence (LYM in 4 and P in 1) with postoperative median survival time of 25 months (4.8-45). DM of the patients without recurrence had achieved CR within shorter period (median: 3.6 vs. 6.7 months) and had higher pathological response rate of the primary lesion (89% vs. 40%) compared to patients with recurrence. Conclusions: Outcome of GC patients who underwent CS after achieving CR in DM was promising, especially in those without P. Further issues such as appropriate chemotherapeutic period, and prognostic factors to decide on the indication for CS need to be solved.

Efficacy and safety of conversion therapy using chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenic therapy in unresectable gastric cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15510-e15510
Author(s):  
Lu chuan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Conversion Therapy ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Unresectable Gastric Cancer

e15510 Background: Conversion therapy has been a promising option for patients with unresectable gastric cancer (GC) (including Phase IV gastric cancer, N3, lymph node fusion and local progression patients). We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of S1/oxaliplatin chemotherapy plus apatinib, a novel inhibitor of VEGFR-2, in the conversion therapy for unresectable GC. Methods: This was a single-center, single-arm, open-label study. unresectable GC patients with unresectable factors were eligible for this study. Apatinib (500mg, qd) was administrated continuously, oxaliplatin (130mg/m2) on day 1, and S1 (<1.25m2, 40mg*2/d; 1.25-1.5m2, 50mg*2/d; >1.5m2, 60mg*2/d) on day 1-14 every 3 weeks. Treatment was given for 4-6 cycles preoperatively, but the last cycle did not include apatinib. The primary objective included R0 resection rate and safety profile of preoperative treatment. Results: Total 17 patients were enrolled, the median age was 57 (55.12±10.08) years old. The histological types were mainly signet ring cell carcinoma 10 (58.82%), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma 5 (29.41%), and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma 2 (11.76%). Among the 17 patients eligible for preoperative efficacy evaluation, 13 achieved partial response (PR), 3 achieved stable disease (SD), and 1 had progressive disease (PD), the overall response rate (ORR) was 76.5% and disease control rate was 94.1%. Of the 13 pts with PR, 1 refused consents for surgery, 12 patients underwent surgery and 9(75%) achieved R0 resection. During preoperative treatment, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 76.5%. The common hematologic AEs were neutropenia (64.7%), leukopenia (64.7%) and hemoglobin decrease (11.8%), and nonhematologic AEs included hyperbilirubinemia (11.8%), hand-foot syndrome (17.6%), oral mucositis (29.4%), fatigue (70.6%), proteinuria (5.9%). Conclusions: Combination of apatinib with S1/oxaliplatin chemotherapy could induce a sufficient conversion rate and achieve a relative high R0 resection rate for initially unresectable GC, with tolerable safety profile. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-ONC-17010430 trial.

Survival benefit of conversion therapy after intensive chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 354-354
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Ohnuma ◽  
Yasushi Sato ◽  
Ginji Omori ◽  
Naoki Onoyama ◽  
Saki Ameda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Conversion Therapy ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

354 Background: The significance of conversion therapy (CT), whereby patients (pts) with unresectable disease respond to chemotherapy and subsequently receive surgery with curative intent (adjuvant surgery: AS), has been specifically established for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, such a strategy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial. This study aims to clarify the clinical significance of CT for AGC. Methods: In this retrospective multi-institution observational study, we analyzed 168 AGC pts who received chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel, cisplatin or oxaliplatin, and S-1 ± trastuzumab between 2003 and 2019. We divided pts into two groups: those who underwent CT (group CT) or chemotherapy only (group C). Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching minimized confounding bias when comparing efficacy and safety between groups. Results: A tumor response to chemotherapy was observed in 82.4% of all cases, while 34.5% (58/168) underwent AS. Fifty-one of the 58 pts underwent an R0 resection, and 79.3% were deemed histological responders. After matching, 44 pairs of C and CT pts were selected; significant differences in baseline characteristics were not observed. Incidences of adverse events during chemotherapy were similar between groups, with neutropenia and febrile neutropenia as common grade 3–4 events. Compared with group C, group CT had a significantly better median overall survival (OS) (15.5 vs. 46.0 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18–0.58; p < .001), and a prolonged progression-free survival (6.5 vs.22.6 months; HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.19–0.56; p < .001). Subgroup analysis of OS showed a favorable trend for CT for almost all parameters. In a multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status (HR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03–0.31) and AS (HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.10–0.40) correlated with favorable OS. In the CT group, pathological response was an independent prognostic factor (HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.06–0.39). Conclusions: CT was associated with better outcomes in AGC pts, even after baseline adjustment. Our data warrants further large-scale studies to establish a conversion therapeutic strategy.

Prognostic significance of surgery after chemotherapy in patients with type 4 gastric cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Arigami ◽  
Daisuke Matsushita ◽  
Keishi Okubo ◽  
Takako Tanaka ◽  
Ken Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Regimen ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

Abstract Background The majority of patients with type 4 gastric cancer have distant metastases with extremely poor prognosis. Consequently, considering a therapeutic strategy that improves the prognosis of these patients is clinically important. The present study aimed to assess the clinical indication and prognostic impact of surgery in patients with type 4 gastric cancer who underwent chemotherapy. Methods A total of 67 patients with type 4 gastric cancer who underwent chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were grouped into progressive disease (PD) and non-PD groups by tumor response to chemotherapy. Results Distant metastases occurred in 58 patients. With regard to tumor response, 16 and 51 patients had PD and non-PD, respectively. The prognosis was significantly poorer in patients with PD than in those with non-PD (p < 0.0001). Among 23 patients who underwent surgery after chemotherapy, 21 had a R0 resection. The presence or absence of surgery was significantly correlated with age, first-line chemotherapeutic regimen, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, number of distant metastatic sites, peritoneal dissemination, and tumor response (p = 0.0412, p = 0.0096, p = 0.0024, p = 0.0059, p = 0.0128, and p = 0.0020, and p = 0.0066, respectively). Multivariate analysis selected tumor response and surgery as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0009, respectively). Moreover, multivariate analysis for the surgery group demonstrated that metastatic nodal status (N0-1 vs N2-3) and residual tumor status (R0 vs R1-2) were significant independent prognostic factors (p = 0.0258 and p = 0.0458, respectively). Conclusion Our retrospective study suggests that surgery after chemotherapy for type 4 gastric cancer may improve the prognosis of responders with N0-1 status and a curative R0 resection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document