scholarly journals Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-based Guidelines Update on the Role of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies in the Management of Progressive Glioblastomaoncolo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Winograd ◽  
Isabelle Germano ◽  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Jeffrey J. Olson ◽  
David Ryan Ormond
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Insufficient Evidence ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Therapies

Abstract The following questions and recommendations are pertinent to the following:Target PopulationThese recommendations apply to adults with progressive GBM who have undergone standard primary treatment with surgery and/or chemoradiation.Question 1In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationLevel III: Treatment with bevacizumab is suggested in the treatment of progressive GBM, as it provides improved disease control compared to historical controls as measured by best imaging response and progression free survival at 6 months, while not providing evidence for improvement in overall survival. Question 2In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as combination therapy with cytotoxic agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationLevel III: There is insufficient evidence to show benefit or harm of bevacizumab in combination with cytotoxic therapies in progressive glioblastoma due to a lack of evidence supporting a clearly defined benefit without significant toxicity.Question 3In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as a combination therapy with targeted agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 4In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of targeted agents as monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 5In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of targeted agents in combination with cytotoxic therapies superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 6In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 7In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy in combination with targeted agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 8In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy in combination with bevacizumab superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.

scholarly journals TILs and Anti-PD1 Therapy: An Alternative Combination Therapy for PDL1 Negative Metastatic Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Yin ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
Xiangling Sun ◽  
Ruili Li ◽  
Cuihua Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Background. We investigated the efficacy of TILs and anti-PD1 combination therapy in patients with metastatic cervical cancer with low MSI expression and PDL1-negative. Methods. A total of 80 patients were put on TILs and anti-PD1 combination therapy, and the progression-free survival time (PFS) and overall survival time (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that could predict the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer in the previously described patients. Results. The objective response rate was 25%, whereas the mPFS and mOS were 6.1 and 11.3 months, respectively. The therapeutic efficacy was influenced by the characteristics of TILs, infection with HPV, and development of fever just after the therapy. Conclusion. Overall, our results show that the combination therapy of TILs and anti-PD1 significantly improves the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer.

Progression-free survival and overall survival in phase III trials of molecular-targeted agents in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Hotta ◽  
Etsuji Suzuki ◽  
Massimo Di Maio ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
Yoshiro Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Correlation between overall response rate and progression-free survival/overall survival in comparative trials involving targeted therapies in molecularly enriched populations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3588-3588
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Solomon ◽  
Herbert H. F. Loong ◽  
Yvonne J. Summers ◽  
Zachary M Thomas ◽  
Pearl Plernjit French ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Comparative Trials

3588 Background: Randomized trials involving agents targeting oncogene addicted tumors have greatly increased over the past decade. Whether clinical response rates can predict or correlate with efficacy measures such as progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) has not been established in molecularly enriched patient populations. In this meta-analysis, we investigated whether improvements in objective response rate (ORR) in comparative trials using targeted agents could serve as a potential surrogate endpoint for improvements in PFS or OS in populations with oncogene addicted cancer. Methods: CT.gov and MEDLINE databases were queried (using commercial text mining software I2E) for randomized, phase 3 clinical trials based on the following prospectively defined criteria: (1) use of agents targeting EGFR activating mutations (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, osimertinib), ALK and ROS1 rearrangements (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib), BRAF V600E or V600K mutations (dabrafenib), and BCR-ABL fusion protein (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib); (2) must include molecularly enriched trial populations (biomarker subgroup data included if available); (3) control arms should not include targeted agents directed towards those molecularly enriched populations. ORR, OS, and PFS data were manually extracted from the relevant studies and correlative analyses (weighted Pearson correlation) were performed. Results: 61 trials were identified with 15 ultimately meeting the prespecified criteria. ORR effect size (both the ORR difference and log odds ratio) and the log PFS hazard ratio were strongly correlated (-0.78, p-value = 0.0007). No significant correlation was found between ORR and OS. Conclusions: In our analyses, a strong correlation between ORR and PFS was found in randomized clinical trials investigating agents targeting oncogene-driven cancers. Establishing a correlation between ORR and OS was limited, most probably due to confounding factors such as treatment cross-over following progression, number of subsequent therapies and long post-progression survival in this setting. These findings further warrant the use of ORR as a surrogate for PFS in biomarker-driven studies.

Results of a phase II study of capecitabine-based doublets in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11538-e11538
Author(s):  
Ying Fan ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Yuqian Liao ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Peng Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

e11538 Background: It is extremely important to identify proper cytotoxic agents for TNBC which had limited choices except chemotherapy. Capecitabine are well established as a major chemotherapeutic agent in metastatic setting. The efficacy of capecitabine-based chemotherapy has not been prospectively studied in TNBC and data remains scant. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of capecitabine-based doublets in the treatment of metastatic TNBC. Methods: Eligible metastatic TNBC women with measurable diseases were recruited to receive either TX regimen (docetaxel 75mg/m2 iv d1 plus capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid, d1-14,q3w) or NX regimen (vinorelbine 25mg/m2 iv d1, 8 plus capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid, d1-14, q3w) at the discretion of physicians for up to 6 cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate and secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Results: 45 mTNBC patients, 27 in TX and 18 in NX were recruited, mostly (73.3%) as 1st line and the remaining as the 2nd line. The total objective response rate was 20.0% and clinical benefit rate was 62.2%. After a median follow-up of 28 months, PFS was 5.2 months (95%CI, 4.1-6.3mons) and OS was 18.2months (95%CI, 8.7-27.7mons). Almost half of the patients (22/45) progressed during treatment or within one month of the treatment discontinuation. PFS was significantly longer if patients got CR/PR (9.6 vs 4.3mons, P=0.015). When comparing two doublets, the response rate was numerically but not statistically lower in TX group than in NX group (14.8% vs 27.8%, P=0.449). Similarly, no difference was found in either PFS (4.9 vs 5.2 mons, P=0.483) or OS (21.5 vs 18.3 mons, P=0.964) between two regimens. Conclusions: Although the overall survival seems to be reasonable, efficacy of capecitabine-contained TX or NX regimen was relatively poor in terms of tumor remission and progression free survival in mTNBC patients, suggesting capecitabine may have limited potency in this subtype. These two combinations may be considered to be acceptable but may not be recommended as prior choice for mTNBC patients.

Combined analysis of three randomized phase III trials comparing S-1 monotherapy and S-1 combination therapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
Madoka Takeuchi ◽  
Wataru Ichikawa ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Yu Sunakawa ◽  
Koji Oba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

49 Background: S-1 is the gold standard for first line therapy of advanced gastric cancer in Asia. There have been multiple meta-analyses published researching and comparing the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy versus combination1,2. However there has been no analysis using actual trial data. Methods: Actual data from three randomized Phase III trials were combined to compare the efficacy of S-1 Monotherapy and S-1 combination therapy. The START trial, comparing S-1 and combination S-1 with docetaxel, SPIRITS, comparing S-1 and combination S-1 with cisplatin and TOP-002, comparing S-1 and S-1 combination with irinotecan, were merged and combined. For this analysis, the three S-1 arms were combined (n = 642) and the different S-1 combination therapy were combined (n = 617) creating two new treatment arms. The primary efficacy outcome of overall survival, progression free survival and subset analysis of overall survival stratified by baseline characteristics were performed. Results: A total of 1248 patients, including 210 Korean patients from the START were used in the analysis. The median overall survival days for S-1 combination and monotherapy was 382 [209, 648] and 321 [177, 597] and median progression free survival days for S-1 combination and monotherapy was 153 [81, 267] and 122 [61, 204]. Both overall survival (p = 0.0088 HR = 0.85 (0.76,0.96)) and progression free survival ( p = < 0.001 HR = 0.75 (0.67,0.85)) was significantly longer in the combination therapy arm compared to the monotherapy arm. Conclusions:Although there are limitations, the analysis re-confirms that S-1 combination therapy shows to be more efficacious compared to S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients. It must be noted that heterogeneity of the S-1 arm was not carefully considered when combining the S-1 data for the trials. In addition, the results are limited to the Asian (Japanese and Korean) population.

Retrospective study to assess the impact of hepatitis C virus infection on the prognosis and management of multiple myeloma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20001-e20001
Author(s):  
David Kaldas ◽  
Andrew Wahba ◽  
Radwa Hamdy Azab ◽  
Ehab Mostafa Elnakoury ◽  
Nagla Fawzy Abdel Karim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hcv Infection ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

e20001 Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a neoplasm of the post-germinal center, terminally differentiated B-cells. MM accounts for 1% of all types of cancer and 10% for all hematologic malignancies. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an infection that affects over 71 million patients worldwide. Cytotoxic agents and immunosuppressive therapy as steroids are the main line of therapy in lymphoid malignancies, but these drugs may exacerbate chronic viral hepatitis and cause uncontrolled replication of hepatitis viruses. The impact of HCV infection on MM patients remains unclear. Objective: To assess the impact of HCV infection on the prognosis and management of MM patients. Methods: A 10-year retrospective study of MM patients was conducted at Cairo University Clinical Oncology Department from January 2009 to April 2019. Results: During this time, 150 patients were diagnosed with MM, 109 (72.7%) were HCV negative, 24 (16%) were HCV positive, and 17 (11.3%) with unknown HCV status. The median age was 51 and 54 years for HCV negative and positive groups respectively, with a statistically insignificant difference (p-value > 0.2). In the multivariate analysis, HCV infection was not an independent factor related to overall survival (OS), however age, creatinine and hemoglobin levels correlated significantly with OS (p < 0.009, 0.008, 0.031 respectively). The median OS for the HCV negative group was 31.11 months (95% CI: 22.62 - 39.61) compared to 37.66 months (95% CI: 7.19 - 68.13) for the HCV positive group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 18.9 months, for HCV positive patients was 15.36 months (95% CI: 13.18 – 17.54), and for HCV negative patients was 20.49 months (95% CI: 14.13 – 26.85). Age below 60 years and creatinine level less than 2 mg/dL were statistically significant for favorable disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.030, 0.034 respectively). Conclusions: Age, creatinine and hemoglobin levels are significant prognostic factors in MM but HCV status doesn’t affect the overall survival or progression-free survival. HCV infection should not contraindicate MM therapy.

scholarly journals The efficacy and safety of apatinib treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caiyun Nie ◽  
Huifang Lv ◽  
Yishu Xing ◽  
Beibei Chen ◽  
Weifeng Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Abstract Introduction The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy or combination therapy for patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). Methods Twenty-eight patients with advanced or recurrent BTC who progressed after prior systemic therapies and treated with apatinib from January 2017 to June 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective and observational study. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity. Results A total of 28 patients with advanced or recurrent BTC who progressed after prior systemic therapies received apatinib monotherapy or combination therapy (with capecitabine, S-1, oxaliplatin, irinotecan or PD-1 inhibitor), including 9 cases of gallbladder cancer and 19 cases of cholangiocarcinoma. Six patients achieved PR, 15 patients had SD and 7 patients had PD. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 4.3 months (95%CI = 1.8–6.8) and 6.2 months (95% CI = 4.6–7.8) respectively. The ORR and DCR were 21.4% (6/28) and 75.0% (21/28), respectively. Most of the adverse events were grade 1–2 in severity, apatinib treatment was well tolerated. Conclusions Apatinib monotherapy or combination therapy can improve PFS in patients with advanced or recurrent BTC who progressed after prior systemic therapies, and adverse reactions can be well tolerated. Our study support apatinib therapy as a feasible therapeutic strategy in advanced or recurrent BTC.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Treatment for Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancer: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caiyun Nie ◽  
Huifang Lv ◽  
Yishu Xing ◽  
Beibei Chen ◽  
Weifeng Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Abstract Background The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy or combination therapy for patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer(BTC). Methods Twenty-eight patients with advanced or recurrent BTC who progressed after prior systemic therapies and treated with apatinib from January 2017 to June 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective and observational study. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity. Results A total of 28 patients with advanced or recurrent BTC who progressed after prior systemic therapies received apatinib monotherapy or combination therapy, including 9 cases of gallbladder cancer and 19 cases of cholangiocarcinoma. 6 patients achieved PR, 15 patients had SD and 7 patients had PD. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 4.3 months(95%CI = 1.8–6.8) and 6.2 months(95% CI = 4.6–7.8) respectively. The ORR and DCR were 21.4% (6/28) and 75.0% (21/28), respectively. Most of the adverse events were grade 1–2 in severity, apatinib treatment was well tolerated. Conclusions Apatinib monotherapy or combination therapy can improve PFS in patients with advanced or recurrent BTC who progressed after prior systemic therapies, and adverse reactions can be well tolerated. Our study support apatinib therapy as a feasible therapeutic strategy in advanced or recurrent BTC.

scholarly journals Molecularly targeted therapies for recurrent glioblastoma: current and future targets

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. E15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl Lau ◽  
Stephen T. Magill ◽  
Manish K. Aghi
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Molecular Targeted Therapies ◽  
The Past

Object Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and diffusely infiltrative primary brain tumor. Recurrence is expected and is extremely difficult to treat. Over the past decade, the accumulation of knowledge regarding the molecular and genetic profile of glioblastoma has led to numerous molecularly targeted therapies. This article aims to review the literature and highlight the mechanisms and efficacies of molecularly targeted therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. Methods A systematic search was performed with the phrase “(name of particular agent) and glioblastoma” as a search term in PubMed to identify all articles published up until 2014 that included this phrase in the title and/or abstract. The references of systematic reviews were also reviewed for additional sources. The review included clinical studies that comprised at least 20 patients and reported results for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma with molecular targeted therapies. Results A total of 42 articles were included in this review. In the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, various targeted therapies have been tested over the past 10–15 years. The targets of interest include epidermal growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, Ras pathway, protein kinase C, mammalian target of rapamycin, histone acetylation, and integrins. Unfortunately, the clinical responses to most available targeted therapies are modest at best. Radiographic responses generally range in the realm of 5%–20%. Progression-free survival at 6 months and overall survival were also modest with the majority of studies reporting a 10%–20% 6-month progression-free survival and 5- to 8-month overall survival. There have been several clinical trials evaluating the use of combination therapy for molecularly targeted treatments. In general, the outcomes for combination therapy tend to be superior to single-agent therapy, regardless of the specific agent studied. Conclusions Recurrent glioblastoma remains very difficult to treat, even with molecular targeted therapies and anticancer agents. The currently available targeted therapy regimens have poor to modest activity against recurrent glioblastoma. As newer agents are actively being developed, combination regimens have provided the most promising results for improving outcomes. Targeted therapies matched to molecular profiles of individual tumors are predicted to be a critical component necessary for improving efficacy in future trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document