scholarly journals Transcriptional signatures associate with the clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced bladder cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Transcriptional Signature ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Inhibitor Treatment

Abstract Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide, the 5-year survival rate remain poor with platinum-based chemotherapy regimens as the standard of cancer treatment protocol. Recent FDA approval of a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, atezolizumab, in advanced UBC patients is changing the therapeutic landscape. Although the response to anti-PD-L1 is correlated to PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden, the molecule determinants of responsiveness or non-responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is largely unknown. A published immunotherapy cohort with whole exome sequencing, RNAseq and clinic outcome data for 29 metastatic urothelial cancer patients was used, paralleled with The Cancer Genome Altas Bladder Cancer cohort for validation. Genomic mutational profiling, mutational signature, a panel genes in antigen presentation and interferon signaling in bladder cancer were delineated with little correlation with durable clinic benefit (DCB) or non-DCB of PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. Whereas, characterized immune-responsive or resistant associated genes showed differentially expressed between DCB group and non-DCB group. Further more, transcriptional signature and transcriptional regulators between DCB and non-DCB were identified from transcripome data. Our exploratory analyses provided multidimension view of complexity of determinants of immune-responsiveness and suggest the influences of transcriptional reprogram in immune checkpoint blockage therapy.

scholarly journals Transcriptional signatures associate with the clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced bladder cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Xu ◽  
Dian Fu ◽  
Hai Zhao ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
Zuheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Transcriptional Signature ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Inhibitor Treatment

Abstract Background Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide, the 5-year survival rate remain poor with platinum-based chemotherapy regimens as the standard of cancer treatment protocol. Recent FDA approval of a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, atezolizumab, in advanced UBC patients is changing the therapeutic landscape. Although the response to anti-PD-L1 is correlated to PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden, the molecule determinants of responsiveness or non-responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is largely unknown. Result A published immunotherapy cohort with whole exome sequencing, RNAseq and clinic outcome data for 29 metastatic urothelial cancer patients was used, paralleled with The Cancer Genome Altas Bladder Cancer cohort for validation. Genomic mutational profiling, mutational signature, a panel genes in antigen presentation and interferon signaling in bladder cancer were delineated with little correlation with durable clinic benefit (DCB) or non-DCB of PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. Whereas, characterized immune-responsive or resistant associated genes showed differentially expressed between DCB group and non-DCB group. Further more, transcriptional signature and transcriptional regulators between DCB and non-DCB were identified from transcripome data. Conclusion Our exploratory analyses provided multidimension view of complexity of determinants of immune-responsiveness and suggest the influences of transcriptional reprogram in immune checkpoint blockage therapy.

scholarly journals Identification of NOTCH4 mutation as a response biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BMC Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyu Long ◽  
Dongxu Wang ◽  
Xu Yang ◽  
Anqiang Wang ◽  
Yu Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefits

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy elicits durable antitumor responses in patients with many types of cancer. Genomic mutations may be used to predict the clinical benefits of ICI therapy. NOTCH homolog-4 (NOTCH4) is frequently mutated in several cancer types, but its role in immunotherapy is still unclear. Our study is the first to study the association between NOTCH4 mutation and the response to ICI therapy. Methods We tested the predictive value of NOTCH4 mutation in the discovery cohort, which included non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, esophagogastric cancer, and bladder cancer patients, and validated it in the validation cohort, which included non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, esophagogastric cancer, glioma, bladder cancer, head and neck cancer, cancer of unknown primary, and breast cancer patients. Then, the relationships between NOTCH4 mutation and intrinsic and extrinsic immune response mechanisms were studied with multiomics data. Results We collected an ICI-treated cohort (n = 662) and found that patients with NOTCH4 mutation had better clinical benefits in terms of objective response rate (ORR: 42.9% vs 25.9%, P = 0.007), durable clinical benefit (DCB: 54.0% vs 38.1%, P = 0.021), progression-free survival (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.558, P < 0.001), and overall survival (OS, HR = 0.568, P = 0.006). In addition, we validated the prognostic value of NOTCH4 mutation in an independent ICI-treated cohort (n = 1423). Based on multiomics data, we found that NOTCH4 mutation is significantly associated with enhanced immunogenicity, including a high tumor mutational burden, the expression of costimulatory molecules, and activation of the antigen-processing machinery, and NOTCH4 mutation positively correlates activated antitumor immunity, including infiltration of diverse immune cells and various immune marker sets. Conclusions Our findings indicated that NOTCH4 mutation serves as a novel biomarker correlated with a better response to ICI therapy.

Rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica occurring after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1747-1750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakiba Belkhir ◽  
Sébastien Le Burel ◽  
Laetitia Dunogeant ◽  
Aurélien Marabelle ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Polymyalgia Rheumatica ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Inhibitor Treatment

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 769
Author(s):  
Arthur Peyrottes ◽  
Idir Ouzaid ◽  
Gianluigi Califano ◽  
Jean-Francois Hermieu ◽  
Evanguelos Xylinas
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Background and Objectives: Facing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, neoadjuvant immunotherapy is an innovative concept in localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Herein, we performed a review of the available and ongoing evidence supporting immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration in the early stages of bladder cancer treatment. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed on Medline and clinical trials databases, using the terms: “bladder cancer” OR “urothelial carcinoma”, AND “neoadjuvant immunotherapy” OR “preoperative immunotherapy”. We restricted our investigations to prospective clinical trials evaluating anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies. Data on efficacy, toxicity and potential biomarkers of response were retrieved. Results: The search identified 6 ICIs that were tested in the neoadjuvant setting for localized bladder cancer—4 anti-PD-(L)1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Nivolumab and Durvalumab) and 2 anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab). Most of the existing literature was based on single-arm phase 2 clinical trials that included from 23 to 143 patients. The pathological complete response rate (pCR) and pathological response rate (pRR) ranged from 31% to 46% and from 55.9% to 66%, respectively. Survival data were immature at this time. The safety profile was acceptable, with severe treatment-related adverse events ranging from 6% to 41%. Conclusions: The results of early phase trials are encouraging, and more investigations are needed to strengthen the rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitor administration in localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

scholarly journals 630 Oncologists' perspectives on evolution of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor maintenance therapy in management of advanced urothelial carcinoma in the US

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A660-A660
Author(s):  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Phani Veeranki ◽  
Kevin Chiu ◽  
Vivek Pawar ◽  
Jane Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

BackgroundAvelumab, a PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), was recently approved as first-line (1L) maintenance therapy for locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) after disease control with platinum-based chemotherapy.1 Given the evolving treatment landscape, the study aim was to gain real-world insights into clinical decision-making among oncologists for patients with aUC.MethodsIn March 2021, a cross-sectional web-based survey was administered to a sample of US oncologists treating patients with aUC. Oncologists' demographics, practice characteristics, and treatment patterns were obtained; descriptive statistics were used.ResultsThe study included 151 medical oncologists, who reported that 54% and 31% of their patients, on average, would be classified as cisplatin or carboplatin eligible for their 1L treatment, respectively. Approximately 78% of oncologists (n=118) considered using ICI maintenance in ≥40% of their patients following disease control with platinum chemotherapy and were categorized as the “high-consideration” group, for further exploratory analysis; the rest (22%) were in the low-consideration group (See table 1). Approximately, 31% and 27% of oncologists in the high- and low-consideration groups reported administering ICI maintenance with a 2–3-week gap after chemotherapy, while 45% and 46% reported administering it with a 4–6-week gap after chemotherapy, respectively.ConclusionsSurveyed oncologists reported that 85% of patients with aUC in US may be eligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. Further, 78% of the surveyed oncologists would consider 1L ICI maintenance therapy after disease control with platinum-based chemotherapy for over 40% of their patients. Future studies are warranted to evaluate real-world treatment patterns, barriers, and utilization of ICI maintenance therapy as the new 1L standard of care.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge all physicians at who participated and completed the survey for the study.ReferencePowles T, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383(13):1218–1230.Ethics ApprovalThe study was reviewed and determined to be exempt by Advarra IRB.ConsentAll survey participated signed a consent form.Abstract 630 Table 1Oncologists characteristics and considerations for 1L ICI maintenance therapy

“Restlessness” After Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

2021 ◽  
pp. 157-159
Author(s):  
Anastasia Zekeridou
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Immunoglobulin G ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Hyperkinetic Movement Disorder ◽  
Phosphodiesterase 10A ◽  
Cancer Remission ◽  
Inhibitor Treatment

A 76-year-old woman sought care for unintentional weight loss, hematuria, and fatigue. She was diagnosed with plurimetastatic renal cell carcinoma. After resection of the primary tumor and metastases, she was treated with pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. The patient experienced involuntary tongue and face movements with dysphagia and weight loss. She was also described as “restless.” At that point, the patient was in cancer remission with ongoing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Blood testing was unremarkable. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed basal ganglia T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensities without gadolinium enhancement. Cerebrospinal fluid testing showed slightly increased protein concentration and 8 cerebrospinal fluid-restricted oligoclonal bands. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid testing for neural autoantibodies showed immunoglobulin G immunoreactivity in a mouse tissue indirect immunofluorescence assay, predominantly staining the basal ganglia. The immunoglobulin G was subsequently identified to bind to phosphodiesterase 10A. The patient was diagnosed with paraneoplastic phosphodiesterase 10A-immunoglobulin G autoimmunity manifesting as hyperkinetic movement disorder triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Given the patient’s cancer remission, the immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was discontinued. She was treated with high-dose intravenous corticosteroids, with improvement of her hyperkinetic movement disorder but persistence of some dystonic movements. Further treatment with oral prednisone did not produce further improvement. The patient was treated symptomatically with onabotulinumtoxinA injections and tetrabenazine, which ameliorated her dystonic movements. Three years after her cancer diagnosis, she was alive and in cancer remission with minimal residual movements. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies targeting “stop signs” of the immune response, which lead to enhanced endogenous responses, including those against cancer. Autoimmune complications are consequences of the enhanced immunity and can affect all organs, including the nervous system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document