Analysis of Common Language Communication Requirements of Manpower, Personnel and Training (MPT) Factors in Materiel System Acquisition

1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Roth
Keyword(s):  
Common Language ◽  
Language Communication ◽  
System Acquisition ◽  
And Training

A call to action: next steps to advance diagnosis education in the health professions

Diagnosis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L. Graber ◽  
Eric Holmboe ◽  
Joan Stanley ◽  
Jennifer Danielson ◽  
Stephen Schoenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Health Professions ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
The State ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Common Language ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
And Training

Abstract Objectives Improving diagnosis-related education in the health professions has great potential to improve the quality and safety of diagnosis in practice. Twelve key diagnostic competencies have been delineated through a previous initiative. The objective of this project was to identify the next steps necessary for these to be incorporated broadly in education and training across the health professions. Methods We focused on medicine, nursing, and pharmacy as examples. A literature review was conducted to survey the state of diagnosis education in these fields, and a consensus group was convened to specify next steps, using formal approaches to rank suggestions. Results The literature review confirmed initial but insufficient progress towards addressing diagnosis-related education. By consensus, we identified the next steps necessary to advance diagnosis education, and five required elements relevant to every profession: 1) Developing a shared, common language for diagnosis, 2) developing the necessary content, 3) developing assessment tools, 4) promoting faculty development, and 5) spreading awareness of the need to improve education in regard to diagnosis. Conclusions The primary stakeholders, representing education, certification, accreditation, and licensure, in each profession must now take action in their own areas to encourage, promote, and enable improved diagnosis, and move these recommendations forward.

Curriculum for Individuals with a Developmental Disability: An Overview

1993 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-29
Author(s):  
Gloria M. Palma ◽  
William A. Meyers ◽  
Susan Robin ◽  
Cindy Thomas ◽  
Dwayne Lizar
Keyword(s):  
New Mexico ◽  
Motor Performance ◽  
Developmentally Disabled ◽  
Fine Motor ◽  
Training Center ◽  
Language Communication ◽  
Contextual Framework ◽  
Survival Skills ◽  
Fine Motor Performance ◽  
And Training

A curriculum that is functional for individuals who are considered developmentally disabled was developed at Tohatchi Special Education and Training Center, located within the Navajo Reservation in New Mexico. The purpose of the curriculum is to provide learning experiences for these individuals with a focus on survival skills. The curriculum is mainly divided into five parts: (a) overview of the contextual framework, (b) curriculum usage, (c) information modules, (d) gross and fine motor performance, and (e) language/communication components.

Mpt in the Air Force

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. 1294-1295
Author(s):  
John Speigel ◽  
Mike Skinner
Keyword(s):  
Air Force ◽  
Weapon System ◽  
Integration System ◽  
Weapon Systems ◽  
System Acquisition ◽  
And Performance ◽  
And Training ◽  
Equal Consideration

The Air Force recognizes the importance of Manpower, Personnel, and Training (MPT) issues in weapon system acquisition. To give supportability of future weapon systems equal consideration to cost, schedule, and performance of the system, the Air Force has set out to build an integration system to monitor MPT issues.

Overview of STEPPS

2016 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Nancee S. Blum ◽  
Don St. John ◽  
Bruce Pfohl ◽  
Donald W. Black
Keyword(s):  
Group Treatment ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Common Language ◽  
University Of Iowa ◽  
Behavioral Skills ◽  
The University ◽  
User Friendly ◽  
Evidence Based Programs ◽  
And Training

This chapter provides an overview of Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS), a manualized, cognitive-behavioral, skills-based group treatment program, originally developed as an adjunctive treatment for outpatients with borderline personality disorder. STEPPS was developed at the University of Iowa in 1995 in response to patient and provider needs. A detailed manual was developed and training workshops are conducted nationally and internationally. The systems component is unique to the program and refers to providing the client’s support system, (i.e., family members, friends, and key professionals) with an understanding of the STEPPS approach, a common language to communicate clearly about BPD, and ways to reinforce the skills that patients are acquiring. The program has been implemented worldwide and is included in SAMSHA’s NREPP list of evidence-based programs. The program is user-friendly and easily learned and delivered by therapists. A follow-up program, STAIRWAYS, is also described.

Human Factors for Naval Systems: Enhanced Hardman

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (16) ◽  
pp. 1100-1103
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Malone ◽  
Clifford C. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Life Support ◽  
System Development ◽  
Human Factors Engineering ◽  
Weapon System ◽  
Acquisition Process ◽  
System Acquisition ◽  
Support Engineering ◽  
And Training ◽  
The U.S

The U.S. Navy is developing methods for integrating the disciplines concerned with personnel considerations into the weapon system acquisition process. This integration essentially involves human factors engineering, manpower, personnel and training, and life support engineering. Since the Navy already has the HARDMAN methodology in place to ensure that manpower, personnel and training concerns are addressed early in system development, the process of integration of personnel issues will involve expanding the HARDMAN methods and data to include human factors engineering and life support engineering, resulting in the Enhanced HARDMAN process. This paper describes the objectives of Enhanced HARDMAN.

MPTS Methodology in the Navy: Enhanced Hardman

1989 ◽  
Vol 33 (16) ◽  
pp. 1044-1048
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Malone
Keyword(s):  
Data Base ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Human Engineering ◽  
Defense System ◽  
Acquisition Process ◽  
Front End ◽  
System Acquisition ◽  
Measures Of Effectiveness ◽  
And Training

Enhanced HARDMAN constitutes the Navy's implementation of the DoD Directive 5000.53 “Manpower, Personnel, Training and Safety (MPTS) in the Defense System Acquisition Process”. Enhanced HARDMAN integrates the domains of human engineering, manpower, personnel and training (MPT), and life support and safety through: 1) a front-end analysis applicable to all domains and to the integration of domain requirements; 2) a consolidated data base applying to all domains; 3) acquisition of lessons learned for all domains; and 4) application of Enhanced HARDMAN measures of effectiveness and T&E activities addressing all domains. The elements of Enhanced HARDMAN are: a standardized and formalized Enhanced HARDMAN process addressing MPTS activities and products at each phase of the weapon system acquisition process; a consolidated Enhanced HARDMAN data base; automated Enhanced HARDMAN analysis tools; Enhanced HARDMAN analyst productivity tools; and a report generator for producing Enhanced HARDMAN plans and reports.

Early Consideration of Human Factors in Military System Design

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. 1286-1286
Author(s):  
Eleanor L. Criswell
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
System Design ◽  
Air Force ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Human Factors Engineering ◽  
The Past ◽  
Design Changes ◽  
System Acquisition ◽  
And Training

The goal of this symposium is to present the status and future directions of programs aimed at consideration of human factors early in military system design. Military initiatives of this nature are not new, but in the past they have not become integral parts of the military system acquisition process. Recent programs in each service, however, reflect more serious and in-depth attempts to use human factors data to influence and evaluate system design than has been the case in the past. The Army now requires MANPRINT analyses, Navy HARDMAN analyses are mandated, and the Air Force is now pilot testing its own program called MPTIS. This symposium consists of introductory remarks by Dr. Joseph Peters of Science Applications International Corporation, and papers from LTC William 0. Blackwood, HQ Department of the Army, CDR George S. Council, Jr., Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, and COL AI Grieshaber, HQ, U. S. Air Force. Dr. Peters' paper, “Human Factors Issues in Military System Design,” defines “human factors” as a combination of human factors engineering, biomedical engineering, manpower/personnel, and training elements. The paper presents three measures of success of human factors programs early in system acquisition: long-lasting policy, committed management, and availability of scientific technology for program Implementation and evaluation. LTC Blackwood's paper discusses the importance the Army places on its MANPRINT program. MANPRINT program history, status, and possible program evolution are addressed. CDR Council's paper addresses the potential for the addition of human factors to the Navy HARDMAN program which addresses manpower, personnel, and training. CDR Council suggests that human factors advocates present a human factors program which is clearly defined and limited in scope to render it easily appreciated by Navy management, and that advocates can benefit from lessons learned during the institutionalization of HARDMAN. COL Grieshaber's paper “MPT in the Air Force” describes a pilot MPT (manpower, personnel, training) program at Aeronautical Systems Division, Wright Patterson AFB. This program will analyze aircraft system designs for their MPT requirements, suggest design changes where requirements exceed Air Force availabilities, and assess design changes for their MPT impact.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document