A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND CLONIDINE USED AS ADJUNCTS TO BUPIVACAINE FOR POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIA BY CAUDAL BLOCK IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipak L Raval ◽  
◽  
Kartik N
Author(s):  
Veena Patodi ◽  
Kavita Jain ◽  
Mukesh Choudhary ◽  
Surendra Kumar Sethi ◽  
Neena Jain ◽  
...  

Introduction: Caudal block is a routinely performed analgesic and anaesthetic technique in paediatric population undergoing various infra-umbilical surgeries. Various adjuvants have been used along with local anaesthetics like ropivacaine in single-shot caudal block for enhancing postoperative analgesia in paediatric infra-umbilical surgeries. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone used as an adjuvant to 0.2% ropivacaine in caudal block for postoperative analgesia in paediatric patients. Materials and Methods: This was a randomised doubleblinded controlled study conducted on 80 paediatric patients (8 months-8 years), with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing various infra-umbilical surgeries,at a tertiary care teaching institute from April 2019 to September 2019. These total subjects were randomly allocated into two groups. GroupR (n=40) administered 0.2% ropivacaine (1 mL/kg) while GroupRD (n=40) administered 0.2% ropivacaine (1 mL/kg) with dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg) in caudal block. The duration of analgesia, postoperative pain scores (Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) score), rescue analgesic consumption in 24 hours, haemodynamic changes and side-effects were noted. The rescue analgesic (paracetamol 15 mg/kg oral) was given whenever FLACC ≥4. Standard qualitative and quantitative tests (unpaired student t-test, Chi-square test) were used to analyse and compare the results obtained. Results: The mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group RD (745.21±146.91 min) as compared to GroupR (440.38±76.44 min); (p-value <0.001). The significantly lower FLACC pain scores were noted in patients in Group RD compared to Group R; (p-value <0.05). The rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lesser in Group RD in terms of requirement of number of doses of rescue analgesic than in Group R; (p-value <0.05). No significant haemodynamic changes or side-effects were observed in both groups; (p-value >0.05). Amongst postoperative complications noted, fever was observed in 1 patient (3.33%) and PONV in 2 patients (6.66%) in Group R. None complications were observed in the patients of RD group. Conclusion: Dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg) was found to be safe and effective adjuvant to 0.2% ropivacaine for caudal block in children undergoing various infra-umbilical surgeries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 32-41
Author(s):  
Nameeda K S ◽  
Fathimath Nihala K ◽  
Anagha Saseendran ◽  
Priya Nagar ◽  
Pallavi Urs

Title : A comparative study on effectiveness of mucosal vibration and topical anaesthetic gel in reducing pain during administration of local anaesthetic in paediatric patients. Introduction: Anxiety related to dentistryis not uncommon in paediatric patients. Poor pain control alongside the fear and anxiety might interfere with appropriate dental management. In this study a modified mucosal vibration device is used to modify the pain perception during LA administration. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of topical anaesthetic gel and mucosal vibration during local anaestheticadministration in children in the age group8-11 years using both subjective and objective scalescales for measuring anxiety and pain. Methodology: Thirty children who required inferior alveolar nerve blockanaesthesia for routine dental procedures were included and divided equally into 3 groups Group I- control Group II- topical anaesthetic gel Group III - Mucosal vibrator Pain perception was compared, assessed and analysed during injection using Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale, Doremon cartoon modified Wong Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, MotuPatlu cartoon modified Venham scale Results: The scores of SEM scale and Doremon pain scale when subjected to statistical analysis gave a p value <0.001. Conclusion: Mucosal vibrator is an easily availablehandyand effective chair sidedevice for pain reduction during administration of local anaesthesia for paediatric patients


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document