scholarly journals The comparison pack carburizing-nitriding SUS 316 with gas type Welding Grade and Ultra High Purity

2021 ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
Bambang Sulistiyono ◽  
Yudy Surya Irawan ◽  
Agus Suprapto ◽  
Rudy Soenoko

The paper discusses the comparison of pack carburizing-nitriding SUS 316 with gas Nitrogen. The purpose of this study was to increase the hardness and corrosion resistance of SUS 316. The research used a pack carburizing-nitriding method with gas type Welding Grade (WG) and Ultra High Purity (UHP). The pack carburizing process uses teak wood activated carbon and barium carbonate as a bio-photo catalyst. The specimens were put into a Sealed Steel Container containing teak wood activated carbon, with a depth of 1 cm below the activated carbon's surface. The test material is then heated until it reaches 850 °C and is held for 1 hour in a heating furnace. Furthermore, the nitriding process, the specimen is put into a tightly closed nitrogen tube, then nitrogen gas flows until the pressure reaches 41 bar and is held for 24 hours. They are using Welding Grade (WG) and Ultra High Purity (UHP) gas types. Furthermore, microVickers hardness testing, optical microscope, and Scan Electron Microscope (SEM) were carried out. The results of the study include a. There was an increase in violence by 41.7 % for UHP and WG (17.3 %). b. The formation of nitride compounds and carbon dissipation on the specimen surface in the UHP carburizing-nitriding pack treatment is more than WG. The formation of a nitride layer is indicated by its fine and dense morphology and film bonding to the substrate. The chemical composition affects the diffusivity of nitrogen atoms in modifying the surface layer of the substrate. The higher the nitride compound formed, the smoother the substrate surface. Also, with UHP treatment, the lower the elemental content of Cr makes SUS 316 more resistant to corrosion. So that SUS 316 UHP can be recommended for use as an implant material

2011 ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
Mike Inkson ◽  
Philip Antier ◽  
Malcolm Topfer

During the SIT conference in Dubai 2005 a single strike crystallization scheme model based on the way that Russian beet factory operated when refining raw sugar was proposed and suggested that it would be particularly suitable for medium size refineries up to about 2000 t/d RSO (refined sugar output). Now there is operational a 1700 t/d RSO stand-alone refinery that uses the scheme. It melts up to VHP raw sugar with 1200 IU (ICUMSA units) and runs carbonatation followed by a light dosing of PAC (powdered activated carbon) as necessary then double effect evaporation to produce fine liquor. Target color for the fine liquor is 340 IU. The centrifugal run-off needs to be segregated into the higher purity, lower color (so-called white) and lower purity, higher color (so called ‘green’) run-off. The white run-off (about 75%) is sent to white crystallization. The remaining 25% (green run-off) is sent to a three-stage crystallization recovery but, given the high purity regime without affination, the ‘A’ sugar is melted back to fine liquor having been crystallized and purged as if food quality. The results presented in the paper show that the refinery is operating broadly as predicted, producing a refined sugar to EEC 2 standard.


1995 ◽  
Vol 353 (5-8) ◽  
pp. 524-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Wilhartitz ◽  
R. Krismer ◽  
H. Hutter ◽  
M. Grasserbauer ◽  
S. Weinbruch ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeru Suzuki ◽  
Shingo Ichimura ◽  
Akira Kurokawa ◽  
Yukio Ishikawa ◽  
Minoru Isshiki ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Majid Entezarian ◽  
Mitsuaki Kobayashi ◽  
Yukihisa Okada ◽  
Takaaki Shirai ◽  
Keita Abe ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 66-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Johnston ◽  
Zhiming Shi ◽  
Matthew S. Dargusch ◽  
Andrej Atrens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document