Does Mandatory Auditor Rotation Increase Audit Quality? A Test of Indonesian Ministry of Finance’s Decree Effectiveness

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmat Febrianto ◽  
Slamet Sugiri
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-206
Author(s):  
Sang Ho Kim ◽  
Jianqun Xi

Manuscript type: Research paper Research aims: This study focuses on the effects of audit partner rotation on audit quality (AQ) in China. In particular, we examine the effects of review auditors (RAs) and engagement auditors (EAs) on AQ when they voluntarily and mandatorily rotate. Design/Methodology/Approach: The data in this study are retrieved from the Chinese Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR) database. We develop an OLS regression model and logit model respectively to test the hypotheses developed. Finally, we have 13,856 firm-year observations collected for the first regression model, and 16,893 firm-year observations gathered for the second logit model from 2003 to 2015. Research findings: Findings show that RAs are more likely to behave opportunistically to retain clients by weighing up the benefits and costs of compromising audit quality in the first year after a rotation. The results imply that RAs may have an incentive to acquiesce the clients’ accounting irregularities in their first year of audit engagement when they are mandatorily rotated. However, we do not find this trend in terms of EAs’ rotation, suggesting that EAs are less affected by the auditor-client relationship compared to RAs. In addition, we find that RAs are less likely to issue modified audit opinions (MOPI) as the magnitude of negative discretionary accruals (DA) increases when they are voluntarily rotated. Theoretical contribution/Originality: Previous studies have investigated the relationship between mandatory audit partner rotation and audit quality. The results are mixed and inconclusive. Our study contributes to the extant literature by considering RAs’ opportunistic behaviour after mandatory rotation, which has not been explored in previous studies. In China, only a few studies have examined the relationship between mandatory audit partner rotation and audit quality. Our study is one of the first study focusing on the RA’s influence on AQ. Practitioner/Policy implication: The findings of our study can help Chinese authorities, listed firms and academics gain more understanding on whether mandatory audit partner rotation improves audit quality in practice. Since RAs have greater incentive to retain the existing client, we propose that RAs should bear more responsibility for the audit work, instead of the equally shared responsibility with EAs. Research limitation/Implications: Our study is subject to some limitations. First, our study adopts the performance-adjusted discretionary accruals as a proxy for audit quality. However, there can be a measurement error in estimating discretionary accruals. Second, we focus on the auditor rotation and exclude the case of audit firm rotation. Since the AQ can be affected by various factors, audit firm rotation can also affect AQ. Third, although we test the relative effects of RAs and EAs in audit work, we do not examine the effect of RAs’ characteristics such as their professional experience, educational background, and years of service. AQ can be affected by RAs’ characteristics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Camelia-Daniela Hategan

Investors’ decisions are based on financial and non-financial information. To be useful, the information provided by the financial reports must be accurate, which is also ensured by the opinion expressed by the auditors. The purpose of the paper is to show the importance of the quality of audit services both for investors and for professional accountants and auditors. Audit quality factors can be structured according to several criteria and were represented by the size of the auditor, rotation, duration of the contract, types of services provided. In order to support this hypothesis, the correlation between the variables was tested on the basis of a sample of seven companies listed at Bucharest Stock Exchange in the energy field and utilities included in index BET, for period 2013 - 2018. The data was collected from the annual financial statements and reports issued by financial auditors. The results show that there is a correlation between variables, but of different intensities depending on the indicators chosen. Increasing the quality of financial reporting and the quality of audit leads to increased investor confidence in professional accountants.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mara Cameran ◽  
Jere R. Francis ◽  
Antonio Marra ◽  
Angela Pettinicchio

SUMMARY Mandatory auditor rotation was recently proposed for the European Union and is also under consideration in the United States. There has been little research into either the benefits or costs of rotation in a true mandatory setting that could inform intelligent policy making. Our paper helps fill this gap by examining Italy, where mandatory rotation of auditors has been required since 1975. We find that outgoing auditors do not shirk on effort (or quality), but final-year fees are 7 percent higher than normal, which may indicate opportunistic pricing. The fees of incoming auditors are discounted by 16 percent even though they have abnormally higher engagement hours in the first year (17 percent), which is suggestive of lowballing. However, subsequent fees are abnormally higher and exceed the initial fee discount. Thus, the costs of mandatory rotation are nontrivial. Higher costs could be acceptable if rotation improves audit quality, but we find evidence of the opposite. Namely, the quality of audited earnings is lower in the first three years following rotation, relative to later years of auditor tenure. Since rotation is costly and earnings quality improves with longer auditor tenure, the evidence from Italy does not support the case for mandatory rotation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Azinudin Nizar

The study aimed to empirically examine the effect of auditor rotation, audit reputation, and audit specialization on audit quality. The population of data is the entire manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia stock Exchange in the period 2012 to 2015. Based on this method, sample of 104 manufacturing firms were obtained from the period 2012-2015. Proxy measurements for audit quality are using earning benchmark. The logistics regression was used to analyse data. The results showed that auditor rotation affecting on audit quality, auditor reputation affecting on audit quality, and auditor specialization affecting on audit quality.Keyword: auditor rotation, auditor reputation, auditor specialization, audit quality.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Velte ◽  
Marc Eulerich

The European audit reform contains the implementation of an external mandatory auditor rotation (audit firm rotation) and a separation of audit and non audit duties to increase auditor independence. The central question is, whether these regulation measures are connected with an increased accounting and audit quality. First, this article presents an agency theoretical foundation of auditor independence. Then, a state of the art analysis of empirical research illustrates these ambivalent results, so that the economic need for the audit market regulation in Europe is controversial.


2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bambang Hartadi

This study aimed to analysis the effect of audit fee, auditor rotation, and reputation of audit firm. Based on literature revie, it was hypothesized that audit fee, auditor rotation, and Reputation of audit firm have significant effect on audit quality. The data was financial statement from manufacturing firmof LQ-45 from 2004-2010 year. The results of statistical tests using multiple linear regression, there are evidences that Fee audit significant effect on audit quality, while the rotation and the reputation of the audit no significant effect on audit quality. There are several reasons why rotation and reputation did not affect audit quality. First possibility, caused by the reluctance of market participants to explore further whether the auditor who issued the opinion on the audited financial statements had actually experienced the rotation or not. Second possibility, market participants also never pay attention to whether the financial statements audited by an auditor who has a certain reputation or not. There are many things that need to consider for future research. Basically the market in Indonesia was largely considered capital gain, so it is less likely to use fundamental analysis (financial report) for consideration by taking action to sell or buy shares. If the market does not consider fundamental analysis exhibited significantly above, the actual market can also be said to be less attention to the audited (audit opinion).


Obiter ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vela Madlela

An independent and objective external audit of companies is an integral element of sound corporate governance and of functional financial markets. The issues relating to auditor independence and objectivity have attracted considerable regulatory and public scrutiny in many leading jurisdictions. This is partly due to a general decrease in audit quality over the years as evidenced by high-profile accounting scandals and audit failures, both locally and internationally, as well as the vital role that an external audit is expected to play in ensuring transparency, accuracy and efficiency in the financial markets. In an attempt to restore confidence in the audit profession and to strengthen the independence of the external audit function for companies, legislatures in some leading jurisdictions have introduced a variety of regulatory strategies, including mandatory rotation of auditors in the form of mandatory audit partner rotation (MAPR) and/or mandatory audit firm rotation (MAFR). In this article, the author examines the adequacy of the current provisions of section 92 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 regarding MAPR and the recently promulgated rule of the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) on MAFR (the MAFR rule) in addressing the issue of mandatory auditor rotation in South Africa. The author considers whether the provisions of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 regarding MAPR and the MAFR rule are adequate to promote an independent and objective external audit function for companies, as well as transparency, efficiency and accountability, while providing certainty for companies and auditors. The author first examines some of the key principles and policy considerations relating to the external audit of companies – namely, the significance of audits and auditors in the financial markets as well as the value of auditor independence and objectivity. This is followed by an examination of the provisions of section 92 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 regarding MAPR and the recently promulgated MAFR rule in light of legislative developments in the United States, Canada, the European Union, Australia and India regarding mandatory rotation of auditors and audit partners. Based on the lessons to be drawn from the experiences of the above jurisdictions, the author then makes recommendations for appropriate reforms for South Africa in this important area of company law. This is followed by some concluding remarks.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Friedrich ◽  
Nicolas Pappert ◽  
Reiner Quick

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document