Stabilizing Log-Normal Diffusion in View of Compounding Swaps Funding Risk Credit Valuation Adjustment (FRCVA)

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Durand

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Román-Román ◽  
Juan José Serrano-Pérez ◽  
Francisco Torres-Ruiz


2016 ◽  
Vol 86 (304) ◽  
pp. 771-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Harbrecht ◽  
Michael Peters ◽  
Markus Siebenmorgen


Author(s):  
Wensheng Xu ◽  
Shuping Chen

AbstractIn this paper, optimal consumption and investment decisions are studied for an investor who has available a bank account and a stock whose price is a log normal diffusion. The bank pays at an interest rate r(t) for any deposit, and vice takes at a larger rate r′(t) for any loan. Optimal strategies are obtained via Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation which is derived from dynamic programming principle. For the specific HARA case, we get the optimal consumption and optimal investment explicitly, which coincides with the classical one under the condition r′(t) ≡ r(t)



1989 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 953-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siegfried H. Lehnigk




2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Derek Singh ◽  
Shuzhong Zhang

This paper investigates calculations of robust X-Value adjustment (XVA), in particular, credit valuation adjustment (CVA) and funding valuation adjustment (FVA), for over-the-counter derivatives under distributional ambiguity using Wasserstein distance as the ambiguity measure. Wrong way counterparty credit risk and funding risk can be characterized (and indeed quantified) via the robust XVA formulations. The simpler dual formulations are derived using recent Lagrangian duality results. Next, some computational experiments are conducted to measure the additional XVA charges due to distributional ambiguity under a variety of portfolio and market configurations. Finally some suggestions for further work are discussed.



2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-182
Author(s):  
O. N. Soboleva ◽  
E. P. Kurochkina


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
Govinda Prasad Dhungana ◽  
Laxmi Prasad Sapkota

 Hemoglobin level is a continuous variable. So, it follows some theoretical probability distribution Normal, Log-normal, Gamma and Weibull distribution having two parameters. There is low variation in observed and expected frequency of Normal distribution in bar diagram. Similarly, calculated value of chi-square test (goodness of fit) is observed which is lower in Normal distribution. Furthermore, plot of PDFof Normal distribution covers larger area of histogram than all of other distribution. Hence Normal distribution is the best fit to predict the hemoglobin level in future.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document