Agency Cost and Uncontrollable Risks in Hiding Fortune Overseas Offshore Companies, Ownership of the Cannes Villa and Money Laundering in the Criminal Case of Bo Xilai

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Fang
GANEC SWARA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
TITIN APRIANI

   This research is a library research that uses data in the form of books, laws, articles, journals and other literature related to the title, while the technique and data collection is by collecting various ideas, theories and concepts of various literature that are centered on the process of comparison between the evidence or other laws. The results of the study concluded that the ruling of the Constitutional Court against the position of the ad hoc judge is appropriate because it gives the same position on a different matter precisely caused injustice.   In addition to having the authority to check, prosecute, and break the criminal corruption, adhoc judges also have the authority to examine the criminal case of money laundering that the original criminal act is a corruption crime. So here corruption as the original criminal act is often referred to as predicate crimes. It is no less important that the role and authority of the adhoc judge specialising in the association of article 6 letter c The authority of the Court of Law to handle a strict follow-up in another law is determined as a corruption criminal act


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahrus Ali ◽  
Syarif Nurhidayat ◽  
Muhammad Shidqon Prabowo ◽  
Rusli Muhammad

Purpose This study aims to investigate Indonesian regulation of Article 69 of the Money Laundering Criminal Act (TPPU) related to proving predicate crimes, as it leaves a debate whether it must be proven beforehand or not. Design/methodology/approach This research is a normative juridical study, in addition to examining the views of criminal law experts on the formulation of Article 69 of the TPPU Law; it is also extended to the practice of prosecution and court decisions in TPPU cases. Findings The results of this study show that there are two views related to the obligation to not prove the corruption in the ML case. The first view states that the origin of corruption must be proven, especially because ML is a follow-up crime, so it is necessary to prove corrosive crime as one of the predicate offenses. The second view states that the predicate offense of corruption does not have to be proven beforehand because TPPU is an independent offense. Originality/value This research focuses on analyzing whether or not it is obligatory to prove the original crime of corruption in the money laundering case.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Dvoretsky ◽  
◽  
A. I. Anapolskaya ◽  

The article reveals the features of the methods and mechanism for the legalization of money obtained by criminal means using electronic settlement transactions. There was conducted a study of the nature and content, methods and methods of money laundering through electronic accounts of banks, analyzed the main causes of the outflow of money supply outside our country, identified problems to overcome this negative phenomenon and suggested ways to solve them. Conclusion to the article was a recommendation to law enforcement officers to study ways to implement the illegal actions in question, which will allow to identify these crimes in a timely manner, to make the right decisions at the stage of initiation of a criminal case, qualitatively to plan and carry out an investigation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation


Paradigma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-86
Author(s):  
Siti Noviatun ◽  
Isfandayani

Abstract             The main fuction of the Bank as an funding and lending activities by offering various types of financial transaction services an attractive choice for people who do money laundering to hide money proceeds of crime. Because of that the government and Indonesian Banks make regulations related prevent money laundering that contains Customer Due Dilligence and Enhanced Due Dilligence. Bank Mandiri Syariah has implementation Customer Due Dilligence and Enhanced Due Dilligence as an effort to prevent money laundering. This analyze aims for knowing implementation Customer Due Dilligence and Enhanced Due Dilligence that has been applied by Bank Syariah Mandiri. In this study using a qualitative descriptive method. Data retrieval is done by observation, interviews and documentation to three sources of informants Bank Syariah Mandiri KCP Bekasi Timur and one sources of informants that specifically handles money laundering prevention program that is SKAP( Satuan Kerja APU PPT) Bank Mandiri Syariah. Data analysis will be done by doing three steps, they are; data reductions, data display, and verification.The observation result shows that implementation Customer Due Dilligence done at the time prospective customer open the account and the Bank doubt information customer by doing identification and verification. implementation Enhanced Due Dilligence is done to customers Politically Exposed Person/ High Risk open the account, but in practiceat Bank Syariah Mandiri KCP Bekasi Timur done when there is suspicious transaction or there is a case. Reporting process suspicious transaction through the system SIAP (System Aplikasi APU PPT) to Satuan Kerja APU PPT (SKAP) Bank Syariah Mandiri then SKAP reports to PPATK (Pusat Pelaporan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan). From implementation Customer Due Dilligence and Enhanced Due Dilligence Bank Mandiri Syariah has been prevent money laundering enter the financial system at Mandiri Sharia Bank.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-121
Author(s):  
Kato Gogo Kingston

Financial crime in Nigeria – including money laundering – is ravaging Nigeria's economic growth. In the past few years, the Nigerian government has made efforts to tackle money laundering by enacting laws and setting up several agencies to enforce the laws. However, there are substantial loopholes in the regulatory and enforcement regimes. This article seeks to unravel the involvement of the churches as key drivers in money laundering crimes in Nigeria. It concludes that the permissive secrecy which enables churches to conceal the names of their financiers and donors breeds criminality on an unimaginable scale.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document