KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERMOTIF RINGAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KAMPUNG KUALA GASIB DI KECAMATAN KOTO GASIB KABUPATEN SIAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-202
Author(s):  
Rosmalinda Rosmalinda ◽  
Arif Arif ◽  
Ainul Mardiyah

Setiap orang adalah sama didepan hukum tak terkecuali penyandang disabilitas. Penelitian berjudul ―Model Pendampingan Hukum Bagi Difabel (Orang Yang Berkebutuhan Khusus) Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Kota Medan dan Binjai didukung oleh DIKTI dalam Skim Penelitian Hibah bersaing. Peneliti berharap diakhir penelitian akan diperoleh informasi; Pertama, situasi penyandang Disabilitas mengakses layanan hukum yang tersedia di masyarakat. Kedua, persfektif Organisasi atau Lembaga penyedia layanan bantuan hukum bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. Untuk memperoleh tujuan yang diharapkan penelitian dilakukan menggunakan metode normatif empiris. Peneliti melakukan pengumpulan peraturan hukum dan menganalisanya dilanjutkan dengan pengumpulan data lapangan melalui Wawancara mendalam dengan beberapa informan di Kota Medan dan Binjai. Beberapa temuan awal penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa Kota Medan dan Binjai memiliki kasus pidana yang melibatkan penyandang disabilitas baik sebagai Pelaku, Korban dan Saksi. Tindak Pidana yang melibatkan penyadang disabilitas ini adalah Kekerasan seksual meliputi pelecehan seksual, perkosaan dan incest. Temuan lain penelitian adalah adanya kendala bagi Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam penanganan kasus yang melibatkan Penyandang Disabilitas ini. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam penanganan kasus hukum yang melibatkan penyandang disabilitas memiliki tantangan khusus terkait keterbatasan penyandan disabilitas. Tantangan tidak hanya dihadapi oleh penyandang disabilitas dan keluarga tetapi juga Aparat Penegak Hukum (APH).   Everyone is equal before the law, including people with disabilities. The study entitled ―The Legal Assistance Model For Disabled (People Who Have Special Needs) Dealing with Law in Medan and Binjai Cities was supported by DIKTI in Competitive Research Schemes. The researcher expected that information would be obtained at the end of the study; First, the situation of persons with disabilities accessing legal services available in the community. Second, the perspective of Legal Aid Services organizations or institutions for persons with disabilities. To obtain the expected goals, the study was conducted using empirical normative methods. The researcher collected and analyzed legal regulations, followed by data collection through in-depth interviews with several informants in the cities of Medan and Binjai. Some preliminary findings of the study showed that Medan and Binjai had criminal cases involving persons with disabilities as Actors, Victims, and Witnesses. The criminal offenses involving persons with disabilities were sexual violence including sexual harassment, rape, and incest. Another finding of the research shows that there were obstacles for Law Enforcement Officials in handling cases involving this Dissability. This study concluded that there were special challenges related to the limitations of disability genders in handling legal cases involving persons with disabilities. The challenges were faced not only by persons with disabilities and families, but also by Law Enforcement Officials (APH).


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Jonlar Purba

<p align="justify">The disparity by judges in decisions led to the inability of people facing criminal offenses. Laws are not grounded to small communities, the judicious use of a crime in Indonesia as well as the strength of spider webs in which only able to ensnare minor crimes, but are not able to touch the major crimes that occurred in Indonesia. This study uses normative juridical. The results of this study found that completion ordinary crime patterned petty can be reached with a restorative justice approach, so it can focus on the direct participation of the offender, victim and community.</p>


Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Rena Yulia ◽  
Aliyth Prakarsa

Police institutions are the first and main gate in law enforcement efforts. First, the police institution in charge of carrying out each criminal case’s enforcement, then the next stage will be determined by the police. The practice of law enforcement so far tends to be retributive justice, so that only a few cases can be resolved in the police investigation process. Restorative justice appears by offering various advantages, including a simple settlement process, involving both parties, both perpetrators and victims, and the role of a third party to mediate, so that cases can be resolved according to the agreement. The police, as the first institution in the law enforcement process, had already issued regulations regarding the application of restorative justice, as a form of law enforcement efforts to change retributive law enforcement. The purpose of this research judicially examined the regulation of restorative justice at the police investigation phase in line with the enactment of the regulation of the Chief of Police Number: SE/8/VII/2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases and the Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian Police Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation. This research used a qualitative research method with the type of normative legal research through a statutory approach


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Jatmiko Raharjo ◽  
Syamsuddin Muchtar ◽  
Audyna Mayasari Muin

The aim of the study is to determine the application of Visum et Repertum as evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence. This study was empirical legal research. The location of this study was conducted in Kejaksaan Negeri Klaten. The result of the research showed that as proof of domestic violence with evidence Visum et Repertum was one of the law enforcements oriented to realize for legal certainty and protection of victims in proving the occurrence of criminal acts in domestic violence. The lack of evidence bothers the process of law enforcement, regarding requirements to determine the victim provided at least two evidence and for the judges to decide on criminal cases with valid evidence at least can be avoided by using Visum et Repertum. The obstacles to prove the evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence with Visum et Repertum includes the differences of understanding among law enforcement officials about the use of Visum et Repertum for criminal acts in domestic violence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Zhulfiana Pratiwi Hafid

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan bertujuan untuk mengetahui peranan justice collaborator dalam pengungkapan suatu kasus tindak pidana; untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan perlindungan hukum terhadap justice collaborator. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan beberapa contoh kasus. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa  kehadiran seorang justice collaborator dalam mengungkap tindak pidana korupsi sangat membantu dalam proses persidangan atau penjatuhan hukuman kepada terdakwa, sehingga secara tidak langsung memudahkan para aparat penegak hukum. Perlindungan yang diterapkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 dan SEMA No. 04 Tahun 2011 belum memberikan kesan positif dalam hal pemberian perlindungan fisik dan hukum, penanganan secara khusus, dan penghargaan kepada justice collaborator. Namun dalam hal perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada justice collaborator dianggap belum signifikan terhadap pemberian reward dan punishment.This research was conducted with the aim of: 1) To determine the role of justice collaborators in disclosing a criminal case; 2) To find out how to regulate legal protection against justice collaborator. This type of research is normative legal research, with a legal approach and several case examples. The results of this research show that: 1) the presence of a very justice collaborator in uncovering criminal acts of corruption is very helpful in the trial process or sentencing of the accused, thus indirectly facilitating law enforcement officials. 2) protection applied to Law Number 31 of 2014 and SEMA No. 04 of 2011 has not given a positive impression in terms of providing physical and legal protection, special handling, and appreciation to justice collaborator. However, in terms of legal protection given to justice collaborators it is deemed not significant to the provision of reward and punishment.


Author(s):  
Rodliyah Rodliyah

This study examines diversion as an alternative settlement of criminal cases. The method used in conducting research is a normative method with a statutory approach. Implementatively diversion in the settlement of criminal cases other than adults will greatly reduce the burden of law enforcement officials in handling cases, besides that the diversion policy will also meet the needs of people who want to handle cases quickly and at a low cost.


Author(s):  
Suwardi Suwardi ◽  
Liston Habonaran Simorangkir

Based on this perspective, the type of legal research is carried out through juridical-empirical. In terms of the orientation of law enforcement towards land management by (PCO) as citizens for gardening, it’s an arbitrary act and leads to legal discrimination, considering that the State has protected the rights of citizens through Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction Article 11 paragraph (3). In addition, the professionalism of law enforcement officials in the field of human resources must be further improved in order to further strengthen the mastery of knowledge of criminal offenses and the elements of crime from an act, so that the community as citizens is not harmed in terms of law enforcement orientation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
July Esther ◽  
Bintang ME Naibaho ◽  
Bintang Christine

The excess housing in the Indonesian Correctional Institution does not abate. This condition is faced with criminal efforts which should be a final diversion related to the effort to include convicted persons in Corrections Institutions. The aim is to analyze whether the mediation of penal as the application of Restorative Justice can be an alternative effort to minimize excess occupancy inmates in correctional institutions. The use of this research as a recommendation for law enforcement officials in the handling of criminal acts by promoting penal mediation. The research uses normative legal research methods with literature studies. Mediation Penal is considered able to be an intermediary process of mediation or peace between perpetrators of criminal acts with victims of criminal acts as minimizing the excess occupancy that starts from handling the police and prosecutors stage.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1301
Author(s):  
Glery Lazuardi

Tujuan penelitian ini yakni memberikan masukan kepada aparat penegak hukum agar menggunakan pendekatan Restorative Justice terhadap pelaku penyebaran informasi tidak benar atau hoaks. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan pendekatan Restorative Justice dapat diterapkan kepada pelaku penyebaran hoaks. Sebab, penerapan Restorative Justice sudah sesuai dengan falsafah bangsa Indonesia, yaitu Pancasila khususnya sila ke-4, yang mengedepankan musyawarah. Dengan demikian, harapannya upaya pemidanaan terhadap pelaku penyebaran hoaks dapat dikurangi dan dilakukan pendekatan melalui cara mediasi antara korban dengan pelaku penyebaran hoaks. The purpose of this study is to provide input to law enforcement officials using the Restorative Justice approach to the perpetrators of disseminating hoaxes. This study uses a normative legal research method with a descriptive analytical approach. The results of this study indicate that the Restorative Justice approach can be applied to the perpetrators of hoax distribution. Because, the application of Restorative Justice is in accordance with the philosophy of the Indonesian people, namely Pancasila especially the 4th precepts, which prioritizes deliberation. Thus, the hope of efforts to reduce the perpetrators of hoax distribution can be reduced and approach is carried out through mediation between the victim and the perpetrators of the spread of hoaxes.


FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendri Pratama

The completion of the juvenile criminal case in restorative justice can be done in a various way, one of the completion is using Megow Pak Tulang Bawang custom. The results of this research, in the completion process of juvenile criminal case using Megow Pak Tulang Bawang Lampung Custom, there are several stages and the completion of juvenile criminal case using Megow Pak Tulang Bawang Lampung Custom has been suitable with restorative justice principle because in the settlement, involving all stakeholder and using penal mediation that was form of restorative justice. There are several reason the completion of the juvenile criminal case using Megow Pak Tulang Bawang custom rarely used, that are: the society is not homogenous anymore, there are no strict rules that recognize the unity of customary law, and sometimes the authority is taken by law enforcement officers contrary to customary law of Megow Pak. Suggestions for this research is the completion of juvenile criminal case using Megow Pak Tulang Bawang Lampung custom can be taken as consideration for the law enforcement officers in Juvenile criminal case completion and also as well as consideration in formulating the new rules (Ius constituendum). Keywords: Juvenile Criminal Cases, Lampung Costum, Restorative Justice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document