Adli Muhasebe Kavramının Önemi ve Farkındalık Düzeyi: Yalova Üniversitesi Öğrencileri ile bir SMMM Meslek Mensubu Üzerinde İki Yönlü Uygulama (The Importance and Awareness Level of Forensic Accounting Concept: A Bilateral Implementation on Yalova University Students and a CPA Member of Profession)

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cevdet Kizil ◽  
İsmail Erkan Çelik ◽  
Vedat Akman ◽  
Doğacan Okkaya
Author(s):  
Wejdan Aljohni ◽  
Nazar Elfadil ◽  
Mutsam Jarajreh ◽  
Mwahib Gasmelsied

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.34) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Syazni Jusoh ◽  
Mohd Khairul Amri Kamarudin ◽  
Noorjima Abd Wahab ◽  
Muhammad Hafiz Md Saad ◽  
Nurul Huda Rohizat ◽  
...  

Environmental awareness is one concept to understand the fragility of our environment and importance of its protection. Environmental awareness program among university students have greatly improved over the years. However, environmental issues always arise as a disaster in the world. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to review the level of environmental awareness issue among universities students in Malaysia. The result showed the level of environmental awareness among university students had high level of knowledge but the level of practices was moderate. They are not applicants and practice this awareness in their life. Therefore, more effective initiatives need to be due by the authorities and the government to preserve our environment. The level of knowledge and practice of the environment care has greatly contributed to the environmental sustainability in Malaysia.  


Author(s):  
Kevan L. Jensen ◽  
Mark W. Smith

ABSTRACT: This study examines the effectiveness of assessment questions in distinguishing perpetrators of dishonest acts from non-perpetrators. Virtually all fraud examination or forensic accounting textbooks teach that assessment questions are useful in identifying perpetrators. Yet there are no scientific studies that provide empirical support for this notion. Using cheating and shoplifting as examples of dishonest acts (i.e., fraud), and using a series of studies wherein we anonymously put assessment questions to university students, we find that students who have perpetrated dishonest acts respond differently to assessment questions than do students who have not perpetrated those acts. Cheaters tend to say that cheating is more common than do non-cheaters, and cheaters tend to say that punishments for cheating should be less severe than do non-cheaters. Results for shoplifters versus non-shoplifters are similar. Some assessment questions are more effective than others, and how questions are framed seems to be relevant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document