scholarly journals Six-month therapy of CGRP monoclonal antibodies in real-world clinical practice: an interim analysis of efficacy and safety data

2022 ◽  
pp. 64-70
Author(s):  
N. V. Vashchenko ◽  
A. M. Uzhakhov ◽  
M. V. Bogorodskaya ◽  
D. Z. Korobkova ◽  
Ju. E. Azimova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Real World ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Antibody Therapy ◽  
Preventive Therapy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Acute Therapy

Introduction. Migraine is one of the most common disabling neurological disorders. Recently developed monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor are the first targeted medication for preventive therapy of both episodic and chronic migraine. They have been thoroughly investigated in clinical trials; however, there is little data from real-world clinical practice available to date. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 6 months of treatment with erenumab in real-world clinical practice and investigate the effect of the drug on the patients’ sensitivity to medicines for migraine headaches relief and patient satisfaction after treatment.Materials and methods. Our observational cohort prospective study included patients in our Headache Clinic prescribed monoclonal antibodies blocking the  CGRP-receptor  – erenumab. During the  investigation, we evaluated the  previous preventive therapy and its efficacy, the number of days with migraine per month, adverse events occurring during the erenumab treatment, depression and anxiety (HADS), migraine disability (MIDAS), the presence of allodynia (ACS-12) and improved response to acute therapy after treatment. A total of 42 patients participated in the study: 6 men, 36 women, the average age was 43.9 ± 12.2. Of them, 38 patients (90%) had chronic migraine. Thirty-two patients (76%) had previously been prescribed preventive therapy, which proved ineffective, and 10 patients (24%) had not once received any type of migraine prevention.Results. Among our patients, we identified 11 patients with resistant migraine and one patient with refractory migraine. During the study, two patients dropped out due to adverse events (constipation). Thirty patients continued the administration of erenumab 70 mg for at least six months. The average number of migraine days per month before treatment was 22.8, and after six months of treatment, it dropped to 7.3. Twenty-nine patients (72.5%) also noted that the response to acute headache treatment improved after the therapy.Conclusion. The results of our study are consistent with the international experience of using erenumab and confirm its effectiveness for migraine preventive therapy, including difficult-to-treat migraine cases. However, further studies with more participants and evaluation of predictors of successful monoclonal antibody therapy are still needed.

Efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP(r) monoclonal antibodies in real clinical practice: preliminary analysis after three months of therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 62-66
Author(s):  
V. N. Vashchenko ◽  
D. Z. Korobkova ◽  
K. V. Skorobogatykh ◽  
Yu. E. Azimova
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Medication Overuse Headache ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cutaneous Allodynia ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Headache Diary ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Monoclonal antibodies inhibiting calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor have been widely used for migraine prophylactic therapy for the past three years. Evaluation of their efficacy and safety of therapy in real clinical practice is needed.Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Erenumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the CGRP receptor during three months of therapy.Patients and methods. Sixty-eight patients (58 women and 10 men, mean age 37±10.4 years) with episodic or chronic migraine who were treated with Erenumab were observed. Patients were assessed with MIDAS, WPAI, and HADS scales; the presence of cutaneous allodynia was evaluated with ASC-12 questionnaire. Patients kept a headache diary and marked adverse events during the whole treatment period.Results and discussion. 47 patients (69%) had chronic migraine and 32 (71.9%) had medication overuse headache. In 48 patients (70%) after 3 injections of Erenumab the number of days with migraine decreased by 50% or more. In 7 patients (10%), the reduction in headache days was more than 75%; 20 (29%) did not experience sufficient effect after three months of therapy. Nineteen adverse events were noted in 15 (22%) patients. Severe constipation led to discontinuation of treatment in two patients (3%).Conclusion. The study showed the efficacy and safety of Erenumab for migraine prophylaxis in both patients with episodic and chronic migraine.

Safety of a trastuzumab biosimilar, used under routine clinical practice conditions in adult HER2+ breast cancer patients in Morocco.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13024-e13024
Author(s):  
Hassan Errihani ◽  
Narjiss Berrada ◽  
Mouna Khouchani ◽  
Abdelkader Acharki ◽  
Kamal Lahbabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

e13024 Background: Hertraz, the first trastuzumab biosimilar was approved in Morocco in 2017. Real world data on trastuzumab biosimilars are very limited or not available. HERLife is a prospective, non-interventional phase IV study program that investigated the experience of using Hertraz, a biosimilar for trastuzumab (Herceptin), under routine clinical practice conditions in Morocco. The primary aim of this study was to confirm the acceptable safety and tolerability of Hertraz. Methods: Ninety-nine patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with Hertraz were enrolled from 8 public and private sector hospitals and followed up for 12 months as part of this non-interventional study. Cardiac events (LVEF) and other unexpected or serious adverse events were monitored. The study arms consisted of patients with early breast cancer (Arm 1, n=70) and metastatic breast cancer (Arm 2, n=29) whose median age was 53 years in both groups. Results: Switching from Herceptin to Hertraz was observed in 45% of 29 MBC patients and 27% of 70 EBC patients. Switching was done at a median of 4th cycle. Pertuzumab was used in combination with Hertraz in 69% and 19% of patients in the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings, respectively. Two patients had a decline in LVEF. One patient treated with Hertraz alone and one patient treated with Hertraz and pertuzumab developed a decrease in LVEF requiring a three-week treatment discontinuation of Hertraz. Treatment of Hertraz was continued after 1 skipped cycle without occurrence of new side effects. No other trastuzumab related adverse events was observed. Four patients in the metastatic group and 2 patients in the early breast cancer arm had a relapse in the 12 months of clinical follow-up. Conclusions: The management of HER2+ breast cancer in Morocco follows the international recommendations. This is the first real world safety data of Hertraz from Morocco. The 12-month follow-up treatment with Hertraz showed an acceptable cardiac safety profile. In cases where there was a switch from Herceptin to Hertraz or Hertraz combined with pertuzumab, the safety profile was similar to that previously reported in other studies.

Ipilimumab in real-world clinical practice: efficacy and safety data from a multicenter observational study

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Russi ◽  
Vera Damuzzo ◽  
Marco Chiumente ◽  
Jacopo Pigozzo ◽  
Marco Cesca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Ponatinib in CML and Ph+ ALL Patients in Real-World Clinical Practice: Data from a Belgian Registry

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1744-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Devos ◽  
Koen Theunissen ◽  
Fleur Samantha Benghiat ◽  
Alain Gadisseur ◽  
Stef Meers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Best Response ◽  
History Of ◽  
T315i Mutation

Abstract Background Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for adult patients with resistant or intolerant chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase, or blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), or those with the T315I mutation. In Belgium, ponatinib has been commercially available since March 2016. The goal of this registry was to collect efficacy and safety data in CML and Ph+ ALL patients and to evaluate ponatinib in routine clinical practice in Belgium. Methods This ongoing, prospective, multi-center registry includes patients ≥18 years of age with CML or Ph+ ALL, who have initiated ponatinib treatment. Demographic, efficacy and safety data were collected for patients enrolled from March 2016 (day 0) onwards. Results up to study month 24 are presented. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Ethics Committee approval was obtained and all patients provided informed consent. Results At time of data analysis, 34 patients (21 CP-CML and 13 Ph+ ALL) were enrolled. The median age of CP-CML and Ph+ ALL patients was 57 and 55 years, respectively. Patients were heavily pretreated: 90% of CML and 92% of Ph+ ALL patients had received ≥2 prior TKIs. Several patients had one or more risk factors for TKI cardiovascular toxicity: hypertension (10), history of cardiovascular disease (11), smoker (10), hypercholesterolemia (5), and diabetes (4). Median follow-up was 539 days for CML and 135 days for Ph+ ALL patients. The reasons for starting ponatinib therapy were related to refractoriness to previous TKIs (36%), progression (18%), presence of the T315I mutation (18%) or intolerance (29%). Eighty percent (8/10) of the patients who started ponatinib due to intolerance to previous TKIs had received ≥3 prior TKIs. At entry, 17 of the 34 patients (50%) had a confirmed BCR-ABL mutation. Of these 17, 10 (59%; 5 CML and 5 Ph+ ALL) had the T315I mutation. Starting doses of ponatinib in CML patients were 45 mg (76%), 30 mg (10%) and 15 mg (14%) once daily. Starting doses in Ph+ ALL patients were 45 mg (85%), 30 mg (8%) and 15 mg (8%). At latest follow up, the median treatment duration for the 21 CML patients was 531 days (range 15 - 2483) and for the 13 Ph+ ALL patients it was 123 days (range 13 - 1945). Best response was a major molecular response (MMR), which was obtained in 71% of CML patients and 38% of Ph+ ALL patients. The median time-to-best response was 175 days in CML and 35 days in Ph+ ALL patients. In the 10 patients (7 CML and 3 Ph+ ALL) who started ponatinib because of intolerance to several previous TKIs, 80% achieved MMR. The median time to achieve best response in these patients was 192 days for CML and 31 days for Ph+ ALL patients. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 20 patients (59%); the most common were rash (26%), dry skin (9%) and constipation (9%). Three patients reported ≥1 treatment-related serious AE (SAE): thrombocytopenia (n=1), cholecystitis (n=1) and hepatocellular injury (n=1). Three serious cardiovascular events were observed in 1 patient, who had a history of congenital cardiomyopathy and aortic prosthesis. They were scored as not related to ponatinib. Dose reductions or interruptions occurred in 33 cases (20 in CML and 13 in Ph+ ALL patients), with the following reasons most frequently mentioned: AEs (76%), to prevent AEs (18%) and other (6%). Dose increases occurred in 12 cases (10 in CML and 2 in Ph+ ALL patients), for the following reasons: good tolerance of treatment (58%), no or low response (33%) or other (8%). At time of analysis, 19 patients (9 CML and 10 Ph+ ALL) had discontinued treatment, of which 32% due to AEs, 5% due to an SAE, 21% due to planned allogeneic transplant, 16% due to disease progression and 26% due to other reasons. [Note: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding] Conclusion Real-world evidence from this Belgian registry shows that ponatinib has a favorable efficacy and safety profile in, and supports its use in CML and Ph+ ALL patients who are resistant or intolerant to previous therapies or those with the T315I mutation. Deep molecular responses were obtained in the majority of patients. No new safety signals emerged with ponatinib treatment than those previously reported. Funding: Incyte Biosciences Benelux BV Disclosures Devos: Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Theunissen:Incyte: Honoraria. Van Eygen:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Kuipers:Incyte Biosciences Benelux BV: Employment.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation and management of adverse events associated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110311
Author(s):  
Chiun Hsu ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Hui-Chuan Sun ◽  
Arndt Vogel ◽  
Ahmed O. Kaseb
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line

In light of positive efficacy and safety findings from the IMbrave150 trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, this novel combination has become the preferred first-line standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several additional trials are ongoing that combine an immune checkpoint inhibitor with another agent such as a multiple kinase inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent. Therefore, the range of first-line treatment options for unresectable HCC is likely to increase, and healthcare providers need succinct information about the use of such combinations, including their efficacy and key aspects of their safety profiles. Here, we review efficacy and safety data on combination immunotherapies and offer guidance on monitoring and managing adverse events, especially those associated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Because of their underlying liver disease and high likelihood of portal hypertension, patients with unresectable HCC are at particular risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, and this risk may be exacerbated by treatments that include antiangiogenic agents. Healthcare providers also need to be alert to the risks of proteinuria and hypertension, colitis, hepatitis, and reactivation of hepatitis B or C virus infection. They should also be aware of the possibility of rarer but potentially life-threatening adverse events such as pneumonitis and cardiovascular events. Awareness of the risks associated with these therapies and knowledge of adverse event monitoring and management will become increasingly important as the therapeutic range broadens in unresectable HCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast Monotherapy for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Retrospective Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvin Ighani ◽  
Jorge R. Georgakopoulos ◽  
Linda L. Zhou ◽  
Scott Walsh ◽  
Neil Shear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Plaque Psoriasis ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Oral Drug ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Background: Apremilast is a new oral drug for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis that reduces inflammation by inhibiting phosphodiesterase 4. Its efficacy and safety data are limited; hence, real-world outcomes are important for elucidating the full spectrum of its adverse events (AEs) and expanding generalizability of clinical trial findings. Objective: Assess the efficacy and safety of apremilast monotherapy in real-world practice. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 2 academic dermatology practices. Efficacy was measured as the proportion of patients achieving a ≥75% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI-75) or a Psoriasis Global Assessment (PGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) at 16 weeks. Safety was measured as the proportion of patients reporting ≥1 AE at 16 weeks. Results: Thirty-four patients were included. Efficacy: 19 patients (55.9%) achieved PASI-75 or PGA 0/1. Safety: 23 patients (67.6%) experienced ≥1 AEs. Five patients (14.7%) withdrew treatment prior to week 16 due to AEs. One patient withdrew treatment due to mood lability and depression. Common AEs included headache (32.4%), nausea (20.6%), diarrhoea (14.7%), weight loss (8.8%), and loose stool (8.8%). Conclusion: Apremilast monotherapy had higher efficacy with similar safety outcomes in the real world compared to clinical trials. There were higher proportions of reported headaches compared to clinical trials. This study supports the apremilast monotherapy clinical trial findings, suggesting that it has an acceptable safety profile and significantly reduces the severity of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document