scholarly journals Challenges to E-government in modern realities. Results of the VII International scientific conference “Electronic governance and open society: Challenges in Eurasia”

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104
Author(s):  
Ludmila A. Vidiasova ◽  
◽  
Dmitrii R. Trutnev ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
Zubayda Farkhod kizi Tukhlibaeva ◽  

In Indian literature, English literature demonstrates its peculiarities by productivity, variety of creative directions and originality of the creative style, the relevance of the issues raised. In this article, we will focus on the work of Sunita Jain, a prominent representative of English literature in India, and the immortal works created by the writer. The current part of our article has not studied the works of the author we have chosen, and her works have not been translated and learned by uzbek and russian literator. Sunita Jain’s works were distinguished by originality and sincerity. Sunita Jane has focused on important topics such as women, love, gender equality and caste. Her novels are distinguished by pure and delicate feminine taste. A realistic depiction of reality in his works is characterized by the fact that there is not much romantic flavor and the disclosure of the relationship between the individual and society through meaning, and society as a whole is oriented toward comprehensibility. Her Hindi novels Bindu and Boju were widely criticized as in both novels the author portrayed the plight of young girls and women in India as two families, openly blaming the environment and society at the time. At a scientific conference at the Women's Department of the University of Delhi, a journalist asked why you accuse the open society in both novels, to which he replied: "I am also a woman in the society embodied in this novel." It is clear that Sunita Jain reflected the realities of life in her works. The novels presented in the article are a vivid example of this.


1996 ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Mykhailo Babiy

This is extremely relevant and very important both in theoretical and practical dimensions, the problem was at the center of the discussions of the international scientific conference, which took place on May 6-7, 1996 in Lviv. The mentioned conference was one of the main events within the framework of the VI International Round Table "History of Religions in Ukraine", at its meetings 3-6, as well as on issues of outstanding dates in the history of the development of religious life in Ukraine on the 8th of May: "400 "the anniversary of the Brest Union", and "400th anniversary of the birth of Peter Mohyla"


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Baugh

In Bergsonism, Deleuze refers to Bergson's concept of an ‘open society’, which would be a ‘society of creators’ who gain access to the ‘open creative totality’ through acting and creating. Deleuze and Guattari's political philosophy is oriented toward the goal of such an open society. This would be a democracy, but not in the sense of the rule of the actually existing people, but the rule of ‘the people to come,’ for in the actually existing situation, such a people is ‘lacking’. When the people becomes a society of creators, the result is a society open to the future, creativity and the new. Their openness and creative freedom is the polar opposite of the conformism and ‘herd mentality’ condemned by Deleuze and Nietzsche, a mentality which is the basis of all narrow nationalisms (of ethnicity, race, religion and creed). It is the freedom of creating and commanding, not the Kantian freedom to obey Reason and the State. This paper uses Bergson's The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, and Deleuze and Guattari's Kafka: For a Minor Literature, A Thousand Plateaus and What is Philosophy? to sketch Deleuze and Guattari's conception of the open society and of a democracy that remains ‘to come’.


Author(s):  
Gerald Gaus

This book lays out a vision for how we should theorize about justice in a diverse society. It shows how free and equal people, faced with intractable struggles and irreconcilable conflicts, might share a common moral life shaped by a just framework. The book argues that if we are to take diversity seriously and if moral inquiry is sincere about shaping the world, then the pursuit of idealized and perfect theories of justice—essentially, the entire production of theories of justice that has dominated political philosophy for the past forty years—needs to change. Drawing on recent work in social science and philosophy, the book points to an important paradox: only those in a heterogeneous society—with its various religious, moral, and political perspectives—have a reasonable hope of understanding what an ideally just society would be like. However, due to its very nature, this world could never be collectively devoted to any single ideal. The book defends the moral constitution of this pluralistic, open society, where the very clash and disagreement of ideals spurs all to better understand what their personal ideals of justice happen to be. Presenting an original framework for how we should think about morality, this book rigorously analyzes a theory of ideal justice more suitable for contemporary times.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document