scholarly journals Single Stage Light Gas Gun Control System.

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Marshall Barnes ◽  
William D. Reinhart ◽  
Christopher T Seagle
2011 ◽  
Vol 383-390 ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
Dong Yuan ◽  
Xiao Jun Ma ◽  
Wei Wei

Aiming at the problems such as switch impulsion, insurmountability for influence caused by nonlinearity in one tank gun control system which adopts double PID controller to realize the multimode switch control between high speed and low speed movement, the system math model is built up; And then, Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC) method based on nonroutine reference model is brought in and the adaptive gun controller is designed. Consequently, the compensation of nonlinearity and multimode control are implemented. Furthermore, the Tracking Differentiator (TD) is affiliated to the front of controller in order to restrain the impulsion caused by mode switch. Finally, the validity of control method in this paper is verified by simulation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 564 ◽  
pp. 428-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.N.A. Safri ◽  
Mohamed Thariq Hameed Sultan ◽  
N. Razali ◽  
Shahnor Basri ◽  
Noorfaizal Yidris ◽  
...  

The purpose of this work is to study the best number of layer with the higher impact energy using Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP). The number of layers used in this study was 25, 33, 41, and 49. The impact test was performed using Single Stage Gas Gun (SSGG) for each layers given above with different bullets such as blunt, hemispherical and conical bullets. The gas gun pressure was set to 5, 10, 15 and 20 bar. All of the signals captured from the impact test were recorded using a ballistic data acquisition system. The correlation between the impact energy in terms of number of layer and type of bullet from this test are presented and discussed. It can be summarise that as the number of layer increases, impact energy also increases. In addition, from the results, it was observed that by using different types of bullets (blunt, hemispherical, conical), there is only a slight difference in values of energy absorbed by the specimen.


Author(s):  
Satish C. GUPTA ◽  
R.G. AGARWAL ◽  
J.S. GYANCHANDANI ◽  
S. ROY ◽  
N. SURESH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 2409-2418
Author(s):  
马晓军 MA Xiao-jun ◽  
袁东 YUAN Dong ◽  
李匡成 LI Kuang-cheng ◽  
魏曙光 WEI Shu-guang

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Bucholtz ◽  
R. J. Gehr ◽  
R. R. Alcon ◽  
R. L. Gustavsen ◽  
Mark Elert ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document