scholarly journals STRUCTURAL RESPONSE TO CLOSE-IN VERTICAL GROUND MOTION FROM UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR TESTS AT PAHUTE MESA. VOL. 1. SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM ELASTIC STRUCTURES.

1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Elastic Structures ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Vertical Ground Motion ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Nuclear Tests

scholarly journals An approach to quantify the influence of ground motion uncertainty on elastoplastic system acceleration in incremental dynamic analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1744-1756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Deng ◽  
Shiling Pei ◽  
John W. van de Lindt ◽  
Hongyan Liu ◽  
Chao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Incremental Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Maximum Acceleration ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Performance Based Earthquake Engineering

Inclusion of ground motion–induced uncertainty in structural response evaluation is an essential component for performance-based earthquake engineering. In current practice, ground motion uncertainty is often represented in performance-based earthquake engineering analysis empirically through the use of one or more ground motion suites. How to quantitatively characterize ground motion–induced structural response uncertainty propagation at different seismic hazard levels has not been thoroughly studied to date. In this study, a procedure to quantify the influence of ground motion uncertainty on elastoplastic single-degree-of-freedom acceleration responses in an incremental dynamic analysis is proposed. By modeling the shape of the incremental dynamic analysis curves, the formula to calculate uncertainty in maximum acceleration responses of linear systems and elastoplastic single-degree-of-freedom systems is constructed. This closed-form calculation provided a quantitative way to establish statistical equivalency for different ground motion suites with regard to acceleration response in these simple systems. This equivalence was validated through a numerical experiment, in which an equivalent ground motion suite for an existing ground motion suite was constructed and shown to yield statistically similar acceleration responses to that of the existing ground motion suite at all intensity levels.

Single-Degree-of-Freedom Based Pressure-Impulse Diagrams for Blast Damage Assessment

2014 ◽  
Vol 567 ◽  
pp. 499-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zubair Imam Syed ◽  
Mohd Shahir Liew ◽  
Muhammad Hasibul Hasan ◽  
Srikanth Venkatesan
Keyword(s):  
Damage Assessment ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Blast Loading ◽  
Computational Effort ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Negative Phase ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Pressure Impulse ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Structural Resistance

Pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams, which relates damage with both impulse and pressure, are widely used in the design and damage assessment of structural elements under blast loading. Among many methods of deriving P-I diagrams, single degree of freedom (SDOF) models are widely used to develop P-I diagrams for damage assessment of structural members exposed to blast loading. The popularity of the SDOF method in structural response calculation in its simplicity and cost-effective approach that requires limited input data and less computational effort. The SDOF model gives reasonably good results if the response mode shape is representative of the real behaviour. Pressure-impulse diagrams based on SDOF models are derived based on idealised structural resistance functions and the effect of few of the parameters related to structural response and blast loading are ignored. Effects of idealisation of resistance function, inclusion of damping and load rise time on P-I diagrams constructed from SDOF models have been investigated in this study. In idealisation of load, the negative phase of the blast pressure pulse is ignored in SDOF analysis. The effect of this simplification has also been explored. Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) codes were developed for response calculation of the SDOF system and for repeated analyses of the SDOF models to construct the P-I diagrams. Resistance functions were found to have significant effect on the P-I diagrams were observed. Inclusion of negative phase was found to have notable impact of the shape of P-I diagrams in the dynamic zone.

Ground Motion Prediction Model for the Peak Inelastic Displacement of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Bilinear Systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 1177-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Heresi ◽  
Héctor Dávalos ◽  
Eduardo Miranda
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction ◽  
Vibration Period ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Inelastic Displacement ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Proposed Model

This paper presents a ground motion prediction model (GMPM) for estimating medians and standard deviations of the random horizontal component of the peak inelastic displacement of 5% damped single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems, with bilinear hysteretic behavior and 3% postelastic stiffness ratio, directly as a function of the earthquake magnitude and the distance to the source. The equations were developed using a mixed effects model, with 1,662 recorded ground motions from 63 seismic events. In the proposed model, the median is computed as a function of the vibration period and the normalized strength of the system, as well as the event magnitude and the Joyner-Boore distance to the source. The standard deviation of the model is computed as a function of the vibration period and the normalized strength of the system. The proposed model has the advantage of not requiring an auxiliary elastic GMPM to predict the median and dispersion of peak inelastic displacement.

scholarly journals Required Time Gap Between Mainshock and Aftershock for Dynamic Analysis of Structures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roohollah M. Pirooz ◽  
Soheila Habashi ◽  
Ali Massumi
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Vibration Period ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Rest Time ◽  
Time Gap ◽  
Earthquake Sequences

Abstract Despite the various studies carried out to evaluate the effects of seismic sequences on structures, the matter of the time gap required to be considered between the mainshock and its corresponding aftershocks in dynamic analyses has never been focused on directly. This subtle but in the meantime effective subject, influences on the amount of accumulated damage caused by earthquake sequences. In the present study, 244 near fault ground motion components from 122 earthquakes were applied to a wide variety of single degree of freedom systems having vibrating period of 0.05 to 7 seconds with linear and nonlinear behavior. Furthermore, 2 planar steel moment-resisting frames, having 3 and 12 stories, were subjected to a set of 30 ground motion components. The purpose of this investigation was to estimate the required time for the structures to cease the free vibration at the end of the mainshock. The main purpose is to generate an estimation that is function of structural system’s parameters and the strong motion duration. Excellent correlations were obtained between the rest time and the following parameters: the combination of natural period of single degree of freedom systems, as well as the strong motion duration of earthquake sequences. In consequence, a formula is proposed which estimates the required optimized rest-time of a structure based on natural vibration period, as well as the duration of strong motion. Additionally, results obtained from the dynamic analysis of the steel frames validate the rest-time values achieved from the proposed formula.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems to Ground Motion

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Ebeling ◽  
Russell A. Green ◽  
Samuel E. French
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree

The Random Response of a Single Degree of Freedom Generalized Maxwell Damping Structure

2015 ◽  
Vol 744-746 ◽  
pp. 1648-1653
Author(s):  
Wan Jie Zou ◽  
Chuan Gao Li ◽  
Yun Xia Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Laplace Transform ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Inverse Laplace Transform ◽  
Maximum Response ◽  
Random Response ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Response Variance

Using the model of stationary white noise excitation, defining the exact analytic method of random response and nearer value of earthquake action about single degree of freedom generalized Maxwell damping, firstly transform the motion equation into standard form, with the Laplace transform and Inverse Laplace transform method, obtained the exact analytical formula of structural response, calculate the response variance by the complex modal method and frequency domain decomposition and make comparisons, The response variance decomposition for the first standard vibrator and second order of the standard vibrator, According to the corresponding relationship between maximum response of the second order vibrator and The design response spectrum, calculated the maximum response by it, base on the maximum response proportion of the first standard vibrator and second, obtained the design of the structural response values and its corresponding earthquake force.

Inelastic Structural Response to Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes

1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lee Marsh ◽  
Christopher M. Gianotti
Keyword(s):  
Subduction Zone ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Cascadia Subduction Zone ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Energy Demands ◽  
Cyclic Displacement ◽  
Energy Dissipated ◽  
Subduction Zone Earthquakes

The effects of postulated Cascadia subduction zone earthquakes on inelastic structural response are examined. The earthquakes considered ranged in size from those previously recorded to the largest plausible event, a magnitude 9.5 earthquake. Artificial acceleration records were generated and used as input for inelastic response history analyses of single-degree-of-freedom systems with bilinear or degrading stiffness hysteretic relationships. The results indicate that the maximum displacements are not significantly greater than those produced by previously recorded events. The inelastic energy dissipated and the numbers of displacement cycles are somewhat greater for the largest events, although the energy demands and the cyclic displacement demands are similar to those from the recorded events for magnitudes up to 8.5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document