Recent Applications of Artificial Intelligence in detection of Gastrointestinal, Hepatic and Pancreatic Diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajnish Kumar ◽  
Farhat Ullah Khan ◽  
Anju Sharma ◽  
Izzatdin BA Aziz ◽  
Nitesh Kumar Poddar
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Pancreatic Diseases ◽  
Substantial Progress ◽  
Identification Analysis ◽  
Wireless Capsule

: There is substantial progress in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and their medical sciences applications in the last two decades. AI-assisted programs have already been established for remotely health monitoring using sensors and smartphones. A variety of AI-based prediction models available for the gastrointestinal inflammatory, non-malignant diseases, and bowel bleeding using wireless capsule endoscopy, electronic medical records for hepatitis-associated fibrosis, pancreatic carcinoma using endoscopic ultrasounds. AI-based models may be of immense help for healthcare professionals in the identification, analysis, and decision support using endoscopic images to establish prognosis and risk assessment of patient’s treatment using multiple factors. Although enough randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy of AI-algorithms assisted and non-AI based treatments before approval of such techniques from medical regulatory authorities. In this article, available AI approaches and AI-based prediction models for detecting gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic diseases are reviewed. The limitation of AI techniques in such disease prognosis, risk assessment, and decision support are discussed.

Perceived Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence based Decision Support System in a Clinical Setting: A Systematic Literature Review (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avishek Choudhury
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Care Providers

UNSTRUCTURED Objective: The potential benefits of artificial intelligence based decision support system (AI-DSS) from a theoretical perspective are well documented and perceived by researchers but there is a lack of evidence showing its influence on routine clinical practice and how its perceived by care providers. Since the effectiveness of AI systems depends on data quality, implementation, and interpretation. The purpose of this literature review is to analyze the effectiveness of AI-DSS in clinical setting and understand its influence on clinician’s decision making outcome. Materials and Methods: This review protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses reporting guidelines. Literature will be identified using a multi-database search strategy developed in consultation with a librarian. The proposed screening process consists of a title and abstract scan, followed by a full-text review by two reviewers to determine the eligibility of articles. Studies outlining application of AI based decision support system in a clinical setting and its impact on clinician’s decision making, will be included. A tabular synthesis of the general study details will be provided, as well as a narrative synthesis of the extracted data, organised into themes. Studies solely reporting AI accuracy an but not implemented in a clinical setting to measure its influence on clinical decision making were excluded from further review. Results: We identified 8 eligible studies that implemented AI-DSS in a clinical setting to facilitate decisions concerning prostate cancer, post traumatic stress disorder, cardiac ailment, back pain, and others. Five (62.50%) out of 8 studies reported positive outcome of AI-DSS. Conclusion: The systematic review indicated that AI-enabled decision support systems, when implemented in a clinical setting and used by clinicians might not ensure enhanced decision making. However, there are very limited studies to confirm the claim that AI based decision support system can uplift clinicians decision making abilities.

scholarly journals Impact of comorbidity assessment methods to predict non-cancer mortality risk in cancer patients: a retrospective observational study using the National Health Insurance Service claims-based data in Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghee Lee ◽  
Yoon Jung Chang ◽  
Hyunsoon Cho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Mortality Risks

Abstract Background Cancer patients’ prognoses are complicated by comorbidities. Prognostic prediction models with inappropriate comorbidity adjustments yield biased survival estimates. However, an appropriate claims-based comorbidity risk assessment method remains unclear. This study aimed to compare methods used to capture comorbidities from claims data and predict non-cancer mortality risks among cancer patients. Methods Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database in Korea; 2979 cancer patients diagnosed in 2006 were considered. Claims-based Charlson Comorbidity Index was evaluated according to the various assessment methods: different periods in washout window, lookback, and claim types. The prevalence of comorbidities and associated non-cancer mortality risks were compared. The Cox proportional hazards models considering left-truncation were used to estimate the non-cancer mortality risks. Results The prevalence of peptic ulcer, the most common comorbidity, ranged from 1.5 to 31.0%, and the proportion of patients with ≥1 comorbidity ranged from 4.5 to 58.4%, depending on the assessment methods. Outpatient claims captured 96.9% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; however, they captured only 65.2% of patients with myocardial infarction. The different assessment methods affected non-cancer mortality risks; for example, the hazard ratios for patients with moderate comorbidity (CCI 3–4) varied from 1.0 (95% CI: 0.6–1.6) to 5.0 (95% CI: 2.7–9.3). Inpatient claims resulted in relatively higher estimates reflective of disease severity. Conclusions The prevalence of comorbidities and associated non-cancer mortality risks varied considerably by the assessment methods. Researchers should understand the complexity of comorbidity assessments in claims-based risk assessment and select an optimal approach.

scholarly journals Prediction Models for Public Health Containment Measures on COVID-19 Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4499
Author(s):  
Anil Babu Payedimarri ◽  
Diego Concina ◽  
Luigi Portinale ◽  
Massimo Canonico ◽  
Deborah Seys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Public Transportation ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
Commercial Activities

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have expanded their utilization in different fields of medicine. During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, AI and ML were also applied for the evaluation and/or implementation of public health interventions aimed to flatten the epidemiological curve. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of AI and ML when applied to public health interventions to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Our findings showed that quarantine should be the best strategy for containing COVID-19. Nationwide lockdown also showed positive impact, whereas social distancing should be considered to be effective only in combination with other interventions including the closure of schools and commercial activities and the limitation of public transportation. Our findings also showed that all the interventions should be initiated early in the pandemic and continued for a sustained period. Despite the study limitation, we concluded that AI and ML could be of help for policy makers to define the strategies for containing the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals An Approach to Sustainability Risk Assessment in Industrial Assets

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6538
Author(s):  
Fco. Javier García-Gómez ◽  
Víctor Fco. Rosales-Prieto ◽  
Alberto Sánchez-Lite ◽  
José Luis Fuentes-Bargues ◽  
Cristina González-Gaya
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Analysis And Evaluation ◽  
The People ◽  
Preliminary Study ◽  
Assessment Procedures ◽  
Identification Analysis ◽  
A Company ◽  
Industrial Company

Asset management, as a global process through which value is added to a company, is a managerial model that involves major changes in strategies, technologies, and resources; risk management; and a change in the attitude of the people involved. The growing commitment of companies to sustainability results in them applying this approach to all their activities. For this reason, it is relevant to develop sustainability risk assessment procedures in industrial assets. This paper presents a methodological framework for the inclusion of sustainability aspects in the risk management of industrial assets. This approach presents a procedure to provide general criteria, methodology, and essential mandatory requirements to be adopted for the identification, analysis, and evaluation of sustainability aspects, impacts, and risks related to assets owned and managed by an industrial company. The proposed procedure is based on ISO 55,000 and ISO 31,000 standards and was developed following three steps: a preliminary study, identification of sustainability aspects and sustainability risks/opportunities, and impact assessment and residual risks management. Our results could serve as a model that facilitates the improvement of sustainability analysis risks in industrial assets and could be used as a basis for future developments in the application of the standards to optimize management of these assets.

scholarly journals Assessing autonomous ship navigation using bridge simulators enhanced by cycle-consistent adversarial networks

2021 ◽  
pp. 1748006X2110210
Author(s):  
Andreas Brandsæter ◽  
Ottar L Osen
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Object Detection ◽  
Autonomous Navigation ◽  
Adversarial Networks ◽  
Maritime Navigation ◽  
Ship Navigation ◽  
Autonomous Ship ◽  
Ship Operation

The advent of artificial intelligence and deep learning has provided sophisticated functionality for sensor fusion and object detection and classification which have accelerated the development of highly automated and autonomous ships as well as decision support systems for maritime navigation. It is, however, challenging to assess how the implementation of these systems affects the safety of ship operation. We propose to utilize marine training simulators to conduct controlled, repeated experiments allowing us to compare and assess how functionality for autonomous navigation and decision support affects navigation performance and safety. However, although marine training simulators are realistic to human navigators, it cannot be assumed that the simulators are sufficiently realistic for testing the object detection and classification functionality, and hence this functionality cannot be directly implemented in the simulators. We propose to overcome this challenge by utilizing Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks (Cycle-GANs) to transform the simulator data before object detection and classification is performed. Once object detection and classification are completed, the result is transferred back to the simulator environment. Based on this result, decision support functionality with realistic accuracy and robustness can be presented and autonomous ships can make decisions and navigate in the simulator environment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document