Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Artery Occlusion May be Detrimental with Thrombus Fragmentation

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Jun Yi ◽  
Jae Hoon Sung ◽  
Dong Hoon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Simultaneous Application

Objective: We investigated whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) affected the outcomes and complications of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), specifically focusing on thrombus fragmentation. Methods: The patients who underwent MT for large artery occlusion (LAO) were classified into two groups: MT with prior IVT (MT+IVT) group and MT without prior IVT (MT-IVT) group. The clinical outcome, successful recanalization with other radiological outcomes, and complications were compared, between two groups. Subgroup analysis was also performed for patients with simultaneous application of stent retriever and aspiration. Results: There were no significant differences in clinical outcome and successful recanalization rate, between both groups. However, the ratio of pre- to peri-procedural thrombus fragmentation was significantly higher in the MT+IVT group (14.6% and 16.2%, respectively; P=0.004) compared to the MT-IVT group (5.1% and 6.8%, respectively; P=0.008). The MT+IVT group required more second stent retriever (16.2%), more stent passages (median value = 2), and more occurrence of distal emboli (3.9%) than the MT-IVT group (7.9%, median value = 1, and 8.1%, respectively) (P=0.004, 0.008 and 0.018, respectively). In subgroup analysis, the results were similar to those of the entire patients. Conclusion: Thrombus fragmentation of IVT with t-PA before MT resulted in an increased need for additional rescue therapies, and it could induce more distal emboli. The use of IVT prior to MT does not affect the clinical outcome and successful recanalization, compared with MT without prior IVT. Therefore, we need to reconsider the need for IVT before MT.

In Hyperacute Recanalization Therapy, Early Hospital Arrival Improves Outcome in Patients with Large Artery Occlusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 335-341
Author(s):  
Junya Aoki ◽  
Kentaro Suzuki ◽  
Satoshi Suda ◽  
Seiji Okubo ◽  
Masahiro Mishina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Independent Factor ◽  
Hospital Arrival

Background: It is unknown whether the effect of onset-­­to-door (OTD) time on clinical outcomes differs between ­patients with and without large artery occlusion (LAO) who undergo hyperacute recanalization therapy. Methods: Hyperacute recanalization therapy includes intravenous thrombolysis tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA), and endovascular therapy (EVT). Favorable clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale of ≤2 at discharge. Results: Among 164 patients, 117 (71%) patients received tPA, 86 (52%) received EVT, and 39 (24%) received tPA and EVT. One hundred and fifteen patients (70%) were classified into the LAO group and 49 (30%) into the non-LAO group. In the total cohort, multivariate regression analysis showed OTD time (OR 0.809 [95% CI 0.693–0.944], p = 0.007) was an independent factor related to the favorable outcome. Similarly, among patients with LAO, OTD was an independent negative factor for the favorable outcome (0.779 [0.646–0.940], p = 0.009). On the contrary, OTD was not associated with the favorable outcome (1.5 [0.7–2.5] vs. 1.7 [1.1–3.2], p = 0.155) in patients without LAO. This was confirmed with multivariate regression analysis, which did not show OTD to be an independent factor for the favorable outcome (0.900 [0.656–1.236], p = 0.516). Conclusion: The effect of early hospital arrival on clinical outcome differed between patients with and without LAO.

scholarly journals Initial experience with the novel EmboTrap II clot-retrieving device for the treatment of ischaemic stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iacopo Valente ◽  
Sergio Nappini ◽  
Leonardo Renieri ◽  
Alessandro Pedicelli ◽  
Emilio Lozupone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Stent Type ◽  
Radiological Data

Introduction We report our experience with the novel stent-type clot-retrieval device EmboTrap II for the revascularization of large artery occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke. Materials and methods Twenty-nine patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large artery occlusion underwent mechanical thrombectomy with the new EmboTrap II in two Italian centres. Clinical, procedural and radiological data were collected. Angiographic results and neurological outcomes were analysed. Results Only large vessel occlusions were included. Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 72% of patients. Successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) was obtained in 76% of patients treated exclusively with EmboTrap II. No device-related permanent complications occurred. Conclusion In our experience, mechanical thrombectomy with EmboTrap II is safe and effective. Reperfusion rate was comparable to that obtained with other stent retrievers.

scholarly journals Stent Retriever Thrombectomy Potentially Increases the Recanalization Rate, Improves Clinical Outcome, and Decreases Mortality in Acute Basilar Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Shu ◽  
Mona Salehi Ravesh ◽  
Olav Jansen ◽  
Ulf Jensen-Kondering
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽  
Basilar Occlusion

Background: Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a devastating condition if untreated. The optimal treatment strategy, however, is unknown. Historically, interventional approaches have been favored over intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), although this is not supported by good evidence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and compare the results for treatment modalities of BAO, namely, IVT and interventional stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT). Methods: Studies on IVT and SRT in BAO were systematically searched. Successful recanalization (TICI ≥2b), favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), mortality, and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) were the target parameters. Only studies with ≥15 patients were included. IVT prior to SRT was allowed. Studies were excluded (1) if >1 thrombectomy device was used in >50% of the patients and (2) when data on outcome or treatment could not be parsed (e.g. registries). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio estimation. Results are given as OR and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The χ2 test was used to compare the outcome parameters clinical outcome, recanalization, mortality, and SICH. Results: A total of 17 studies (4 on IVT and 13 on SRT) with a total of 672 patients (IVT, n = 314; SRT, n = 358) were identified. Cumulatively, we found a highly significantly improved clinical outcome (43 vs. 31%, p = 0.004, OR [95% CI] = 1.66 [1.21, 2.76]), increased recanalization rate (88 vs. 60%, p < 0.00001, OR [95% CI] = 3.99 [2.73, 5.84]), and decreased mortality (26 vs. 41%, p = 0.0004, OR [95% CI] = 1.86 [1.33, 2.61]), as well as an equal rate of SICH (5 vs. 7%, p = 0.15, OR [95% CI] = 1.68 [0.82, 3.43]), in patients treated with SRT compared to those treated with IVT alone. Conclusions: The data from this meta-analysis suggest a possible superiority of SRT over IVT, pending positive results of randomized controlled trials. According to international recommendations, patients with BAO should preferentially be treated with SRT; if no contraindications exist, IVT should not be withheld.

Safety and Efficacy of Intra-arterial Tirofiban Injection During Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Artery Occlusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 416-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho J. Yi ◽  
Jae H. Sung ◽  
Dong H. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Tissue Plasminogen ◽  
Occlusion Rate

Objective: The safety and effect of intra-arterial (IA) tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, during the stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was investigated. Methods: From January 2015 to May 2019, a total of 327 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy of large artery occlusions (LAO). Patients were classified into two groups: MT with IA tirofiban (MTT) group and MT only (MTO, without IA tirofiban) group. Clinical outcomes, radiological results, and various complications, such as post thrombectomy hemorrhage, symptomatic hemorrhage, other systemic bleeding, and hemorrhagic transformation of infarct were evaluated by comparing the MTT group and MTO group. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed for patients who underwent MT with prior intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). Results: The MTT group needed a lower mean number of stent passes and showed a re-occlusion rate as compared with the MTO group (P=0.038 and 0.022, respectively). Between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in post thrombectomy hemorrhage, symptomatic hemorrhage, other systemic bleeding complications, or hemorrhagic transformation of infarct (P = 0.511, 0.397, 0.429, and 0.355, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, similar findings were observed. Conclusion: The use of IA tirofiban during MT seems to be safe and potentially more effective than only MT without IA tirofiban, even in patients who used IV t-PA before MT.

scholarly journals In-Hospital Intravenous Thrombolysis Offers No Benefit in Mechanical Thrombectomy in Optimized Tertiary Stroke Center Setting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha-Pekka Pienimäki ◽  
Jyrki Ollikainen ◽  
Niko Sillanpää ◽  
Sara Protto
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Stroke Center

Abstract Purpose Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the first-line treatment in acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT is being contested. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT without IVT in patients with no contraindications to IVT presenting directly to a tertiary stroke center with acute anterior circulation LVO. Materials and Methods We collected the data of 106 acute stroke patients who underwent MT in a single high-volume stroke center. Patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for IVT and directly admitted to our institution who subsequently underwent MT were included. We recorded baseline clinical, laboratory, procedural, and imaging variables and technical, imaging, and clinical outcomes. The effect of intravenous thrombolysis on 3-month clinical outcome (mRS) was analyzed with univariate tests and binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results Fifty-eight out of the 106 patients received IVT + MT. These patients had 2.6-fold higher odds of poorer clinical outcome in mRS shift analysis (p = 0.01) compared to MT-only patients who had excellent 3-month clinical outcome (mRS 0–1) three times more often (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the groups in process times, mTICI, or number of hemorrhagic complications. A trend of less distal embolization and higher number of device passes was observed among the MT-only patients. Conclusions MT without prior IVT was associated with an improved overall three-month clinical outcome in acute anterior circulation LVO patients.

scholarly journals Endovascular therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion due to cardioembolism versus large-artery atherosclerosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642199901
Author(s):  
Meredeth Zotter ◽  
Eike I. Piechowiak ◽  
Rupashani Balasubramaniam ◽  
Rascha Von Martial ◽  
Kotryna Genceviciute ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and aims: To investigate whether stroke aetiology affects outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who undergo endovascular therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analysed patients from the Bernese Stroke Centre Registry (January 2010–September 2018), with acute large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation due to cardioembolism or large-artery atherosclerosis, treated with endovascular therapy (±intravenous thrombolysis). Results: The study included 850 patients (median age 77.4 years, 49.3% female, 80.1% with cardioembolism). Compared with those with large-artery atherosclerosis, patients with cardioembolism were older, more often female, and more likely to have a history of hypercholesterolaemia, atrial fibrillation, current smoking (each p < 0.0001) and higher median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores on admission ( p = 0.030). They were more frequently treated with stent retrievers ( p = 0.007), but the median number of stent retriever attempts was lower ( p = 0.016) and fewer had permanent stent placements ( p ⩽ 0.004). Univariable analysis showed that patients with cardioembolism had worse 3-month survival [72.7% versus 84%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.51; p = 0.004] and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score shift ( p = 0.043) and higher rates of post-interventional heart failure (33.5% versus 18.5%, OR = 2.22; p < 0.0001), but better modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score shift ( p = 0.025). Excellent (mRS = 0–1) 3-month outcome, successful reperfusion (mTICI = 2b–3), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and Updated Charlson Comorbidity Index were similar between groups. Propensity-matched analysis found no statistically significant difference in outcome between stroke aetiology groups. Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of favourable mRS score shift, but lower admission NIHSS score, younger age and independence pre-stroke were (each p < 0.0001). Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of heart failure, but older age, admission antithrombotics and dependence pre-stroke were (each ⩽0.027). Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of favourable mTICI score shift, but application of stent retriever and no permanent intracranial stent placement were (each ⩽0.044). Conclusion: We suggest prospective studies to further elucidate differences in reperfusion and outcome between patients with cardioembolism and large-artery atherosclerosis.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy using Penumbra ACETM Aspiration Catheter Compared to Stent Retriever SolitaireTM FR in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Dalibor Sila ◽  
Markus Lenski ◽  
Maria Vojtková ◽  
Mustafa Elgharbawy ◽  
František Charvát ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aspiration Technique

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The primary aim of our study was to compare the procedural efficacy of the direct aspiration technique, using Penumbra ACETM aspiration catheter, and the stent retriever technique, with a SolitaireTM FR stent. Secondarily, we investigated treatment-dependent and treatment-independent factors that predict a good clinical outcome. Methods: We analyzed our series of mechanical thrombectomies using a SolitaireTM FR stent and a Penumbra ACETM catheter. The clinical and radiographic data of 76 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Using binary logistic regression, we looked for the predictors of a good clinical outcome. Results: In the Penumbra ACETM group we achieved significantly higher rates of complete vessel recanalization with lower device passage counts, shorter recanalization times, shorter procedure times and shorter fluoroscopy times (p < 0.001) compared to the SolitaireTM FR group. We observed no significant difference in good clinical outcomes (52.4% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.756). Predictors of a good clinical outcome were lower initial NIHSS scores, pial arterial collateralization on admission head CT angiography scan, shorter recanalization times and device passage counts. Conclusions: The aspiration technique using Penumbra ACETM catheter is comparable to the stent retriever technique with SolitaireTM FR regarding clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke patients with pre-interventional intracranial haemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 197140092110091
Author(s):  
Hanna Styczen ◽  
Matthias Gawlitza ◽  
Nuran Abdullayev ◽  
Alex Brehm ◽  
Carmen Serna-Candel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Haemorrhage ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Background Data on outcome of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion suffering from intravenous thrombolysis-associated intracranial haemorrhage prior to mechanical thrombectomy remain scarce. Addressing this subject, we report our multicentre experience. Methods A retrospective analysis of consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy due to large vessel occlusion despite the pre-interventional occurrence of intravenous thrombolysis-associated intracranial haemorrhage was performed at five tertiary care centres between January 2010–September 2020. Baseline demographics, aetiology of stroke and intracranial haemorrhage, angiographic outcome assessed by the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score and clinical outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days were recorded. Results In total, six patients were included in the study. Five individuals demonstrated cerebral intraparenchymal haemorrhage on pre-interventional imaging; in one patient additional subdural haematoma was observed and one patient suffered from isolated subarachnoid haemorrhage. All patients except one were treated by the ‘drip-and-ship’ paradigm. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 4/6 (67%) individuals. In 5/6 (83%) patients, the pre-interventional intracranial haemorrhage had aggravated in post-interventional computed tomography with space-occupying effect. Overall, five patients had died during the hospital stay. The clinical outcome of the survivor was modified Rankin Scale=4 at 90 days follow-up. Conclusion Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with intravenous thrombolysis-associated intracranial haemorrhage is technically feasible. The clinical outcome of this subgroup of stroke patients, however, appears to be devastating with high mortality and only carefully selected patients might benefit from endovascular treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document