scholarly journals A Split-Mouth Design Comparison for Lateral and Crestal Sinus Lift Techniques with Dental Implants Placements: Short Communication

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 603-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Al-Almaie ◽  
Abdul Majeed Kavarodi ◽  
Ali Alorf ◽  
Saeed Alzahrani
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Short Communication ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Clinical Complications ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Postoperative Vertigo ◽  
Reduced Time

Objective:The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of implant placement and patient appraisal for two sinus lift techniques using both crestal and lateral techniques for bilateral sinus left in a split-mouth design.Introduction:All implants were successfully osseointegrated without any clinical complications or peri-implant radiolucency during the follow-up period of maximum 3 years.Methods:In terms of outcomes postoperative vertigo showed to be a major concern with the crestal approach, this approach is preferred over the lateral technique because of the reduced time required for the procedure and because it is less invasive.Results:Most patients preferred the crestal approach over the lateral approach due to the delay in implant placement.

A combined lateral-crestal approach of sinus floor elevation: A report on three cases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Yuting Zhang ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Qianbing Wan ◽  
Lei Li
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Clinical Report ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Sinus Floor

This clinical report describes a combined lateral-crestal approach to elevate the sinus floor when placing implants on a wide maxillary posterior ridge. The buccally enlarged osteotomy broadens vision of practitioners and facilitates access of instruments in the sinus. Compared to the traditional lateral approach of sinus lift, the proposed technique may offer a more conservative treatment modality. And a clinical study with sufficient subjects and long term follow up is needed to validate the potential and limitations of the proposed technique.

scholarly journals Comparative study of immediately inserted dental implants in sinus lift: 24 months of follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
MarceloCarlos Bortoluzzi ◽  
Rodrigo Cecconello ◽  
EstevoD′Agostini Derech ◽  
Vinicius Fabris ◽  
Rafael Manfro
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Sinus Lift

scholarly journals Oral Rehabilitation of Hypodontia Patients Using an Endosseous Dental Implant: Functional and Aesthetic Results

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameh Attia ◽  
Heidrun Schaaf ◽  
Thaqif El Khassawna ◽  
Deeksha Malhan ◽  
Katharina Mausbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Interdisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
General Satisfaction ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Fixed Prosthodontics ◽  
Aesthetic Results

Hypodontia often leads to limited bone availability of the alveolar ridges. Oral rehabilitation of severe hypodontia patients is challenging. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the functional and aesthetic results after dental implants in hypodontia patients, corroborated by Albrektsson implant success criteria. Over a period of 15 years (2000–2015), a total of 43 patients were diagnosed with hypodontia and 165 dental implants were inserted. Six patients who received 10 implants were lost in the follow-up. We examined 155 implants in 37 patients between December 2015 and May 2017. Besides family history, patients evaluated the general satisfaction, functionality, and aesthetics of the implants. Study subjects were between 17 and 44 years old (mean ± SD: 21.4 ± 5.6). Hypodontia patients were missing one to five teeth (n = 28), whereas patients diagnosed with oligodontia (≥6 missing teeth, n = 9). In this study, 24 patients (64.9%) with hypodontia had a positive family history; the remaining 13 patients had no family member with hypodontia. The final follow-up time ranged between 5 and 189 months after implant placement. Orthodontic treatment was performed in 32 patients (86%) before implant placement. Rehabilitation resulted in 62% of the cases being treated with 1–2 implants and 38% treated with 3–15 implants. However, out of 155 inserted dental implants, 18 implants failed to meet Albrektsson criteria, under which two implants were removed. Only autografts were used for bone augmentation with 97 implants. More than two-thirds of the patients showed high general satisfaction and masticatory function (69.4%) as well as phonetic ability (80.6%). The aesthetic outcome was rated as excellent by 17 patients (47.2%). The findings emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary treatment of hypodontia, leading to a satisfactory, functional, and long-term fixed prosthodontics using dental implants.

scholarly journals Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Aurea Immacolata Lumbau ◽  
Silvio Mario Meloni ◽  
Marco Tallarico ◽  
Luca Melis ◽  
Giovanni Spano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Combined Approach ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Prosthetic Complications

The aim of this retrospective study was to clinically evaluate the five-year outcomes of implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus, consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes. Medical records of patients with implants placed in combination with crestal sinus lift using sequential drills and osteotomes, with a residual alveolar bone crest between 4 to 8 mm, and a follow-up of at least five years after final loading, were evaluated. Outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival and success rates, any complication, and marginal bone loss. Data from 96 patients (53 women and 43 men; mean age 54.7 years; range 23–79 years) were collected. A total of 105 single implants were analyzed. After five years of function, two implants were lost and two prostheses failed. No major biological or prosthetic complications occurred. At the five-year examination, the marginal bone loss was 1.24 ± 0.28 mm. Within the limitations of this retrospective study it can be concluded that implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes seem to be a viable option for the treatment of posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla.

Restorative dentistry 5: dental implants

2020 ◽  
pp. 361-375
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
History Of ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Supporting Structures

Single or multiple dental implants have become a well-accepted method of replacement of missing teeth and their supporting structures. This chapter introduces implantology, with an explanation of the history of dental implants and a discussion regarding the need to replace missing teeth. The key aspects of treatment planning for implants are outlined including assessment of suitability for implant placement, indications, and contraindications. Available implant types are outlined and the risks of implant placement such as failure to osseointegrate, gingival recession, and nerve damage are considered. Basic surgical techniques for implant placement are described including an explanation of healing and integration times. The chapter includes provision, follow-up, and maintenance advice regarding restoration of the dental implant.

Adverse Effects of Implants in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rekhalakshmi Kamatham ◽  
Priyanka Avisa ◽  
Dileep Nag Vinnakota ◽  
Sivakumar Nuvvula
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Mini Implants ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Ebsco Host

Objective: To determine the evidence on the adverse effects of placing dental implants in healthy growing children. Study design: A systematic search was conducted in five electronic databases: PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, EBSCO host, ProQuest. Studies on implants placed in children below the age of 19 years, with loss of tooth either due to trauma or caries were included, whereas, studies on mini implants and implants placed due to congenital absence of teeth were excluded. The articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed based on the predetermined criteria of success. Results: A total of 8 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the included articles were case reports/series, involving a total of 16 implants (15 maxillary, one mandibular) in 11 adolescents (7 boys and 4 girls). The age of implant placement ranged between ten to 17 years with a mean age of 13.4 years and the follow up period, 4.5 months to 13 years. Pain, paresthesia, mobility or peri-implant radiolucency was not reported in any case report, indicating good integration. Radiographic crestal bone loss, probing depth and implant esthetics were not mentioned. The infraocclusion was not reported in 5 cases (age: 11–17 years, follow up: 4.5 months-two years), however, it was an adverse effect in 6 cases (age: ten-17 years, follow up: three-13 years). Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to contradict the placement of dental implants in healthy growing children; the only reported adverse event is infraocclusion, the management of which too is discussed. However, as all the data is from case reports, the result should be interpreted with caution. Therefore, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to address this gap in the literature.

scholarly journals Single Sitting Surgical Treatment of Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis Using GTR Technique and Immediate Implant Placement with 10-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Fatme Mouchref Hamasni ◽  
Fady El Hajj ◽  
Rima Abdallah
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Aggressive Periodontitis ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Periodontal Tissues ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Maintenance Program ◽  
The Status ◽  
Immediate Implant

This case report exhibits a patient with generalized aggressive periodontitis who has been under maintenance for the past 12 years after being surgically treated in a single sitting and restored with dental implants. A 41-year-old systemically healthy male patient presented complaining of lower anterior teeth mobility and pain in the upper right quadrant. After clinical and radiographic examination, the upper right molars and lower anterior incisors were deemed unrestorable. Covered by doxycycline, the patient received a nonsurgical periodontal treatment. Three weeks later, teeth extraction, immediate implant placement, immediate nonloading provisional prosthesis, and a guided tissue regeneration were performed at indicated areas in a single sitting. The clinical decisions were based on patient compliance, the status of the existing periodontal tissues, and the prognosis of the remaining teeth. During the 12-year follow-up period, no residual pockets were observed and there was no exacerbation of the inflammatory condition. Marginal bone stability is present on all implants. For aggressive periodontal disease, a high risk of relapse as well as limited success and survival of dental implants should be considered. This case shows proper containment of the disease based on appropriate treatment planning and a strict maintenance program.

scholarly journals Dental Implants in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Chrcanovic ◽  
Aline Cruz ◽  
Ricardo Trindade ◽  
Ricardo Gomez
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Lichen Planus ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Oral Lichen Planus ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oral Lichen ◽  
Very High

Background and Objectives: To integrate the available published data on patients with oral lichen planus (OLP) rehabilitated with dental implants, as well as to review the recommendations for OLP patients receiving implants. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was undertaken in February 2019 using five databases. Publications reporting cases of patients with OLP and rehabilitated with implant-supported oral prosthesis were included. Results: Twenty-two publications were included (230 patients, 615 implants). The overall implant failure rate was 13.9% (85/610). In patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) the failure rate was 90.6% (29/32), but none of these implants lost osseointegration; instead, the implants were removed together with the tumor. One study presented a very high implant failure rate, 76.4% (42/55), in patients with “active lichen planus”, with all implants failing between 7–16 weeks after implant placement, and its conflicting and incongruent results are discussed in detail. There was a statistically significant difference between the failure rates in implants installed in different jaws (maxilla/mandible) and when implants of different surfaces were used (turned/moderately rough), but not between patients with reticular or erosive OLP types, or between male and female patients. If OSCC patients and the cases of the latter study are not considered, then the failure rate becomes very low (2.7%, 14/523). The time between implant placement and failure was 25.4 ± 32.6 months (range 1–112). The mean ± SD follow-up was 58.9 ± 26.7 months (1–180). Conclusions: When the results of the one study with a very high failure rate and of the cases that developed OSCC are not considered, the dental implant failure rate in OLP patients was 2.7% after a follow-up of approximately five years. Recommendations are given when treating OLP patients with dental implants.

Successful Management of Dental Implants in Postoperative Maxillary Cyst: A Case Report With a 13-Year Follow-Up

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won-Bae Park ◽  
Young-Jin Kim ◽  
Ji-Young Han ◽  
Philip Kang
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Surrounding Tissue ◽  
Ciliated Cells ◽  
Successful Management ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Maxillary Cyst

The report is presenting a case of implant placement in the postoperative maxillary cyst (POMC) with a follow-up of 13 years. The POMC is a complication associated with various surgical interventions involving maxillary sinus diseases such as Caldwell-Luc operation, orthognathic surgery, and sinus grafting procedures. The lesion of POMC is believed to develop as a result of the changes of ciliated cells or the blockage of ostia inside the maxillary sinus. Two dental implants were placed near the lesion that was later confirmed to be POMC. Of the 2 dental implants placed, one was explanted and the other was successfully managed with surface debridement followed by guided bone regeneration. The removed specimen inclusive of the implant and surrounding tissue was evaluated with clinical photographs, radiographs, and histology and the findings are described in the paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document