scholarly journals Analisis Desk Research Kebijakan Technology Transfer Office Sebagai Solusi Hambatan Teknologi Transfer di Lembaga Litbang Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Aditya Wisnu Pradana ◽  
Anugerah Yuka Asmara ◽  
Budi Triyono ◽  
Ria Jayanthi ◽  
Anggini Dinaseviani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Technology Transfer ◽  
Technology Transfer Office ◽  
Desk Research

Kiprah lembaga penelitian dan pengembangan milik pemerintah sudah ada sejak lama, baik unit yang berada di bawah kementerian atau perguruan tinggi maupun yang independen dalam struktur Lembaga Pemerintah Non Kementerian bidang Riset dan Teknologi (LPNK Ristek). Namun, panjangnya eksistensi LPNK Ristek dinilai tidak sejalan dengan output hasil litbang karena minimnya kontribusi LPNK Ristek dalam melakukan hilirisasi hasil kegiatan penelitian dan pengembangan (litbang) ke para pengguna. Studi ini berupaya memberikan pemahaman mengenai bentuk desain kebijakan yang berangkat dari isu minimnya hilirisasi/komersialisasi hasil litbang di Indonesia dengan kebijakan transfer teknologi yang sudah ada dan mengusulkan alternatif kebijakan baru, yakni Technology Transfer Office (TTO) untuk menggantikan kebijakan yang lama. Pendekatan studi ini adalah kualitatif dengan metode desk research, di mana sumber data yang digunakan diperoleh melalui sumber sekunder dari dokumen tertulis, jurnal ilmiah, buku ilmiah, arsip, kebijakan atau regulasi yang terkait, dan penelusuran dari website lembaga terkait. Sumber data tersebut dipublikasikan dalam rentang waktu tahun 1996 hingga tahun 2020. Hasil dari studi ini menemukan ada tiga hambatan transfer teknologi di lembaga litbang Indonesia yakni minimnya pendanaan, terbatasnya kualitas dan kuantitas SDM, serta struktur kelembagaan yang kaku dan menghambat fungsi transfer teknologi. Studi ini juga merekomendasikan kebijakan TTO sebagai alternatif kebijakan transfer teknologi dengan empat instrumen utamanya yakni (1) dari aktivitas pemerintah yang terlibat, (2) struktur sistem penyampaian baik langsung atau tidak langsung, (3) derajat sentralisasi, dan (4) derajat automisasi dengan mekanisme pendanaan, SDM, dan kelembagaan berupa Badan Layanan Umum (BLU).

scholarly journals Lessons Learned in Fifteen Years of Evolution of the Linking and MoT Office of a R&D Public Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Luis Roberto Vega-González
Keyword(s):  
Technology Transfer ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Final Section ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Technology Transfer Office ◽  
Management Of Technology ◽  
Time Standard ◽  
The Way

In this paper it is proposed that similarly with the evolution and maturation of any organization, the Linking and Management of Technology Office (L & MoT) of a public R&D Mexican Centre has been evolved and is in the way to be transformed into a Technology Transfer Office (TTO). Case of fifteen year evolution of the Centro de Ciencias Aplicadas y Desarrollo Tecnológico L & MoT presents empirical evidence to identify the main phases and actions that have been driving this process along this time. Standard results obtained through the years using the L & MoT Management of Technology Model (MoT) are presented. Emphasis is placed in a final section with the lessons obtained from non-standard results coming from unsuccessful negotiations and failed link actions between the Center and some external organizations. Experience has shown that not all negotiations are successful but curiously, the best lessons for the personnel of a technology transfer office are probably derived from these problematic cases.

Information-based imitation of university commercialization strategies: The role of technology transfer office autonomy, age, and membership into an association

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Pitsakis ◽  
Claudio Giachetti
Keyword(s):  
Technology Transfer ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
University Technology Transfer ◽  
Internal Source ◽  
Technology Transfer Office ◽  
Technology Transfer Offices ◽  
University Technology ◽  
Source Of Information ◽  
Successful Technology

We investigate whether university technology transfer offices, that is, divisions responsible for the commercialization of academic research, imitate their industry peers when designing their commercialization strategy. We borrow from information-based theories of imitation and the literature on academic entrepreneurship to argue that given a technology transfer office’s autonomy to strategize independently from its parent university, information from within and outside the technology transfer office affects its propensity to imitate the commercialization strategy of the “most successful peers,” that is, those with the largest live spinoff portfolio and greatest revenues from spinoffs in the industry. We contend that a technology transfer office’s experience, that is, a function of its age, represents a key internal source of information for the technology transfer office when deciding whether to imitate or not; we also consider the technology transfer office’s embeddedness in a network where the most successful peer is also a member as a key external source of information. From data on 86 British university technology transfer offices and their commercialization strategies between 1993 and 2007 that were drawn from both secondary sources and in-depth interviews with technology transfer office managers, we find that there is a negative relationship between technology transfer offices’ autonomy and their level of imitation of the most successful technology transfer office’s strategy, and that this relationship is moderated by the technology transfer offices’ age and by their membership into an association where the most successful technology transfer office is also a member.

scholarly journals Perspectives of University-Industry Technology Transfer in African Emerging Economies: Evaluating the Nigerian Scenario via a Data Envelopment Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwaseun Fadeyi ◽  
Petra Maresova ◽  
Ruzena Stemberkova ◽  
Micheal Afolayan ◽  
Funminiyi Adeoye
Keyword(s):  
Technology Transfer ◽  
Emerging Economies ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Technology Transfer Office ◽  
Innovation Transfer ◽  
Using Data ◽  
University Industry ◽  
Infant Stage ◽  
Resource Input

All of Africa’s emerging economies are faced with developmental challenges, which can be partly ameliorated using effective University–Industry technology transfer. While technology transfer remains at the infant stage, sparsely documented, and with no complex ongoing processes in many African societies, Universities in Africa are making efforts in University–Industry collaborations aimed at bringing significant improvements to the continent in a bid to drive national innovation and regional economic development. In this paper, we attempt to evaluate the progress made so far by Nigerian Universities in technological innovation transfer, in order to suggest ways for possible future progress. To do this, crucial technology transfer resource factors (inputs), namely, the number of linkage projects funded by the “African Research Council” (ARC), consortium membership of the University’s technology transfer office, and the number of doctoral staff at the University’s technology transfer office, were checked against a set of performance measures (number of executed licenses, amount of licensing royalty income, number of spin-offs created, and the number of spin-offs created with university equity), using data envelopment analysis and multiple regression, respectively. Results suggest that Universities that possess better resource factors reported higher outputs on most of the performance indicators applied. In addition, it was observed that Universities with greater ability to effectively transfer knowledge had higher technology commercialization performance and financial sustainability. The implication of these results is that Universities in Africa need to develop in line with the technology transfer resource (input) factors suggested within this study, as this is the way to go for better performance.

Value generation from industry-science linkages in light of targeted open innovation

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Meissner ◽  
Elias George Carayannis
Keyword(s):  
Technology Transfer ◽  
Knowledge Transfer ◽  
Holistic View ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Knowledge And Technology Transfer ◽  
Science And Research ◽  
Desk Research ◽  
Transfer Channels ◽  
Science Technology And Innovation

Purpose This paper aims to provide a substantial overview of features and channels of knowledge and technology transfer in light of achieving impact from science and research. Design/methodology/approach The paper is conceptual with substantial desk research undertaken. A taxonomy of transfer channels is proved and levels of impact from STI proposed. Findings It is found that there are different levels of value generated from science, technology and innovation, each featuring different stakeholders with different agendas and expectations. It is argued that to make knowledge and technology transfer impactful and sustainable, a long-term and holistic view and approach is required. Originality/value Against most papers about technology and knowledge transfer, this work presents an overarching overview of objects, channels and features of partners involved in transfer. It is features technology and knowledge transfer from a holistic perspective and provides useful background for future empiric studies and impact assessments.

Commercialization of University Research for Technology-Based Economic Development

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
W. Ker Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Technology Transfer ◽  
Economic Impact ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
University Research ◽  
Technology Transfer Office ◽  
Federally Funded ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Technology Transfer Offices ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Commercialization Of University Research

This empirical study investigates the hypothesized relationship between US federally funded university research and development (R&D) and its resulting economic impact, as measured by the level of licensing revenue generated by US universities. The author also examines the key operating statistics of the top-ten licensing income-producing technology transfer offices in the USA to determine what may differentiate them from their counterparts in other institutions and whether there are identifiable traits within the data that could be incorporated into a best practice model for the rest of the industry. It is found that there is a small but statistically significant correlation between R&D spending and economic impact. However, university licence income is found to be more a function of the system-wide volume of R&D funding than individual technology transfer office behaviour.

Licensing of university inventions: The role of a technology transfer office

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inés Macho-Stadler ◽  
David Pérez-Castrillo ◽  
Reinhilde Veugelers
Keyword(s):  
Technology Transfer ◽  
Technology Transfer Office ◽  
University Inventions
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document