Evaluating the Intertwined Relationships of the Drivers for University Technology Transfer

Universities are the best places to gather knowledge and innovation, but the basis of technological development lies in talented R&D personnel who provide services to enterprise R&D activities, research institutions, and universities. Universities also gather many elites who cultivate talent for the country. However, universities do not have adequate technology transfer experience and do not network in industrial circles, which results in a huge gap between the concept and the practical result. This research determined the critical success factors and explored the causal relationships influencing the technology transfer from universities. We found that the main impact of the key factors was the technology market dimension. University technology transfer activities had to be classified as top priority. Technology industrial applicability was the main key evaluation factor, along with inventor attitude. In the organizational culture dimension, the attitude and ability of top management were the main evaluation factors. We attempted to draw upon our analysis results to make recommendations related to technology transfer to assist universities in successfully transferring their research results.

Does social trust stimulate university technology transfer? Evidence from China

This paper examines the effect of social trust on university technology transfer. A large sample of Chinese universities from the 2007–2017 period was used. We find that social trust facilitates university technology transfer. The finding remain valid after a series of robustness. The mechanism test shows that social trust facilitates university technology transfer by improving the level of university-industry cooperative innovation. Our study suggests that social trust is an important factor that affects university technology transfer.

University Technology Transfer Network Structure Development: Education and Research Quality Issues

The article analyzes the main models of technology transfer in Europe, the USA, Japan and China. The national legislative base in the technology transfer sphere is analyzed. The main reasons for successful (at a systematic level) mechanisms of the technologies transfer are determined. Leading tendencies of technology transfer development in leading countries are presented. The necessity of creating technology transfer centers at universities as a place of the state intellectual potential concentration is substantiated. Authors propose ways for increasing technology transfer efficiency based on the complex approach to promote scientific research results.

University Technology Transfer in Innovation Management

University technology transfer (UTT) has been growing in importance for many decades and is of increasing importance to university leadership, university researchers, research funding agencies, and government policy makers. It is of interest to academic researchers in the fields of business management, economics, innovation, geography, and public policy. UTT is a subset of the broader field of technology transfer, and it involves the transfer of university research results from the university to business so that the business can invest in the development of products and services that benefit society. The research results can arise from any academic discipline, are not limited to a particular definition of technology, and can be transferred to existing and new for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. The core activity involves licensing patent applications and other intellectual property to existing companies and establishing new companies that raise investment finance, to develop the early-stage research outputs into new products and services. In recent decades, research universities have set up technology transfer offices (TTOs) to manage their UTT activities. TTOs adopt a project management approach to supporting university researchers who wish to transfer the results of their research to business. Project stages include identifying, evaluating, protecting, marketing, deal making, and post-deal management. TTOs are also involved in other activities, beyond patenting, licensing, and entrepreneurship, which generate positive impact on society. Measuring and evaluating UTT is a topic of continuing debate, with an early focus on activity metrics developing into a more sophisticated assessment of the impact of university research outputs on society. Current issues in UTT involve understanding the position of UTT in the broader area of research impact, as well as funding and organization models for UTT within a university. The COVID-19 global crisis is highlighting the importance of university research and its transfer out to organizations that develop and deliver products and services that benefit society. It has further emphasized the importance of UTT as an activity where much more has to be researched and understood in order to maximize the benefits for society of all the activities performed by universities.

THE THIRD MISSION OF UNIVERSITIES: CONSTRAINTS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CASE OF VIETNAM

This article researches current practices of several Vietnamese universities to fulfill their third mission. Analyzing results of major activities (such as technology transfer, research commercialization, and entrepreneurship) in 9 universities in the North of Vietnam from 2013 to 2018, the article identifies the limitations and suggests a number of governance policies to support universities in fulfilling their third mission in Vietnam’s current context. Keywords: Third Mission, University, Entrepreneurial University, Technology Transfer, Commercialization.