scholarly journals Understanding Hearing Loss, Hearing Protection and Hearing Conservation Program: A Survey for Shipyard Field Managers

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheol Min Yoon ◽  
Junghwa Bahng
2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariel Leshchinsky

Noise-induced hearing loss occurs among workers across a wide spectrum of industries. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether annual hearing testing contributed to a change in employees’ habits and awareness and aimed to evaluate the use of hearing protection at work and at home. Employees enrolled in a university’s hearing conservation program (HCP) were anonymously surveyed regarding their hearing protection habits and awareness of noise exposures on and off the job using a Likert-type scale. Approximately half were “very much” concerned about hearing loss over time. Evidence supports that annual testing, part of the workplace HCP, also led over half of participants to change their habits at work and at home. Awareness of noise exposures increased both at home and at work with annual testing. Overall, the HCP in this particular setting was associated with improved on-the-job and home hearing protection use.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Hyun Jin ◽  
Peggy B. Nelson ◽  
Robert S. Schlauch ◽  
Edward Carney

Purpose To examine the risk for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in university marching band members and to provide an overview of a hearing conservation program for a marching band. Method Sound levels during band rehearsals were recorded and audiometric hearing thresholds and transient otoacoustic emission were measured over a 3-year period. Musician's earplugs and information about hearing loss were provided to the students. The hearing thresholds of other college students were tested as a partial control. Results There were no significant differences in hearing thresholds between the two groups. During initial testing, more marching band members showed apparent high-frequency notches than control students. Follow-up hearing tests in a subsequent year for the marching band members showed that almost all notches disappeared. Persistent standard threshold shift (STS) across tests was not observed in the band members. Conclusion Band members showed no evidence of STS or persistent notched audiograms. Because accepted procedures for measuring hearing showed a lack of precision in reliably detecting early NIHL in marching band members, it is recommended that signs of NIHL be sought in repeated measurements compared to baseline audiograms rather than in a single measure (a single notch). A hearing conservation program for this population is still recommended because of lengthy rehearsal times with high sound-level exposure during rehearsals.


1981 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Dobie ◽  
Robert J. Archer

Baseline and periodic audiometry was performed on noise-exposed workers in 21 industrial plants. Workers showing moderate hearing loss, asymmetry, or significant threshold shifts were referred for otologic evaluation. The overall referral rate was 2.76%. Of 107 referrals, 53% had otologic diagnoses other than noise-induced hearing loss, or required specific intervention, or both. The results support the use of criteria at least as stringent as those used in this study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 109-122
Author(s):  
Sylvanna L. Bielko ◽  
Khalid M. Khan ◽  
M. Margaret Weigel

HighlightsNoise-measuring applications (apps) and in-person classroom presentation were identified as the most preferred approaches by the college agriculture students.Multiple features of noise apps and in-person intervention were identified as beneficial.A subset of participants reported that a combination of approaches could influence hearing protection use.Abstract. Noise-induced hearing loss is a major public health challenge for agricultural communities. However, there is limited hearing conservation research addressing the issue, especially for youth and young adults. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions and practices of Indiana undergraduate students who lived or worked on a farm. The students were asked to rank the most common and current hearing conservation educational approaches, including in-person classroom presentation, mailers, and technology-based approaches, i.e., computer-based training, interactive websites, static websites, and smartphone noise-measuring applications (apps). A total of 91 undergraduate students enrolled in agriculture classes at four Indiana higher educational institutions participated in the study. They completed a sociodemographic and farm activity survey, followed by a 30-minute in-person presentation on hearing health conservation. After the presentation, each participant completed a questionnaire that included items about their perceptions of the feasibility, sustainability, rankings, and preferences of the various educational approaches discussed in the presentation. Participants ranked the noise-measuring app and in-person classroom presentation as their most preferred educational approaches for hearing conservation (39% and 28%, respectively). They identified multiple features of these two intervention approaches as beneficial. Sixty-four percent of participants indicated that a combination of approaches could influence hearing protection use and should include in-person classroom presentation and one of the technology-based approaches (noise-measuring apps, 37.3%). These findings are expected to assist health interventionists and program designers in developing future hearing protection education programs for farm youth, who may otherwise lack access to resources for preventing premature hearing loss due to loud noise exposure. Keywords: Agricultural workers, Hearing conservation, Hearing protection, Undergraduate college students, Youth education.


1978 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Anne Esler

Attitude change was studied in an Industrial Hearing Conservation Program. Persuasive communications were presented to a group of 117 bottling workers in a Brewery in the Midwest. These took the form of management directives, educational presentations and individual audiometric testing. All workers were observed for a period of two weeks following the audiometric test and those wearing hearing protection, both before and after the test were compared to those not wearing protection, on the basis of age, years of experience and degree of impairment. The individual persuasive communication in the setting of the test was found to be a significant factor in increasing compliance behavior to the rule making hearing protection mandatory in the workplace.


1985 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce L. Plakke

A survey of secondary industrial arts teachers was made to examine the use of hearing protection in industrial arts programs. The results showed the teachers had little knowledge of hearing conservation methods. All of the teachers had access to an audiologist but very few knew that an audiologist was available. They did say that they would consult with one if help were offered. Although 47% of the teachers believed that they had acquired an occupational hearing loss, they did not use personal hearing protection. The results pointed out the need for further education of industrial arts teachers and more use of school audiologists as consultants.


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Federman ◽  
Erin Picou

Abstract Millions of people are exposed to loud music, either as musicians or as recreational consumers of music. Audiologists are in the best position to address hearing conservation problems for musicians and music listeners. However, the issue of music-induced hearing loss (MIHL) has unique challenges. Specifically, estimates of the size of the populations have likely underestimated the number of musicians at risk for MIHL. In addition, performance levels for musicians have been measured to be as loud as 109 dBA, and both professional and recreational listening devices can deliver sounds as loud as 130 dBA. However, compliance with conservation recommendations remains poor for a variety of reasons, despite increased awareness through educational campaigns. Moreover, methods to mediate exposure have had limited successes for both groups. The purpose of this paper is to assess the scope of the problem and the successes of current conservation strategies with the aim of inspiring renewed interest and solutions to the problems helping musicians and consumers protect their hearing.


2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais C. Morata ◽  
Christa L. Themann ◽  
Robert F. Randolph ◽  
Babette L. Verbsky ◽  
David C. Byrne ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Ann E Curk ◽  
David R Cunningham

The present study was undertaken to investigate the behaviors and attitudes of percussionists regarding hearing conservation. Little is known about the frequency with which percussionists use hearing protection, the reasons for non-use, and their general knowledge about music-induced hearing loss. Using a written survey or personal interview, we surveyed approximately 500 amateur and professional percussionists who attended two local percussionists' conventions, which produced 283 completed surveys. This article describes the frequency of hearing protection device (HPD) use, reasons for non-use, types of HPD used, the advantages and disadvantages of wearing HPDs from the percussionists' point of view, sources where percussionists obtained information regarding HPDs, time of their most recent purchase, and accuracy of percussionists' knowledge of music-induced hearing loss and HPDs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document