Association of MGMT Gene Promoter Methylation With Clinicopathological Parameters in Patients With Wild-type IDH Glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 335-341
Author(s):  
MOONSIK KIM ◽  
JIHWAN YOO ◽  
JONG HEE CHANG ◽  
SE HOON KIM
2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sridhar Epari ◽  
Iteeka Arora ◽  
Mamta Gurav ◽  
Rachna Rumde ◽  
Sandeep Dhanavade ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 3357-3361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antje Wick ◽  
Jörg Felsberg ◽  
Joachim P. Steinbach ◽  
Ulrich Herrlinger ◽  
Michael Platten ◽  
...  

Purpose Evaluation of toxicity and efficacy of an alternating weekly regimen of temozolomide administered 1 week on and 1 week off in patients with recurrent glioma. Patients and Methods Ninety adult patients with recurrent gliomas accrued in one center received chemotherapy with temozolomide at 150 mg/m2/d (days 1 through 7 and 15 through 21 every 4 weeks) with individual dose adjustments according to hematologic toxicity. Results A total of 906 treatment weeks were delivered. Grade 4 hematotoxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 3.0) was observed in 24 treatment weeks (2.6%). CTCAE grade 4 lymphopenia eventually developed in 11 patients (12%). There were neither cumulative lymphopenias nor opportunistic infections. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months for glioblastoma patients was 43.8%. The median PFS in these patients was 24 weeks (95% CI, 17 to 26 weeks), the median survival time from diagnosis of progression was 38 weeks (95% CI, 30 to 46 weeks), and the 1-year survival rate from progression was 23%. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation in the tumor tissue was not associated with longer PFS (log-rank P = .37). Conclusion These data imply that the alternating weekly schedule is feasible, safe, and effective and clearly warrants investigation in randomized studies. Compared with more protracted low-dose temozolomide schedules, the 1-week-on/1-week-off schedule may be less toxic. We provide preliminary evidence that this dose-dense schedule is also active in patients with tumors lacking MGMT gene promoter methylation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 820-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Hassel ◽  
◽  
A Sucker ◽  
L Edler ◽  
H Kurzen ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (27) ◽  
pp. 4412-4417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Herrlinger ◽  
Johannes Rieger ◽  
Dorothee Koch ◽  
Simon Loeser ◽  
Britta Blaschke ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate toxicity and efficacy of the combination of lomustine, temozolomide (TMZ) and involved-field radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Patients and Methods Thirty-one adult patients (median Karnofsky performance score 90; median age, 51 years) accrued in two centers received involved-field radiotherapy (60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions) and chemotherapy with lomustine 100 mg/m2 (day 1) and TMZ 100 mg/m2/d (days 2 to 6) with individual dose adjustments according to hematologic toxicity. Results A median of five courses (range, one to six courses) were delivered. WHO grade 4 hematotoxicity was observed in five patients (16%) and one of these patients died as a result of septicemia. Nonhematologic toxicity included one patient with WHO grade 4 drug-induced hepatitis (leading to discontinuation of lomustine and TMZ) and one patient with WHO grade 2 lung fibrosis (leading to discontinuation of lomustine). The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months was 61.3%. The median PFS was 9 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 11.7 months), the median overall survival time (MST) was 22.6 months (95% CI, 12.5 to not assessable), the 2-year survival rate was 44.7%. O6-Methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene-promoter methylation in the tumor tissue was associated with longer PFS (P = .014, log-rank test) and MST (P = .037). Conclusion The combination of lomustine, TMZ, and radiotherapy had acceptable toxicity and yielded promising survival data in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. MGMT gene-promoter methylation was a strong predictor of survival.


2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S175-S176
Author(s):  
D. Kim ◽  
Y. Kim ◽  
Y. Song ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document