scholarly journals Implementation Science Research Examining the Integration of Evidence-Based Practices Into HIV Prevention and Clinical Care: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Model

10.2196/11202 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e11202 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Idalski Carcone ◽  
Karin Coyle ◽  
Sitaji Gurung ◽  
Demetria Cain ◽  
Rafael E Dilones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Hiv Prevention ◽  
Implementation Science ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Care Protocol

scholarly journals Implementation Science Research Examining the Integration of Evidence-Based Practices Into HIV Prevention and Clinical Care: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Model (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Idalski Carcone ◽  
Karin Coyle ◽  
Sitaji Gurung ◽  
Demetria Cain ◽  
Rafael E Dilones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Hiv Prevention ◽  
Implementation Science ◽  
Real World ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Ebp Implementation

BACKGROUND The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) model is an implementation framework for studying the integration of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into real-world settings. The EPIS model conceptualizes implementation as a process starting with the earliest stages of problem recognition (Exploration) through the continued use of an EBP in a given clinical context (Sustainment). This is the first implementation science (IS) study of the integration of EBPs into adolescent HIV prevention and care settings. OBJECTIVE This protocol (ATN 153 EPIS) is part of the Scale It Up program, a research program administered by the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN), described in this issue by Naar et al. The EPIS study is a descriptive study of the uptake of 4 EBPs within the Scale It Up program. The goal of EPIS is to understand the barriers and facilitators associated with the Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment of EBPs into HIV prevention and clinical care settings. METHODS The EPIS study is a convergent parallel mixed-methods IS study. Key implementation stakeholders, that is, clinical care providers and leaders, located within 13 ATN sites across the United States will complete a qualitative interview conducted by telephone and Web-based surveys at 3 key implementation stages. The Preparation assessment occurs before EBP implementation, Implementation occurs immediately after sites finish implementation activities and prepare for sustainment, and Sustainment occurs 1 year postimplementation. Assessments will examine stakeholders’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to EBP implementation within their clinical site as outlined by the EPIS framework. RESULTS The EPIS baseline period began in June 2017 and concluded in May 2018; analysis of the baseline data is underway. To date, 153 stakeholders have completed qualitative interviews, and 91.5% (140/153) completed the quantitative survey. CONCLUSIONS The knowledge gained from the EPIS study will strengthen the implementation and sustainment of EBPs in adolescent prevention and clinical care contexts by offering insights into the barriers and facilitators of successful EBP implementation and sustainment in real-world clinical contexts. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR DERR1-10.2196/11202

scholarly journals Social networks and implementation of evidence-based practices in public youth-serving systems: a mixed-methods study

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A Palinkas ◽  
Ian W Holloway ◽  
Eric Rice ◽  
Dahlia Fuentes ◽  
Qiaobing Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices

scholarly journals A mixed-methods study of system-level sustainability of evidence-based practices in 12 large-scale implementation initiatives

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley T. Scudder ◽  
Sarah M. Taber-Thomas ◽  
Kristen Schaffner ◽  
Joy R. Pemberton ◽  
Leah Hunter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
System Level ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices

scholarly journals Engaging primary care providers in managing pediatric eating disorders: a mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Lebow ◽  
Cassandra Narr ◽  
Angela Mattke ◽  
Janna R. Gewirtz O’Brien ◽  
Marcie Billings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment

Abstract Background The primary care setting offers an attractive opportunity for, not only the identification of pediatric eating disorders, but also the delivery of evidence-based treatment. However, constraints of this setting pose barriers for implementing treatment. For interventions to be successful, they need to take into consideration the perspectives of stakeholders. As such, the purpose of this study was to examine in-depth primary care providers’ perspective of challenges to identifying and managing eating disorders in the primary care setting. Methods This mixed methods study surveyed 60 Pediatric and Family Medicine providers across 6 primary care practices. Sixteen of these providers were further interviewed using a qualitative, semi-structured interview. Results Providers (n = 60, response rate of 45%) acknowledged the potential of primary care as a point of contact for early identification and treatment of pediatric eating disorders. They also expressed that this was an area of need in their practices. They identified numerous barriers to successful implementation of evidence-based treatment in this setting including scarcity of time, knowledge, and resources. Conclusions Investigations seeking to build capacities in primary care settings to address eating disorders must address these barriers.

scholarly journals Team functioning and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. McGuier ◽  
David J. Kolko ◽  
Mary Lou Klem ◽  
Jamie Feldman ◽  
Grace Kinkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Human Service ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Services Implementation ◽  
Team Functioning

Abstract Background Healthcare and human services increasingly rely on teams of individuals to deliver services. Implementation of evidence-based practices and other innovations in these settings requires teams to work together to change processes and behaviors. Accordingly, team functioning may be a key determinant of implementation outcomes. This systematic review will identify and summarize empirical research examining associations between team functioning and implementation outcomes in healthcare and human service settings. Methods We will conduct a comprehensive search of bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC) for articles published from January 2000 or later. We will include peer-reviewed empirical articles and conference abstracts using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods. We will include experimental or observational studies that report on the implementation of an innovation in a healthcare or human service setting and examine associations between team functioning and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes of interest are acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles/abstracts, review full-text articles, and extract data from included articles. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess methodological quality/bias and conduct a narrative synthesis without meta-analysis. Discussion Understanding how team functioning influences implementation outcomes will contribute to our understanding of team-level barriers and facilitators of change. The results of this systematic review will inform efforts to implement evidence-based practices in team-based service settings. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020220168

Using Student-Led Discussions and Snapshot Lectures to Stimulate Active Learning and Accountability: A Mixed Methods Study on Teaching an Implementation Science Course

2021 ◽  
pp. 237337992110500
Author(s):  
Robert W. S. Coulter ◽  
Lindsay Onufer
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Active Learning ◽  
Implementation Science ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Graduate Level ◽  
Teaching Techniques ◽  
Class Discussions ◽  
Student Accountability

We theorized that integrating student-led class activities would foster accountability and active learning in a graduate-level public health implementation science course. We used mixed methods to collect students’ feedback about two active-learning teaching techniques, wherein students were randomly selected to lead class discussions and deliver short, informal “snapshot” lectures. Students reported that both activities encouraged student initiative, engagement with the material, and completion of the assigned readings. However, students thought that the student-led discussions were more enjoyable, made the course more interesting, and contributed more to their learning. These techniques can stimulate active learning and student accountability in public health courses.

scholarly journals Evidence-based intrapartum practice and its associated factors at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines, a descriptive mixed-methods study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chisato Masuda ◽  
Shirley Kristine Ferolin ◽  
Ken Masuda ◽  
Chris Smith ◽  
Mitsuaki Matsui
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Assisted Delivery ◽  
Fundal Pressure

Abstract Background Evidenced-based practice is a key component of quality care. However, studies in the Philippines have identified gaps between evidence and actual maternity practices. This study aims to describe the practice of evidence-based intrapartum care and its associated factors, as well as exploring the perceptions of healthcare providers in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted, which consisted of direct observation of intrapartum practices during the second and third stages, as well as semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with care providers to determine their perceptions and reasoning behind decisions to perform episiotomy or fundal pressure. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyse the relationship between observed practices and maternal, neonatal, and environmental factors. Qualitative data were parsed and categorised to identify themes related to the decision-making process. Results A total of 170 deliveries were included. Recommended care, such as prophylactic use of oxytocin and controlled cord traction in the third stage, were applied in almost all the cases. However, harmful practices were also observed, such as intramuscular or intravenous oxytocin use in the second stage (14%) and lack of foetal heart rate monitoring (57%). Of primiparae, 92% received episiotomy and 31% of all deliveries received fundal pressure. Factors associated with the implementation of episiotomy included primipara (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 62.3), duration of the second stage of more than 30 minutes (aOR 4.6), and assisted vaginal delivery (aOR 15.0). Factors associated with fundal pressure were primipara (aOR 3.0), augmentation with oxytocin (aOR 3.3), and assisted delivery (aOR 4.8). Healthcare providers believe that these practices can prevent laceration. The rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) was 17%. Associated with OASIS were assisted delivery (aOR 6.0), baby weights of more than 3.5 kg (aOR 7.8), episiotomy (aOR 26.4), and fundal pressure (aOR 6.2). Conclusions Our study found that potentially harmful practices are still conducted that contribute to the occurrence of OASIS. The perception of these practices is divergent with current evidence, and empirical knowledge has more influence. To improve practices the scientific evidence and its underlying basis should be understood among providers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document