scholarly journals Patient and Health Care Provider Experiences With a Recently Introduced Patient Portal in an Academic Hospital in the Netherlands: Mixed Methods Study

10.2196/13743 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. e13743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M T Vreugdenhil ◽  
Sander Ranke ◽  
Yvonne de Man ◽  
Maaike M Haan ◽  
Rudolf B Kool
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Work Processes ◽  
One Year

Background In the Netherlands, the health care system and related information technology landscape are fragmented. Recently, hospitals have started to launch patient portals. It is not clear how these portals are used by patients and their health care providers (HCPs). Objective The objective of this study was to explore the adoption, use, usability, and usefulness of a recently introduced patient portal in an academic hospital to learn lessons for the implementation of patient portals in a fragmented health care system. Methods A mixed methods study design was used. In the quantitative study arm, characteristics of patients who used the portal were analyzed, in addition to the utilization of the different functionalities of the portal. In the qualitative study arms, think-aloud observations were made to explore usability. Focus group discussions were conducted among patients and HCPs of the dermatology and ophthalmology outpatient departments. Thematic content analysis of qualitative data was carried out and overarching themes were identified using a framework analysis. Results One year after the introduction of the portal, 24,514 patients, 13.49% of all patients who visited the hospital, had logged in to the portal. Adoption of the portal was associated with the age group 45 to 75 years, a higher socioeconomic status, and having at least one medical diagnosis. Overarching themes from the qualitative analyses were (1) usability and user-friendliness of the portal, (2) HCP-patient communication through the portal, (3) usefulness of the information that can be accessed through the portal, (4) integration of the portal in care and work processes, and (5) HCP and patient roles and relationships. Conclusions One year after the introduction of the patient portal, patients and HCPs who used the portal recognized the potential of the portal to engage patients in their care processes, facilitate patient-HCP communication, and increase patient convenience. Uncertainties among patients and HCPs about how to use the messaging functionality and limited integration of the portal in care and work processes are likely to have limited portal use and usefulness.

scholarly journals Patient and Health Care Provider Experiences With a Recently Introduced Patient Portal in an Academic Hospital in the Netherlands: Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M T Vreugdenhil ◽  
Sander Ranke ◽  
Yvonne de Man ◽  
Maaike M. Haan ◽  
Rudolf B. Kool
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Work Processes ◽  
One Year

BACKGROUND In the Netherlands, the health care system and related information technology landscape are fragmented. Recently, hospitals have started to launch patient portals. It is not clear how these portals are used by patients and their health care providers (HCPs). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore the adoption, use, usability, and usefulness of a recently introduced patient portal in an academic hospital to learn lessons for the implementation of patient portals in a fragmented health care system. METHODS A mixed methods study design was used. In the quantitative study arm, characteristics of patients who used the portal were analyzed, in addition to the utilization of the different functionalities of the portal. In the qualitative study arms, think-aloud observations were made to explore usability. Focus group discussions were conducted among patients and HCPs of the dermatology and ophthalmology outpatient departments. Thematic content analysis of qualitative data was carried out and overarching themes were identified using a framework analysis. RESULTS One year after the introduction of the portal, 24,514 patients, 13.49% of all patients who visited the hospital, had logged in to the portal. Adoption of the portal was associated with the age group 45 to 75 years, a higher socioeconomic status, and having at least one medical diagnosis. Overarching themes from the qualitative analyses were (1) usability and user-friendliness of the portal, (2) HCP-patient communication through the portal, (3) usefulness of the information that can be accessed through the portal, (4) integration of the portal in care and work processes, and (5) HCP and patient roles and relationships. CONCLUSIONS One year after the introduction of the patient portal, patients and HCPs who used the portal recognized the potential of the portal to engage patients in their care processes, facilitate patient-HCP communication, and increase patient convenience. Uncertainties among patients and HCPs about how to use the messaging functionality and limited integration of the portal in care and work processes are likely to have limited portal use and usefulness.

scholarly journals Perception of the Progressing Digitization and Transformation of the German Health Care System Among Experts and the Public: Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Hansen ◽  
Maximilian Herrmann ◽  
Jan P Ehlers ◽  
Thomas Mondritzki ◽  
Kai Oliver Hensel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Health Care Market ◽  
German Health ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Care System

BACKGROUND Health care systems worldwide are struggling to keep rising costs at bay with only modest outcome improvement among many diseases. Digitization with technologies like Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning algorithms might address this. Although digital technologies have been successfully applied in clinical studies the effect on the overall health care system so far was limited. The regulatory ecosystem or data privacy might be responsible, but other reasons may also predominate. OBJECTIVE We analyzed how the digitization of the German health care market is currently perceived among different stakeholders and investigated reasons for its slow adaption. METHODS This was a mixed methods study split into a qualitative Part A using the conceptual approach of the Grounded Theory and a quantitative Part B using the Delphi method. For Part A we interviewed experts in the health care system and converted the results into 17 hypotheses. The Delphi method consisted of an online survey which was sent to the participants via email and was available for three months. For the assessment of the 17 hypotheses, the participants were given a six-point Likert scale. The participants were grouped into patients, physicians, and providers of services within the German health care market. RESULTS There was a strong alignment of opinions on the hypotheses between experts (N=21) and survey participants (N=733), with 70.5% overall agreement on 12/17 hypotheses. Physicians demonstrated the lowest level of agreement with the expert panel at 88% (15/17) disagreement, with the hypotheses “H8: Digitization in the health care system will free up jobs,” and “H6: Digitization in the health care system will empower the patients,” perceived to be in profound disagreement (<italic>P</italic>=.036 and <italic>P</italic>&lt;.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Despite the firm agreement among participants and experts regarding the impact of digitization on the health care system, physicians demonstrated a more negative attitude. We assume that this might be a factor contributing to the slow adoption of digitization in practice. Physicians might be struggling with changing power structures, so future measures to transform the market should involve them to a larger degree.

scholarly journals Perception of the Progressing Digitization and Transformation of the German Health Care System Among Experts and the Public: Mixed Methods Study

10.2196/14689 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. e14689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Hansen ◽  
Maximilian Herrmann ◽  
Jan P Ehlers ◽  
Thomas Mondritzki ◽  
Kai Oliver Hensel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Health Care Market ◽  
German Health ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Care System

Background Health care systems worldwide are struggling to keep rising costs at bay with only modest outcome improvement among many diseases. Digitization with technologies like Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning algorithms might address this. Although digital technologies have been successfully applied in clinical studies the effect on the overall health care system so far was limited. The regulatory ecosystem or data privacy might be responsible, but other reasons may also predominate. Objective We analyzed how the digitization of the German health care market is currently perceived among different stakeholders and investigated reasons for its slow adaption. Methods This was a mixed methods study split into a qualitative Part A using the conceptual approach of the Grounded Theory and a quantitative Part B using the Delphi method. For Part A we interviewed experts in the health care system and converted the results into 17 hypotheses. The Delphi method consisted of an online survey which was sent to the participants via email and was available for three months. For the assessment of the 17 hypotheses, the participants were given a six-point Likert scale. The participants were grouped into patients, physicians, and providers of services within the German health care market. Results There was a strong alignment of opinions on the hypotheses between experts (N=21) and survey participants (N=733), with 70.5% overall agreement on 12/17 hypotheses. Physicians demonstrated the lowest level of agreement with the expert panel at 88% (15/17) disagreement, with the hypotheses “H8: Digitization in the health care system will free up jobs,” and “H6: Digitization in the health care system will empower the patients,” perceived to be in profound disagreement (P=.036 and P<.001, respectively). Conclusions Despite the firm agreement among participants and experts regarding the impact of digitization on the health care system, physicians demonstrated a more negative attitude. We assume that this might be a factor contributing to the slow adoption of digitization in practice. Physicians might be struggling with changing power structures, so future measures to transform the market should involve them to a larger degree.

scholarly journals Patient Portal Functionalities and Uptake: Systematic Review Protocol

10.2196/14975 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e14975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abrar Alturkistani ◽  
Geva Greenfield ◽  
Felix Greaves ◽  
Shirin Aliabadi ◽  
Rosemary H Jenkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Quality Outcomes

Background Patient portals are digital health tools adopted by health care organizations. The portals are generally connected to the electronic health record of the health care organization and offer patients functionalities such as access to the medical record, ability to order repeat prescriptions, make appointments, or message the health care provider. Patient portals may be beneficial for both patients and the health care system. Patient portals can widely differ from one context to another due to the differences in the portal functionalities and capabilities and it is anticipated that outcomes associated with the functionalities also differ. Current systematic reviews report outcomes associated with patient portal uptake but do not explicitly specify the patient portal functionalities. Objective The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence on health and health care quality outcomes associated with patient portal use among adult (18 years or older) patients. The review research questions are as follows: What kind of health outcomes do tethered patient portals and patient portal functionalities contribute to in adult patients (18 years or older)? and What kind of health care quality outcomes, including health care utilization outcomes, do tethered patient portals and patient portal functionalities contribute to in adult patients (18 years or older)? Methods The systematic review will be conducted by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases for relevant literature. The review inclusion criteria will be studies about adult patients (18 years or older), studies only about tethered patient portals, and studies with or without a comparator. We will report patient portal–associated health and health care quality outcomes based on the patient portal functionalities. All quantitative primary study types will be included. Risk of bias of included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s quality assessment tools. Data will be synthesized using narrative synthesis and will be reported according to the patient portal functionalities, country, disease, and health care system model. Results Searches will be conducted in September 2019, and the review is anticipated to be completed by the end of June 2020. Conclusions This systematic review will provide an overview of health and health care quality outcomes associated with patient portal use among adult patients, providing detailed information about the functionalities of the portals and their associations with the outcomes. The review could potentially help patient portal evaluation studies by providing insights into outcomes associated with the different functionalities of patient portals. Trial Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019141131; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=141131 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/14975

scholarly journals Patient Portal Functionalities and Uptake: Systematic Review Protocol (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abrar Alturkistani ◽  
Geva Greenfield ◽  
Felix Greaves ◽  
Shirin Aliabadi ◽  
Rosemary H Jenkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Quality Outcomes

BACKGROUND Patient portals are digital health tools adopted by health care organizations. The portals are generally connected to the electronic health record of the health care organization and offer patients functionalities such as access to the medical record, ability to order repeat prescriptions, make appointments, or message the health care provider. Patient portals may be beneficial for both patients and the health care system. Patient portals can widely differ from one context to another due to the differences in the portal functionalities and capabilities and it is anticipated that outcomes associated with the functionalities also differ. Current systematic reviews report outcomes associated with patient portal uptake but do not explicitly specify the patient portal functionalities. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence on health and health care quality outcomes associated with patient portal use among adult (18 years or older) patients. The review research questions are as follows: What kind of health outcomes do tethered patient portals and patient portal functionalities contribute to in adult patients (18 years or older)? and What kind of health care quality outcomes, including health care utilization outcomes, do tethered patient portals and patient portal functionalities contribute to in adult patients (18 years or older)? METHODS The systematic review will be conducted by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases for relevant literature. The review inclusion criteria will be studies about adult patients (18 years or older), studies only about tethered patient portals, and studies with or without a comparator. We will report patient portal–associated health and health care quality outcomes based on the patient portal functionalities. All quantitative primary study types will be included. Risk of bias of included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s quality assessment tools. Data will be synthesized using narrative synthesis and will be reported according to the patient portal functionalities, country, disease, and health care system model. RESULTS Searches will be conducted in September 2019, and the review is anticipated to be completed by the end of June 2020. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review will provide an overview of health and health care quality outcomes associated with patient portal use among adult patients, providing detailed information about the functionalities of the portals and their associations with the outcomes. The review could potentially help patient portal evaluation studies by providing insights into outcomes associated with the different functionalities of patient portals. CLINICALTRIAL International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019141131; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=141131 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/14975

scholarly journals Factors Affecting Patient Portal Use Among Low-Income Pregnant Women: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study (Preprint)

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhee Kim ◽  
Holly Mathews ◽  
Lindsay M Cortright ◽  
Xiaoming Zeng ◽  
Edward Newton
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Prenatal Health

BACKGROUND Patient portals offer patients personalized and secure Web access to their medical information and enable patients to manage their health care online. However, there is a lack of information about patient acceptance and use of patient portals among low-income pregnant women. OBJECTIVE This formative research aims to assess the potential of a patient portal, MyChart, for improving prenatal health care and pregnancy outcomes, and identify the barriers and facilitators of MyChart use among low-income pregnant women. METHODS A mixed-methods study was conducted with a convenience sample of 18 low-income pregnant women comprising low- and high-risk patients enrolled in a prenatal clinic in eastern North Carolina. MyChart use, patient demographics, and pregnancy information were collected by reviewing electronic medical charts. Health literacy was measured. Reported use and attitudes toward MyChart were collected using a semi-structured interview. RESULTS Although 39% (7/18) of participants interviewed signed up for MyChart, only 22% (4/18) of them became active users. Another 33% (6/18) had never heard of MyChart or was unsure of how to access it. Users primarily accessed test results and appointment schedules. The main facilitating factors for patient portal use were information and motivation from health care providers and concerns about pregnancy due to a history of miscarriage. Reported barriers were lack of educational resources, lack of care provider encouragement, and technical difficulties possibly exacerbated by low health literacy. Participants also suggested improvements for MyChart, especially the provision of discussion-based support for pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS The one-time verbal introduction of MyChart does not meet current patients’ needs. Data reveal the need for more consistent patient education and support programs, tailored to patients’ previous pregnancy histories. The clinic also needs to facilitate better provider-patient communication about the importance of MyChart use.

scholarly journals Patient portals and broadband internet inequality

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam T Perzynski ◽  
Mary Joan Roach ◽  
Sarah Shick ◽  
Bill Callahan ◽  
Douglas Gunzler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Internet Access ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Public Health Care ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Broadband Internet ◽  
Care System

Abstract Background: Patient portals have shown potential for increasing health care quality and efficiency. Internet access and other factors influencing patient portal use could worsen health disparities. Methods: Observational study of adults with 1 or more visits to the outpatient clinics of an urban public health care system from 2012 to 2015. We used mixed effects logistic regression to evaluate the association between broadband internet access and (1) patient portal initiation (whether a patient logged in at least 1 time) and (2) messaging, controlling for demographic and neighborhood characteristics. Results: There were 243 248 adults with 1 or more visits during 2012–2015 and 70 835 (29.1%) initiated portal use. Portal initiation was 34.1% for whites, 23.4% for blacks, and 23.8% for Hispanics, and was lower for Medicaid (26.5%), Medicare (23.4%), and uninsured patients (17.4%) than commercially insured patients (39.3%). In multivariate analysis, both initiation of portal use (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24 per quintile, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–1.24, P &lt; .0001) and sending messages to providers (OR = 1.15, 95%CI, 1.09–1.14, P &lt; .0001) were associated with neighborhood broadband internet access. Conclusions: The majority of adults with outpatient visits to a large urban health care system did not use the patient portal, and initiation of use was lower for racial and ethnic minorities, persons of lower socioeconomic status, and those without neighborhood broadband internet access. These results suggest the emergence of a digital divide in patient portal use. Given the scale of investment in patient portals and other internet-dependent health information technologies, efforts are urgently needed to address this growing inequality.

scholarly journals Older Adults' Perceptions and Use of Patient Portals: A Comparative Analysis of Two Samples

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 837-837
Author(s):  
Hyojin Son ◽  
Eun-Shim Nahm ◽  
Shijun Zhu ◽  
Elizabeth Galik ◽  
Barbara Van de Castle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Community Sample ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Perceived Usability ◽  
Care System

Abstract Older adults can benefit from using patient portals. Little is known whether the perceptions and use of patient portals differ among diverse older adult populations. The aim of this study was to assess the difference in perceived usability of patient portals, self-efficacy for using patient portals, and patient portal use between two adult samples aged 65 years or older. One sample was recruited from a health care system, including hospitals and clinics (n = 174), and the other sample was recruited from nationwide communities (n = 126). Conducting a secondary data analysis using two survey datasets, this study performed a series of linear and ordinal logistic regression analyses. The health care system sample had a higher mean number of chronic diseases and proportion of recent hospitalization than the community sample. The health care system sample showed higher perceived usability, self-efficacy, and usage frequency of patient portals compared to the community sample. eHealth literacy was a significant predictor of perceived usability and self-efficacy. Perceived usability was another significant predictor of self-efficacy. Self-efficacy and health condition variables significantly predicted the more frequent use of patient portals. Compared to the health care system sample, the relationship between perceived usability and use of patient portals was stronger and significant in the community sample. These findings suggest that approaches for promoting patient portal use should consider personal characteristics and health conditions of diverse older adult populations. Future research needs to focus on assessing the impact of using patient portals on older adults’ health care outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document