scholarly journals Benefits, Problems, and Potential Improvements in a Nationwide Patient Portal: Cross-sectional Survey of Pharmacy Customers’ Experiences (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Sääskilahti ◽  
Anna Ojanen ◽  
Riitta Ahonen ◽  
Johanna Timonen
Keyword(s):  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Comprehensive Health ◽  
Prescription Medicines ◽  
Potential Improvement

BACKGROUND Patient engagement is a worldwide trend in health care. Patient portals have the potential to increase patients’ knowledge about their health and care and therefore enhance patient engagement. Portal users’ experiences are needed to determine if these portals work appropriately and if there are barriers to achieving the aims that were set before their implementation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to analyze pharmacy customers’ experiences of the Finnish nationwide patient portal My Kanta in terms of benefits, problems, and potential improvements. METHODS A questionnaire survey was conducted among pharmacy customers in the spring of 2019. The questionnaires (N=2866) were distributed from 18 community pharmacies across mainland Finland to customers aged ≥18 years who were purchasing prescription medicines for themselves or their children aged <18 years. Using open-ended questions, customers were asked about their experiences of the benefits and problems of My Kanta and what improvements could be made. Their responses were encoded and categorized using inductive content analysis, stored in SPSS Statistics for Windows, and analyzed using frequencies. RESULTS Of the 2866 questionnaires, a total of 994 (34.68%) questionnaires were included in the analysis. Most respondents were My Kanta users (820/994, 82.5%); of these 820 users, 667 (81.3%) reported at least one benefit, 311 (37.9%) reported at least one problem, and 327 (39.9%) reported at least one potential improvement when using My Kanta. The most commonly mentioned benefits were opportunities to view health data (290/667, 43.5%) and prescriptions (247/667, 37%) and to renew prescriptions (220/667, 33%). The most extensively reported problems with My Kanta were that the portal lacks health data (71/311, 22.8%), navigating the service and searching for information is difficult (68/311, 21.9%), and the delay before health data are incorporated into the service (41/311, 13.2%). The most frequently suggested potential improvements were that My Kanta needs more comprehensive health data (89/327, 27.2%); the service should be easier to navigate and information easier to access (71/327, 21.7%); the service should have more functions (51/327, 15.6%); and health data should be entered into the portal more promptly (47/327, 14.4%). CONCLUSIONS Pharmacy customers reported more benefits than problems or potential improvements regarding the use of My Kanta. The service is useful for viewing health data and prescriptions and for renewing prescriptions. However, portal users would like to see more data and functions available in the portal and data searches to be made easier. These improvements could make the data and functions provided by the portal easier to view and use and hence promote patient engagement.

scholarly journals Benefits, Problems, and Potential Improvements in a Nationwide Patient Portal: Cross-sectional Survey of Pharmacy Customers’ Experiences

10.2196/31483 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. e31483
Author(s):  
Maria Sääskilahti ◽  
Anna Ojanen ◽  
Riitta Ahonen ◽  
Johanna Timonen
Keyword(s):  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Comprehensive Health ◽  
Prescription Medicines ◽  
Potential Improvement

Background Patient engagement is a worldwide trend in health care. Patient portals have the potential to increase patients’ knowledge about their health and care and therefore enhance patient engagement. Portal users’ experiences are needed to determine if these portals work appropriately and if there are barriers to achieving the aims that were set before their implementation. Objective The aim of this study is to analyze pharmacy customers’ experiences of the Finnish nationwide patient portal My Kanta in terms of benefits, problems, and potential improvements. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among pharmacy customers in the spring of 2019. The questionnaires (N=2866) were distributed from 18 community pharmacies across mainland Finland to customers aged ≥18 years who were purchasing prescription medicines for themselves or their children aged <18 years. Using open-ended questions, customers were asked about their experiences of the benefits and problems of My Kanta and what improvements could be made. Their responses were encoded and categorized using inductive content analysis, stored in SPSS Statistics for Windows, and analyzed using frequencies. Results Of the 2866 questionnaires, a total of 994 (34.68%) questionnaires were included in the analysis. Most respondents were My Kanta users (820/994, 82.5%); of these 820 users, 667 (81.3%) reported at least one benefit, 311 (37.9%) reported at least one problem, and 327 (39.9%) reported at least one potential improvement when using My Kanta. The most commonly mentioned benefits were opportunities to view health data (290/667, 43.5%) and prescriptions (247/667, 37%) and to renew prescriptions (220/667, 33%). The most extensively reported problems with My Kanta were that the portal lacks health data (71/311, 22.8%), navigating the service and searching for information is difficult (68/311, 21.9%), and the delay before health data are incorporated into the service (41/311, 13.2%). The most frequently suggested potential improvements were that My Kanta needs more comprehensive health data (89/327, 27.2%); the service should be easier to navigate and information easier to access (71/327, 21.7%); the service should have more functions (51/327, 15.6%); and health data should be entered into the portal more promptly (47/327, 14.4%). Conclusions Pharmacy customers reported more benefits than problems or potential improvements regarding the use of My Kanta. The service is useful for viewing health data and prescriptions and for renewing prescriptions. However, portal users would like to see more data and functions available in the portal and data searches to be made easier. These improvements could make the data and functions provided by the portal easier to view and use and hence promote patient engagement.

scholarly journals Predictors of Online Patient Portal Use among a Diverse Sample of Emerging Adults: A Cross-Sectional Survey (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Wright ◽  
Julie E Volkman ◽  
Suzanne G Leveille ◽  
Daniel J. Amante
Keyword(s):  
Health Literacy ◽  
Emerging Adults ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Convenience Sample

BACKGROUND Self-management of health is becoming increasingly more influenced by Health IT as online patient portals become more common. Patient portals allow patients direct access to their health information and opportunities to engage with their healthcare team. Data suggest that e-Health literacy is an important skill for using portals. Emerging adults (EA; ages 18-29), while generally healthy, are regular users of the healthcare system. A good understanding about their use of online patient portals and how their e-Health literacy skills impact their use is lacking. OBJECTIVE To describe patient portal use and explore the predictors of portal use among a diverse sample of EAs. METHODS A convenience sample, cross-sectional survey study was conducted at two universities. Demographics, healthcare visits, e-Health literacy, patient engagement and use of patient portal features (administrative and clinical) were asked. Logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with portal use. RESULTS Of the 340 EAs (76% female, 65% white, 47% low income), 54% reported having patient portal access. Of those reporting access, 77% used at least 1 portal feature and 23% reported using none. Significant predictors were patient engagement (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.13, p=.001;) and total encounters (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.44, p=.009;) but not e-Health literacy. Hispanic and Asian EAs were more likely to be frequent users of clinical portal features than white EAs (Hispanic, OR 2.97, 95%CI 1.03-8.52 p=.043; and Asian, OR 4.28, 95%CI 1.08-16.89, p=.038). CONCLUSIONS Surprisingly, e-Health literacy did not predict use of patient portals in this diverse sample of EAs. Moreover, there may be ethnic differences that are important for healthcare systems to consider. Interventions to promote patient portal use, an essential self-management skill, should include strategies to increase patient engagement with patient portals in EA populations. CLINICALTRIAL N/A

scholarly journals Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (e1) ◽  
pp. e157-e161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison J Lazard ◽  
Ivan Watkins ◽  
Michael S Mackert ◽  
Bo Xie ◽  
Keri K Stephens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Technology Acceptance ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Perceived Usefulness ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Perceived Ease Of Use ◽  
Design Strategies ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Aesthetic

Abstract Objective This study focused on patient portal use and investigated whether aesthetic evaluations of patient portals function are antecedent variables to variables in the Technology Acceptance Model. Methods A cross-sectional survey of current patient portals users ( N  = 333) was conducted online. Participants completed the Visual Aesthetics of Website Inventory, along with items measuring perceived ease of use (PEU), perceived usefulness (PU), and behavioral intentions (BIs) to use the patient portal. Results The hypothesized model accounted for 29% of the variance in BIs to use the portal, 46% of the variance in the PU of the portal, and 29% of the variance in the portal’s PEU. Additionally, one dimension of the aesthetic evaluations functions as a predictor in the model – simplicity evaluations had a significant positive effect on PEU. Conclusion This study provides evidence that aesthetic evaluations – specifically regarding simplicity – function as a significant antecedent variable to patients’ use of patient portals and should influence patient portal design strategies.

The My Diabetes Care Patient Portal Intervention: Usability and Pre-Post Assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 539-550
Author(s):  
William Martinez ◽  
Amber J. Hackstadt ◽  
Gerald B. Hickson ◽  
Thomas Knoerl ◽  
S. Trent Rosenbloom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Patient Activation ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
System Usability Scale ◽  
Literacy Level

Abstract Background My Diabetes Care (MDC) is a novel, multifaceted patient portal intervention designed to help patients better understand their diabetes health data and support self-management. MDC uses infographics to visualize and summarize patients' diabetes health data, incorporates motivational strategies, and provides literacy level–appropriate educational resources. Objectives We aimed to assess the usability, acceptability, perceptions, and potential impact of MDC. Methods We recruited 69 participants from four clinics affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Participants were given 1 month of access to MDC and completed pre- and post-questionnaires including validated measures of usability and patient activation, and questions about user experience. Results Sixty participants completed the study. Participants' mean age was 58, 55% were females, 68% were Caucasians, and 48% had limited health literacy (HL). Most participants (80%) visited MDC three or more times and 50% spent a total of ≥15 minutes on MDC. Participants' median System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 78.8 [Q1, Q3: 72.5, 87.5] and significantly greater than the threshold value of 68 indicative of “above average” usability (p < 0.001). The median SUS score of patients with limited HL was similar to those with adequate HL (77.5 [72.5, 85.0] vs. 82.5 [72.5, 92.5]; p = 0.41). Participants most commonly reported the literacy level–appropriate educational links and health data infographics as features that helped them better understand their diabetes health data (65%). All participants (100%) intended to continue to use MDC. Median Patient Activation Measure® scores increased postintervention (64.3 [55.6, 72.5] vs. 67.8 [60.6, 75.0]; p = 0.01). Conclusion Participants, including those with limited HL, rated the usability of MDC above average, anticipated continued use, and identified key features that improved their understanding of diabetes health data. Patient activation improved over the study period. Our findings suggest MDC may be a beneficial addition to existing patient portals.

scholarly journals Perceptions of adopters versus non-adopters of a patient portal: an application of diffusion of innovation theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivas Emani ◽  
Ellen Peters ◽  
Sonali Desai ◽  
Andrew S. Karson ◽  
Stuart R. Lipsitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diffusion Of Innovation ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Patient Perceptions ◽  
Relative Advantage ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Doi Theory ◽  
Doctor's Office

BackgroundPatient portals have emerged as an important tool through which patients can access online health information and engage in their health care. However, we know little about how patients perceive portals and whether patient perceptions might influence portal adoption.ObjectiveApply the diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory to assess perceptions of adopters and non-adopters of a patient portal.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of adopters and non-adopters of the portal. Our survey consisted of perceived attributes from the DOI theory, socio-demographic characteristics and patient perceptions of technology adoption.ResultsThree factors representing perceived attributes from DOI theory accounted for 73% of the variance in the data: Factor 1 – Relative Advantage (27%); Factor 2 – Ease of Use (24%) and Factor 3 – Trialability (22%). Adopters perceived greater Relative Advantage [mean (SD)] = 3.8 (0.71) versus 3.2 (0.89), p < 0.001, Ease of Use = 4.1 (0.71) versus 3.3 (0.95), p < 0.001 and Trialability = 4.0 (0.57) versus 3.4 (0.99), p < 0.001 than non-adopters. In multivariate modelling, age [OR = 3.75, 95% CI: (2.17, 6.46), p < 0.001] and income [OR = 1.87, 95% CI: (1.17, 3.00), p < 0.01] predicted adoption of the portal. Among DOI factors, Relative advantage predicted adoption of the portal [OR = 1.48, 95% CI: (1.03, 2.11), p < 0.05].ConclusionPatients will adopt a patient portal if they perceive it to offer a relative advantage over existing practices such as telephoning or visiting the doctor’s office. Organisations seeking to increase the adoption of patient portals should implement strategies to promote the relative advantage of portals as, for example, through posters in waiting and exam rooms. A digital divide in the adoption of patient portals may exist with respect to age and income.

scholarly journals Acute Care Patient Portal Intervention: Portal Use and Patient Activation (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumiko O Schnock ◽  
Julia E Snyder ◽  
Theresa E Fuller ◽  
Megan Duckworth ◽  
Maxwell Grant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Patient Activation ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Access Period ◽  
Care Partners ◽  
Patient Activation Measure

BACKGROUND Patient-facing health information technology (HIT) tools, such as patient portals, are recognized as a potential mechanism to facilitate patient engagement and patient-centered care, yet the use of these tools remains limited in the hospital setting. Although research in this area is growing, it is unclear how the use of acute care patient portals might affect outcomes, such as patient activation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe the use of an acute care patient portal and investigate its association with patient and care partner activation in the hospital setting. METHODS We implemented an acute care patient portal on 6 acute care units over an 18-month period. We investigated the characteristics of the users (patients and their care partners) of the patient portal, as well as their use of the portal. This included the number of visits to each page, the number of days used, the length of the user’s access period, and the average percent of days used during the access period. Patient and care partner activation was assessed using the short form of the patient activation measure (PAM-13) and the caregiver patient activation measure (CG-PAM). Comparisons of the activation scores were performed using propensity weighting and robust weighted linear regression. RESULTS Of the 2974 randomly sampled patients, 59.01% (1755/2974) agreed to use the acute care patient portal. Acute care patient portal enrollees were younger, less sick, less likely to have Medicare as their insurer, and more likely to use the Partners Healthcare enterprise ambulatory patient portal (Patient Gateway). The most used features of the acute care patient portal were the laboratory test results, care team information, and medication list. Most users accessed the portal between 1 to 4 days during their hospitalization, and the average number of days used (logged in at least once per day) was 1.8 days. On average, users accessed the portal 42.69% of the hospital days during which it was available. There was significant association with patient activation on the neurology service (P<.001) and medicine service (P=.01), after the introduction of HIT tools and the acute care patient portal, but not on the oncology service. CONCLUSIONS Portal users most often accessed the portal to view their clinical information, though portal usage was limited to only the first few days of enrollment. We found an association between the use of the portal and HIT tools with improved levels of patient activation. These tools may help facilitate patient engagement and improve outcomes when fully utilized by patients and care partners. Future study should leverage usage metrics to describe portal use and assess the impact of HIT tools on specific outcome measures in the hospital setting.

scholarly journals Patient Portal Barriers and Group Differences: Cross-Sectional National Survey Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kea Turner ◽  
Alecia Clary ◽  
Young-Rock Hong ◽  
Amir Alishahi Tabriz ◽  
Christopher M Shea
Keyword(s):  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Multiple Variable ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
National Trends

BACKGROUND Past studies examining barriers to patient portal adoption have been conducted with a small number of patients and health care settings, limiting generalizability. OBJECTIVE This study had the following two objectives: (1) to assess the prevalence of barriers to patient portal adoption among nonadopters and (2) to examine the association between nonadopter characteristics and reported barriers in a nationally representative sample. METHODS Data from this study were obtained from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey. We calculated descriptive statistics to determine the most prevalent barriers and conducted multiple variable logistic regression analysis to examine which characteristics were associated with the reported barriers. RESULTS The sample included 4815 individuals. Among these, 2828 individuals (58.73%) had not adopted a patient portal. Among the nonadopters (n=2828), the most prevalent barriers were patient preference for in-person communication (1810/2828, 64.00%), no perceived need for the patient portal (1385/2828, 48.97%), and lack of comfort and experience with computers (735/2828, 25.99%). Less commonly, individuals reported having no patient portal (650/2828, 22.98%), no internet access (650/2828, 22.98%), privacy concerns (594/2828, 21.00%), difficulty logging on (537/2828, 18.99%), and multiple patient portals (255/2828, 9.02%) as barriers. Men had significantly lower odds of indicating a preference for speaking directly to a provider compared with women (odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; <i>P</i>=.01). Older age (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02; <i>P</i>&lt;.001), having a chronic condition (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.44-2.33; <i>P</i>&lt;.001), and having an income lower than US $20,000 (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11-2.34; <i>P</i>=.01) were positively associated with indicating a preference for speaking directly to a provider. Hispanic individuals had significantly higher odds of indicating that they had no need for a patient portal (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.05; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) compared with non-Hispanic individuals. Older individuals (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06; <i>P</i>&lt;.001), individuals with less than a high school diploma (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.79-5.53; <i>P</i>&lt;.001), and individuals with a household income of less than US $20,000 (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.88-4.11; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) had significantly higher odds of indicating that they were uncomfortable with a computer. CONCLUSIONS The most common barriers to patient portal adoption are preference for in-person communication, not having a need for the patient portal, and feeling uncomfortable with computers, which are barriers that are modifiable and can be intervened upon. Patient characteristics can help predict which patients are most likely to experience certain barriers to patient portal adoption. Further research is needed to tailor implementation approaches based on patients’ needs and preferences.

Behavioral Health Patient Engagement in Video-based Visits through a Patient Portal at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital During COVID-19: Direct Patient Outreach and Case-Control Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Yue ◽  
Victoria Mail ◽  
Maura DiSalvo ◽  
Christina Borba ◽  
Joanna Piechniczek-Buczek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Safety Net Hospital ◽  
Urban Safety

BACKGROUND Patient portals are a safe and secure way for patients to connect with providers for video-based telepsychiatry and help to overcome the financial and logistical barriers associated with face-to-face mental health care. Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telepsychiatry has become increasingly important to obtaining mental health care. However, financial, and technological barriers, termed the “digital divide,” prevent some patients from accessing the technology needed to utilize telepsychiatry services. OBJECTIVE As part of an outreach project during COVID-19 to improve patient engagement with video-based visits through the hospital’s patient portal among adult behavioral health patients at an urban safety net hospital, we aimed to assess patient preference for patient portal-based video visits or telephone-only visits, and to identify the demographic variables associated with their preference. METHODS Patients in an outpatient psychiatry clinic were contacted by phone and preference for telepsychiatry by phone or video through a patient portal, as well as device preference for video-based visits, were documented. Patient demographic characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-eight patients were reached by phone. Seventy-nine patients (61.7%) chose video-based visits and 69.6% of these patients preferred to access the patient portal through a smartphone. Older patients were significantly less likely to agree to video-based visits. CONCLUSIONS Among behavioral health patients at a safety-net hospital, there was a relatively low engagement with video-based visits through the hospital’s patient portal, particularly among older adults.

Chinese Americans’ use of patient portal systems: a scoping review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine Lawrence ◽  
Stella Chong ◽  
Holly Krelle ◽  
Timothy Roberts ◽  
Lorna Thorpe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Chinese American ◽  
Chinese Americans ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Sample Population ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Use Patterns

BACKGROUND Patient portals are increasingly deployed in healthcare systems as communication and information-sharing tools for patients and providers. While portals show promise in addressing healthcare access, quality, and outcomes, research on portal access and use patterns among diverse populations is limited, including among Chinese Americans. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to summarize existing evidence on the access and use patterns, barriers, and facilitators of patient portals among Chinese Americans, and to identify gaps and areas for future research. METHODS The authors conducted a scoping review using the PRISMA Protocol for Scoping Reviews of articles published in major databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO) on the topic of patient portals and Chinese Americans. Authors independently reviewed the papers during initial screening and full-text review. The studies were analyzed and coded for study method type, sample population, and main outcomes of interest. RESULTS In total 17 articles were selected for inclusion in the review. The included articles varied in study aims, methodology, data collection, sample population, and geographic areas of study. The majority of studies were cross-sectional in nature. Major findings and themes identified from the articles include: variable patterns of patient portal access and use among Chinese Americans compared to other racial/ethnic groups; limited evidence on the specific barriers and facilitators of access and use for this group; a reliance on quantitative proxy measures (e.g. log-ins, click-throughs) to assess portal access and use; and a pattern of aggregating Chinese American-related data into a larger Asian or Asian American designation. CONCLUSIONS There is limited research dedicated to understanding the use patterns, experiences, and needs of Chinese Americans who access and utilize patient portal systems. Most research is cross-sectional, focusing on disparities in use and access, and have tended to aggregate the Chinese American experience into that of Asian Americans. Future research should focus specifically on Chinese Americans and prioritize more detailed evaluations of their relationship to patient portal technology to understand specific use patterns, preferences, and needs. A broader understanding of the diversity of health technology users can help ensure applicable and equitable design, development, and implementation of these tools. CLINICALTRIAL N/a

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document