Who is Included in Digital Health Technologies to Support Hospital to Home Transitions for Older Adults?: Secondary analysis of a rapid review and equity-informed recommendations (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Marie Kokorelias ◽  
Michelle LA Nelson ◽  
Terence Tang ◽  
Carolyn Steele Gray ◽  
Moriah Ellen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Oldest Old ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Sex And Gender ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Hospital To Home

BACKGROUND Digital health technologies have been proposed to support hospital to home transitions for older adults. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated physical distancing guidelines propelled a shift to digital health technologies. However, the characteristics of older adults who participated in digital health interventions to support hospital to home transitions remain unclear. This information is needed to assess whether current digital health technologies are generalizable to the needs of broader older adult populations. OBJECTIVE We conducted a rapid review of the existing literature to: i) identify the characteristics of the populations targeted by studies testing the implementation of digital health interventions that are designed to support hospital to home transitions, ii) identify the characteristics of the samples included within studies testing digital health interventions used to support hospital to home transitions, and iii) create recommendations for enhancing the diversity of samples within future digital health interventions. METHODS A rapid review methodology informed by Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review guidelines was conducted. A search for peer-reviewed literature published between (2010-2021) on digital health solutions that support hospital to home transitions for older adults was conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. The Sex-and Gender-Based Analysis Plus (SGBA+) lens theoretically guided the study design, analysis and interpretation. RESULTS 34 papers met inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate that many groups of older adults were excluded from these interventions and remain understudied. Specifically, the “oldest old” and those living with cognitive impairments were excluded from studies included in this review. In addition, very few studies described characteristics related to gender diversity, education, race, ethnicity and culture. No study commented on the sexual orientation of participants. CONCLUSIONS This is the first review, to our knowledge, that has mapped the literature focusing on the inclusion of older adults in digital hospital to home interventions. Findings suggest that the literature on digital health interventions tends to operationalize older adults as a homogenous group, ignoring the heterogeneity in older age definitions. Inconsistency in the literature surrounding the characteristics of included participants suggests a need for further study to understand better how digital technologies to support hospital to home transitions can be inclusive. CLINICALTRIAL N/A

scholarly journals How digital health solutions align with the roles and functions that support hospital to home transitions for older adults: a rapid review study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e045596
Author(s):  
Hardeep Singh ◽  
Alana Armas ◽  
Susan Law ◽  
Terence Tang ◽  
Carolyn Steele Gray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Care Transitions ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Hospital To Home

IntroductionOlder adults may experience challenges during the hospital to home transitions that could be mitigated by digital health solutions. However, to promote adoption in practice and realise benefits, there is a need to specify how digital health solutions contribute to hospital to home transitions, particularly pertinent in this era of social distancing. This rapid review will: (1) elucidate the various roles and functions that have been developed to support hospital to home transitions of care, (2) identify existing digital health solutions that support hospital to home transitions of care, (3) identify gaps and new opportunities where digital health solutions can support these roles and functions and (4) create recommendations that will inform the design and structure of future digital health interventions that support hospital to home transitions for older adults (eg, the pre-trial results of the Digital Bridge intervention; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04287192).Methods and analysisA two-phase rapid review will be conducted to meet identified aims. In phase 1, a selective literature review will be used to generate a conceptual map of the roles and functions of individuals that support hospital to home transitions for older adults. In phase 2, a search on MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL will identify literature on digital health solutions that support hospital to home transitions. The ways in which digital health solutions can support the roles and functions that facilitate these transitions will then be mapped in the analysis and generation of findings.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol is a review of the literature and does not involve human subjects, and therefore, does not require ethics approval. This review will permit the identification of gaps and new opportunities for digital processes and platforms that enable care transitions and can help inform the design and implementation of future digital health interventions. Review findings will be disseminated through publications and presentations to key stakeholders.

scholarly journals The role of economic, educational and social resources in supporting the use of digital health technologies by people with T2D: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Turnbull ◽  
Patricia J. Lucas ◽  
Alastair D. Hay ◽  
Christie Cabral
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Social Resources ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Digital Skills ◽  
Care Support

Abstract Background Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a common chronic disease, with socially patterned incidence and severity. Digital self-care interventions have the potential to reduce health disparities, by providing personalised low-cost reusable resources that can increase access to health interventions. However, if under-served groups are unable to access or use digital technologies, Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) might make no difference, or worse, exacerbate health inequity. Study aims To gain insights into how and why people with T2D access and use DHTs and how experiences vary between individuals and social groups. Methods A purposive sample of people with experience of using a DHT to help them self-care for T2D were recruited through diabetes and community groups. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in person and over the phone. Data were analysed thematically. Results A diverse sample of 21 participants were interviewed. Health care practitioners were not viewed as a good source of information about DHTs that could support T2D. Instead participants relied on their digital skills and social networks to learn about what DHTs are available and helpful. The main barriers to accessing and using DHT described by the participants were availability of DHTs from the NHS, cost and technical proficiency. However, some participants described how they were able to draw on social resources such as their social networks and social status to overcome these barriers. Participants were motivated to use DHTs because they provided self-care support, a feeling of control over T2D, and personalised advice or feedback. The selection of technology was also guided by participants’ preferences and what they valued in relation to DHTs and self-care support, and these in turn were influenced by age and gender. Conclusion This research indicates that low levels of digital skills and high cost of digital health interventions can create barriers to the access and use of DHTs to support the self-care of T2D. However, social networks and social status can be leveraged to overcome some of these challenges. If digital interventions are to decrease rather than exacerbate health inequalities, these barriers and facilitators to access and use must be considered when DHTs are developed and implemented.

scholarly journals Digital Health Interventions for Healthy Aging: A Qualitative User Evaluation and Ethical Assessment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Ienca ◽  
Christophe Schneble ◽  
Reto Kressig ◽  
Tenzin Wangmo
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Older People ◽  
Healthy Aging ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Healthy Ageing ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Community Dwelling Older Adults

Abstract BackgroundDigital health technologies are being increasingly developed with the aim of allowing older adults to maintain functional independence throughout the old age, a process known as healthy ageing. Such digital health technologies for healthy ageing are expected to mitigate the socio-economic effects of population ageing and improve the quality of life of older people. However, little is known regarding the views and needs of older people regarding these technologies. AimThe aim of this study is to explore the views, needs and perceptions of community-dwelling older adults regarding the use of digital health technologies for healthy ageing. MethodFace-to-face, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with community-dwelling older adults (median age 79.6 years). The interview process involved both abstract reflections and practical demonstrations. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to inductive content analysis. ResultsThree main themes and twelve sub-themes emerged. The three main themes revolved around the following thematic areas: favorable views and perceptions on technology-assisted living, usability evaluations and ethical considerations. ConclusionsOur study reveals a generally positive attitude towards digital health technologies as participants believed digital tools could positively contribute to improving their overall wellbeing, especially if designed in a patient-centered manner. Safety concerns and ethical issues related to privacy, empowerment and lack of human contact also emerged as key considerations.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of digital health interventions for diabetes: systematic review of systematic reviews

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonkana Maiga ◽  
Cheick O Bagayoko ◽  
Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed ◽  
Abdrahamane Anne ◽  
Marie-Pierre Gagnon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Clinical Indicators ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Digital Interventions ◽  
Effective Interventions

Abstract Background The use of digital health technologies to tackle diabetes has been particularly flourishing in recent years. Previous studies have shown to varying degrees that these technologies can have an impact on diabetes prevention and management. Objective The aim of this review is to summarize the best evidence regarding the effectiveness of digital health interventions to improve one or more diabetes indicators. Methods We included all types of interventions aimed at evaluating the effect of digital health on diabetes. We considered at all types of digital interventions (mobile health, teleconsultations, tele-expertise, electronic health records, decision support systems, e-learning, etc.). We included systematic reviews published in English or French over the last 29 years, from January 1991 to December 2019, that met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the studies to assess their eligibility, and extracted relevant information according to a predetermined grid. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion and consensus between the two reviewers, or involved a third author as referee. Results In total in our review of journals, we included 10 reviews. The outcomes of interest were clinical indicators of diabetes that could be influenced by digital interventions. These outcomes had to be objectively measurable indicators related to diabetes surveillance and management that are generally accepted by diabetes experts. Six of the ten reviews showed moderate to large significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HBA1c) levels compared to controls. Most reviews reported overall positive results and found that digital health interventions improved health care utilization, behaviours, attitudes, knowledge and skills. Conclusion Based on a large corpus of scientific evidence on digital health interventions, this overview could help identify the most effective interventions to improve diabetes indicators.

scholarly journals The role of economic, educational and social resources in supporting the use of digital health technologies by people with T2D: a qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Turnbull ◽  
Patricia Lucas ◽  
Alastair D Hay ◽  
Christie Cabral
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Social Resources ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Digital Skills ◽  
Care Support

Abstract BackgroundType 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a common chronic disease, with socially patterned incidence and severity. Digital self-care interventions have the potential to reduce health disparities, by providing personalised low-cost reusable resources that can increase access to health interventions. However, if under-served groups are unable to access or use digital technologies, Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) might make no difference, or worse, exacerbate health inequity. Study aimsTo gain insights into how and why people with T2D access and use DHTs and how experiences vary between individuals and social groups.MethodsA purposive sample of people with experience of using a DHT to help them self-care for T2D were recruited through diabetes and community groups. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in person and over the phone. Data were analysed thematically.ResultsA diverse sample of 21 participants were interviewed. Health care practitioners were not viewed as a good source of information about DHTs that could support T2D. Instead participants relied on their digital skills and social networks to learn about what DHTs are available and helpful. The main barriers to accessing and using DHT described by the participants were availability of DHTs from the NHS, cost and technical proficiency. However, some participants described how they were able to draw on social resources such as their social networks and social status to overcome these barriers. Participants were motivated to use DHTs because they provided self-care support, a feeling of control over T2D, and personalised advice or feedback. The selection of technology was also guided by participants’ preferences and what they valued in relation to DHTs and self-care support, and these in turn were influenced by age and gender.ConclusionThis research indicates that low levels of digital skills and high cost of digital health interventions can create barriers to the access and use of DHTs to support the self-care of T2D. However, social networks and social status can be leveraged to overcome some of these challenges. If digital interventions are to decrease rather than exacerbate health inequalities, these barriers and facilitators to access and use must be considered when DHTs are developed and implemented.

scholarly journals Cognitive dispersion predicts grip strength trajectories in men but not women in a sample of the oldest-old without dementia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamlyn Watermeyer ◽  
Fernando Massa ◽  
Jantje Goerdten ◽  
Lucy Stirland ◽  
Boo Johansson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Oldest Old ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Sex And Gender ◽  
The Common ◽  
Reliable Marker ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Design And Methods

Abstract Background and Objectives Grip strength is a reliable marker of biological vitality and it typically demonstrates an expected decline in older adults. According to the common-cause hypothesis there is also a significant association between cognitive and physical function in older adults. Some specific cognitive functions have been shown to be associated with grip strength trajectories with most research solely focused on cut-off points or mean cognitive performance. In the present study we examine whether a measure of cognitive dispersion might be more informative. We therefore used an index that quantifies dispersion in cognitive scores across multiple cognitive tests, shown to be associated with detrimental outcomes in older adults. Research Design and Methods Using repeated grip strength measures from men and women aged 80 and older, free of dementia in the OCTO-Twin study, we estimated ageing-related grip strength trajectories. We examined the association of cognitive dispersion and mean cognitive function with grip strength level and ageing-related rate of change, accounting for known risk factors. Results Cognitive dispersion was associated with grip strength trajectories in men and the association varied by mean cognitive performance, whereas we found no association in women. Discussion and Implications Our results provide evidence of a sex-specific vitality association between cognitive dispersion and ageing-related trajectories of grip strength. Our results support the call for integration of sex and gender in health promotion and intervention research.

scholarly journals Digital Predictors of Morbidity, Hospitalization, and Mortality Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Daniolou ◽  
Andreas Rapp ◽  
Celina Haase ◽  
Alfred Ruppert ◽  
Marlene Wittwer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Design Development ◽  
Clinical Implementation ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Improve Health

The widespread adoption of digital health technologies such as smartphone-based mobile applications, wearable activity trackers and Internet of Things systems has rapidly enabled new opportunities for predictive health monitoring. Leveraging digital health tools to track parameters relevant to human health is particularly important for the older segments of the population as old age is associated with multimorbidity and higher care needs. In order to assess the potential of these digital health technologies to improve health outcomes, it is paramount to investigate which digitally measurable parameters can effectively improve health outcomes among the elderly population. Currently, there is a lack of systematic evidence on this topic due to the inherent heterogeneity of the digital health domain and the lack of clinical validation of both novel prototypes and marketed devices. For this reason, the aim of the current study is to synthesize and systematically analyse which digitally measurable data may be effectively collected through digital health devices to improve health outcomes for older people. Using a modified PICO process and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework, we provide the results of a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis of digitally measurable predictors of morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality among older adults aged 65 or older. These findings can inform both technology developers and clinicians involved in the design, development and clinical implementation of digital health technologies for elderly citizens.

scholarly journals ProACT - A Digital Platform to Support Self-Management of Multiple Chronic Conditions: Findings in Relation to Engagement during a one-year Proof-of-Concept Trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Doyle ◽  
Emma Murphy ◽  
Shane Gavin ◽  
Alessandra Pascale ◽  
Stephane Deparis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
User Engagement ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Care Approach

BACKGROUND Self-management, a core activity for older adults living with multiple chronic conditions (multimorbidity), is challenging, requiring the person to engage in multiple tasks such as symptom monitoring, recognition of exacerbations, medication adherence and inter-stakeholder communication. A digital, integrated care approach is a critical part of the solution, however, there is a dearth of literature on this topic. Furthermore, there is little research on older adults’ acceptability, usage and experiences of engaging with digital health technologies, particularly over long periods of time. OBJECTIVE The objectives were to (1) co-design and develop a digital health platform, called ProACT, to facilitate older adults self-managing multimorbidity, with support from their care network (CN); (2) evaluate end user engagement and experiences with the platform through a 12-month trial. METHODS The ProACT digital health platfrom is presented. The platform was evaluated in a year-long proof-of-concept (PoC) action research trial with 120 older persons with multimorbidity (PwMs) in Ireland and Belgium. Alongside the technology, participants had access to a clinical triage service responding to symptom alerts, and a technical helpdesk. Interactions with the platform during the PoC trial were logged to determine engagement, semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants and analysed using inductive thematic analysis methods, while usability and user burden were examined using validated questionnaires. RESULTS This article presents the ProACT platform and its components, along with findings on engagement with the platform and its usability. Of the 120 participants who took part, 24 withdrew before the end of the study while three passed away. The remaining 93 participants actively used the platform until the end of the trial, on average taking two or three health readings daily over the course of the trial, in Ireland and Belgium respectively. Participants reported ProACT to be usable and of low burden. Findings from interviews outline that participants experienced multiple benefits as a result of using ProACT, including improved self-management, improved health and wellbeing and support from the triage service. For those who withdrew, barriers to engagement were poor health and frustration when technology didn’t work as expected. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to present findings from a longitudinal study of older adults using digital health technology to self-manage multiple chronic conditions. Our findings show that older adults sustained engagement with the technology and found it usable. Potential reasons for this include a strong focus on user-centred design and engagement throughout the project lifecycle, resulting in a platform that met user needs, as well as the integration of behavior change techniques and personal analytics into the platform. The provision of triage and technical support services alongside the platform during the trial were also important facilitators of engagement. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/preprints.22125

Digital Health Interventions for Delivery of Mental Health Care: Systematic and Comprehensive Meta-Review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tristan J Philippe ◽  
Naureen Sikder ◽  
Anna Jackson ◽  
Maya E Koblanski ◽  
Eric Liow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Mobile Communications ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Stress Disorders ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has shifted mental health care delivery to digital platforms, video conferencing, and other mobile communications. However, existing reviews of digital health interventions are narrow in scope and focus on a limited number of mental health conditions. OBJECTIVE To address this gap, we conducted a rapid review of the literature to assess the state of digital health interventions for the treatment of several mental health conditions. METHODS We searched MEDLINE for secondary literature published between 2010-2021 on the use, efficacy, and appropriateness of digital health interventions for the delivery of mental health care. RESULTS Sixty percent (60%) of research involved the treatment of substance use disorders, 25% focused on mood, anxiety and traumatic stress disorders and 5% or less on other mental health conditions. Synchronous and asynchronous communication, computerized therapy, and cognitive training appear to be effective, but require further examination in understudied mental health conditions. Similarly, virtual reality, mobile apps, social media platforms, and online forums are novel technologies that have the potential to improve mental health but require higher quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS Digital health interventions offer promise in the treatment of mental health conditions. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, digital health interventions provide a safer alternative to face-to-face treatment. However, further research on the applications of digital interventions in understudied mental health conditions is needed. Additionally, evidence is needed on the effectiveness and appropriateness of digital health tools for patients, who are marginalized, and may lack access to digital health interventions.

scholarly journals Digital health interventions for the management of mental health in people with chronic diseases: a rapid review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e044437
Author(s):  
Maxime Sasseville ◽  
Annie LeBlanc ◽  
Mylène Boucher ◽  
Michèle Dugas ◽  
Gisele Mbemba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Children And Youth ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Manage Mental ◽  
Manage Mental Health

ObjectiveDetermine the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions for individuals with a concomitant chronic disease.DesignWe conducted a rapid review of systematic reviews. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection and risk of bias evaluation. A standardised extraction form was used. Data are reported narratively.InterventionsWe included systematic reviews of digital health interventions aiming to prevent, detect or manage mental health problems in individuals with a pre-existing chronic disease, including chronic mental health illnesses, published in 2010 or after.Main outcome measureReports on mental health outcomes (eg, anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms).ResultsWe included 35 reviews, totalling 702 primary studies with a total sample of 50 692 participants. We structured the results in four population clusters: (1) chronic diseases, (2) cancer, (3) mental health and (4) children and youth. For populations presenting a chronic disease or cancer, health provider directed digital interventions (eg, web-based consultation, internet cognitive–behavioural therapy) are effective and safe. Further analyses are required in order to provide stronger recommendations regarding relevance for specific population (such as children and youth). Web-based interventions and email were the modes of administration that had the most reports of improvement. Virtual reality, smartphone applications and patient portal had limited reports of improvement.ConclusionsDigital technologies could be used to prevent and manage mental health problems in people living with chronic conditions, with consideration for the age group and type of technology used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document